We study in this article the motion of a floating ball attached to a soft string set in circular motion through its other end. Although simple, the system exhibits rich dynamics that we investigate experimentally and theoretically. At low rotation speeds, we show that the circular trajectory of the ball shrinks when we stir faster, which challenges common intuition based on centrifugal force. For higher rotation rates, the ball is either suddenly attracted toward the center, or is repulsed away from it, depending on the string length. Experimental measurements of the generated flow show that a Magnus force must be taken into account to correctly explain all the observations. In particular, our deformable system allows us to measure the ratio of the lift force over the inertial force. Interestingly, the system exhibits strong hysteretic behavior, showing that the ball can robustly trap itself at the center of the flow generated by its past motion. The present experiment also revisits the famous “tea-leaf paradox,” which refers to the unexpected migration of tea leaves toward the center of a tea cup when the latter is mixed with a rigid spoon. The ball attached to the string plays the role of a deformable spoon, and we show that there can exist a maximum rotation speed above which the tea-leaves transport brutally stops.

In classical mechanics, a circular trajectory is associated with a fictitious force that tends to push objects away from the rotation center, in accordance with our sensitive experience during a turn in a ride. However, this intuition is challenged by other experiments in which the reverse effect appears. For instance, particles suspended in a rotating fluid are pushed toward the rotation center if their relative density is less than one. The centrifugal force acts in this case as an effective radial gravity which generates buoyancy directed toward the rotation center for light particles. More surprisingly, heavy particles placed at the bottom of a liquid stirred from the top by a rotating paddle also tend to aggregate at the rotation center. This effect is often referred to as “tea-leaf paradox,” as it can be observed with tea leaves when one mixes a tea cup with a spoon. Such peculiar particles transport finds its roots in the three-dimensional flows induced by the container edges1 and has manifestation in sediments transport in rivers,2–6 dissolution mediated by rotating paddles,7 aggregation control of nanoparticles,8 or blood-plasma separation.9,10

However, the picture is completely different if the stirrer's trajectory can be affected in return by the flow it generates. In the experiments mentioned above, the circular trajectory of the stirrer is indeed imposed by an external operator, and the backaction of the flow simply consists in a friction force that the operator must overcome. The situation is completely different when the trajectory itself can be modified by the action of the flow, a commonly encountered example being the deflection experienced by a spinning sphere moving in a fluid due to lift (or Magnus) forces.11–13 Similarly, the trajectory of magnetic disks set in rotation at a liquid interface were shown to be strongly impacted by the generated flow,14,15 and several disks could interact and self-assemble under the generated flow's action.16–18 On top of those translational degrees of freedom, object–flow interactions can also alter the shape of deformable bodies. For instance, a flexible plate placed in constant flow will tend to bend, which will modify the flow in return.19–21 More generally, the interplay between deformable bodies and flow generation is at the heart of propulsion mechanisms for living organisms22–25 or robots.26–28 The extra degrees of freedom offered by the object's deformations and motion therefore offer a large panel of behaviors that are still to explore.

Inspired by this rich phenomenology, we propose to revisit the tea-leaf paradox when one replaces the rigid spoon by a deformable one, as depicted in Fig. 1(a). As an experimental model of such system, we will study the motion of a ball attached to a rotation arm by a deformable string as in Fig. 1(b). The motion at one end of the string is therefore imposed, but the ball attached to other end can move under the liquid's action. Although simple in principle, this system exhibits rich phenomenology that we briefly summarize here. At low rotation speed, the ball performs circular trajectories which radius decreases when the rotation rate increases, hence challenging the intuition on centrifugal force. At high rotation speed, a strong bifurcation is observed and the ball suddenly gets expelled or attracted toward the rotation center depending on the string length. In the latter case, the ball can moreover exhibit strong hysteretic behavior and gets robustly trap at the rotation center, showing that the system is sensitive to its past history. Moreover, those states are shown to drastically reduce the mixing efficiency of the liquid.

FIG. 1.

Experimental system and definitions: (a) What happens if one tries to stir a liquid with a deformable spoon? (b) Picture of the model deformable spoon consisting in a ball pulled by an inextensible string. The latter is guided by a tube and knotted to the rotation arm on the top. (c) Definition of the string length Ls and trajectory radius Rt, rotation arm length being fixed to W=4.4 cm.

FIG. 1.

Experimental system and definitions: (a) What happens if one tries to stir a liquid with a deformable spoon? (b) Picture of the model deformable spoon consisting in a ball pulled by an inextensible string. The latter is guided by a tube and knotted to the rotation arm on the top. (c) Definition of the string length Ls and trajectory radius Rt, rotation arm length being fixed to W=4.4 cm.

Close modal

This work is organized as follows. We first present in Sec. II experimental results for different rotation rates and string length. Section III is dedicated to force analysis while Sec. IV focuses on the lift force exerted by the liquid, which must be taken into account to satisfactory explain the experimental results. Section V focuses on the impact of string deformation, and a full model of the system which shows good agreement with our data is proposed. We discuss in Sec. VI the appearance of hysteresis and discuss the existence of self-trapped states. Section VII finally discusses the emergence of tea-leaf paradox in our experimental case.

We describe in this section our experimental setup and results. All measurement are conducted in a rectangular tank of 26  × 36 cm2 filled with tap water with depth 6.5 cm. Our model deformable stirrer consists in a 3 D-printed plastic ball of radius Rs=7 mm, mass m=1.3 g, and relative density ρ̂s=0.9 attached to a rotation arm of length W=4.4 cm by a wool strand, as shown in Figs. 1(b) and 1(c). The arm is rotated at rate Ω going from 0.2 to 3 round/s with a stepper motor. In all the experiments, the ball remains far (>3 cm) from any edge of the container to prevent boundary effect to occur. In order to recover the ball's trajectory, a camera (Basler) is placed below the tank and records 10 images per revolution of the rotation arm. The ball's position is retrieved on each image using a convolution algorithm. More details on the experimental procedure and analysis algorithm can be found in supplementary material.

In our experimental regimes, the strand is non-extensible, of negligible mass compared to the ball and free of static or plastic deformation after being constrained. Nevertheless, the way to attach it to the rotation arm is a sensitive parameter for experimental repeatability. After several attempts, the final design consists in knotting the strand to the rotation arm and guides it close to the surface with a tube as shown in Figs. 1(b) and 2. This avoids the introduction of constrains, as the strand is free to move in the tube, and confines the deformable part of the stirrer close to the horizontal interface. In this configuration, the camera placed below the tank can also be used to characterize the string's shape, as most of its deformation will occur in the horizontal plane. The results obtained with this setup were qualitatively similar to those obtained when the strand was directly tied to the rotation arm far from the surface. This shows that confining the strand in the horizontal plane did not affect significantly the underlying physics while simplifying experimental measurement and enforcing repeatability.

We performed experimental measurement of the ball's trajectory for progressively increased rotation speeds Ω and different string lengths Ls, measured from the tube to the ball. We plot in Figs. 3(a) and 3(b) the results for three different rotation speed Ω=0.2,1.4 and 2.0 round/s and two string length Ls=4.6 cm [Fig. 3(a)] and Ls=5.3 cm [Fig. 3(b)]. The trajectories are circular in all cases and their radius Rt depends strongly on the rotation speed. For both string length, the radius of the trajectory decreases as Ω goes from 0.2 to 1.4 round/s. This is opposite to what is expected from the tea-leaf paradox, in which floating particles are pushed toward the outside by secondary flows. When the rotation speed is increased to 2.0 round/s, two opposite behaviors were observed depending on the string length. For the shortest string, the ball was suddenly expelled from the rotation center in what we call a “diverged” state. Conversely, the ball was trapped at the rotation center in a “collapsed” state when the string was longer. Kinnograms obtained by stacking images from the side are shown in Fig. 3(c) and display the three “rotating,” “collapsed” and “diverged” regimes discussed above and shown respectively in Figs. 2(a)–,2(c) (multimedia available online). Experimental snapshots in Fig. 3(d) show that the string is straight in non-collapsed cases, but gains some curvature in the collapsed state. One can, therefore, qualitatively interpret such collapse as the inability of the system to maintain tension in the string during the ball's straddling.

FIG. 2.

(a) Circular trajectory performed by the ball pulled by a deformable string at low rotation speed (1 round/s) (the string is 4.6 cm long). (b) Example of collapsed state reached when the rotation speed goes from 1.8 round/s to 2 round/s (string is 5.1 cm long). In such collapsed state, the ball spins without any translation and the string is curved. The ball remains trapped in such state until the rotation speed is decreased below 1.4 round/s, showing the existence of hysteresis discussed below. (c) Example of diverged state reached when the rotation speed goes from 1.7 round/s to 1.9 round/s (the string is 4.6 cm long). When the rotation rate is decreased from 1.9 round/s to 1.6 round/s, the system shows no hysteresis and the ball gets back to its initial rotating state. Multimedia available online.

FIG. 2.

(a) Circular trajectory performed by the ball pulled by a deformable string at low rotation speed (1 round/s) (the string is 4.6 cm long). (b) Example of collapsed state reached when the rotation speed goes from 1.8 round/s to 2 round/s (string is 5.1 cm long). In such collapsed state, the ball spins without any translation and the string is curved. The ball remains trapped in such state until the rotation speed is decreased below 1.4 round/s, showing the existence of hysteresis discussed below. (c) Example of diverged state reached when the rotation speed goes from 1.7 round/s to 1.9 round/s (the string is 4.6 cm long). When the rotation rate is decreased from 1.9 round/s to 1.6 round/s, the system shows no hysteresis and the ball gets back to its initial rotating state. Multimedia available online.

Close modal
FIG. 3.

Trajectory of the ball for different string lengths when the rotation speed is progressively increased: (a-b) Examples of experimentally measured trajectories for different rotation speed Ω=0.2,1.4,2 round/s and two different string length (a) Ls=4.6 cm and (b) Ls=5.3 cm. (c) Experimental kinograms showing a circular (top), a collapsed (middle) and a diverged (bottom) trajectory. (d) Picture from below showing the loss of tension in the string when a collapsed state is reached. (e) Radius of the trajectory for progressively increasing rotation speed and different string lengths Ls. For the shortest strings (Ls4.6 cm, red curves), the ball reaches a diverged state while longest strings (Ls5 cm, green curves) lead to collapsed states.

FIG. 3.

Trajectory of the ball for different string lengths when the rotation speed is progressively increased: (a-b) Examples of experimentally measured trajectories for different rotation speed Ω=0.2,1.4,2 round/s and two different string length (a) Ls=4.6 cm and (b) Ls=5.3 cm. (c) Experimental kinograms showing a circular (top), a collapsed (middle) and a diverged (bottom) trajectory. (d) Picture from below showing the loss of tension in the string when a collapsed state is reached. (e) Radius of the trajectory for progressively increasing rotation speed and different string lengths Ls. For the shortest strings (Ls4.6 cm, red curves), the ball reaches a diverged state while longest strings (Ls5 cm, green curves) lead to collapsed states.

Close modal

More systematic measurement of the trajectory's radius Rt for progressively increased rotation rate Ω and string length Ls are shown in Fig. 3(e). Two distinct behaviors emerge from those results. For the shortest string length (Ls<5 cm, red curves), the ball eventually reaches a diverged state at high rotation speed, where the radius no longer depends on the string length. This state is reached continuously for the shortest string length (Ls=2.7 cm and 3.5 cm) or by a brutal jump for the longest strings (Ls=4 cm and 4.6 cm). Before such diverged state is reached, there exists a range in which the trajectory radius decreases when the rotation speed increases. The associated range of rotation speeds increases as the string lengthens. Above a certain string length (Ls5 cm, green curves), the ball conversely reaches a collapsed state. The rotation speed at which the collapse occurs strongly decreases as the string becomes longer, going from 2.8 round/s for Ls=5 cm to almost zero for Ls>6 cm. Before such collapse occurs, we observe as for shorter string length that the radius globally decreases when the rotation speed increases.

In what follows, we aim to explain theoretically both why the radius decreases when the rotation speed increases and why the system collapses or diverges depending on the string length.

We propose in this section to perform a force analysis on the ball in the comoving frame. For now, we will consider the inertial force Fin, the viscous force Fv, and the string tension T as sketched in Fig. 4(a). We assume that the string is tensed and that the ball performs a circular motion of radius Rt with rotation speed Ω.The inertial force due to the acceleration writes Fin=(m+madd)RtΩ2er where madd is the added mass of fluid that needs to be pushed by the sphere. In the potential flow approximation, the added mass of a fully immersed sphere can be computed to be exactly madd=m/2.29 However, the flow is not irrotational [see Fig. 4(d)] and the presence of a free surface makes the computation of the added mass a very difficult task. In particular, the waves emitted during the ball's motion may significantly contribute to the added mass.30,31 We have measured experimentally that the waves emitted had a maximum amplitude of typically A0.2 mm with wavevector k2π/Rs (see supplementary material). A plane wave of such amplitude would apply on an object of size Rs a force of typically Fwave1/4(ρg+3γk2)A2Rs,32 and one can thus show that Fwave/Fin<102. This justifies that we neglect the impact of the waves in what follows. Nevertheless, the free surface changes the boundary condition compared to infinite fluid, which impacts the exact value of the added mass. In what follows, we will thus write madd=M̂addm and keep M̂add1/2 as an approximated value for discussion.

FIG. 4.

Force analysis: (a) Sketch of the ball trajectory in the laboratory or comoving frame, and definition of the forces and angle ϕ=(er,T). (b) Experimental measurement of tan(ϕ) for different string length as a function of rotation speed Ω. (c) All data collapse on a single line when plotted as a function of the trajectory radius Rt. Its slope is αexp=0.56 cm−1 (dashed line) while theory without lift force predicts αth=0.17 cm−1 (dot line). Adding the lift force allows us to correct the slope to match experimental results. (d) Stack of 15 consecutive images taken at 150 frame/s showing the motion of particles at the water surface in the laboratory (left) and comoving (right) frame. Fluid motion (white arrow) is indicated and according to the streamlines, an extra lift force FL (red arrow) is expected to occur. (e) Example of velocity reconstruction using PIV (black arrows) and corresponding norm (background color). The fluid moves faster on the inner side (red square) than on the outer side (blue square) of the sphere. (f) Averaged velocity difference VinVout for different rotation speeds. The errorbars show the standard deviation of the measurement over 20 consecutive frames.

FIG. 4.

Force analysis: (a) Sketch of the ball trajectory in the laboratory or comoving frame, and definition of the forces and angle ϕ=(er,T). (b) Experimental measurement of tan(ϕ) for different string length as a function of rotation speed Ω. (c) All data collapse on a single line when plotted as a function of the trajectory radius Rt. Its slope is αexp=0.56 cm−1 (dashed line) while theory without lift force predicts αth=0.17 cm−1 (dot line). Adding the lift force allows us to correct the slope to match experimental results. (d) Stack of 15 consecutive images taken at 150 frame/s showing the motion of particles at the water surface in the laboratory (left) and comoving (right) frame. Fluid motion (white arrow) is indicated and according to the streamlines, an extra lift force FL (red arrow) is expected to occur. (e) Example of velocity reconstruction using PIV (black arrows) and corresponding norm (background color). The fluid moves faster on the inner side (red square) than on the outer side (blue square) of the sphere. (f) Averaged velocity difference VinVout for different rotation speeds. The errorbars show the standard deviation of the measurement over 20 consecutive frames.

Close modal

The Reynolds number Re typically ranges from 500 to 5000 in our experiments, so that a quadratic law can be used to estimate the friction force Fv=1/2ρCDŜimπRs2(RtΩ)2eθ, where CD is the dimensionless drag parameter11 and Ŝim is the immersed cross-sectional surface of the object in the direction of motion normalized by the total normal surface πRs2. For simplicity, we will assume that the immersed volume does not vary with the rotation speed. Experimental pictures taken from the side confirm this hypothesis except in the diverged regime, in which the immersed volume diminishes significantly (see supplementary material). The corresponding data will hence be discarded for the force analysis. We will furthermore only consider the cases were the string is tensed, and therefore discard all the collapsed states as well. An extensive discussion on the data selection is available in SI.

As the ball is steady in the comoving frame, one obtains T=FinFv. In particular, the angle ϕ=(er,T) drawn in Fig. 4(a) can be expressed as
(1)
where
(2)
Experimental measurements of tan(ϕd) as a function of Ω, using same dataset as in Fig. 3(e), are shown in Fig. 4(b) for different string length. All those data points remarkably collapse on a single curve tan(ϕ)=αexpRt when plotted as a function of the trajectory radius Rt [Fig. 4(c)]. This confirms the scaling law predicted in Eq. (1), and the measured prefactor is αexp=0.57 cm−1. Taking the specific values from our experiment ρ̂s=0.9, Ŝim0.9 (see SM), M̂add=1/2 and Cd0.4, the prediction from Eq. (2) gives αth=0.17 cm−1. Although we used some approximation to evaluate the prefactor, the important discrepancy between theory and experiments suggests that other forces may have been forgotten in the model.

A good candidate of such force is the lift produced by the fluid. The latter arises from the complete solid rotation performed by the sphere during its revolution [see Fig. 4(a)]13,29 and results from asymmetric flow between the two sides of the sphere. The flow can be visualized by seeding the liquid surface with small particles (pepper grains) while water is made opaque using a bit of powder milk to ensure good contrast. A camera placed above the tank recorded 150 frames/s during a full revolution of the ball, ensuring small displacement of the ball and the particles between two images. A stack of 15 consecutive images is shown in Fig. 4(d) and in Fig. 5 (multimedia available online). The same stack in the co-moving frame shows the streamlines bending by the ball. From this picture, one can qualitatively expect a lift force directed toward the inward of the trajectory as drawn in Fig. 4(d).

FIG. 5.

Particle's trajectory (pepper grains) at the water surface both in the laboratory frame and in the comoving frame. Water is made opaque using a bit of powder milk. A moving stack of 15 images shows the streamlines followed by the particles. Streamline's bending indicates that a lift force directed toward the inward of the trajectory acts on the ball. Multimedia available online.

FIG. 5.

Particle's trajectory (pepper grains) at the water surface both in the laboratory frame and in the comoving frame. Water is made opaque using a bit of powder milk. A moving stack of 15 images shows the streamlines followed by the particles. Streamline's bending indicates that a lift force directed toward the inward of the trajectory acts on the ball. Multimedia available online.

Close modal

There exists exact formula to compute the lift force at low Reynolds numbers13 or in the case or irrotational flow through Kutta-Jukowski theorem.29 In our case, the Reynolds number is large but not infinite (Re103) and the flow is strongly rotational on an area comparable to the ball's surface, as shown by the large vortex structure of Figs. 4(d) and 5. An analytical computation of the lift force is thus difficult to perform, but we nevertheless estimate its magnitude through experimental measurement of the flow. We reconstruct the velocity field at the water surface by particle image velocimetry (PIV) with the free software PIVLab.33,34 A typical result of velocity reconstruction in the comoving frame is shown in Fig. 4(e) with the norm of the velocity superimposed in the background. The fluid's velocity is higher in the region closer to the rotation center (inner part) compared to the external region. We estimate the mean inner and outer velocity Vin and Vout by averaging over the corresponding areas [see Fig. 4(e)]. Both values are very sensitive to the frame change that is performed numerically, but their difference ΔV=VinVout is insensitive to it. It is plotted as a function of the rotation speed Ω in Fig. 4(f) and is compatible with a linear fit ΔV=2ReffΩ with Reff=0.45 cm. The errorbars are obtained by computing the standard deviation over 20 consecutive PIV-frames and show low dispersion of the measurement along time.

If one assumes non-slip boundary condition of the fluid at the ball's edges, the fluid in the comoving frame has velocity Vball+δΩ on the inside and VballδΩ on the outside, with δ the horizontal radius of the sphere at the surface [inset of Fig. 4(f)]. The velocity difference is, thus, ΔV=2δΩ. Remarkably, the found value Reff=0.45 cm is very close from the horizontal radius of the sphere at the surface δ=0.5 cm. The pressure difference between the two sides of the ball can be estimated from Bernouilli's equation ΔP=12ρ(Vint2Vext2)ρVballΔV, where we neglected the ΔV2 term since ΔV/Vball=δ/Rt<0.2. Keeping the scaling ΔV2ΩRs, we can estimate the Magnus force over the whole sphere as
(3)
where MLρπŜimRs3 is homogeneous to a mass and depends on the mass and radius of the ball.
The lift force exactly scales as the inertial force but is directed in the opposite direction. Adding it to the previous force analysis leads to
(4)
and the ratio at the bottom is the ratio of the lift force over the inertial force. The linearly measured relationship ΔVΩ ensures that Eqs. (1) and (4) have similar dependency with respect to Rt, but with an increasing prefactor in the second case. This is perfectly consistent with the results of Fig. 4(c). Moreover, the order of magnitude of the lift mass is MLρRs3m, so that the denominator can be significantly impacted it. The found value αexp=0.57 cm−1 found above prescribes ML/(m+madd)=0.7. Thanks to the deformable string, we were thus able to measure the ratio of the lift force over the inertial force, or equivalently the ratio of the lift mass over the added mass.

Assuming as before that madd=m/2, we get ML=1.05×m, which is in fair agreement with the scaling law found above that gives ML0.75×m. Our angle and flow measurement thus offer two independent and consistent estimate of the lift's magnitude. A full quantitative measurement of the lift force would require to obtain the full pressure and velocity field around the sphere, as well as to take into account possible viscous effects occurring near the ball in the boundary layer. Such study is beyond the scope of this article, but it is interesting to compare our result with other lift force measurement. For three-dimensional flows and high Reynolds numbers, the lift force acting on a rotating sphere of velocity V is often set in the form FL=1/2CLρSimVb2 with CL the lift coefficient that depends on spin factor RsΩ/Vb.35 An approximate expression for the lift coefficient is CL2CDRsΩ/Vball.35 We can, thus, write FL=CDρŜimπRs3RtΩ2, and we recover the same scaling law as in Eq. (3). The prefactor are, moreover, of the same order of magnitude since CD0.5, but a quantitative comparison is not accessible despite our two independent measurement techniques. Indeed, the measurement from the angles requires an exact value of the added mass madd to extract the lift mass ML, while a flow measurement over the whole sphere is not accessible for direct measurement of the lift. Moreover, the presence of an interface may affect the expression of the lift force compared to the fully immersed case. It is, therefore, not obvious whether the previous expression would hold or not beyond the order of magnitude that we have performed.

For completeness of the force analysis, we would finally like to mention that Eq. (4) predicts the dependency of the proportionality constant with respect to the characteristics of the ball, which essentially scales as α1/Rs. A complete discussion and additional experimental data for different ball's radius were performed to probe the found scaling law. The results are presented in supplementary material and are in fair agreement with the model.

So far, we have shown that our experimental measurement were consistent with the force analysis that includes the lift force induced by the fluid. Nevertheless, this is not enough to predict the trajectories radius Rt shown in Fig. 3(e) as the force equilibrium admits an infinite number of solutions (Rt,ϕ). The geometry of the system will provide an extra relationship between those two quantities, which will finally fully determine the equilibrium state.

In the case where the strand is shaped as a straight line in the horizontal plane, the triangle formed by the ball, the hooking point, and the rotation center in the horizontal plane [Fig. 6(a)] imposes
(5)
where Lh(Ω) in the length of the string in the horizontal plane. The latter was found experimentally to increase with the rotation rate, as shown by experimental pictures taken from the side in Fig. 6(b). The horizontal projection Lh(Ω) reaches its maximal value Lhmax when the string is fully tensed as in Fig. 6(b) for Ω=1.5 round/s. We plot in Fig. 6(c) the difference Ls(Ω)Lhmax measured experimentally on the images taken from below. The maximum difference of about 4 mm for the smallest rotation speeds, and the horizontal length reaches its maximal value for Ω typically larger than 1 round/s. Heuristically, this can be understood by noticing that the tension in the string increases with Ω as a reaction for the increasing viscous drag on the sphere FvΩ2. The string thus becomes straighter, which leads to an increase in the horizontal length Lh(Ω). A quantitative prediction of the string elongation as a function of the rotation speed requires a precise description of the mechanical properties of the string as well as of its interaction with the liquid, which is out of the scope of this work. For what follows, we will thus simply keep the progressive elongation of the string in the horizontal plane as a phenomenological fact.
FIG. 6.

Apparent flexibility and effective model: (a) Triangle formed by the tensed string, the lever arm and trajectory radius. (b) Pictures from the side at Ω=0.5 round/s (top) and Ω=1.5 round/s (bottom) and sketch of the string elongation in the horizontal plane as Ω increases. (c) Experimental measurement of Lh(Ω)Lhmax as a function of the rotation speed (same dataset as in Fig. 3). (d) Angle ϕ as a function of the trajectory radius Rt for different horizontal string length Lh according to geometric constraint of Eq. (5) (color lines) and to force equilibrium of Eq. (1) (dashed line). When solutions exist, only the largest one (orange circle) is stable (see the supplementary material). Due to varying horizontal elongation, the equilibrium radius changes with Ω. (e) Radius of the equilibrium trajectories as a function of Lh. The loss of solution for largest Lh results in the collapse of the trajectory.

FIG. 6.

Apparent flexibility and effective model: (a) Triangle formed by the tensed string, the lever arm and trajectory radius. (b) Pictures from the side at Ω=0.5 round/s (top) and Ω=1.5 round/s (bottom) and sketch of the string elongation in the horizontal plane as Ω increases. (c) Experimental measurement of Lh(Ω)Lhmax as a function of the rotation speed (same dataset as in Fig. 3). (d) Angle ϕ as a function of the trajectory radius Rt for different horizontal string length Lh according to geometric constraint of Eq. (5) (color lines) and to force equilibrium of Eq. (1) (dashed line). When solutions exist, only the largest one (orange circle) is stable (see the supplementary material). Due to varying horizontal elongation, the equilibrium radius changes with Ω. (e) Radius of the equilibrium trajectories as a function of Lh. The loss of solution for largest Lh results in the collapse of the trajectory.

Close modal

The geometrical constrain (5) is plotted in Fig. 6(d) for three horizontal length Lh=5,5.4 and 5.8 cm (plain colored lines). We plot on the same graph the force equilibrium from Eq. (4) (black dashed line). The intersections between the two curves graphically determines the solutions (Rt,ϕ) that satisfy both force equilibrium and geometrical constrains for a given horizontal string length. Two solutions exist for Lh=5 cm and 5.4 cm, while no solution exists for Lh=5.8 cm. Among the two solutions, we show in supplementary material that only the largest one is linearly stable with respect to small radius perturbation. This solution is materialized by orange circles in Fig. 6(d), and corresponds to the radius effectively observed for a given horizontal string length. The latter increases with Ω, which displaces the equilibrium radius Rt as shown in Fig. 6(d) (orange arrow). In particular, one expects the radius to decrease as the rotation speed increases, which is consistent with our experimental results.

Such decreasing behavior is confirmed in Fig. 6(e), where we plot the expected radius Rt a function of the horizontal length Lh. When the string's horizontal length is larger than a critical value Lhc5.5 cm, no more stable solutions can be found [Figs. 6(c) and 6(d)]. This is in good agreement with our experimental results of Fig. 3(e), in which collapsed states occur for Ls>5 cm. In this case, the ball's equilibrium and the string's tension cannot be guaranteed simultaneously, which leads to a shape change of the strand. The critical horizontal length is reached for smaller rotation rates when the total length of the string Ls is greater. The model, therefore, predicts that longer strings should collapse at lower rotation rates. Moreover, the smallest radius observed before collapse is approximately 2 cm and independent of Lh [dashed line in Fig. 6(d)]. All those features are in quantitative agreement with our experimental results of Fig. 3(e).

Our model also sheds light on the existence of diverged states for shorter string length. The elongation eventually saturates at large rotation speed, so that a collapsed state cannot be reached if the string is too short Lhmax<Lhc. At the bifurcation toward diverging state, we observed that the immersed volume of the ball suddenly decreases (see supplementary material). This is consistent with our force analysis and Eq. (1): a decrease in the immersed volume decreases the angle ϕ, which corresponds to increase the rotation radius Rt as the rope aligns with er [see Fig. 4(a)]. Similarly, a decrease in the immersed volume tends to bring the dashed curve in Fig. 6(b) closer from zero, which tends to increase the equilibrium radius. The reason for such brutal variation of the immersed volume, at the heart of the sudden radius jump, is nevertheless still to be understood.

We have shown that the combination of force analysis on the ball and changing geometry of the string offers a consistent description of our experimental results. The apparent flexibility of the string in the horizontal plane, induced by its three-dimensional spatial reorganization, is at the heart of all the observed results. We, therefore, anticipate that the transition between rotating and collapsed trajectories described here is a rather general process, while the thresholds for their appearance depend on the chosen experimental configuration. We have already observed qualitatively the same three “rotating,” “collapsing,” and “diverging” regimes for different ball's size and rotation arm's length, but a more systematic study would be required to probe quantitative agreement with our model.

We now aim to discuss the stability of the collapsed state. Starting from the collapsed state obtained for Ls=5 cm and Ω>Ωu=2.6 round/s [blue circles in Fig. 7(a)], the rotation speed is progressively decreased (red squares). Interestingly, the ball does not reach its previous rotating state but rather remains trapped at the rotation center. Such bistability occurs on a large range of rotation speed and eventually breaks down for Ω<Ωd=1.2 round/s where circular trajectories appear again. The rotation range [Ωd,Ωu] for which the hysteresis occurs strongly depends on the string length and rapidly decreases as the latter increases, as shown in Fig. 7(c). In comparison, no hysteresis was observed in the diverged cases as shown in Fig. 7(b).

The existence of hysteresis and memory effects is ubiquitous in fluid mechanics and occurs, for instance, in Basset forces on accelerating objects,36 in the motion of bouncing droplets37 or more generally in subcritical instabilities.38,39 In the present case, the memory can be qualitatively interpreted in two ways. First, the tension lost in the string needs to be recovered to expel the ball from the flow's center. Second, the surrounding flow exhibits circular symmetry that needs to be broken to recover circular trajectories. Both features require a strong perturbation to be broken, leading to a robust hysteresis.

Contrary to the diverging/collapsing phenomena, which were observed in all the tested configurations, the occurrence and range of hysteresis strongly depend on the peculiar experimental details. For instance, no hysteresis was observed when the guiding tube was set 1.5 cm above the water surface. In this case, the collapsed state presents some intermittency instead of regular spinning. The ball alternates between no motion, during which the string wraps around it, and sudden fast rotation where of the tension accumulated in the string releases. Those “stop-and-go” trajectory provoke a lot of hysteresis, as the ball is sufficiently perturbed to reach back its rotating state. This effect is believed to come from the vertical component of the string's tension. It is consistent with the large hysteresis observed when the guiding tube is brought very close (3 mm) from the water surface to ensure horizontal pulling. We show in supplementary material that in this case, very large hysteresis cycles could be observed with Ωu=2 round/s and Ωd<0.3 round/s.

We discuss in this last section the secondary “tea-leaf” flows induced by the motion of the sphere. To get closer from the original version of the tea-leaf paradox occurring in a cup, we used a circular tank of 13 cm diameter filled with 4.5 cm of water. We introduce infused tea leaves in the water, which sink typically within a couple of seconds before settling at the bottom of the tank. A camera is placed above the tank while a LED panel is set below, so that the tea leaves appear as dark areas [see Figs. 8(a) and 8(b)]. This allows to monitor their spatial repartition by simple contrast analysis. In each experiment, the liquid is initially at rest and the tea leaves are uniformly spread at the bottom. We then start the ball's rotation at Ω and record a movie from the top during one minute. The pictures in Figs. 8(a) and 8(b) show the initial and final state for Ω=1.2 round/s and Ls=5.5 cm. The leaves clearly gathered at the rotation's center, showing that the tea-leaf paradox also occurs with our “deformable spoon.” As mentioned in the introduction, the migration is caused by the secondary flow induced by the boundary layers between the rotating bulk and the nonmoving edges of the tank.2 Our results show that adding some flexibility on the stirrer does not qualitatively impact the flow generation.

FIG. 7.

Hysteresis and critical rotation speed. (a) Radius of the trajectory for the collasping (Ls=5.0 cm) and (b) diverging (Ls=4.6 cm) cases when the rotation speed is progressively increased (blue circles) or decreased (red squares). (c) Critical rotation speeds Ωu and Ωd as a function of string length Ls, showing the range of rotation speed for which the hysteresis exists.

FIG. 7.

Hysteresis and critical rotation speed. (a) Radius of the trajectory for the collasping (Ls=5.0 cm) and (b) diverging (Ls=4.6 cm) cases when the rotation speed is progressively increased (blue circles) or decreased (red squares). (c) Critical rotation speeds Ωu and Ωd as a function of string length Ls, showing the range of rotation speed for which the hysteresis exists.

Close modal

However, the deformation of the spoon can strongly impact the efficiency of those secondary flows and so particle's transport. In particular, the leave's transport is suppressed when the ball reaches a collapsed state. To prove this, we first compute the leave's spatial distribution at a given time along the horizontal direction by performing the average of the pixel's value over a small vertical window, as shown in Fig. 8(a). The resulting curves display either uniform [Fig. 8(a)] or plateau-like [Fig. 8(b)] distribution, corresponding respectively to uniformly spread or gathered tea leaves. Those two configurations can be easily distinguished by computing the average value p on the central area materialized by the green area in Figs. 8(a) and 8(b). Uniform spreading corresponds to p100150 (equal mix of white and black pixels) while gathered leaves correspond to p0 (completely black pixels). The value of p(t) along time is thus a good indicator of the leave's transport due to secondary flow. It is plotted in Fig. 8(c) for different rotation speeds. For the lower rotation speed Ω=0.6 round/s, p(t) is approximately constant which indicates that no transport occurred during the acquisition. This suggests that the secondary flows are too weak to transport the leaves. For higher rotation speeds Ω=0.91.8 round/s, the ball performs circular trajectories and we clearly observe the gathering of the leaves after some delay. Interestingly, this delay seems to decrease as the rotation speed increases, which shows an increase in the mixing efficiency with the rotation speed. The same trend was observed for another dataset generated for Ls=4.5 cm, but more data would be needed to perform statistical analysis.

FIG. 8.

Tea-leaf paradox with a deformable stirrer: (a) Top view of the experimental setup, with tea leaves uniformly spread at the bottom. Their spatial distribution is probed by computing the average in the vertical direction of the pixel's value in the red rectangle. (b) Occurrence of tea-leaf paradox for Ω=1.2 round/s and Ls=5.5 cm. The spatial distribution exhibits two strong plateau corresponding to full-black or full-white area. (c) Average pixel's value in the central area along time, showing or not the transition from uniform spreading to gathering of tea leaves.

FIG. 8.

Tea-leaf paradox with a deformable stirrer: (a) Top view of the experimental setup, with tea leaves uniformly spread at the bottom. Their spatial distribution is probed by computing the average in the vertical direction of the pixel's value in the red rectangle. (b) Occurrence of tea-leaf paradox for Ω=1.2 round/s and Ls=5.5 cm. The spatial distribution exhibits two strong plateau corresponding to full-black or full-white area. (c) Average pixel's value in the central area along time, showing or not the transition from uniform spreading to gathering of tea leaves.

Close modal

Interestingly, a further increase in the rotation speed to Ω=2.1 rad/s completely suppresses the tea-leaf transport. This loss of the tea-leaf paradox is concomitant with the appearance of a collapsed state, leading to sudden decrease in the mixing area. We have let the system evolve in this state for tens of minutes without observing any noticeable migration of the leaves. This suggests that the secondary flow is, as for the lowest rotation case, too weak to perform transport. Those results clearly show that in the presence of a flexible stirrer, increasing the rotation speed does not always lead to higher mixing efficiency. A sudden drop of the mixing area can indeed occur when the stirrer reaches a collapsed state, which significantly reduces the momentum transfer between the fluid and the sphere.

We have discussed in this work the circular motion of a ball pulled by a string and the induced flows. The unexpected radius shrinking when the rotation speed increases results from an equilibrium between the string's deformation and flow's action. Our deformable system allowed to measure the ratio between the lift and the added mass for a sphere moving circularly at the water surface, and the obtained results were consistent with direct flow measurement. At higher rotation speed, we have shown the existence of bifurcation and robust self-trapped states. Interestingly, those trapped states were shown to strongly decrease the mixing efficiency compared to rotating state at lower rotation speed.

The results presented in this work open several interesting avenues for the future. It would be interesting to perform the same experiment for other size or body shapes, as well as to study analytically the impact of the free surface on the lift force expression. It also strongly suggests to perform the same experiments with several objects to introduce pairwise interactions mediated by the flow, as it was done for rotating magnetic disks.16 Last, one may replace water with a non-Newtonian fluid, which were, for instance, shown to modify swimmers efficiency,40 or replace the inextensible rope by a flexible one to introduce flow-elasticity coupling. The impact of those modifications on the object's trajectories and induced mixing is expected to exhibit rich phenomenological features.

See the supplementary material for this article include details on the experimental setup, details on data selection for the force analysis, detailed computation on the stability of equilibrium position, and additional experimental data with different balls.

The authors acknowledge J.B. Gorce for fruitful discussions, M. Mallejac for his help with Blender, and G. Noetinger for precious feedbacks.

The authors have no conflicts to disclose.

Benjamin Apffel: Conceptualization (lead); Formal analysis (lead); Investigation (lead); Methodology (lead); Validation (lead); Writing – original draft (lead). Romain Fleury: Funding acquisition (lead); Supervision (equal); Writing – review & editing (equal).

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

1.
J.
Thomson
, “
V. On the origin of windings of rivers in alluvial plains, with remarks on the flow of water round bends in pipes
,”
Proc. R. Soc. London
25
,
5
(
1877
).
2.
A.
Einstein
, “
Die Ursache der Mäanderbildung der Flußläufe und des sogenannten Baerschen Gesetzes
,”
Naturwissenschaften
14
,
223
(
1926
).
3.
J.
Friedkin
,
A Laboratory Study of the Meandering of Alluvial Rivers
(
United States Waterways Experiment Station
,
1945
).
4.
K.
Bowker
, “
Albert Einstein and meandering rivers
,”
Earth Sci. Hist.
7
,
45
(
1988
).
5.
L. B.
Leopold
and
M. G.
Wolman
, “
River meanders
,”
Geol. Soc. Am. Bull.
71
,
769
(
1960
).
6.
R. G.
Jackson
II
, “
Velocity–bed-form–texture patterns of meander bends in the lower Wabash River of Illinois and Indiana
,”
Geol. Soc. Am. Bull.
86
,
1511
(
1975
).
7.
L. G.
McCarthy
,
C.
Kosiol
,
A. M.
Healy
,
G.
Bradley
,
J. C.
Sexton
, and
O. I.
Corrigan
, “
Simulating the hydrodynamic conditions in the United States Pharmacopeia paddle dissolution apparatus
,”
AAPS PharmSciTech
4
,
22
(
2003
).
8.
Z.
Zhang
,
B.
Zhou
,
M.
Jia
,
C.
Wu
,
T.
Niu
,
C.
Feng
,
H.
Wang
,
Y.
Liu
,
J.
Lu
,
Z.
Zhang
,
J.
Shen
, and
A.
Du
, “
Einstein's tea leaf paradox induced localized aggregation of nanoparticles and their conversion to gold aerogels
,”
Sci. Adv.
9
,
eadi9108
(
2023
).
9.
L. Y.
Yeo
,
J. R.
Friend
, and
D. R.
Arifin
, “
Electric tempest in a teacup: The tea leaf analogy to microfluidic blood plasma separation
,”
Appl. Phys. Lett.
89
,
103516
(
2006
).
10.
D. R.
Arifin
,
L. Y.
Yeo
, and
J. R.
Friend
, “
Microfluidic blood plasma separation via bulk electrohydrodynamic flows
,”
Biomicrofluidics
1
,
014103
(
2007
).
11.
C.
Clanet
, “
Sports ballistics
,”
Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech.
47
,
455
(
2015
).
12.
G.
Dupeux
,
A. L.
Goff
,
D.
Quéré
, and
C.
Clanet
, “
The spinning ball spiral
,”
New J. Phys.
12
,
093004
(
2010
).
13.
S. I.
Rubinow
and
J. B.
Keller
, “
The transverse force on a spinning sphere moving in a viscous fluid
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
11
(
3
),
447
(
1961
).
14.
J.-B.
Gorce
,
H.
Xia
,
N.
Francois
,
H.
Punzmann
,
G.
Falkovich
, and
M.
Shats
, “
Confinement of surface spinners in liquid metamaterials
,”
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
116
,
25424
(
2019
).
15.
J.-B.
Gorce
,
K. Y.
Bliokh
,
H.
Xia
,
N.
Francois
,
H.
Punzmann
, and
M.
Shats
, “
Rolling spinners on the water surface
,”
Sci. Adv.
7
,
eabd4632
(
2021
).
16.
B. A.
Grzybowski
,
H. A.
Stone
, and
G. M.
Whitesides
, “
Dynamic self-assembly of magnetized, millimetre-sized objects rotating at a liquid–air interface
,”
Nature
405
,
1033
(
2000
).
17.
B. A.
Grzybowski
,
X.
Jiang
,
H. A.
Stone
, and
G. M.
Whitesides
, “
Dynamic, self-assembled aggregates of magnetized, millimeter-sized objects rotating at the liquid-air interface: Macroscopic, two-dimensional classical artificial atoms and molecules
,”
Phys. Rev. E
64
,
011603
(
2001
).
18.
B. A.
Grzybowski
,
H. A.
Stone
, and
G. M.
Whitesides
, “
Dynamics of self assembly of magnetized disks rotating at the liquid–air interface
,”
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
99
,
4147
(
2002
). publisher: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
19.
T. Y.-T.
Wu
, “
Swimming of a waving plate
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
10
,
321
(
1961
).
20.
S.
Alben
, “
Collective locomotion of two-dimensional lattices of flapping plates. Part 1. Numerical method, single-plate case and lattice input power
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
915
,
A20
(
2021
).
21.
J.
Toomey
and
J. D.
Eldredge
, “
Numerical and experimental study of the fluid dynamics of a flapping wing with low order flexibility
,”
Phys. Fluids
20
,
073603
(
2008
).
22.
M.
Gazzola
,
M.
Argentina
, and
L.
Mahadevan
, “
Scaling macroscopic aquatic locomotion
,”
Nat. Phys.
10
,
758
(
2014
).
23.
G. I.
Taylor
, “Analysis of the swimming of microscopic organisms,”
Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. A. Math. Phys. Sci.
209
,
447
(
1997
).
24.
T. Y.
Wu
, “
Fish swimming and bird/insect flight
,”
Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech.
43
,
25
(
2011
).
25.
I.
Ashraf
,
H.
Bradshaw
,
T.-T.
Ha
,
J.
Halloy
,
R.
Godoy-Diana
, and
B.
Thiria
, “
Simple phalanx pattern leads to energy saving in cohesive fish schooling
,”
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
114
,
9599
(
2017
).
26.
S. O.
Santos
,
N.
Tack
,
Y.
Su
,
F.
Cuenca-Jiménez
,
O.
Morales-Lopez
,
P. A.
Gomez-Valdez
, and
M. M.
Wilhelmus
, “
Pleobot: A modular robotic solution for metachronal swimming
,”
Sci. Rep.
13
,
9574
(
2023
).
27.
C. J.
Esposito
,
J. L.
Tangorra
,
B. E.
Flammang
, and
G. V.
Lauder
, “
A robotic fish caudal fin: Effects of stiffness and motor program on locomotor performance
,”
J. Exp. Biol.
215
,
56
(
2012
).
28.
J.
Zhu
,
C.
White
,
D. K.
Wainwright
,
V.
Di Santo
,
G. V.
Lauder
, and
H.
Bart-Smith
, “
Tuna robotics: A high-frequency experimental platform exploring the performance space of swimming fishes
,”
Sci. Rob.
4
,
eaax4615
(
2019
).
29.
G.
Falkovich
,
Fluid Mechanics
, 2nd ed. (
Cambridge University Press
,
Cambridge
,
2018
), p.
56
.
30.
F.
URSELL
, “
On the heaving motion of a circular cylinder on the surface of a fluid
,”
Q J. Mech. Appl. Math.
2
,
218
(
1949
).
31.
B.
Voisin
, “
Added mass of oscillating bodies in stratified fluids
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
987
,
A27
(
2024
).
32.
M. S.
Longuet-Higgins
and
R. w
Stewart
, “
Radiation stresses in water waves; a physical discussion, with applications
,”
Deep Sea Res. Oceanogr. Abstr.
11
,
529
(
1964
).
33.
W.
Thielicke
and
E. J.
Stamhuis
, “
PIVlab–Towards user-friendly, affordable and accurate digital particle image velocimetry in MATLAB
,”
J. Open Res. Software
2
,
e30
(
2014
).
34.
W.
Thielicke
and
R.
Sonntag
, “
Particle image velocimetry for MATLAB: Accuracy and enhanced algorithms in PIVlab
,”
J. Open Res. Software
9
,
12
(
2021
).
35.
A. M.
Nathan
, “
The effect of spin on the flight of a baseball
,”
Am. J. Phys.
76
,
119
(
2008
).
36.
E. E.
Michaelides
, “
Hydrodynamic force and heat/mass transfer from particles, bubbles, and drops—The Freeman scholar lecture
,”
J. Fluids Eng.
125
,
209
(
2003
).
37.
Y.
Couder
,
S.
Protière
,
E.
Fort
, and
A.
Boudaoud
, “
Walking and orbiting droplets
,”
Nature
437
,
208
(
2005
).
38.
S.
Douady
, “
Experimental study of the Faraday instability
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
221
,
383
(
1990
).
39.
S.
Fauve
, “
Pattern forming instabilities
,” in
Hydrodynamics and Nonlinear Instabilities, Collection Alea-Saclay: Monographs and Texts in Statistical Physics
, edited by
C.
Godrèche
and
P.
Manneville
(
Cambridge University Press
,
Cambridge
,
1998
), pp.
387
492
.
40.
J.
Espinosa-Garcia
,
E.
Lauga
, and
R.
Zenit
, “
Fluid elasticity increases the locomotion of flexible swimmers
,”
Phys. Fluids
25
,
031701
(
2013
).