Sediment-laden surface vortices in pump sump represent a three-phase flow, comprising gas, liquid, and solid phases, surpassing the complexity of clear water vortices, which has also more serious effect on the hydraulic machinery. In this paper, focusing on sediment-laden free surface vortices, a model experiment was employed to investigate their motion characteristics. The spatiotemporal evolution of sediment-laden vortices has been captured through three-dimensional velocity testing, revealing particle aggregation and dispersion patterns within vortex cores at various stages. Radial velocity within the vortex core accelerates the inward movement of particles, while axial velocity enhances their vertical transport. The scale of sandy vortices is larger than that of clear water vortices, approximately 1.2 times the size, and the rotational velocity within the vortex core is lower for sandy vortices, with maximum rotational velocities of 1.04 and 0.5 m/s, respectively. The maximum suction speed of the vortex is 6.1 times that of the initial stage, and the sediment-carrying capacity is 21 times greater. Finally, the mechanism and characteristics of vortex transporting sand and air are discussed, along with the detrimental effects of various sediment-carrying vortices on the sediment erosion of hydraulic machinery. The research findings of this paper have significant theoretical and engineering values.

1.
W.-P.
Zhang
,
L.-J.
Shi
,
F.-P.
Tang
et al, “
Identification and analysis of the inlet vortex of an axial-flow pump
,”
J. Hydrodyn.
34
(
2
),
234
243
(
2022
).
2.
S.
Kim
,
C.
Kim
,
B.
Kim
et al, “
A study comparing the subsurface vortex characteristics in pump sumps
,”
Energies
15
(
14
),
5049
(
2022
).
3.
Y.-N.
Zhang
,
K.-H.
Liu
,
J.-W.
Li
et al, “
Analysis of the vortices in the inner flow of reversible pump turbine with the new omega vortex identification method
,”
J. Hydrodyn.
30
(
3
),
463
469
(
2018
).
4.
Y. K.
Park
,
M. K.
Dey
,
Y. H.
Choi
et al, “
Numerical visualization of air intake induced by free surface vortex
,”
J. Therm. Sci.
26
(
6
),
540
544
(
2017
).
5.
H.
Zeng
,
Z.
Li
,
D.
Li
et al, “
Vortex distribution and energy loss in s-shaped region of pump turbine
,”
Front. Energy Res.
10
,
904202
(
2022
).
6.
T.
Boushaki
,
A.
Koched
,
Z.
Mansouri
et al, “
Volumetric velocity measurements (V3V) on turbulent swirling flows
,”
Flow Meas. Instrum.
54
,
46
55
(
2017
).
7.
X.
Song
and
C.
Liu
, “
Experimental study of the floor-attached vortices in pump sump using V3V
,”
Renewable Energy
164
,
752
766
(
2021
).
8.
F. C. K.
Ting
and
D. A.
Beck
, “
Observation of sediment suspension by breaking-wave-generated vortices using volumetric three-component velocimetry
,”
Coastal Eng.
151
,
97
120
(
2019
).
9.
S.
Xijie
and
C.
Liu
, “
Prediction on the pressure pulsation induced by the free surface vortex based on experimental investigation and Biot-Savart Law
,”
Ocean Eng.
250
,
110934
(
2022
).
10.
K.
Kan
et al, “
Effects of clearance and operating conditions on tip leakage vortex-induced energy loss in an axial-flow pump using entropy production method
,”
J. Fluids Eng.
145
(
3
),
031201
(
2023
).
11.
V.
Naderi
et al, “
A 3D study of an air-core vortex using HSPIV and flow visualization
,”
Arab. J. Sci. Eng.
44
(
10
),
8573
8584
(
2019
).
12.
T. K.
Wong
,
B. R.
Shin
, and
H. D.
Doeg
, “
An effective shape of floor splitter for reducing sub-surface vortices in pump sump
,”
J. Mech. Sci. Tecnol.
28
(
1
),
175
182
(
2014
).
13.
H.
Tian
et al, “
Lagrangian-based spatial-temporal topological study on the evolution and migration of coherent structures in wall turbulence
,”
Acta Mech. Sin.
38
(
1
),
321465
(
2022
).
14.
A.
Albadawi
et al, “
Influence of surface tension implementation in volume of fluid and coupled volume of fluid with level set methods for bubble growth and detachment
,”
Int. J. Multiphase Flow
53
,
11
28
(
2013
).
15.
N. I.
Mikheev
et al, “
Estimation of turbulent energy dissipation in the boundary layer using Smoke Image Velocimetry
,”
Exp. Fluids
58
(
8
),
1
10
(
2017
).
16.
M.
Ashtari Jafari
and
G.
Quaranta
, “
Comparative application of time-frequency methods on strong motion signals
,”
Adv. Civ. Eng.
2021
,
1
14
.
17.
I.
Grcić
,
H.
Pandžić
, and
D.
Novosel
, “
Fault detection in DC microgrids using short-time Fourier transform
,”
Energies
14
(
2
),
277
(
2021
).
18.
Z.
Xu
et al, “
Flow instability and energy performance of a coastal axial-flow pump as turbine under the influence of upstream waves
,”
Energy
272
,
127121
(
2023
).
19.
D.
Li
et al, “
Analysis of vorticity dynamics for hump characteristics of a pump turbine model
,”
J. Mech. Sci. Technol.
30
(
8
),
3641
3650
(
2016
).
20.
S.
Nahale
,
M.
Reza
, and
J. C.
Michel
, “
Investigation of rotating vortex rope formation during load variation in a Francis turbine draft tube
,”
Renewable Energy
151
(
3
),
238
254
(
2020
).
21.
M. S.
Zhao
,
W. W.
Zhao
, and
D. C.
Wan
, “
Numerical simulations of propeller cavitation flows based on Open Foam
,”
J. Hydrodyn.
32
(
6
),
1071
1079
(
2020
).
22.
K. C.
Anup
,
H. L.
Young
, and
T.
Bhola
, “
CFD study on prediction of vortex shedding in draft tube of Francis turbine and vortex control techniques
,”
Renewable Energy
86
(
2
),
1406
1421
(
2016
).
You do not currently have access to this content.