Five spacecraft-plasma models are used to simulate the interaction of a simplified geometry Solar Probe Plus (SPP) satellite with the space environment under representative solar wind conditions near perihelion. By considering similarities and differences between results obtained with different numerical approaches under well defined conditions, the consistency and validity of our models can be assessed. The impact on model predictions of physical effects of importance in the SPP mission is also considered by comparing results obtained with and without these effects. Simulation results are presented and compared with increasing levels of complexity in the physics of interaction between solar environment and the SPP spacecraft. The comparisons focus particularly on spacecraft floating potentials, contributions to the currents collected and emitted by the spacecraft, and on the potential and density spatial profiles near the satellite. The physical effects considered include spacecraft charging, photoelectron and secondary electron emission, and the presence of a background magnetic field. Model predictions obtained with our different computational approaches are found to be in agreement within 2% when the same physical processes are taken into account and treated similarly. The comparisons thus indicate that, with the correct description of important physical effects, our simulation models should have the required skill to predict details of satellite-plasma interaction physics under relevant conditions, with a good level of confidence. Our models concur in predicting a negative floating potential for SPP at perihelion. They also predict a “saturated emission regime” whereby most emitted photo- and secondary electron will be reflected by a potential barrier near the surface, back to the spacecraft where they will be recollected.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
June 2014
Research Article|
June 10 2014
Cross-comparison of spacecraft-environment interaction model predictions applied to Solar Probe Plus near perihelion
R. Marchand;
R. Marchand
1Department of Physics,
University of Alberta
, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2E1, Canada
Search for other works by this author on:
Y. Miyake;
Y. Miyake
2Graduate School of System Informatics,
Kobe University
, Kobe 657-8501, Japan
Search for other works by this author on:
H. Usui;
H. Usui
2Graduate School of System Informatics,
Kobe University
, Kobe 657-8501, Japan
Search for other works by this author on:
J. Deca;
J. Deca
3
Centre for Mathematical Plasma Astrophysics
, Mathematics Department, KU Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 200B bus 2400, 3001 Leuven, Belgium
Search for other works by this author on:
G. Lapenta;
G. Lapenta
3
Centre for Mathematical Plasma Astrophysics
, Mathematics Department, KU Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 200B bus 2400, 3001 Leuven, Belgium
Search for other works by this author on:
J. C. Matéo-Vélez;
J. C. Matéo-Vélez
4Department of Space Environment, Onera—The French Aerospace Lab, Toulouse,
France
Search for other works by this author on:
R. E. Ergun;
R. E. Ergun
5Department of Astrophysical and Planetary Science,
University of Colorado
, Boulder, Colorado 80309, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
A. Sturner;
A. Sturner
5Department of Astrophysical and Planetary Science,
University of Colorado
, Boulder, Colorado 80309, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
V. Génot;
V. Génot
6Institut de Recherche en Astrophysique et Planétologie,
Université de Toulouse
, France
and CNRS, IRAP
, 9 Av. colonel Roche, BP 44346, 31028 Toulouse cedex 4, France
Search for other works by this author on:
A. Hilgers;
A. Hilgers
7
ESA, ESTEC
, Keplerlaan 1, PO Box 299, 2200 AG Noordwijk, The Netherlands
Search for other works by this author on:
S. Markidis
S. Markidis
8High Performance Computing and Visualization Department,
KTH Royal Institute of Technology
, Stockholm, Sweden
Search for other works by this author on:
Phys. Plasmas 21, 062901 (2014)
Article history
Received:
November 29 2013
Accepted:
May 27 2014
Citation
R. Marchand, Y. Miyake, H. Usui, J. Deca, G. Lapenta, J. C. Matéo-Vélez, R. E. Ergun, A. Sturner, V. Génot, A. Hilgers, S. Markidis; Cross-comparison of spacecraft-environment interaction model predictions applied to Solar Probe Plus near perihelion. Phys. Plasmas 1 June 2014; 21 (6): 062901. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4882439
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Sign in via your Institution
Sign in via your InstitutionPay-Per-View Access
$40.00