Predictive transport simulations of the temperature and density profiles have been carried out for Tokamak Fusion Test Reactor (TFTR) [K. Young et al., Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion 26, 11 (1984)] current, density, and heating power scans. Two competing resistive ballooning mode theories are considered in order to examine their intrinsic magnetic‐q dependence. The theoretically derived transport model employed in this study includes drift wave contributions from the Weiland theory of trapped electron and ion temperature gradient modes, the Kwon–Biglari–Diamond neoclassical magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) theory, the Tang–Rewoldt kinetic ballooning mode theory, and either the previously used Carreras–Diamond or the recently developed Guzdar–Drake resistive ballooning mode theories. It is found that the Guzdar–Drake theory provides the correct scaling with plasma current while maintaining a scaling with density and auxiliary heating power that is consistent with experimental data from TFTR low confinement (L‐mode) plasmas. A statistical analysis of the profile results for the current scan is included to give quantitative measures of how well simulations that include either the Guzdar–Drake or the Carreras–Diamond theory compare with the experimental data.
Skip Nav Destination
,
,
,
Article navigation
February 1996
Research Article|
February 01 1996
Comparison of two resistive ballooning mode models in transport simulations
Jon E. Kinsey;
Jon E. Kinsey
Physics Department, 16 Memorial Dr. East, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania 18015
Search for other works by this author on:
Glenn Bateman;
Glenn Bateman
Physics Department, 16 Memorial Dr. East, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania 18015
Search for other works by this author on:
Arnold H. Kritz;
Arnold H. Kritz
Physics Department, 16 Memorial Dr. East, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania 18015
Search for other works by this author on:
Aaron Redd
Aaron Redd
Physics Department, 16 Memorial Dr. East, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania 18015
Search for other works by this author on:
Jon E. Kinsey
Glenn Bateman
Arnold H. Kritz
Aaron Redd
Physics Department, 16 Memorial Dr. East, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania 18015
Phys. Plasmas 3, 561–570 (1996)
Article history
Received:
June 30 1995
Accepted:
October 31 1995
Citation
Jon E. Kinsey, Glenn Bateman, Arnold H. Kritz, Aaron Redd; Comparison of two resistive ballooning mode models in transport simulations. Phys. Plasmas 1 February 1996; 3 (2): 561–570. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.871883
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
Progress toward fusion energy breakeven and gain as measured against the Lawson criterion
Samuel E. Wurzel, Scott C. Hsu
A review of plasma acceleration and detachment mechanisms in propulsive magnetic nozzles
Kunlong Wu, Zhiyuan Chen, et al.
Comparison of laser-produced plasma spatio-temporal electron density evolution measured using interferometry with simulation results
Mathew P. Polek, Tirtha R. Joshi, et al.
Related Content
Collisionless and resistive ballooning stability
Phys. Plasmas (November 1999)
Theory‐based transport modeling of the gyro‐radius experiments
Phys. Plasmas (September 1996)
An analytic model for limiting high density LH transition by the onset of the tertiary instability
Phys. Plasmas (July 2016)
Drift mode growth rates and associated transport
Phys. Plasmas (April 1999)
Drift wave instability near a magnetic separatrix
Phys. Plasmas (May 2002)