The bifurcated states of a rotating tokamak plasma in the presence of a static, resonant, error-field are strongly analogous to the bifurcated states of a conventional induction motor. The two plasma states are the “unreconnected” state, in which the plasma rotates and error-field-driven magnetic reconnection is suppressed, and the “fully reconnected” state, in which the plasma rotation at the rational surface is arrested and driven magnetic reconnection proceeds without hindrance. The response regime of a rotating tokamak plasma in the vicinity of the rational surface to a static, resonant, error-field is determined by three parameters: the normalized plasma viscosity, P, the normalized plasma rotation, Q0, and the normalized plasma resistivity, R. There are 11 distinguishable response regimes. The extents of these regimes are calculated in P–Q0–R space. In addition, an expression for the critical error-field amplitude required to trigger a bifurcation from the “unreconnected” to the “fully reconnected” state is obtained in each regime. The appropriate response regime for low-density, ohmically heated, tokamak plasmas is found to be the nonlinear constant-ψ regime for small tokamaks, and the linear constant-ψ regime for large tokamaks. The critical error-field amplitude required to trigger error-field-driven magnetic reconnection in such plasmas is a rapidly decreasing function of machine size, indicating that particular care may be needed to be taken to reduce resonant error-fields in a reactor-sized tokamak.

1.
The conventional definition of this parameter is β=2μ0〈p〉/〈B2〉, where 〈⋯〉 denotes a volume average, p is the plasma pressure, and B is the magnetic field-strength.
2.
The standard large-aspect-ratio, low-β tokamak ordering is R0/a≫1 and β∼(a/R0)2, where R0 and a are the major and minor radii of the plasma, respectively.
3.
Z.
Chang
and
J. D.
Callen
,
Nucl. Fusion
30
,
219
(
1990
).
4.
J. A.
Wesson
,
R. D.
Gill
,
M.
Hugon
,
F. C.
Schüler
et al.,
Nucl. Fusion
29
,
641
(
1989
).
5.
R. Fitzpatrick, in Theory of Fusion Plasmas, Proceedings of the Joint Varenna-Lausanne International Workshop, Varenna 1992 (Società Italiana di Fisica, Bologna, 1992), p. 147.
6.
R.
Fitzpatrick
,
Nucl. Fusion
33
,
1049
(
1993
).
7.
Z. W.
Ma
,
X.
Wang
, and
A.
Bhattacharjee
,
Phys. Plasmas
3
,
2427
(
1996
).
8.
X.
Wang
and
A.
Bhattacharjee
,
Phys. Plasmas
4
,
748
(
1997
).
9.
O. A.
Hurricane
,
T. H.
Jensen
, and
A. B.
Hassam
,
Phys. Plasmas
2
,
1976
(
1995
).
10.
H. P.
Furth
,
J.
Killeen
, and
M. N.
Rosenbluth
,
Phys. Fluids
6
,
459
(
1963
).
11.
T. H.
Stix
,
Phys. Fluids
16
,
1260
(
1973
).
12.
The strong analogy between the bifurcation theory for error-field-driven reconnection in a rotating plasma and that for a conventional induction motor was pointed out to the author independently by C. G. Gimblett and M. K. Bevir of Culham Laboratory and T. H. Jensen of General Atomics.
13.
R.
Fitzpatrick
,
Phys. Plasmas
1
,
3308
(
1994
).
14.
R. J. Hastie (private communication, 1992).
15.
A. H.
Boozer
,
Phys. Plasmas
3
,
4620
(
1996
).
16.
P. H.
Rutherford
,
Phys. Fluids
16
,
1903
(
1973
).
17.
P. H. Rutherford, in Basic Physical Processes of Toroidal Fusion Plasmas Proceedings, Course and Workshop, Varenna, 1985 (Commission of the European Communities, Brussels, 1986), Vol. 2, p. 531.
18.
F. L.
Waelbroeck
,
Phys. Fluids B
1
,
2372
(
1989
).
19.
F. L.
Waelbroeck
,
Phys. Rev. Lett.
70
,
3259
(
1993
).
20.
F. L.
Waelbroeck
,
J. Plasma Phys.
50
,
477
(
1993
).
21.
P. A. Sweet, Electromagnetic Phenomena in Cosmical Physics (Cambridge U.P., New York, 1958).
22.
E. N.
Parker
,
J. Geophys. Res.
62
,
509
(
1957
).
23.
W.
Park
,
D. A.
Monticello
, and
R. B.
White
,
Phys. Fluids
27
,
137
(
1984
).
24.
K.
Brau
,
M.
Bitter
,
R. J.
Goldston
,
D.
Manos
,
K.
McGuire
, and
S.
Suckewer
,
Nucl. Fusion
23
,
1643
(
1983
).
25.
D. Stork, A. Boileau, F. Bombarda et al., in Controlled Fusion and Plasma Physics 1987, Proceedings of the 14th European Conference, Madrid (European Physical Society, Petit-Lancy, 1987), Vol. 1, p. 306.
26.
J. Y. Chen, S. C. McCool, A. J. Wootton et al., in Research Using Small Tokamaks, Proceeding of Technical Committee Meeting, Arlington 1990 (International Atomic Energy Authority, Vienna, 1990), p. 41.
27.
T. C.
Hender
,
R.
Fitzpatrick
,
A. W.
Morris
et al.,
Nucl. Fusion
32
,
2091
(
1992
).
28.
J. T.
Scoville
,
R. J.
La Haye
,
A. G.
Kellman
,
T. H.
Osborne
,
R. D.
Stambaugh
,
E. J.
Strait
, and
T. S.
Taylor
,
Nucl. Fusion
31
,
875
(
1991
).
29.
G. M.
Fishpool
and
P. S.
Haynes
,
Nucl. Fusion
34
,
109
(
1994
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.