The problem of defining a proper measure for the size of disturbances that evolve spatially is assessed. A model problem serves as a demonstration that the disturbance energy, which is almost exclusively used in a temporal setting, is generally not sufficient as a measure of the disturbance size in the spatial case. It is shown that the specific form of the ‘‘energy’’ transferred between Fourier components in the spatial case is not unique, but rather depends on the formulation of the spatial evolution problem. In addition to the model problem, suggestions on how to evaluate spatial ‘‘energy’’ transfer in the Navier–Stokes equations are presented.
REFERENCES
1.
E. M.
Saiki
, S.
Biringen
, G.
Danabasoglu
, and C. L.
Streett
, “Spatial simulation of secondary instability in plane channel flow: comparison of K- and H-type disturbances
,” J. Fluid Mech.
253
, 485
(1993
).2.
B. Singer, J. H. Ferziger, and H. Reed, “Numerical simulation studies of laminar-turbulent transition in the plane channel,” Tech. Report No. TF-31, Thermosciences Division, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, 1987.
3.
G. B. Whitham, Linear and Nonlinear Waves (Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1974).
4.
J. Kevorkian, Partial Differential Equations: Analytic Solution Techniques, Wadsworth and Brooks/Cole Mathematics Series (Brooks/Cole, Pacific Grove, CA, 1990).
5.
G.
Kreiss
, A.
Lundbladh
, and D. S.
Henningson
, “Bounds for threshold amplitudes in subcritical shear flows
,” J. Fluid Mech.
270
, 175
(1994
).6.
H.
Salwen
and C. E.
Grosch
, “The continuous spectrum of the Orr-Sommerfeld equation. Part 2. Eigenfunction expansions
,” J. Fluid Mech.
104
, 445
(1981
).7.
P. J. Schmid, A. Lundbladh, and D. S. Henningson, “Spatial evolution of disturbances in plane Poiseuille flow,” Proceedings from the 1993 ICASE/ NASA Langley Workshop on the Transition to Turbulence, 1993.
This content is only available via PDF.
© 1994 American Institute of Physics.
1994
American Institute of Physics
You do not currently have access to this content.