Finding kinetic equilibria for non-collisional/collisionless tangential current layers is a key issue as well for their theoretical modeling as for our understanding of the processes that disturb them, such as tearing or Kelvin Helmholtz instabilities. The famous Harris equilibrium [E. Harris, Il Nuovo Cimento Ser. 10 23, 115–121 (1962)] assumes drifting Maxwellian distributions for ions and electrons, with constant temperatures and flow velocities; these assumptions lead to symmetric layers surrounded by vacuum. This strongly particular kind of layer is not suited for the general case: asymmetric boundaries between two media with different plasmas and different magnetic fields. The standard method for constructing more general kinetic equilibria consists in using Jeans theorem, which says that any function depending only on the Hamiltonian constants of motion is a solution to the steady Vlasov equation [P. J. Channell, Phys. Fluids (1958–1988) 19, 1541 (1976); M. Roth et al., Space Sci. Rev. 76, 251–317 (1996); and F. Mottez, Phys. Plasmas 10, 1541–1545 (2003)]. The inverse implication is however not true: when using the motion invariants as variables instead of the velocity components, the general stationary particle distributions keep on depending explicitly of the position, in addition to the implicit dependence introduced by these invariants. The standard approach therefore strongly restricts the class of solutions to the problem and probably does not select the most physically reasonable. The BAS (Belmont-Aunai-Smets) model [G. Belmont et al., Phys. Plasmas 19, 022108 (2012)] used for the first time the concept of particle accessibility to find new solutions: considering the case of a coplanar-antiparallel magnetic field configuration without electric field, asymmetric solutions could be found while the standard method can only lead to symmetric ones. These solutions were validated in a hybrid simulation [N. Aunai et al., Phys. Plasmas (1994-present) 20, 110702 (2013)], and more recently in a fully kinetic simulation as well [J. Dargent and N. Aunai, Phys. Plasmas (submitted)]. Nevertheless, in most asymmetric layers like the terrestrial magnetopause, one would indeed expect a magnetic field rotation from one direction to another without going through zero [J. Berchem and C. T. Russell, J. Geophys. Res. 87, 8139–8148 (1982)], and a non-zero normal electric field. In this paper, we propose the corresponding generalization: in the model presented, the profiles can be freely imposed for the magnetic field rotation (although restricted to a 180 rotation hitherto) and for the normal electric field. As it was done previously, the equilibrium is tested with a hybrid simulation.

1.
E.
Harris
, “
On a plasma sheath separating regions of oppositely directed magnetic field
,”
Il Nuovo Cimento Ser. 10
23
,
115
121
(
1962
).
2.
P. J.
Channell
, “
Exact Vlasov-Maxwell equilibria with sheared magnetic fields
,”
Phys. Fluids (1958–1988)
19
,
1541
(
1976
).
3.
M.
Roth
,
J.
De Keyser
, and
M.
Kuznetsova
, “
Vlasov theory of the equilibrium structure of tangential discontinuities in space plasmas
,”
Space Sci. Rev.
76
,
251
317
(
1996
).
4.
F.
Mottez
, “
Exact nonlinear analytic Vlasov-Maxwell tangential equilibria with arbitrary density and temperature profiles
,”
Phys. Plasmas
10
,
2501
(
2003
).
5.
G.
Belmont
,
N.
Aunai
, and
R.
Smets
, “
Kinetic equilibrium for an asymmetric tangential layer
,”
Phys. Plasmas
19
,
022108
(
2012
).
6.
N.
Aunai
,
G.
Belmont
, and
R.
Smets
, “
First demonstration of an asymmetric kinetic equilibrium for a thin current sheet
,”
Phys. Plasmas (1994-present)
20
,
110702
(
2013
).
7.
J.
Dargent
and
N.
Aunai
, “
Full PIC simulations of kinetic equilibria and role of the initial current sheet on steady asymmetric magnetic reconnection
,”
Phys. Plasmas
(submitted).
8.
J.
Berchem
and
C. T.
Russell
, “
Magnetic field rotation through the magnetopause–ISEE 1 and 2 observations
,”
J. Geophys. Res.
87
,
8139
8148
, doi: (
1982
).
9.
Y.-C.
Chou
and
L.-N.
Hau
, “
A statistical study of magnetopause structures: Tangential versus rotational discontinuities
,”
J. Geophys. Res. (Space Phys.)
117
,
A08232
, doi: (
2012
).
10.
A.
Chasapis
,
A.
Retinò
,
F.
Sahraoui
,
A.
Vaivads
,
Y. V.
Khotyaintsev
,
D.
Sundkvist
,
A.
Greco
,
L.
Sorriso-Valvo
, and
P.
Canu
, “
Thin current sheets and associated electron heating in turbulent space plasma
,”
Astrophys. J. Lett.
804
,
L1
(
2015
).
11.
M.
Faganello
,
F.
Califano
, and
F.
Pegoraro
, “
Numerical evidence of undriven, fast reconnection in the solar-wind interaction with earth's magnetosphere: Formation of electromagnetic coherent structures
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
101
,
105001
(
2008
).
12.
M. M.
Echim
and
J. F.
Lemaire
, “
Two-dimensional Vlasov solution for a collisionless plasma jet across transverse magnetic field lines with a sheared bulk velocity
,”
Phys. Rev. E
72
,
036405
(
2005
).
13.
M. M.
Echim
,
J. F.
Lemaire
, and
M.
Roth
, “
Self-consistent solution for a collisionless plasma slab in motion across a magnetic field
,”
Phys. Plasmas
12
,
072904
(
2005
).
14.
M. J. D.
Powell
, “
An efficient method for finding the minimum of a function of several variables without calculating derivatives
,”
Comput. J.
7
,
155
162
(
1964
).
15.
P.
Pritchett
, “
Collisionless magnetic reconnection in an asymmetric current sheet
,”
J. Geophys. Res.
113
,
06210
, doi: (
2008
).
16.
K.
Malakit
,
M.
Shay
,
P.
Cassak
, and
D.
Ruffolo
, “
New electric field in asymmetric magnetic reconnection
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
111
,
135001
(
2013
).
You do not currently have access to this content.