We show that under appropriate conditions the impact of a very short and intense laser pulse onto a plasma causes the expulsion of surface electrons with high energy in the direction opposite to the one of the propagations of the pulse. This is due to the combined effects of the ponderomotive force and the huge longitudinal field arising from charge separation (“slingshot effect”). The effect should also be present with other states of matter, provided the pulse is sufficiently intense to locally cause complete ionization. An experimental test seems to be feasible and, if confirmed, would provide a new extraction and acceleration mechanism for electrons, alternative to traditional radio-frequency-based or laser-wake-field ones.
References
1.
T.
Tajima
and J. M.
Dawson
, Phys. Rev. Lett.
43
, 267
(1979
).2.
3.
P.
Sprangle
, E.
Esarey
, A.
Ting
, and G.
Joyce
, Appl. Phys. Lett.
53
, 2146
(1988
).4.
A.
Irman
, M. J. H.
Luttikhof
, A. G.
Khachatryan
, F. A.
van Goor
, J. W. J.
Verschuur
, H. M. J.
Bastiaens
, and K.-J.
Boller
, J. Appl. Phys.
102
, 024513
(2007
).5.
C.
Joshi
, Sci. Am.
294
, 40
(2006
).6.
J.
Faure
, Y.
Glinec
, A.
Pukhov
, S.
Kiselev
, S.
Gordienko
, E.
Lefebvre
, J.-P.
Rousseau
, F.
Burgy
, and V.
Malka
, Nature
431
, 541
–544
(2004
).7.
S.
Kalmykov
, S. A.
Yi
, V.
Khudik
, and G.
Shvets
, Phys. Rev. Lett.
103
, 135004
(2009
).8.
X.
Wang
et al., Nat. Commun.
4
, 1988
(2013
).9.
G.
Fiore
, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.
47
, 225501
(2014
).10.
G.
Fiore
, Acta Appl. Math.
132
, 261
–271
(2014
).11.
L. A.
Gizzi
et al., Appl. Sci.
3
, 559
–580
(2013
).12.
L.
Pribyl
, L.
Juha
, G.
Korn
et al., in Proceedings of the IBIC2012, Tsukuba, Japan
(2012
), p. 482485
.13.
V. I.
Eremin
, A. V.
Korzhimanov
, and A. V.
Kim
, Phys. Plasmas
17
, 043102
(2010
).14.
J. P.
Geindre
, R. S.
Marjoribanks
, and P.
Audebert
, Phys. Rev. Lett.
104
, 135001
(2010
).15.
A. A.
Gonoskov
, A. V.
Korzhimanov
, A. V.
Kim
, M.
Marklund
, and A. M.
Sergeev
, Phys. Rev. E
84
, 046403
(2011
).16.
, with the time lapses spent during the oscillation respectively in the domain of the elastic and of the constant force; due to the size of the domains it is . Hence, τ depends on Z and on the oscillation amplitude, but is at the least of the order of .
17.
The longitudinal equation of motion of the electrons is where , respectively, for circular, linear polarization, and is the square of the plasma frequency. In the nonrelativistic regime we find , , hence the maximum of and the end of the pulse reach these electrons respectively at , , and the equation of motion in the bulk reduces to that of a forced harmonic oscillator: ; the solution with initial conditions is . Electrons initially located at small will experience approximately the same longitudinal displacement with a time delay Z/c. keeps nonnegative if during the pulse switches from positive to negative at (only). In particular, it must be for all , and must fulfill . If the pulse is so intense to make electrons relativistic the conditions for maximal slingshot loading are more complicated; for an estimate in the proposed experimental conditions see the comments after (A7).
18.
In (6), we have chosen the additive constant so that the minima of U w.r.t. ze are equal to zero for all Z.
19.
To perform the work integral, we have used the relation . We have chosen the additive constant equal to the last three terms, so that .
20.
D.
Jovanović
, R.
Fedele
, F.
Tanjia
, S. De
Nicola
, and L. A.
Gizzi
, Eur. Phys. J. D
66
, 328
(2012
).21.
22.
W.
Lu
, M.
Tzoufras
, C.
Joshi
, F. S.
Tsung
, J.
Vieira
, R. A.
Fonseca
, and L. O.
Silva
, Phys. Rev. Spec. Top. Accel. Beams
10
, 061301
(2007
).23.
As , only in the nonrelativistic limit is independent of ζ (nonrelativistic harmonic oscillator).
24.
In fact, (B3) implies for all ; is the time when the pulse reaches is the time lapse necessary for a EM signal to travel from to , hence their sum is the time when the information that the charge distribution does not extend indefinitely in the xy plane, but is confined in , arrives at .
25.
In fact, by the assumptions we find , and, taking the square root, .
26.
In fact, decreases as Z grows and when the electrons penetrate inside , as correspondingly the negative contribution due to the electrons displaced beyond grows, while the positive one by the ions decreases.
© 2014 AIP Publishing LLC.
2014
AIP Publishing LLC
You do not currently have access to this content.