This work shows a comparative study of a change in properties of plasma-activated water (PAW) when prepared by using two different dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) configurations named a pencil plasma jet (PPJ) and a plasma device (PD). The air plasma produced from the DBD-PPJ and DBD-PD is characterized by voltage-current characteristics, and plasma species/radicals are identified using optical emission spectroscopy. Moreover, the present work emphasizes the trapping of reactive species (O3, NOx, etc.) carried by post-discharge residual gases during PAW production. The trapping of these gases' reactive species is carried out in water, which provides a useful by-product named plasma processed water (PPW). The results revealed a higher concentration of reactive oxygen species (dissolved O3 and H2O2) and a lower concentration of reactive nitrogen species (NO3− and NO2− ions) in PAW prepared by the DBD-PPJ configuration compared to the DBD-PD configuration. The trapping of reactive species (O3 and NOx) present in post-discharge residual gases is confirmed by determining the change in physicochemical properties and reactive oxygen–nitrogen species (RONS) concentration in virgin water used as a trapping medium. The high concentration of RONS in PPW showed a high concentration of reactive species in post-discharge residual gases and vice versa. Therefore, the reduction in reactive species downstream of post-discharge residual gases is shown by a substantial decrease in the concentration of RONS and physicochemical properties of PPW. Thus, PAW and PPW (by-product) prepared in this work could be used for multiple applications such as microbial inactivation, food preservation, and agriculture.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
March 2022
Research Article|
March 16 2022
A comparative study of dielectric barrier discharge plasma device and plasma jet to generate plasma activated water and post-discharge trapping of reactive species
Vikas Rathore
;
Vikas Rathore
a)
1
Atmospheric Plasma Division, Institute for Plasma Research (IPR)
, Gandhinagar, Gujarat 382428, India
2
Homi Bhabha National Institute
, Mumbai, Maharashtra 400094, India
a)Author to whom correspondence should be addressed: vikas.rathore@ipr.res.in
Search for other works by this author on:
Sudhir Kumar Nema
Sudhir Kumar Nema
1
Atmospheric Plasma Division, Institute for Plasma Research (IPR)
, Gandhinagar, Gujarat 382428, India
2
Homi Bhabha National Institute
, Mumbai, Maharashtra 400094, India
Search for other works by this author on:
a)Author to whom correspondence should be addressed: vikas.rathore@ipr.res.in
Phys. Plasmas 29, 033510 (2022)
Article history
Received:
November 15 2021
Accepted:
February 25 2022
Citation
Vikas Rathore, Sudhir Kumar Nema; A comparative study of dielectric barrier discharge plasma device and plasma jet to generate plasma activated water and post-discharge trapping of reactive species. Phys. Plasmas 1 March 2022; 29 (3): 033510. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0078823
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Citing articles via
Progress toward fusion energy breakeven and gain as measured against the Lawson criterion
Samuel E. Wurzel, Scott C. Hsu
The crucial role of diagnostics in achieving ignition on the National Ignition Facility (NIF)
J. D. Kilkenny, A. Pak, et al.
Development of steady-state fusion reactor by Helical Fusion
J. Miyazawa, T. Goto