In an effort to temporally resolve the electron density, electron temperature, and plasma potential for turbulent plasma discharges, a unique high-speed dual Langmuir probe (HDLP) has been developed. A traditional single Langmuir probe of cylindrical geometry (exposed to the plasma) is swept simultaneously with a nearby capacitance and noise compensating null probe (fully insulated from the plasma) to enable bias sweep rates on a microsecond timescale. Traditional thin-sheath Langmuir probe theory is applied for interpretation of the collected probe data. Data at a sweep rate of 100 kHz are presented; however the developed system is capable of running at 1 MHz—near the upper limit of the applied electrostatic Langmuir probe theory for the investigated plasma conditions. Large sets (100 000 sweeps at each of 352 spatial locations) of contiguous turbulent plasma properties are collected using simple electronics for probe bias driving and current measurement attaining 80 dB signal-to-noise measurements with dc to 1 MHz bandwidth. Near- and far-field plume measurements with the HDLP system are performed downstream from a modern Hall effect thruster where the time-averaged plasma properties exhibit the approximate ranges: electron density ne from (1×1015)(5×1016)m3, electron temperature Te from 1 to 3.5 eV, and plasma potential Vp from 5 to 15 V. The thruster discharge of 200 V (constant anode potential) and 2 A (average discharge current) displays strong, 2.2 A peak-to-peak, current oscillations at 19 kHz, characteristic of the thruster “breathing mode” ionization instability. Large amplitude discharge current fluctuations are typical for most Hall thrusters, yet the HDLP system reveals the presence of the same 19 kHz fluctuations in ne(t), Te(t), and Vp(t) throughout the entire plume with peak-to-peak divided by mean plasma properties that average 94%. The propagation delays between the discharge current fluctuations and the corresponding plasma density fluctuations agree well with expected ion transit-times observed with distinct plasma waves traveling away from the thruster at velocities >10km/s.

1.
H. M.
Mott-Smith
and
I.
Langmuir
,
Phys. Rev.
28
,
727
(
1926
).
2.
M. A.
Lieberman
and
A. J.
Lichtenberg
,
Principles of Plasma Discharges and Materials Processing
(
Wiley
,
New York
,
2005
).
3.
J. D.
Swift
and
M. J. R.
Schwar
,
Electrical Probes for Plasma Diagnostics
(
Elsevier
,
New York
,
1970
).
4.
F. F.
Chen
,
Plasma Diagnostic Techniques
, edited by
R. H.
Huddlestone
(
Academic
,
New York
,
1965
).
5.
N.
Hershkowitz
,
Plasma Diagnostics
(
Academic
,
San Diego
,
1989
), Vo.
1
, p.
113
.
6.
R. B.
Lobbia
and
A. D.
Gallimore
, “
Temporal limits of a rapidly swept Langmuir probe
,”
Phys. Plasmas
(to be published).
7.
P. C.
Liewer
,
J. M.
McChesney
,
S. J.
Zweben
, and
R. W.
Gould
,
Phys. Fluids
29
,
309
(
1986
).
8.
R.
Balbin
,
C.
Hidalgo
,
M. A.
Pedrosa
,
I.
Garcia-Cortes
, and
J.
Vega
,
Proceedings of the Ninth Topical Conference on High Temperature Plasma Diagnostics
(
AIP
,
Santa Fe, NM
,
1992
), pp.
4605
4607
.
9.
L.
Giannone
,
R.
Balbin
,
H.
Niedermeyer
,
M.
Endler
,
G.
Herre
,
C.
Hidalgo
,
A.
Rudyj
,
G.
Theimer
, and
Ph.
Verplanke
,
Phys. Plasmas
1
,
3614
(
1994
).
10.
G.
Chiodini
,
C.
Riccardi
, and
M.
Fontanesi
,
Rev. Sci. Instrum.
70
,
2681
(
1999
).
11.
M.
Schubert
,
M.
Endler
, and
H.
Thomsen
,
Rev. Sci. Instrum.
78
,
053505
(
2007
).
12.
T. F.
Yang
,
Q. X.
Zu
, and
P.
Liu
,
Rev. Sci. Instrum.
66
,
3879
(
1995
).
13.
L.
Albarède
,
S.
Mazouffre
,
A.
Bouchoule
, and
M.
Dudeck
,
Phys. Plasmas
13
,
063505
(
2006
).
14.
E. Y.
Choueiri
,
Phys. Plasmas
8
,
1411
(
2001
).
15.
R. B.
Lobbia
,
T. M.
Liu
, and
A. D.
Gallimore
,
Proceedings of the Sixth Modeling and Simulation/Fourth Liquid Propulsion/Third Spacecraft Propulsion Joint Subcommittee JANNAF Meeting, SPS-III-36
,
2008
.
16.
J. M.
Fife
,
M.
Martinez-Sanchez
, and
J.
Szabo
,
Proceedings of the 33rd AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit
,
1997
, Paper No. AIAA-97-3052.
You do not currently have access to this content.