Predicting a transient stress overshoot for polymer melts under startup shear flow is challenging. In recent, the classical White–Metzner (WM) constitutive equation of nonlinear viscoelastic fluids was potentially extended. For viscoelastic material functions, the minus ratio of the second normal stress difference to the first normal stress difference (−N2/N1) is important in characterizing a fluid's elasticity related to molecular structures and molecular weight distribution. Using the extended WM model to analyze a dramatic change in stress overshoot with respect to the −N2/N1 ratio at high Weissenberg numbers would be significant. As a validation, numerical predictions of shear stress growth coefficient at different shear rates are in good agreement with experimental data.

Stress overshoot is very beneficial in seeking to understand a variety of nonlinear viscoelastic behaviors of polymer melts and entangled polymer solutions exhibited by undergoing startup shear at sufficient flow strengths.1 For Newtonian fluids, the stress instantaneously reaches its steady state. In particular with regard to non-Newtonian fluids, it is common to observe an overshoot, followed by a decrease toward the steady value. If the steady shear rate is high enough, the shear stress can overshoot; then, they can even undershoot. Thus, Fig. 1 depicts the transient shear viscosity or shear stress growth coefficient with respect to time for Newtonian fluids and non-Newtonian fluids.

FIG. 1.

The normalized shear stress growth coefficient η+/ηe with respect to time for Newtonian fluids and non-Newtonian fluids; η+ and ηe are transient-state and equilibrium-state values of shear stress growth coefficient, respectively.

FIG. 1.

The normalized shear stress growth coefficient η+/ηe with respect to time for Newtonian fluids and non-Newtonian fluids; η+ and ηe are transient-state and equilibrium-state values of shear stress growth coefficient, respectively.

Close modal

Generally, the molecular origin of overshoot can be explained: when the material has a structure on the microscopic scale, deforming the material implies that the structure must be re-organized.2 From its molecular origin, the overshoot response is found to be primarily due to chain stretching rather than chain orientation.3,4 Additionally, the overshoot is a phenomenon stemming from an elastic energy storage mechanism and moving toward a dissipative energy release mechanism after the stress peak.5 Most studies on the nonlinear transient shear response include experimental measurements and theoretical predictions to deeply explore the origin of stress overshoot for polymer chains.1,3,5–7 Osaki et al.6 experimentally investigated the stress overshoot and also detected the undershoot trough and double-overshoot in a series of polystyrene (PS) solutions up to high shear rates. Ebrahimi et al.7 used the K-BKZ (Kaye-Bernstein–Kearsley–Zapas) integral constitutive model8–11 to well predict the transient shear response of the high-density polyethylene (HDPE) melt, as compared with experimental data obtained from a rotational rheometer. Saengow et al.12–15 applied the Oldroyd 8-constant differential constitutive equation16 to provide slightly early underpredictions of the overshoots at high shear rates for a high viscoelastic fluid of wormlike micellar solution. It is significant that Pipe et al.17 performed an important study of concentrated wormlike micellar solutions in quantitative comparison between experimental data and scission model predictions. In particular, Moore et al.18 used the nonequilibrium molecular dynamics (NEMD) simulation19,20 and the Doi–Edwards (DE) molecular rheological theoretical model prediction21 to exhibit the pronounced overshoot for a polyethylene (PE) melt at high shear rates.

A dramatic change in shear stress overshoot, with respect to viscoelastic material functions of the first and second normal stress differences, thus far, has been barely investigated from the complex multi-mode nonlinear constitutive equations. Among the viscoelastic fluid models, the earlier White–Metzner (WM) model22,23 expresses a relatively simple nonlinear viscoelastic fluid of polymer melts. Such a model is the single-mode upper-convected Maxwell (UCM) constitutive equation combined with the generalized-Newtonian-fluids (GNF) model of shear viscosity.16,24,25 However, such a differential stress model, substantial with strong hyperbolic and singular problems, has hitherto always obtained unsatisfactory simulations of corner vortex in a typical contraction flow, especially for high Weissenberg numbers. Most recently, Tseng26 proposed a modification of the WM constitutive equation, called WMT-X (WM eXtended by Tseng). This model can fit the first normal stress difference for characterizing a fluid's elasticity, as well as shear viscosity and extensional viscosity. It is significant to discuss the vortex formation and growth, with the predicted vortex sizes in good agreement with the experimental data. Note that the numerical calculation of the WMT-X viscoelastic fluids is stable convergent at high shear rates.

For completeness, the WMT-X model26 is introduced below:

(1)

where τ is the extra stress tensor; D is the rate-of-deformation tensor and the symmetric matrix of the velocity gradient v; λ is the relaxation time; ηW is the weighted viscosity of the GNF-X (eXtended GNF) model; λ and ηW are a function of strain rates γ̇.

In particular, τ is called the Gordon–Schowalter hybrid time derivative24 with a slip factor ξ is a linear combination of the Oldroyd upper-convected time derivative τ and the Jaumann corotational time derivative27τ:

(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)

where W is the vorticity tensor, which is the anti-symmetric matrix of the velocity gradient v; DτDt is the well-known material derivative convective term. In recent times, it is significant that Ramlawi et al.28 derived new analytical solutions for the non-affine Johnson–Segalman/Gordon–Schowalter constitutive equation with a general relaxation kernel in medium-amplitude oscillatory shear deformation. The slip parameter ξ can also be interpreted through the framework of the Oldroyd 8-constant model of Saengow et al.14,15

The Weissenberg number Wi is the product of the shear rate γ̇ and the longest relaxation time λ:

(7)

At a large Weissenberg number, Wi1, the fluid will respond with elastic behavior like that of a solid. For Wi1, a liquid-like viscous state is expected.

In addition, the Weissenberg number was originally related to the ratio of the first normal stress difference N1 to the shear stress τ12:

(8)
(9)

where τ11, τ22, and τ33 are flow-directional, gradient-directional, and neutral-direction normal (diagonal) stress components, respectively. In other words, this number also indicates the dimensionless magnitude of N1. The second normal stress difference N2 is expressed as:

(10)

Generally, the second normal stress difference N2 is more difficult to measure than the first normal stress difference N1. In most cases, the negative N2 value is typically 10% of N1 in its magnitude.16 Thus, the ratio −N2/N1 is especially used to indicate the dimensionless magnitude of N2, reasonably existing in a region between 0 and 0.5. Note that the normal stress differences are important in characterizing a fluid's elasticity with respect to molecular structures (entanglement and orientation) and molecular weight distribution (sharp and broad).29–31 

Recently, Tseng32 derived the weighted shear/extensional viscosity ηW(γ̇), called the eXtended GNF (GNF-X) viscous model, as expressed below:

(11)
(12)
(13)

where W is the weighting function, and also called the extension fraction; ηS and ηE are the GNF shear viscosity and extensional viscosity with respect to strain rates, respectively. γ̇S and γ̇E are the principal shear rate and principal extensional rate, respectively; and γ̇T is the total strain rate. For a pure shear flow, the GNF-X weighted viscosity returns to the GNF shear viscosity, namely, ηW=ηS. The details of the GNF-X weighted viscosity are available elsewhere.32 

In the shear flow, the complete form of the WMT-X model,26 therefore, is unfolded:

(14)
(15)
(16)
(17)

where D* and W* are dimensionless tensors of the rate-of-deformation tensor D and the vorticity tensor W, respectively. Note that τt = 0 and τ = 0 indicate the steady state and homogenous flows, respectively. The normal stress parameter CN is limited between 0 and 1.

In the homogenous, steady-state, simple shear flow, the viscoelastic material functions are further derived:

(18)
(19)
(20)

It is critically important to indicate that both N1 and N2 are steady-state values, and not the transient ones. Thereby, it is important to find ξ and CN related to −N2/N1, which are a function of shear rate.

(21)
(22)

In recent times, Saengow et al.14,15 provided an interpretation of the slip factor based on the Oldroyd 8-constant model.

For a homogenous simple shear flow with an x-axis flow direction, a y-axis in a gradient direction, and a z-axis in a neutral direction, the flow strength of velocity-gradient tensor v is given by shear rate γ̇ to determine the rate-of-deformation tensor D and the vorticity tensor W, which are the symmetric matrix and anti-symmetric matrix of the velocity gradient tensor, respectively.

(23)
(24)
(25)

These tensors are inputted to the WMT-X of Eq. (14).

Here, one can perform the startup calculation of shear flow under homogenous conditions with the WMT-X viscoelastic constitutive equation of Eq. (14) and adopt the fourth-order Runge–Kutta method33 to solve the time-evolution. Figure 2 shows the transient shear stress responses with respect to time at different values of −N2/N1 between 0.01 and 0.5 under transient shear with shear rate γ̇ = 1.0 s−1 and shear viscosity ηS=1×105 Pa·s. Note that the ratio −N2/N1 = 0.5 implies the viscoelastic fluid reflecting in the correlational Maxwell model.

FIG. 2.

The WMT-X model predictions of transient shear stress with respect to time at different values of −N2/N1 for (a) a low Weissenberg number Wi = 0.1 and (b) a high Weissenberg number Wi = 1.0 under shear with shear rate γ̇ = 1.0 s−1 and shear viscosity ηS=1×105 Pa·s.

FIG. 2.

The WMT-X model predictions of transient shear stress with respect to time at different values of −N2/N1 for (a) a low Weissenberg number Wi = 0.1 and (b) a high Weissenberg number Wi = 1.0 under shear with shear rate γ̇ = 1.0 s−1 and shear viscosity ηS=1×105 Pa·s.

Close modal

For a relatively small Weissenberg number, Wi = 0.1, the transient stress curves are almost kept constant and are a linear viscoelastic response without overshoot. When a large Wi = 1.0 and −N2/N1 > 0.1 are given, the stress increases linearly with time, passes through a maximum (i.e., overshoot), and then decreases to a convergent plateau. At −N2/N1 = 0.5, the overshoot response is obvious. According to rheological treatises,16 the negative N2 value is typically 10% of N1 in its magnitude for polymer melts. Also, the overshoot–undershoot–overshoot peak is found for a very high Wi = 3.0 and reasonable −N2/N1 = 0.1, as shown in Fig. 3. This finding is the same as the previous experimental observation of Osaki et al.6 for PS solutions at high shear rates, namely, a peculiar stronger nonlinear viscoelastic behavior with an oscillator damping. In the constitutive analysis of the WMT-X model, one therefore can conclude that the stress overshoot is evidently related to the value of −N2/N1, but hardly occurs at the weak elastic effect or the small Weissenberg number condition of −N2/N1 ≪ 0.1. From a mathematical perspective, the occurrence of overshoot is due to an interdependence relationship of shear stress (τ12) and normal stresses (τ11 and τ22).

FIG. 3.

The WMT-X model predictions of transient shear stress with respect to time at −N2/N1 = 0.1 for a very high Weissenberg number Wi = 3.0 under shear with shear rate γ̇ = 1.0 s−1 and shear viscosity ηS=1×105 Pa·s.

FIG. 3.

The WMT-X model predictions of transient shear stress with respect to time at −N2/N1 = 0.1 for a very high Weissenberg number Wi = 3.0 under shear with shear rate γ̇ = 1.0 s−1 and shear viscosity ηS=1×105 Pa·s.

Close modal

To validate the accuracy of the WMT-X model, one can refer to Ebrahimi et al.,7 who used the rotational rheometer to measure the experimental data of the shear stress growth coefficient for a HDPE melt taken at 180 °C and performed excellent predictions of the K-BKZ integral constitutive model. At different shear rates between 0.5 and 5.0, Fig. 4 shows that the WMT-X model predictions match the experimental data well. For the overshoot at the higher shear rate γ̇ = 5.0 s−1, the overshoot degree of the WMT-X model is somewhat small than that of the K-BKZ model. At low shear rates γ̇ < 1.0 s−1, the response of the shear stress growth coefficient attached without overshoot is almost linear viscoelastic. Hence, the WMT-X model for describing the nonlinear viscoelastic behavior of the overshoot is satisfied for polymer melts. In addition, all the parameters are addressed in Table I. With increasing shear rate, one can find that the shear viscosity and relaxation time are decreased, whereas the elastic parameters Wi and −N2/N1 are increased. According to Eq. (21), the slip factor can be obtained. Thus, Fig. 5 shows that the slip factor is increased with shear rates; this implies the chain entanglement predominates at low shear rates and the chain orientation predominates at high shear rates. From the previous NEMD simulation of Tseng et al.,34 the −N2/N1 trend is the same as in the present WMT-X work.

FIG. 4.

The WMT-X model predictions of shear stress growth coefficient with respect to time at different shear rates for HDPE melt taken at 180 °C.

FIG. 4.

The WMT-X model predictions of shear stress growth coefficient with respect to time at different shear rates for HDPE melt taken at 180 °C.

Close modal
TABLE I.

The WMT-X parameters at different shear rates for HDPE melt taken at 180 °C.

γ̇ (s−1)ηS (Pa·s)Wiλ (s)N2/N1ξ
0.5 1.0×105 0.8 1.6 0.02 0.04 
1.0 5.5×104 0.8 0.8 0.08 0.16 
5.0 3.0×104 1.0 0.2 0.3 0.6 
γ̇ (s−1)ηS (Pa·s)Wiλ (s)N2/N1ξ
0.5 1.0×105 0.8 1.6 0.02 0.04 
1.0 5.5×104 0.8 0.8 0.08 0.16 
5.0 3.0×104 1.0 0.2 0.3 0.6 
FIG. 5.

The slip factor ξ vs shear rate.

FIG. 5.

The slip factor ξ vs shear rate.

Close modal

Eventually, this work has achieved the constitutive analysis of the stress overshoot via the WMT-X viscoelastic model. One can understand the relationship between the overshoot and the elastic parameters of Wi and −N2/N1. The overshoot easily occurs at high Wi values and −N2/N1 > 0.1. At different shear rates, the predicted transient stress responses are in agreement with the experimental data. The values of the elastic parameters imply a fluid's elasticity depending on entangled/oriented chains and sharp/broad weight distributions of polymer structures.29–31 In future work, it will be important to explore the difference of overshoot between complex structure characteristics of polymer melts, such as the linear low-density and branched high-density PE melts.

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

1.
J. G.
Oakley
,
A. J.
Giacomin
, and
J. A.
Yosick
, “
Molecular origins of nonlinear viscoelasticity
,”
Microchim. Acta
130
,
1
(
1998
).
2.
C.
Ancey
,
Introduction to Fluid Rheology
(
LHE École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
,
2005
).
3.
Y.
Lu
,
L.
An
,
S.-Q.
Wang
, and
Z.-G.
Wang
, “
Origin of stress overshoot during startup shear of entangled polymer melts
,”
ACS Macro Lett.
3
,
569
(
2014
).
4.
K. S.
Schweizer
and
S.-J.
Xie
, “
Physics of the stress overshoot and chain stretch dynamics of entangled polymer liquids under continuous startup nonlinear shear
,”
ACS Macro Lett.
7
,
218
(
2018
).
5.
N.
Koumakis
,
M.
Laurati
,
A. R.
Jacob
,
K. J.
Mutch
,
A.
Abdellali
,
A. B.
Schofield
,
S. U.
Egelhaaf
,
J. F.
Brady
, and
G.
Petekidis
, “
Start-up shear of concentrated colloidal hard spheres: Stresses, dynamics, and structure
,”
J. Rheol.
60
,
603
(
2016
).
6.
K.
Osaki
,
T.
Inoue
, and
T.
Isomura
, “
Stress overshoot of polymer solutions at high rates of shear
,”
J. Polym. Sci., Part B: Polym. Phys.
38
,
1917
(
2000
).
7.
M.
Ebrahimi
,
V. K.
Konaganti
, and
S. G.
Hatzikiriakos
, “
Dynamic slip of polydisperse linear polymers using partitioned plate
,”
Phys. Fluids
30
,
030601
(
2018
).
8.
E.
Mitsoulis
, “
Numerical simulation of entry flow of the IUPAC-LDPE melt
,”
J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech.
97
,
13
(
2001
).
9.
E.
Mitsoulis
,
M.
Schwetz
, and
H.
Münstedt
, “
Entry flow of LDPE melts in a planar contraction
,”
J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech.
111
,
41
(
2003
).
10.
E.
Mitsoulis
,
I. B.
Kazatchkov
, and
S. G.
Hatzikiriakos
, “
The effect of slip in the flow of a branched PP melt: Experiments and simulations
,”
Rheol. Acta
44
,
418
(
2005
).
11.
R.-Y.
Chang
and
S.-Y.
Chiou
, “
A unified K-BKZ model for residual stress analysis of injection molded three-dimensional thin shapes
,”
Polym. Eng. Sci.
35
,
1733
(
1995
).
12.
C.
Saengow
and
A. J.
Giacomin
, “
Normal stress differences from Oldroyd 8-constant framework: Exact analytical solution for large-amplitude oscillatory shear flow
,”
Phys. Fluids
29
,
121601
(
2017
).
13.
C.
Saengow
,
A. J.
Giacomin
, and
C.
Kolitawong
, “
Exact analytical solution for large-amplitude oscillatory shear flow from Oldroyd 8-constant framework: Shear stress
,”
Phys. Fluids
29
,
043101
(
2017
).
14.
C.
Saengow
,
A. J.
Giacomin
,
N.
Grizzuti
, and
R.
Pasquino
, “
Startup steady shear flow from the Oldroyd 8-constant framework
,”
Phys. Fluids
31
,
063101
(
2019
).
15.
C.
Saengow
and
A. J.
Giacomin
, “
Stress growth shearfree flow from the Oldroyd 8-constant framework
,”
Phys. Fluids
32
,
083112
(
2020
).
16.
R. B.
Bird
,
R. C.
Armstrong
, and
O.
Hassager
,
Dynamics of Polymeric Liquids: Fluid Mechanics
(
Wiley-Interscience
,
New York
,
1987
).
17.
C. J.
Pipe
,
N. J.
Kim
,
P. A.
Vasquez
,
L. P.
Cook
, and
G. H.
McKinley
, “
Wormlike micellar solutions: II. Comparison between experimental data and scission model predictions
,”
J. Rheol.
54
,
881
(
2010
).
18.
J. D.
Moore
,
S. T.
Cui
,
H. D.
Cochran
, and
P. T.
Cummings
, “
Transient rheology of a polyethylene melt under shear
,”
Phys. Rev. E
60
,
6956
(
1999
).
19.
H.-C.
Tseng
,
J.-S.
Wu
, and
R.-Y.
Chang
, “
Shear thinning and shear dilatancy of liquid n-hexadecane via equilibrium and nonequilibrium molecular dynamics simulations: Temperature, pressure, and density effects
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
129
,
014502
(
2008
).
20.
H.-C.
Tseng
,
J.-S.
Wu
, and
R.-Y.
Chang
, “
Linear viscoelasticity and thermorheological simplicity of n-hexadecane fluids under oscillatory shear via non-equilibrium molecular dynamics simulations
,”
Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.
12
,
4051
(
2010
).
21.
M.
Doi
and
S. F. M.
Edwards
,
The Theory of Polymer Dynamics
(
Clarendon
,
Oxford
,
1986
).
22.
J. L.
White
and
A. B.
Metzner
, “
Development of constitutive equations for polymeric melts and solutions
,”
J. Appl. Polym. Sci.
7
,
1867
(
1963
).
23.
D. V.
Boger
,
M. J.
Crochet
, and
R. A.
Keiller
, “
On viscoelastic flows through abrupt contractions
,”
J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech.
44
,
267
(
1992
).
24.
F. A.
Morrison
,
Understanding Rheology
(
Oxford University
,
2001
).
25.
N.
Phan-Thien
,
Understanding Viscoelasticity: An Introduction to Rheology
(
Springer-Verlag
Berlin
,
2013
).
26.
H.-C.
Tseng
, “
A revisitation of White-Metzner viscoelastic fluids
,”
Phys. Fluids
33
,
057115
(
2021
).
27.
P.
Poungthong
,
C.
Saengow
,
A. J.
Giacomin
,
C.
Kolitawong
,
D.
Merger
, and
M.
Wilhelm
, “
Padé approximant for normal stress differences in large-amplitude oscillatory shear flow
,”
Phys. Fluids
30
,
040910
(
2018
).
28.
N.
Ramlawi
,
N. A.
Bharadwaj
, and
R. H.
Ewoldt
, “
The weakly nonlinear response and non-affine interpretation of the Johnson-Segalman/Gordon-Schowalter model
,”
J. Rheol.
64
,
1409
(
2020
).
29.
R. G.
Larson
,
The Structure and Rheology of Complex Fluids
(
Oxford University Press
,
New York
,
1999
).
30.
T.
Schweizer
, “
Measurement of the first and second normal stress differences in a polystyrene melt with a cone and partitioned plate tool
,”
Rheol. Acta
41
,
337
(
2002
).
31.
N.
Ohl
and
W.
Gleissle
, “
The second normal stress difference for pure and highly filled viscoelastic fluids
,”
Rheol. Acta
31
,
294
(
1992
).
32.
H.-C.
Tseng
, “
A revisitation of generalized Newtonian fluids
,”
J. Rheol.
64
,
493
(
2020
).
33.
W. H.
Press
,
S. A.
Teukolsky
,
W. T.
Vetterling
, and, and
B. P.
Flannery
,
Numerical Recipes in C
(
Cambridge University Press
,
New York
,
2007
).
34.
H.-C.
Tseng
,
J.-S.
Wu
, and
R.-Y.
Chang
, “
Material functions of liquid n-hexadecane under steady shear via non-equilibrium molecular dynamics simulations: Temperature, pressure, and density effects
,”
J. Chem. Phys
130
,
084904
(
2009
).