Observations show that plasma particles in the solar wind frequently display power-law velocity distributions, which can be isotropic or anisotropic. Particularly, the velocity distribution functions of solar wind electrons are frequently modeled as a combination of a background Maxwellian distribution and a non-thermal distribution which is known as the “halo” distribution. For fast solar wind conditions, highly anisotropic field-aligned electrons, denominated as the “strahl” distribution, are also present. Motivated by these observations, the present paper considers a tenuous plasma with Maxwellian ions, and electrons described by a summation of an isotropic Maxwellian distribution and an isotropic Kappa distribution. The formalism of weak turbulence theory is utilized in order to discuss the spectra of electrostatic waves that must be present in such a plasma, satisfying the conditions of quasi-equilibrium between the processes of spontaneous fluctuations and of induced emission. The kappa index and relative density of the Kappa electron distribution are varied. By taking into account the effects due to electromagnetic waves into the weak turbulence formalism, we investigate the electromagnetic spectra that satisfy the conditions of “turbulent equilibrium,” and also the time evolution of the wave spectra and of the electron distribution, which occurs in the case of the presence of an electron beam in the electron distribution.

Observations made in the space environment consistently show plasma particles with velocity distributions that have non-thermal tails, and frequently with anisotropies.1–6 Characteristically, observed solar wind electrons are modeled by a combination of the Maxwellian core population (with energy in the range of tens of eV) and a tenuous but energetic halo distribution that contains a power-law velocity distribution in the suprathermal range (∼102–103 eV). For energy range even higher than that of the halo population, that is, for ∼20–200 keV range, superhalo electrons are also observed.7 The halo and superhalo distributions are often modeled by the Kappa distribution.7–15 For the fast solar wind condition,16 a field-aligned electron beam called the strahl is often observed to stream away from the Sun. The strahl is characterized by the similar energy range as that of the halo electrons. Observations show that the number density of strahl decreases as one moves away from the Sun while the halo density increases,17 but their combined density remains constant, being ∼4%–5% of the total density. The energetic superhalo electrons contribute very little to the net electron content, as their number density amounts to not more than 10−6 of the total electron density, but owing to their high energy, their presence is evident in the velocity or energy spectrum. The observations thus suggest that the strahl electrons are but a field aligned portion of the halo population, which are gradually pitch-angle scattered/diffused back to the isotropic halo by some unknown processes, of which the whistler wave fluctuations are the prime candidate.15,18

The Kappa distribution was introduced to phenomenologically describe the non-thermal feature of the electron velocity distribution,8 but appears nowadays in the literature in a framework of non-extensive thermo-statistical equilibrium.19 Possibly the first time that a Kappa distribution was mentioned in such a context was about 20 years ago, in Ref. 20. A family of Kappa distributions is used in the literature, which include isotropic or anisotropic Kappa models. Isotropic Kappa distributions are usually written in terms of two different forms, one which can be found in Refs. 8–10 and the other which can be found in Refs. 13 and 14. These two different forms of Kappa distributions have been used by the plasma physics community and have been the subject of a number of theoretical discussions in recent years.21–25 In the present paper, we use a generic form of Kappa distribution, which, in particular cases, can reproduce the two widely used forms mentioned earlier, and use such a distribution to describe the halo distribution in the electron population.

Velocity distributions with power-law tails also appear mentioned in the context of turbulence theory, as in the pioneering work of Ref. 26, dealing with the velocity distributions in the presence of a superthermal radiation field. Recently, one of us put forth a rigorous theory of Kappa distribution from the viewpoint of weak turbulence theory, rather than treating the Kappa distribution as simply a phenomenological tool.27,28 In such a theory, it was shown that a quasi-stationary state of electrons and a spectrum of electrostatic Langmuir fluctuations form a self-consistent pair of solutions of the stationary weak turbulence kinetic equations. A rather remarkable finding is that such a solution permits only the Kappa distribution as the legitimate solution, but nothing else, if the nonlinear interaction terms in the wave kinetic equation are considered. This finding may explain the physical origin of the pervasive Kappa-like electron distribution functions observed in the space environment. The accompanying Langmuir fluctuation spectrum, according to the above-referenced papers,27,28 is significantly modified from the thermal equilibrium form of the spectrum in that the long wavelength regime of the fluctuation spectrum exhibits an inverse power-law behavior, ∝ k−2, while for high k, the spectrum approaches a constant value. These findings and discussions were, however, carried out on the basis of the simplifying assumption of a single electron species. This was done for the sake of simplicity. For the actual situation, as overviewed earlier, the solar wind electrons are composed of several components, typically a quasi isotropic Maxwellian core plus a quasi isotropic halo population, which is often modeled by a Kappa distribution. In view of this, it is timely and appropriate to revisit the problem of solar wind such as electron distribution and the associated Langmuir fluctuation spectrum for multi- or, at least, a two-component electron plasma.

Ideally, one must obtain the electron distribution and the Langmuir fluctuation spectrum in a self-consistent manner without making any assumption at the outset. This is possible if one makes a simplifying assumption of single component electrons.27,28 However, if one is to consider multiple (or two component) electrons, then the situation becomes rather complex. Even if one ignores the nonlinear coupling term, the self-consistent solution for both electron distribution and the Langmuir spectrum must be obtained by numerical iteration scheme.29 In the present analysis, we are interested in revisiting the approach taken in Ref. 29 but within the context of the analytical method. In order to reduce the complexity of the problem to some extent, we approach the problem by allowing a two component electron distribution function model and seeking the Langmuir spectrum intensity, which is consistent with the model electron distribution function.

Thus, in the first part of the present analysis, we will investigate the spectral form of the electrostatic fluctuation intensity that exists in a plasma, satisfying equilibrium conditions between the processes related to spontaneous fluctuations and the processes induced by the waves themselves. The analysis is made in the framework of weak turbulence theory including spontaneous effects. We consider an unmagnetized plasma with plasma particles described by velocity distributions, which are a summation of an isotropic Maxwellian background and a “halo” characterized by isotropic Kappa distributions of generic form. The analysis to be made under the framework of weak turbulence theory shows that electrostatic waves, i.e., Langmuir (L) and ion-sound (S) waves, can be naturally occurring in a plasma as a result of spontaneous and induced effects. Electromagnetic waves, i.e., transverse waves (T), cannot be generated by these mechanisms, but can appear due to nonlinear interactions involving other types of plasma waves.

In the second part of the present paper, we also investigate the generation of electromagnetic waves, and the possibility of an approximated asymptotic solution for the spectrum of transverse waves, obtained as the outcome of nonlinear processes described by weak turbulence theory. Investigations on the equilibrium spectra of electrostatic waves and on the spectrum of T waves at turbulent equilibrium have already been made in the case of Maxwellian plasmas, but to the best of our knowledge, they have not yet been made taking into account the presence of a tenuous but energetic population of Kappa distributed particles. In addition to the investigation of the equilibrium spectra, we also investigate using weak turbulence theory the time evolution of the wave-particle system when an electron beam is assumed to exist in the medium.

The equations of weak turbulence theory can be found in the literature and will not be reproduced here for brevity. For the present paper, we utilize the formalism as presented in Ref. 30, and only comment on the basic features of these equations, which will be useful for the analysis of the results appearing in the present paper. We start by commenting on the equation that describes the time evolution of L waves.

In the context of weak turbulence theory, the time evolution of L waves is ruled by terms associated with spontaneous and induced emission, three-wave decay, and spontaneous plus induced scattering. The emission terms satisfy the wave-particle resonance condition, σωkLk·v=0, where ωkL is the dispersion relation for L waves, and σ = ±1 represent forward or backward propagation of the waves. The three-wave decay processes involve interactions between different types of waves, satisfying the following resonance conditions: σωkLσωkLσωkkS=0,σωkLσωkLσωkkT=0, σωkLσωkTσωkkT=0, and σωkLσωkSσωkkT=0, where ωkS and ωkT are the dispersion relations for ion-acoustic waves (S) and for transverse waves, respectively. The scattering processes involve waves with two different wavelengths and frequencies, interacting with plasma particles, satisfying the following resonance conditions: σωkLσωkL(kk)·v=0 and σωkLσωkT(kk)·v=0. Detailed expressions for these terms can be found, for instance, in Ref. 30.

The equation that describes the time evolution of S waves presents a similar structure, containing spontaneous and induced emission terms, which satisfy the resonance condition, σωkSk·v=0; three-wave decay terms satisfying the resonance conditions, σωkSσωkLσωkkL=0, and σωkSσωkLσωkkT=0; and a scattering term that satisfies σωkSσωkL(kk)·v=0. The scattering processes are deemed to be extremely slow in the case of S waves and are usually neglected.30 

The equation for the T waves can be considered of a different nature, in the sense that the superluminal T waves do not satisfy the wave-particle resonance condition, and therefore, there is no emission terms, either spontaneous or induced. The equation that describes the time evolution of T waves features three-wave decay terms with resonance conditions given by σωkTσωkLσωkkL=0,σωkTσωkLσωkkS=0, and σωkTσωkTσωkkL=0, and a scattering term satisfying σωkTσωkL(kk)·v=0.30 

In addition to the wave equations, the set of weak turbulence equations also contains equations for the time evolution of the particle distribution functions. In collisionless plasmas, the equation for the time evolution of the particle distribution function is well-known [see, for instance, Eq. (1) of Ref. 30] and includes a quasilinear diffusion term and a term originated from spontaneous fluctuations, both satisfying the wave-particle resonance conditions σωkαk·v=0, where α can be L or S

(1)

In Eq. (1), fa(v) is the distribution function for particles of species a (a = e for electrons and a = i for ions), normalized as dvfa(v)=1.

The present paper is organized as follows: In Sec. II, we introduce a generic form of isotropic Kappa distribution and describe the distribution function for plasma particles, constituted by a summation of a Maxwellian distribution and an isotropic Kappa distribution, with much lower number density than the Maxwellian population. In Sec. III, we briefly derive the expressions that give the spectra of L and S waves and that satisfy equilibrium conditions. In doing so, we take into account the velocity distributions presented in Sec. II. In Sec. IV, we discuss the possibility of an asymptotic spectrum of transverse waves (T), which is the result of nonlinear interaction in the wave-particle system. We derive an expression, which approximately describes this asymptotic state. In Sec. V, we present some results that show the wave spectra, taking into account parameters which are compatible with conditions in the solar wind. We also present in Sec. V some results that show the time evolution of the wave spectra and of the particle distribution function, obtained by numerical solution of equations of weak turbulence theory. Section VI summarizes the results obtained.

Let us assume that isotropic distributions for ions and electrons are made of the summation of Maxwellian and Kappa distributions. In three dimensions (3D), considering a generic form for the Kappa distribution, we may write

(2)

where

(3)
(4)

where vβ=2Tβ/mβ is the thermal velocity of particle species labeled β, and vβ,κ is a parameter with the same physical dimension as the particle thermal velocity, and reduces to the thermal velocity in the limit κβ. The distribution functions given by Eqs. (3) and (4) are normalized such that d3vfβ=1.

Particular cases of the distribution (4) that correspond to the forms of Kappa distributions which are widely used in the literature can be obtained by a suitable choice of parameters αβ and vβ,κ. Namely, if αβ = 1, and

(5)

then Eq. (4) becomes a form of isotropic Kappa distribution, which is widely used in the literature8–10 

(6)

The average value of the kinetic energy, in the case of distribution (6), leads to the usual notion of temperature, since it is easily obtained that

(7)

In the above, β=dvfβ.

Another customary choice is to take αβ = 0 and vβ,κ = vβ. This corresponds to the case in which Eq. (4) becomes the isotropic Kappa distribution, which is used, for instance, in Refs. 13 and 14 

(8)

For distribution function (8), the average value of the kinetic energy does not lead to the usual notion of temperature, since it is easy to obtain that

(9)

It can also be noticed that the distribution given by (8) can be obtained as a result of the use of the non-extensive statistical mechanics as formulated in Refs. 13, 31, and 32, while the distribution function given by (6) results from a modified approach to non-extensive statistical mechanics, which utilizes the so-called escort probability functions.33,34

For convenience, we define dimensionless velocities, by division of the velocity by the electron thermal velocity ve, u = v/ve, the normalized wavenumber q = kve/ωpe, the normalized wave frequency for waves of type α, zqα=ωqα/ωpe (where α = L, S, or T), and the dimensionless time variable, τ = ωpet, with ωpe=4πnee2/me being the electron plasma frequency. We also define the normalized wave intensity for waves of type α

(10)

and introduce other useful dimensionless quantities

(11)

In terms of the dimensionless variables, the dispersion relations for the waves and the velocity distribution functions become

(12)
(13)
(14)
(15)
(16)

Making use of the equations of weak turbulence theory, the spectra of electrostatic waves may be initialized by neglecting the nonlinear interactions and balancing the spontaneous and induced emission terms, and by taking into account only the background populations. For the L waves, using the symbol Φe(u) for the electron distribution function in terms of normalized quantities, we utilize the wave equation without the nonlinear terms, written in terms of the dimensionless quantities

(17)

Using spherical coordinates in velocity space, with the z axis along q, and considering distribution (2) written in terms of dimensionless variables, we obtain

(18)

where

(19)

The equilibrium is obtained by setting the expression for the time derivative equal to zero, which leads to

(20)

The integrals IMβα,I1βα, and I2βα can be evaluated analytically. For the case β = e, it is possible to obtain

(21)

For the S waves, we obtain the following equation:

(22)

where

(23)

Following steps are similar to those employed in the case of L waves, and the initial spectrum of S waves is seen to obey the following expression:

(24)

where

After the evaluation of the IMβα,I1βα, and I2βα integrals, one obtains the following:

(25)

where ξe and ξe,κ are defined in (21) and

(26)

This brings a closure to the first part of the present paper, namely, to theoretically discuss the self-consistent form of electrostatic Langmuir and ion-sound wave fluctuation intensities that arise when the electron velocity distribution function is composed of a Maxwellian core plus a “halo” component given by a Kappa distribution. In Ref. 29, a similar problem was approached (minus the discussion of ion-acoustic wave intensity) by considering the iterative numerical solution of the self-consistent set of particle and wave kinetic equations. The present discussion complements Ref. 29 in that our approach has been within the context of an analytical method. The analytical solution, while less rigorous that the iterative solution obtained in Ref. 29, is nevertheless useful in the subsequent discussion of transverse wave intensity, which we turn to next.

The time evolution of transverse T waves, which are electromagnetic waves, is governed by an equation that contains the terms related to three wave decay involving a T wave and two L waves: a T wave, an L wave, and an S wave, and two T waves and a L wave, and also a scattering term involving a T wave, a L wave, and particles.30 The evolution equation does not feature a quasilinear term, such as those appearing in the equations for L and S waves, given by Eqs. (17) and (22), because the linear resonance condition with the particles is not satisfied by the superluminal T waves.30 

The occurrence of decay processes involving L and S waves, and also of scattering processes, has as a consequence that T waves are generated by these nonlinear mechanisms, even if they are not considered present as an initial condition. It is therefore pertinent to investigate the asymptotic state attained by the spectrum of T waves, due to the nonlinear processes. This asymptotic state characterizes what can be called a “turbulent equilibrium” and has already been investigated by us considering an equilibrium plasma in which the plasma particles are described by Maxwellian distributions.35,36 In the present investigation, we consider the case in which the velocity distributions of plasma particles contain a population described by Kappa distributions, as given by Eq. (2).

At the asymptotic state, it may be considered that the decay terms are not very effective in changing the wave level, since they do not involve particles and represent just an exchange of momentum and energy among different waves. The scattering term can therefore be considered to be the dominant term for late evolution of the system. This conjecture has already been used in the case of Maxwellian velocity distributions, and has been well supported by numerical analysis of the time evolution considering the complete weak turbulence equation for the T waves.35,36 Consequently, using this approximation and adopting normalized variables, the equation for late stages of the time evolution of T waves can be written as follows:30 

(27)

The asymptotic state is obtained by taking the time derivative equal to zero. Doing this, and using the distribution functions given by Eq. (2), we obtain

(28)

Making use of the analytical expressions for the quantities IMβ,I1β, and I2β, one arrives at the following:

(29)

This is a fairly complex expression. However, one notices that the contributions due to the Maxwellian population feature an exponential factor, which is very peaked with maximum occurring for σ=σ and qqm, the value of q for which zqL=zqT. The contributions due to the Kappa distribution are also proportional to a factor which is unity for σ=σ and qqm, and decrease rapidly away from this point. As a consequence, the terms corresponding to the induced scattering can be neglected, since they are proportional to (σzqTσzqL), and the asymptotic spectrum of T waves can be approximated by the following:

(30)

As a result of these approximations, and assuming that in the absence of particle beams, the spectrum of L waves remains nearly the same as in the initial state, and is therefore symmetrical, EqmL=Eqm+L, it is seen that the asymptotic spectrum of T waves can be simplified by

(31)

To sum up the second part of the present analysis, by making use of the equations of electromagnetic weak turbulence, we have derived the asymptotic form of the transverse wave intensity, which is given in terms of the Langmuir wave intensity. The Langmuir wave fluctuation intensity, however, was already discussed in Sec. III so that we may readily obtain the explicit form of the transverse wave intensity.

In order to illustrate the effects of the presence of a Kappa population of electrons on the spectrum of waves, which satisfy the conditions of equilibrium with the particle distribution, we consider that the electron population is described by distribution function (2), with α = 1, and ue,κ2=ue2(κe3/2)/κe. The ion distribution is assumed to be described by an isotropic Maxwellian distribution, i.e., we assume δi = 0. Finally, we use Te/Ti = 2, a value for the electron and ion temperature ratio which is within the range of values observed in the solar wind.37 

In Fig. 1, we show the initial spectrum of electrostatic waves divided by g, as a function of normalized wavenumber q = kve/ωpe, for several values of the index κe. We assume that the electron population described by a Kappa distribution constitute 10% of the electron population, i.e., δe = 0.1. Figures 1(a) and 1(b) show the initial spectra of L and S waves, obtained using Eqs. (21) and (25), respectively. The spectra obtained in the case of purely Maxwellian distribution, with nκe/ne = 0.0, are also shown in Figs. 1(a) and 1(b), for reference. In Figs. 1(a) and 1(b) are shown the curves corresponding to several values of κe (κe = 40, 20, 10, 5, and 2.5).

FIG. 1.

Initial spectrum of electrostatic waves divided by g, as a function of normalized wavenumber q = kve/ωpe, for several values of the index κe. The case of Maxwellian distribution, nκe/ne = 0.0, is also shown for reference. (a) L waves and (b) S waves. For S waves, all curves overlap. Electron distribution given by Eq. (2), with αe = 1 and uβ,κ2=uβ2(κe3/2)/κe, for nκe/ne = 0.1. The ion distribution is an isotropic Maxwellian, and Te/Ti = 2. The spectra of L and S waves are given by Eqs. (21) and (25).

FIG. 1.

Initial spectrum of electrostatic waves divided by g, as a function of normalized wavenumber q = kve/ωpe, for several values of the index κe. The case of Maxwellian distribution, nκe/ne = 0.0, is also shown for reference. (a) L waves and (b) S waves. For S waves, all curves overlap. Electron distribution given by Eq. (2), with αe = 1 and uβ,κ2=uβ2(κe3/2)/κe, for nκe/ne = 0.1. The ion distribution is an isotropic Maxwellian, and Te/Ti = 2. The spectra of L and S waves are given by Eqs. (21) and (25).

Close modal

Figure 1(a) shows that the value of EqL(0) in the case of the presence of Kappa population is higher than the value obtained in the case of a purely Maxwellian distribution, with a difference that is already noticeable in the scale of the figure even for the upper limit shown, q = 0.6, and increases for smaller values of q, featuring a peak that diverges for q → 0. For larger values of κe, the shape of the L spectrum is similar to the shape exhibited in the case of small values of κe, but the magnitude of the spectrum at a given value of q is smaller for increasing values of κe. It is noticed, however, that the peak at q → 0 is present even for large values of κe.

The presence of the peak in the L spectrum, for q → 0, can be understood by the analysis of Eq. (21). In the presence of a population of kappa electrons, even for a small value of nκe/ne, it is seen that for a sufficiently small value of q the contribution due to the Maxwellian population vanishes, due to the factor exp((zqL/q)2/ue2). For the region of q values where this occurs, the contribution of the Kappa population is dominant, and the equilibrium spectrum can be given by the approximated expression

(32)

In the case of κe, this expression reduces to g/(2(zqL)2, which is the expression obtained in the Maxwellian case, as expected. However, for finite values of κe, no matter how large, Eq. (32) is seen to diverge at q → 0. The explanation for this is as follows: For large values of κe, the Kappa distribution coincides with a Maxwellian distribution, in the region of velocity space with significant electron population. However, the initial spectra of waves are obtained from Eq. (17), which for equilibrium requires a balance between the term associated with spontaneous fluctuations, which is proportional to the distribution function, and the term associated with induced emission, which is proportional to the velocity derivative of the distribution function and to the value of the wave spectra at the resonant velocity. For q → 0, the resonant velocity becomes progressively larger. Since for very large velocities the derivative of the Kappa distribution is smaller than the derivative of the Maxwellian distribution, the wave spectra for small q have to be higher in the case of Kappa distribution than in the case of Maxwellian distribution, in order to satisfy the equilibrium condition.

Figure 1(b) shows the values of EqS(0)/g vs. q = kve/ωpe. In fact, the figure shows the values of EqS(0) multiplied by μqS, but we continue to denote the quantity as EqS(0), for simplicity. The figure displays the results obtained for several values of κe, but the different curves cannot be distinguished in the scale of the figure. It is seen that the kappa index of the Kappa distribution is not relevant for the initial spectrum of S waves, while it was seen to be relevant for the initial spectrum of L waves.

We have also obtained the initial spectrum of electrostatic waves by assuming a fixed value of the index κe and considering different values of the relative number density of the Kappa population, nκe/ne. The results obtained, both for large and for small values of κe, show that the spectra obtained for L and S waves are almost independent of the value of the number density of the Kappa population, as long as it is not zero. These results are not shown here for the sake of brevity, since the curves obtained for different values of nκe/ne are basically the same as the curves shown in Fig. 1, for each value of κe. The important point to be emphasized is that the presence of a small population of electrons described by a Kappa population is sufficient to significantly affect the equilibrium spectrum of L waves in the region of small wave numbers, leading to the formation of the peaked feature at q ≃ 0.

Figure 2 displays the asymptotic spectrum of T waves, obtained using Eq. (31). Figure 2(a) shows EqT/g as a function of normalized wavenumber, for nκe/ne=0.1, and several values of κe, and also present a curve obtained considering a purely Maxwellian electron distribution, obtained with nκe/ne = 0. The conditions and parameters are the same as those used to obtain the spectrum of L waves in Fig. 1. Let us first comment on the result obtained considering nκe/ne=0, given by the red line in Fig. 2(a). This result is explained by the analysis of Eq. (31), which shows that the spectrum of T waves is proportional to the spectrum of L waves, given by Eq. (21), evaluated at q = qm. If the Kappa population is vanishing, nκe/ne=0, the Kappa contributions vanishes in Eq. (21), and the contributions due to the Maxwellian population in the numerator and in the denominator cancel out, and the spectrum turns out to be given by

FIG. 2.

Asymptotic spectrum of T waves, EqT, characterizing a state of “turbulent equilibrium,” vs normalized wavenumber q. (a) EqT, for nκe/ne = 0.1, and several values of κe. The case of Maxwellian distribution, nκe/ne = 0.0, is also shown for reference; (b) expanded view of the region of small values of q in Fig. 3(a). Other parameters and conditions are as in Fig. 1.

FIG. 2.

Asymptotic spectrum of T waves, EqT, characterizing a state of “turbulent equilibrium,” vs normalized wavenumber q. (a) EqT, for nκe/ne = 0.1, and several values of κe. The case of Maxwellian distribution, nκe/ne = 0.0, is also shown for reference; (b) expanded view of the region of small values of q in Fig. 3(a). Other parameters and conditions are as in Fig. 1.

Close modal

At q = 0, the amplitude of the spectrum of T waves in the case of Maxwellian electron distribution is therefore twice the magnitude of the spectrum of L waves, but decays faster for larger values of q, since qm ≫ q. With the presence of a population described by a Kappa distribution, Fig. 2(a) shows that the spectrum of T waves is modified in the region of small wave numbers, in comparison with the spectrum obtained in the Maxwellian case. In the scale of the figure, the modification is noticeable for normalized wavenumber q < 0.1, with a difference that increases with the decrease in the κe index, i.e., increases with the increase in the non-thermal character of the electron distribution. The spectrum features divergent behavior for q → 0, as already noticed for the L waves in Fig. 1.

Figure 2(b) shows an expanded view of the region of small values of q, for the conditions that have been discussed in Fig. 2(a). The expanded view clearly shows the increase in the magnitude of the T wave spectrum at small values of q. For instance, it is seen that for q ≃ 0.02, the intensity of the spectrum of T waves in the case of κe = 2.5 is about one order of magnitude above the intensity displayed in the case of κe = 40.

We have also investigated the dependence of the T spectrum on the relative number density nκe/ne, for a fixed value of κe. The results obtained have shown that the T wave spectrum obtained in the presence of a Kappa distribution is almost independent of the number density of the Kappa population. The only noticeable feature in the spectra is the presence of the peak around q = 0, which occurs for any finite value of nκe/ne, and vanishes in the purely Maxwellian case (nκe/ne = 0).

In addition to these results concerning the initial spectra of electrostatic waves and the asymptotic spectrum of transverse waves, we also present some results which show the time evolution of the wave-particle system, comparing a situation in which the background electron velocity distribution is a Maxwellian distribution with a situation in which an “halo” population described by as isotropic Kappa distribution is also present.

For the study of the time evolution of the system, we utilize the set of weak turbulence equations, with some additional approximations. Regarding the plasma particles, we assume that the ion velocity distribution remains constant along the evolution and that in the case of the equation for the electron distribution, the quasilinear diffusion due to S waves can be neglected in comparison with the diffusion caused by the L waves. Regarding the waves, we describe the evolution of the L waves by including the spontaneous and induced emission processes, the three-wave decay processes involving L and S waves, and the scattering process involving two L waves and the particles. Nonlinear interaction involving T waves are neglected in the equation for the time evolution of the L waves, for simplicity, which is common practice in the literature. The evolution of S waves is described in the present analysis by taking into account the emission terms and the three-wave decay term involving L and S waves, and neglecting the effect of the decay term involving S, L, and T waves, and also the scattering term. In the equation for the T waves, however, which contains only nonlinear effects, we keep all the terms that have already been described in Sec. I, namely, the decay involving a T wave and two L waves, the decay involving a T wave, a L wave, and a S wave, the decay involving two T waves and a L wave, and the scattering term.

We utilize a two-dimensional approximation (2D), considering a grid of 51 × 101 points in (u, uz) space, with 0 ≤ u≤ 12 and –12 ≤ uz ≤ 12, a grid of 51 × 51 points in (q, qz) space for L and S waves, and a grid of 71 × 71 points in (q, qz) space for the T waves, which develop fine features that require a better resolution than the L and S waves, considering the evolution in the interval 0 ≤ q≤ 0.6 and 0 ≤ qz ≤ 0.6 for all waves. The normalized time step has been adopted as Δτ = 0.1, and the equations were solved using a fourth-order Runge-Kutta procedure for the wave equations and the splitting method for the equation describing the time evolution of the electrons.

As starting conditions, we assume that the background electron population is described by distribution function (2), with the 2D versions of Eqs. (3) and (4), with the Kappa distribution defined using α = 1 and ue,κ2=ue2(κe1)/κe, which is the proper value of ue,κ2 for 2D distributions. We assume that the ion distribution is described by an isotropic Maxwellian distribution, with Te/Ti = 2. We also assume that the plasma parameter is (nλD3)1=5.0×103, and ve2/c2=4.0×103, values that have already been used in the analyses of the plasma emission without taking into account the presence of a Kappa distribution.36,38

A further approximation is made for the numerical analysis, regarding the initial wave spectra. As already discussed in the initial paragraphs of this section on numerical results [see Eq. (32) and the accompanying comments], in the presence of a Kappa distribution, the initial spectrum of L diverges for q → 0. This divergence, although consistent with the non-relativistic approach, is not appropriate for the numerical analysis. In our numerical implementation of the formalism, the initial spectrum of L waves is given by Eq. (21) down to the value of q such the resonant velocity becomes equal to c, i.e., the value of q for which zqL/q=c/ve. It is assumed that for values of q smaller than this value, the initial L wave spectrum is given by the same value obtained at the limit value of the resonant q. With such approximation, when a Kappa distribution is assumed to be present, the initial spectrum of L has significant growth in the region of small values of q, in comparison with the spectrum in the case of a Maxwellian plasma background, but the divergence is avoided. The initial spectrum of L waves is therefore given by Eq. (21), with an approximation in the region of small values of q, and the spectrum of S is given by Eq. (25). The T waves are assumed not present at initial time.

Figure 3 shows one dimensional (1D) representations of the spectrum of T waves, i.e., obtained after integration of EqT along the perpendicular component of normalized wavenumber, q. The spectra are shown for different values of τ and show the evolution of the T wave spectrum. Figure 3(a) displays the wave spectra obtained in the case of purely Maxwellian electron distribution, i.e., nκe/ne = 0.0. Figure 3(b) depicts the wave spectra obtained when the electron distribution contains a Kappa population, with nκe/ne = 5.0 × 10−2, and κe = 5.0. In panel (a), it is seen that the amplitude of the waves increases for all values of qz and gradually evolves toward the asymptotic solution described by Eq. (31) in the case of nκe = 0.0, and which appears as the red lines in Fig. 2. The situation depicted in Fig. 3(a) corresponds to the initial stages of the evolution, which is displayed up to a longer time in Fig. 2 of Ref. 36. In the presence of a small Kappa population, the spectrum of T waves evolves as shown in Fig. 3(b). The spectrum grows for all values of qz, much as seen in Fig. 3(a), but there is a difference. A peak is seen to appear near qz = 0 and grows in time. What is seen in Fig. 3(b) are some steps in the time evolution of the spectrum that is asymptotically given by Eq. (31), and represented in Fig. 2. It must be noticed that the peak near qz = 0 in Fig. 3(b) has a finite height. It does not diverge as the peaks appearing in 2, because for the numerical analysis of the equation which describes the time evolution, we have assumed that the L wave spectrum saturates for sufficiently small value of q, instead of growing infinitely for q → 0.

FIG. 3.

(a) 1D spectrum of T waves vs. q, for several values of τ, for nκe/ne = 0.0; (b) 1D spectrum of T waves vs. q, for several values of τ, for nκe/ne = 5.0 × 10−2 and κe = 5.0. Other parameters and conditions are as in Fig. 1.

FIG. 3.

(a) 1D spectrum of T waves vs. q, for several values of τ, for nκe/ne = 0.0; (b) 1D spectrum of T waves vs. q, for several values of τ, for nκe/ne = 5.0 × 10−2 and κe = 5.0. Other parameters and conditions are as in Fig. 1.

Close modal

The growth of the peak near q = 0 in the T wave spectrum can be explained as follows. The dominant process for the formation of background spectrum of T is the scattering involving L waves. The scattering effect is maximum for wavelengths which satisfy zqT=zqL, which means q=qm, where qm is defined by Eq. (31). As seen in Fig. 1(a), in the case of a small population described by a Kappa distribution, the spectrum of L waves is above the spectra obtained in the purely Maxwellian case for q0.2. The scattering process is therefore most effective to generate T waves with q ≤ 0.02, for the value of ve/c which we have assumed. The scattering of L waves is mainly responsible for the formation of the spectrum of T waves, and the peak for large wavelengths, which is seen in the L wave spectrum that occurs in the presence of Kappa distributed electrons, is the cause for the growth of the peak for large wavelengths in the T wave spectrum.

In what follows, we investigate the time evolution of the beam-plasma instability, comparing the situation in which the background electron distribution is purely Maxwellian with a case in which there is also a “halo” population described by a Kappa distribution. We assume a beam population described by a displaced Maxwellian distribution, with a normalized beam velocity ub = 6.0, number density given by nb/ne = 1.0 × 10−3, and temperature Tb = Te. Figure 4 shows 2D plots of the electron velocity distribution. Due to the presence of the beam, the background electron distribution is slightly displaced in velocity space so that the average velocity of the complete electron velocity distribution is zero.

FIG. 4.

(a) Electron distribution function at τ = 500, vs. u and u, for nκe/ne = 0.0; (b) electron distribution function at τ = 500, vs. u and u, for nκe/ne = 5.0 × 10−2; (c) spectrum of L waves at τ  =  500, vs. q and q, for nκe/ne = 0.0; (d) spectrum of L waves at τ  =  500, vs. q and q, for nκe/ne = 5.0 × 10−2; (e) spectrum of T waves at τ  =  500, vs. q and q, for nκe/ne = 0.0; and (f) spectrum of T waves at τ = 500, vs. q and q, for nκe/ne = 5.0 × 10−2. Input parameters are as follows: Te/Ti = 2.0, Tb/Te = 1.0, nb/ne = 1.0 × 10−3, vb/ve = 6.0, g = 5.0× 10−3, and κe = 5.0.

FIG. 4.

(a) Electron distribution function at τ = 500, vs. u and u, for nκe/ne = 0.0; (b) electron distribution function at τ = 500, vs. u and u, for nκe/ne = 5.0 × 10−2; (c) spectrum of L waves at τ  =  500, vs. q and q, for nκe/ne = 0.0; (d) spectrum of L waves at τ  =  500, vs. q and q, for nκe/ne = 5.0 × 10−2; (e) spectrum of T waves at τ  =  500, vs. q and q, for nκe/ne = 0.0; and (f) spectrum of T waves at τ = 500, vs. q and q, for nκe/ne = 5.0 × 10−2. Input parameters are as follows: Te/Ti = 2.0, Tb/Te = 1.0, nb/ne = 1.0 × 10−3, vb/ve = 6.0, g = 5.0× 10−3, and κe = 5.0.

Close modal

Figure 4 shows 2D plots of the electron velocity distribution, the spectrum of L waves, and the spectrum of T waves, at τ = 500. The spectrum of S waves remains very similar to the initial shape and is not shown. The three panels at the left column were obtained considering that the background electron distribution is a Maxwellian distribution, i.e., considering nκe/ne = 0.0, and the panels at the right column were obtained assuming nκe/ne = 0.05, with κe = 5.0. For the parameters chosen, at such a point in the time evolution, the quasilinear process has already transferred a significant part of the energy available in the beam to the waves, creating a peak in the spectrum of L waves. The nonlinear processes are already operative, creating a ring-like structure in the spectrum of L waves, creating a spectrum of T waves over the whole grid of q values, and creating some peaked features for the T waves, in the region of small values of q. The situations depicted in Figs. 4(a), 4(c), and 4(e) correspond to those appearing in Figs. 1(b), 2(b), and 4(b) of Ref. 39, which is dedicated to the study of emission by nonlinear processes in a plasma with Maxwellian background distributions. It can be noticed in Figs. 4(a) and 4(b) that the region between the core of the velocity distribution and the peak of the beam distribution is already quite flattened, corresponding to the formation of the peak in the L spectrum which is centered at (q, qz) ≃ (0, 0.2) in Figs. 4(c) and 4(d).

The results appearing in Fig. 4 can be considered as representative of the time evolution of the wave-particle system. For further analysis of the time evolution, we show in Fig. 5 1D representations of the electron distribution and of the wave spectra, obtained after the integration of the 2D quantities, along u in the case of the velocity distribution and along q in the case of the wave spectra. As in Fig. 4, the left column displays the results obtained assuming nκe/ne = 0.0, and the right column shows the results obtained assuming nκe/ne = 0.05, with κe = 5.0. The electron distribution function in each case is shown in Figs. 5(a) and 5(b), respectively, for several values of τ, between τ = 100 and τ = 2000. In both panels, the gradual flattening of the peak of the beam distribution and the formation of a plateau in the region of velocities between the beam and the core distribution can be noticed. In Fig. 5(a), the appearance of a small population of backscattered electrons is also noticed, which start to become distinguishable at τ ≃ 1000. In panel 5(b), these backscattered electrons are not noticeable in the scale of the figure, because the Kappa distribution already had a sizeable population at that region of velocity space.

FIG. 5.

(a) 1D electron distribution function vs. u, for several values of τ, for nκe/ne = 0.0; (b) 1D electron distribution function vs. u. for several values of τ  =  500, for nκe/ne = 5.0× 10−2; (c) 1D spectrum of L waves vs. q, for several values of τ, for nκe/ne = 0.0; (d) 1D spectrum of L waves vs. q, for several values of τ, for nκe/ne = 5.0 × 10−2; (e) 1D spectrum of T waves vs. q, for several values of τ, for nκe/ne = 0.0; (f) 1D spectrum of T waves vs. q, for several values of τ, for nκe/ne = 5.0 × 10−2. (g) Spectrum of T waves vs. q, for several values of τ, for nκe/ne = 0.0. (h) Spectrum of T waves vs. q, for several values of τ, for nκe/ne = 5.0 × 10−2. The parameters are the same as those used in Fig. 4.

FIG. 5.

(a) 1D electron distribution function vs. u, for several values of τ, for nκe/ne = 0.0; (b) 1D electron distribution function vs. u. for several values of τ  =  500, for nκe/ne = 5.0× 10−2; (c) 1D spectrum of L waves vs. q, for several values of τ, for nκe/ne = 0.0; (d) 1D spectrum of L waves vs. q, for several values of τ, for nκe/ne = 5.0 × 10−2; (e) 1D spectrum of T waves vs. q, for several values of τ, for nκe/ne = 0.0; (f) 1D spectrum of T waves vs. q, for several values of τ, for nκe/ne = 5.0 × 10−2. (g) Spectrum of T waves vs. q, for several values of τ, for nκe/ne = 0.0. (h) Spectrum of T waves vs. q, for several values of τ, for nκe/ne = 5.0 × 10−2. The parameters are the same as those used in Fig. 4.

Close modal

Figures 5(c) and 5(d) show a 1D projection of the L wave spectrum. In panel (c), one notices that at τ = 100, the only distinctive feature in the spectrum is the primary peak generated at qz ≃ 0.2, at the spectral region where the waves are in resonance with electrons in the region of positive velocity in the velocity distribution. At τ = 200, there is already a hint of a backward peak, at qz ≃ −0.2. At τ = 500, and beyond that, the backward peak appears well developed, and there is a profile in the wave spectrum, continuous between the forward peak and the backward peak. This is only a 1D projection of the ring formed by scattering and decay, which is seen in the 2D representation appearing in Fig. 4(c). On the other hand, when the electron distribution function features the presence of a Kappa distribution, the L wave spectrum at τ = 100 features the peak generated by quasilinear effect at qz ≃ 0.2, and also the peak around q = 0, characteristic of the spectrum at equilibrium in the presence of a Kappa distribution. Due to the approximation that we have adopted, of a limiting resonant velocity, the spectrum at q = 0 is finite instead of divergent. The 1D projection at Fig. 5(d) shows at τ = 200, there is already a hint of the backward peak. At τ = 500, and beyond, the 1D spectrum of Fig. 5(d) becomes similar to that appearing in Fig. 5(c), but this is only the effect of the 1D projection. The actual spectrum in the case of Fig. 5(d) is constituted by the primary and the back-scattered peaks, by the peak around q = 0, and by the ring structure formed by nonlinear effects, as shown in Fig. 4(d).

The 1D projection of the spectrum of T waves appears depicted in Figs. 5(e) and 5(f), for several values of τ. In both panels, the sequence of lines show initially the formation of a background spectrum of T waves, added of the growth of a wave peak around qz = 0. Between τ = 500 and τ = 1000, other peaked structures appear in the 1D representations of Figs. 5(e) and 5(f), which are the projections of the narrow ring structure shown in Figs. 4(e) and 4(f). The 1D representations in Fig. 5, as well as the 2D representations in Fig. 4, show that the T wave spectrum obtained in the case of Maxwellian electron distribution is very similar to the T wave spectrum obtained in the case of the presence of a “halo” described by a Kappa distribution. The only noticeable difference is that the peaks appearing in the T wave spectrum are slightly higher in the case of nκe ≠ 0, panel (e), than in the case of nκe = 0, panel (f), for the same value of τ.

Another representation of the T wave spectrum appears in Figs. 5(g) and 5(h), which display the spectrum of T waves after integration along the pitch angle. That is, Figs. 5(g) and 5(h) show the quantity

as a function of the normalized wave frequency. This representation clearly shows the early formation of the T wave background, then the onset of the primary peak of fundamental emission, with the frequency equal to the electron plasma frequency, and later on the onset of harmonic emission, with the peak of emission at 2ωpe clearly emerging between τ = 500 and τ = 1000. The comparison between Figs. 5(h) and 5(g) show that the curves obtained in both cases are qualitatively the same, with the sole difference that the peaks are slightly higher in the case of nκe ≠ 0, shown in Fig. 5(h).

In the present paper, we have discussed the spectra of electrostatic and electromagnetic waves, which may be present at quiescent situation in plasmas whose particles have velocity distribution functions which are a combination of a thermal background and an energetic “halo” distribution. The motivation for the study has been the abundance of measurements made in the solar wind environment, by satellites at different orbits, which show the occurrence of particle distribution functions with these characteristics. For the analysis presented in the paper, the electron velocity distribution has been represented as a summation of a Maxwellian distribution function and an isotropic Kappa distribution, with the fraction of population having the Kappa populations assumed as a free parameter.

The investigation has been conducted using the theoretical framework of weak turbulence theory. We have briefly discussed basic features of the equations of weak turbulence theory, and we have initially used these equations to obtain expressions for the spectra of electrostatic waves, obtained as the outcome of the balance between spontaneous fluctuations and induced emission. These equilibrium spectra, for high frequency Langmuir waves (L) and for low frequency ion-acoustic waves (S), have been routinely discussed in the literature for the case of Maxwellian plasmas, but this paper presents as a novel feature a description of the effects of the presence of a population of particles described by a Kappa velocity distribution. Theoretical expressions for the spectra of L and S waves have been obtained considering that both ions and electrons can be described by a combination of Maxwellian and Kappa distribution. Some numerical results have also been presented, considering the case of Maxwellian distribution for the ions and the combined distribution for electrons, and considering different values of the κe index. These results show that the effect of the presence of the Kappa distribution is noticeable in the spectrum of L waves in the region of large wavelengths, with difference relative to the spectrum obtained in the case of purely Maxwellian distribution which increases for decreasing values of the index κe in the energetic population. The distinctive feature, which exists even for very tenuous Kappa population, is the presence of a peak of wave intensity for very large wavelengths (wavenumber k → 0).

We have also discussed the characteristics of the spectrum of electromagnetic waves (T), which is presented in the plasma as the outcome of nonlinear processes involving L and S waves, and particles. These spectra can be characterized as a state of “turbulent equilibrium.” The turbulent equilibrium spectra have already been discussed for the case of Maxwellian velocity distributions, and the present paper extends the discussion for the case in which an energetic “halo” described as a Kappa distribution is also present in the plasma. The results obtained show that the spectrum of T waves has the general features similar to those obtained in the case of Maxwellian distributions, with the effect of the presence of the Kappa population appearing as a peak of T waves in the large wavelength region, much narrower than the peak obtained in the spectrum of the L waves.

In addition to the results concerning the equilibrium spectra, we have also presented some results, which show the time evolution of the spectra of L and T waves, and the time evolution of the electron distribution function, as a result of the presence of a tenuous electron beam travelling in the plasma. We have followed the time evolution of the wave-particle system up to the formation of the plateau in the electron distribution function, which indicates the saturation of the induced processes described by quasilinear theory. The results shown in the paper compared with the results obtained in the case in which the background electron population is described by a Maxwellian distribution, with the results obtained in the case of a background distribution described as a core population with Maxwellian distribution and a tenuous population with isotropic Kappa distribution. It is shown that the time evolution of the spectrum of L waves obtained in the presence of the “halo” distribution is qualitatively very similar to the spectrum obtained in the case of thermal background distribution, except for the occurrence of the enhanced wave intensity for k → 0, characteristic of the presence of a Kappa population of particles. The spectra obtained for the T waves along the time evolution, in the two situations which have been considered, are also qualitatively very similar, with the difference that the peak corresponding to the harmonic emission is slightly more pronounced in the presence of a tenuous Kappa distribution, in comparison with harmonic emission obtained in the case of Maxwellian background population.

S.F.T. and L.T.P. acknowledge Ph.D. fellowships from CNPq (Brazil). L.F.Z. acknowledges the support from CNPq (Brazil), Grant No. 304363/2014-6. R.G. acknowledges the support from CNPq (Brazil), Grant Nos. 478728/2012-3 and 307626/2015-6. P.H.Y. acknowledges NSF Grant No. AGS1550566 to the University of Maryland, the BK21 plus program from the National Research Foundation (NRF), Korea, to Kyung Hee University, and the Science Award Grant from the GFT, Inc., to the University of Maryland.

1.
W. C.
Feldman
,
J. R.
Asbridge
,
S. J.
Bame
,
M. D.
Montgomery
, and
S. P.
Gary
,
J. Geophys. Res.
80
,
4181
, (
1975
).
2.
W. G.
Pilipp
,
H.
Miggenrieder
,
M. D.
Montgomery
,
K.-H.
Mühlhäuser
,
H.
Rosenbauer
, and
R.
Schwenn
,
J. Geophys. Res.
92
,
1075
, (
1987
).
3.
R. P.
Lin
,
K. A.
Anderson
,
S.
Ashford
,
C.
Carlson
,
D.
Curtis
,
R.
Ergun
,
D.
Larson
,
J.
McFadden
,
M.
McCarthy
,
G. K.
Parks
,
H.
Réme
,
J. M.
Bosqued
,
J.
Coutelier
,
F.
Cotin
,
C.
D'Uston
,
K.-P.
Wenzel
,
T. R.
Sanderson
,
J.
Henrion
,
J. C.
Ronnet
, and
G.
Paschmann
,
Space Sci. Rev.
71
,
125
(
1995
).
4.
E. C.
Stone
,
A. C.
Summings
, and
F. B.
McDonald
,
Nature
454
,
71
(
2008
).
5.
S.
Krucker
and
M.
Battaglia
,
Astrophys. J.
780
,
107
(
2014
).
6.
M.
Oka
,
S.
Krucker
,
H. S.
Hudson
, and
P.
Saint-Hilaire
,
Astrophys. J.
799
,
129
(
2015
).
7.
L.
Wang
,
R. P.
Lin
,
C.
Salem
,
M.
Pulupa
,
D. E.
Larson
,
P. H.
Yoon
, and
J. G.
Luhmann
,
Astrophys. J. Lett.
753
,
L23
(
2012
).
8.
V. M.
Vasyliunas
,
J. Geophys. Res.
73
,
2839
, (
1968
).
9.
D.
Summers
and
R. M.
Thorne
,
Phys. Fluids B
3
,
1835
(
1991
).
10.
R. L.
Mace
and
M. A.
Hellberg
,
Phys. Plasmas
2
,
2098
(
1995
).
11.
M. P.
Leubner
and
N.
Schupfer
,
J. Geophys. Res.
105
,
27387
, (
2000
).
12.
M. P.
Leubner
and
N.
Schupfer
,
J. Geophys. Res.
106
,
12993
, (
2001
).
13.
M. P.
Leubner
,
Astrophys. Space Sci.
282
,
573
(
2002
).
14.
M. P.
Leubner
,
Astrophys. J.
604
,
469
(
2004
).
15.
S.
Kim
,
P. H.
Yoon
,
G. S.
Choe
, and
L.
Wang
,
Astrophys. J.
806
,
32
(
2015
).
16.
D. J.
McComas
,
H. A.
Elliott
,
N. A.
Schwadron
,
J. T.
Gosling
,
R. M.
Skoug
, and
B. E.
Goldstein
,
Geophys. Res. Lett.
30
,
24
, (
2003
).
17.
M.
Maksimovic
,
I.
Zouganelis
,
J.-Y.
Chaufrey
,
K.
Issautier
,
E. E.
Scime
,
J. E.
Littleton
,
E.
Marsch
,
D. J.
McComas
,
C.
Salem
,
R. P.
Lin
, and
H.
Elliott
,
J. Geophys. Res.
110
,
A09104
, (
2005
).
18.
C.
Vocks
and
G.
Mann
,
Astrophys. J.
593
,
1134
(
2003
).
19.
E. G.
Livadiotis
,
Kappa Distributions
(
Elsevier
,
Amsterdam
,
2017
).
20.
R.
Treumann
,
Geophys. Res. Lett.
24
,
1727
, (
1997
).
21.
M. A.
Hellberg
,
R. L.
Mace
,
T. K.
Baluku
,
I.
Kourakis
, and
N. S.
Saini
,
Phys. Plasmas
16
,
094701
(
2009
).
22.
M.
Hapgood
,
C.
Perry
,
J.
Davies
, and
M.
Denton
,
Planet. Space Sci.
59
,
618
(
2011
).
23.
G.
Livadiotis
and
D. J.
McComas
,
Space Sci. Rev.
175
,
183
(
2013
).
24.
G.
Livadiotis
,
J. Geophys. Res.
120
,
1607
, (
2015
).
25.
M.
Lazar
,
H.
Fichtner
, and
P. H.
Yoon
,
Astron. Astrophys.
589
,
A39
(
2016
).
26.
A.
Hasegawa
,
K.
Mima
, and
M.
Duongvan
,
Phys. Rev. Lett.
54
,
2608
(
1985
).
27.
P. H.
Yoon
,
Phys. Plasmas
19
,
052301
(
2012
).
28.
P. H.
Yoon
,
J. Geophys. Res.
119
,
7074
, (
2014
).
29.
S.
Kim
,
P. H.
Yoon
,
G. S.
Choe
, and
Y. J.
Moon
,
Astrophys. J.
828
,
60
(
2016
).
30.
P. H.
Yoon
,
L. F.
Ziebell
,
R.
Gaelzer
, and
J.
Pavan
,
Phys. Plasmas
19
,
102303
(
2012
).
31.
C.
Tsallis
,
J. Stat. Phys.
52
,
479
(
1988
).
32.
R.
Silva
,
A. R.
Plastino
, and
J. A. S.
Lima
,
Phys. Lett. A
249
,
401
(
1998
).
33.
C.
Tsallis
,
R. S.
Mendes
, and
A. R.
Plastino
,
Physica A
261
,
534
(
1998
).
34.
G.
Livadiotis
and
D. J.
McComas
,
J. Geophys. Res.
114
,
A11105
, (
2009
).
35.
L. F.
Ziebell
,
P. H.
Yoon
,
F. J. R.
Simões
, Jr.
,
R.
Gaelzer
, and
J.
Pavan
,
Phys. Plasmas
21
,
010701
(
2014
).
36.
L. F.
Ziebell
,
P. H.
Yoon
,
R.
Gaelzer
, and
J.
Pavan
,
Phys. Plasmas
21
,
012306
(
2014
).
37.
J. A.
Newbury
,
C. T.
Russell
,
J. L.
Phillips
, and
S. P.
Gary
,
J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys.
103
,
9553
, (
1998
).
38.
L. F.
Ziebell
,
P. H.
Yoon
,
R.
Gaelzer
, and
J.
Pavan
,
Astrophys. J. Lett.
795
,
L32
(
2014
).
39.
L. F.
Ziebell
,
P. H.
Yoon
,
L. T.
Petruzzellis
,
R.
Gaelzer
, and
J.
Pavan
,
Astrophys. J.
806
,
237
(
2015
).