Dissection techniques were developed to measure dynamic parameters of debris clouds from energetic events such as explosions or impacts. Various configurations of plates and grids were designed for selectively interrupting expanding clouds to generate discrete and identifiable debris segments. Variations of the basic technique were used to obtain dynamic data pertaining to (1) debris distribution, (2) velocity profiles, (3) segment trajectories, (4) departure sequences from the region of original impact, and (5) impulse profiles. Extensive technique evaluation indicated that no artificial alterations of dynamic parameters were produced by the dissection process.

1.
C. J.
Maiden
and
A. R.
McMillan
,
AIAA J.
2
,
1992
(
1964
).
2.
A. E. Olshaker and R. L. Bjork, Proceedings of the Fifth Symposium on Hypervelocity Impact, Vol. 1, Pt. 1, pp. 225–239; symposium held at University of Colorado, Boulder, Colo., 1961.
3.
Field Emission Fexitron series flash x‐ray generators were used.
4.
Beckman & Whitley model 300 framing camera (maximum framing rate of 4.5×106frames/sec).
5.
N. A. Engler, “Development of Methods to Determine Winds, Density, Pressure, and Temperature from the ROBIN Falling Balloon,” University of Dayton, Dayton, Ohio, Tech. Rep. No. UDRI‐TR‐66‐101 (1965).
6.
H. F. Swift, D. D. Preonas, W. C. Turpin, and J. H. Cunningham, “Characterization of Debris Clouds Behind Impacted Meteoroid Bumper Plates.” paper presented at the AIAA Hypervelocity Impact Conference, Cincinnati, Ohio, April 30‐May 2, 1969, AIAA Paper No. 69–380.
7.
J. S. Synge and B. A. Griffith, Principles of Mechanics (McGraw‐Hill Book Co., New York, 1949), 2nd ed., pp. 227–233.
8.
Beckman & Whitley “Dynafax” model 326 framing camera was used (maximum framing rate of 2.6×104frames/secrpar;.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.