A fully implicit particle-in-cell method for handling the -formalism of electromagnetic gyrokinetics has been implemented in XGC. By choosing the -formalism, we avoid introducing the nonphysical skin terms in Ampère's law, which are responsible for the well-known “cancellation problem” in the -formalism. The -formalism, however, is known to suffer from a numerical instability when explicit time integration schemes are used due to the appearance of a time derivative in the particle equations of motion from the inductive component of the electric field. Here, using the conventional δf scheme, we demonstrate that our implicitly discretized algorithm can provide numerically stable simulation results with accurate dispersive properties. We verify the algorithm using a test case for shear Alfvén wave propagation in addition to a case demonstrating the ion temperature gradient-kinetic ballooning mode (ITG-KBM) transition. The ITG-KBM transition case is compared to results obtained from other δf gyrokinetic codes/schemes, whose verification has already been archived in the literature.
Skip Nav Destination
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
Article navigation
July 2021
Research Article|
July 08 2021
Verification of a fully implicit particle-in-cell method for the -formalism of electromagnetic gyrokinetics in the XGC code
Benjamin J. Sturdevant
;
Benjamin J. Sturdevant
a)
1
Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory
, P.O. Box 451, Princeton, New Jersey 08543, USA
a)Author to whom correspondence should be addressed: [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
S. Ku
;
S. Ku
1
Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory
, P.O. Box 451, Princeton, New Jersey 08543, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
L. Chacón
;
L. Chacón
2
Los Alamos National Laboratory
, P.O. Box 1663, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Y. Chen;
Y. Chen
3
Department of Physics, University of Colorado at Boulder
, 390 UCB, Boulder, Colorado 80309, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
D. Hatch
;
D. Hatch
4
Institute for Fusion Studies, University of Texas at Austin
, 1 University Station, C1500, Austin, Texas 78712, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
M. D. J. Cole
;
M. D. J. Cole
1
Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory
, P.O. Box 451, Princeton, New Jersey 08543, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
A. Y. Sharma
;
A. Y. Sharma
1
Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory
, P.O. Box 451, Princeton, New Jersey 08543, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
M. F. Adams
;
M. F. Adams
5
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
, 1 Cyclotron Rd., Berkeley, California 94720, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
C. S. Chang
;
C. S. Chang
1
Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory
, P.O. Box 451, Princeton, New Jersey 08543, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
S. E. Parker;
S. E. Parker
3
Department of Physics, University of Colorado at Boulder
, 390 UCB, Boulder, Colorado 80309, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
R. Hager
R. Hager
1
Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory
, P.O. Box 451, Princeton, New Jersey 08543, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Benjamin J. Sturdevant
1,a)
L. Chacón
2
Y. Chen
3
D. Hatch
4
M. D. J. Cole
1
A. Y. Sharma
1
M. F. Adams
5
C. S. Chang
1
S. E. Parker
3
R. Hager
1
1
Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory
, P.O. Box 451, Princeton, New Jersey 08543, USA
2
Los Alamos National Laboratory
, P.O. Box 1663, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545, USA
3
Department of Physics, University of Colorado at Boulder
, 390 UCB, Boulder, Colorado 80309, USA
4
Institute for Fusion Studies, University of Texas at Austin
, 1 University Station, C1500, Austin, Texas 78712, USA
5
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
, 1 Cyclotron Rd., Berkeley, California 94720, USA
a)Author to whom correspondence should be addressed: [email protected]
Phys. Plasmas 28, 072505 (2021)
Article history
Received:
February 17 2021
Accepted:
June 08 2021
Citation
Benjamin J. Sturdevant, S. Ku, L. Chacón, Y. Chen, D. Hatch, M. D. J. Cole, A. Y. Sharma, M. F. Adams, C. S. Chang, S. E. Parker, R. Hager; Verification of a fully implicit particle-in-cell method for the -formalism of electromagnetic gyrokinetics in the XGC code. Phys. Plasmas 1 July 2021; 28 (7): 072505. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0047842
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
Progress toward fusion energy breakeven and gain as measured against the Lawson criterion
Samuel E. Wurzel, Scott C. Hsu
Comparison of laser-produced plasma spatio-temporal electron density evolution measured using interferometry with simulation results
Mathew P. Polek, Tirtha R. Joshi, et al.
A review of plasma acceleration and detachment mechanisms in propulsive magnetic nozzles
Kunlong Wu, Zhiyuan Chen, et al.
Related Content
Development and testing of an unstructured mesh method for whole plasma gyrokinetic simulations in realistic tokamak geometry
Phys. Plasmas (December 2019)
Gyrokinetic simulations of neoclassical electron transport and bootstrap current generation in tokamak plasmas in the TRIMEG code
Phys. Plasmas (July 2023)
An E and B gyrokinetic simulation model for kinetic Alfvén waves in tokamak plasmas
Phys. Plasmas (February 2022)
An explicit large time step particle-in-cell scheme for nonlinear gyrokinetic simulations in the electromagnetic regime
Phys. Plasmas (March 2016)
A reanalysis of a strong-flow gyrokinetic formalism
Phys. Plasmas (March 2015)