With the appearance of cavitation, the two-phase flow of water and vapor around the turbine runner has non-homogeneous characteristics, and the propagation mode of the acoustic pressure wave in water changes significantly, leading to changes in the coupling mode between the structure and the surrounding water and affecting the vibration characteristics of the runner. The paper analyzes the effect of acoustic speed changing from 0<cc/c0<0.5 on the structure and acoustic-fluid modes of a prototype hydraulic turbine through numerical simulations. The results show that the coupling characteristics between cavitation flow and turbine runner can be classified into three variations. The first type is acoustic-fluid dominated coupling modes, which present the same modal characteristics as in pure water. The acoustic-fluid modes ffc1-ffc13 induce runner modes fsc1-fsc13 with lower frequencies and smaller modal displacement. This may cause acoustic resonance. The second type is the new acoustic-fluid coupling modes generated by the appearance of cavitation, leading to the mode transition phenomenon of the runner's 0ND (Zero Nodal Diameter), 1ND (One Nodal Diameter), 2ND (Two Nodal Diameter), and 3ND (Three Nodal Diameter) at low acoustic speed. The third type is the runner dominated coupling modes, which refer to the 0ND-3ND modes of the runner, and they induce the corresponding modes of the surrounding acoustic-fluid. The pressure distribution of the acoustic-fluid modes changes under cavitation, which results in different modal displacements at the trailing edge of the blade. The research results provide a scientific basis for the accurate judgment of the resonance phenomenon in hydraulic machinery.

1.
S.
Pang
,
B.
Zhu
,
Y.
Shen
et al, “
Study on suppression of cavitating vortex rope on pump-turbines by J-groove
,”
Appl. Energy
360
,
122843
(
2024
).
2.
D.
Frunzǎverde
,
S.
Muntean
,
G.
Mǎrginean
et al, “
Failure analysis of a Francis turbine runner
,”
IOP Conf Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci.
12
(
1
),
012115
(
2010
).
3.
X.
Liu
,
Y.
Luo
, and
Z.
Wang
, “
A review on fatigue damage mechanism in hydro turbines
,”
Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev.
54
,
1
14
(
2016
).
4.
T.
Liaghat
,
F.
Guibault
,
L.
Allenbach
et al, “
Two-way fluid-structure coupling in vibration and damping analysis of an oscillating hydrofoil
,” in
ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition
(
2014
).
5.
C. G.
Rodriguez
,
E.
Egusquiza
,
X.
Escaler
,
Q. W.
Liang
, and
F.
Avellan
, “
Experimental investigation of added mass effects on a Francis turbine runner in still water
,”
J. Fluids Struct.
22
(
5
),
699
712
(
2006
).
6.
M.
Amabili
,
G.
Frosali
, and
M. K.
Kwak
, “
Free vibrations of annular plates coupled with fluids
,”
J. Sound Vib.
191
(
5
),
825
846
(
1996
).
7.
M.
Amabili
and
M. K.
Kwak
, “
Free vibration of circular plates coupled with liquids: Revising the Lamb problem
,”
J. Fluids Struct.
10
(
7
),
743
761
(
1996
).
8.
M.
Amabili
and
M. K.
Kwak
, “
Vibration of circular plates on a free fluid surface: Effect of surface waves
,”
J. Sound Vib.
226
(
3
),
407
424
(
1999
).
9.
M. C.
Junger
and
D.
Feit
,
Sound, Structures, and Their Interaction
(
MIT Press
,
Cambridge
,
1986
).
10.
X.
Escaler
and
O.
De La Torre
, “
Axisymmetric vibrations of a circular Chladni plate in air and fully submerged in water
,”
J. Fluids Struct.
82
,
432
445
(
2018
).
11.
O. D. L.
Torre
,
X.
Escaler
,
E.
Egusquiza
, and
M.
Farhat
, “
Numerical and experimental study of a nearby solid boundary and partial submergence effects on hydrofoil added mass
,”
Comput. Fluids
91
,
1
9
(
2014
).
12.
W.
Wang
,
L. J.
Zhou
,
Z. W.
Wang
et al, “
Numerical investigation into the influence on hydrofoil vibrations of water tunnel test section acoustic modes
,”
J. Vib. Acoust.
141
(
5
),
051015
(
2019
).
13.
M.
Bossio
,
D.
Valentín
,
A.
Presas
,
D. R.
Martin
,
E.
Egusquiza
,
C.
Valero
, and
M.
Egusquiza
, “
Numerical study on the influence of acoustic natural frequencies on the dynamic behaviour of submerged and confined disk-like structures
,”
J. Fluids Struct.
73
,
53
69
(
2017
).
14.
A.
Ducoin
,
Y. L.
Young
, and
J. F.
Sigrist
, “
Hydroelastic responses of a flexible hydrofoil in turbulent, cavitating flow
,” in
ASME International Symposium on Fluid-Structure Interactions
, Montreal, Canada (
2010
).
15.
N. E.
Fine
,
J. S.
Uhlman
, and
D. C.
Kring
, “
Calculation of the added mass and damping forces on supercavitating bodies
,” in
Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Cavitation
(
2001
).
16.
A.
Lelong
,
P.
Guiffant
, and
J.
André Astolfi
, “
An experimental analysis of the structural response of flexible lightweight hydrofoils in cavitating flow
,”
J. Fluids Eng.
140
(
2
),
021116
1
021116
9
(
2018
).
17.
D. T.
Akcabay
,
E. J.
Chae
,
L. Y.
Young
,
A.
Ducoin
, and
J. A.
Astolfi
, “
Cavity induced vibration of flexible hydrofoils
,”
J. Fluids Struct.
49
(
8
),
463
484
(
2014
).
18.
X.
Liu
,
Y.
Luo
,
A.
Presas
,
Z. W.
Wang
, and
L. J.
Zhou
, “
Cavitation effects on the structural resonance of hydrodynamic turbines: Failure analysis in a real Francis turbine runner
,”
Energies
11
(
9
),
2320
(
2018
).
19.
X.
Huang
and
X.
Escaler
, “
Added mass effects on a francis turbine runner with attached blade cavitation
,”
Fluids
4
(
2
),
107
(
2019
).
20.
H.
Crein
and
E.
Coede
, “
Site experience with Francis turbines operating under very large head variations
,” in
Proceedings 17t IAHR Symposium
(
1994
).
21.
F.
Emmanuel
, “
Francis turbine operation at low heads-Case study of the FOZDO CHAPECO hydropower plant
,”
External Big Motor
2
,
47
50
(
2009
).
22.
O. D. L.
Torre
,
X.
Escaler
,
E.
Egusquiza
, and
M.
Farhat
, “
Experimental mode shape determination of a cantilevered hydrofoil under different flow conditions
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part C: J. Mech. Eng. Sci.
230
,
3408
3419
(
2016
).
23.
J. P.
Franc
, “
Physics and control of cavitation
,”
Heat Transfer
3
,
3
(
2006
).
24.
M.
Callenaere
,
J.
Franc
,
J.
Michel
, and
M.
Riondet
, “
The cavitation instability induced by the development of a re-entrant jet
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
444
,
223
256
(
2001
).
25.
K.
Laberteaux
and
S.
Ceccio
, “
Partial cavity flows. Part 1. Cavities forming on models without spanwise variation
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
431
,
1
41
(
2001
).
26.
K.
Laberteaux
and
S.
Ceccio
, “
Partial cavity flows. Part 2. Cavities forming on test objects with spanwise variation
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
431
,
43
63
(
2001
).
27.
C. E.
Brennen
,
Cavitation and Bubble Dynamics
(
Oxford University Press
,
New York
,
1995
).
28.
X.
Liu
,
Blade Crack Initiation/Propagation Prediction and Wet Modal Analysis during Cavitation of the Turbine Runner
(
Tsinghua University
,
Beijing
,
2016
).
29.
W.
Wang
,
L. J.
Zhou
,
Z. W.
Wang
et al, “
Numerical investigation into the effect of sound speed in attached cavitation on hydrofoil modes of vibration
,”
Energies
12
(
2
),
1758
(
2019
).
30.
ANSYS CFX
, “
Release 17.0, help system, theory guide
” (
ANSYS, Inc
,
2009
).
31.
K. J.
Bathe
,
Finite Element Procedures
(
Prentice-Hall
,
Englewood Cliffs, NJ
,
1996
).
32.
O. C.
Zienkiewicz
, “
Coupled vibrations of a structure submerged in a compressible fluid
,”
Proceedings of the of Symposium on Finite Element Techniques Held at the University of Stuttgart
(
1969
).
33.
R.
Parker
, “
Resonance effects in wake shedding from parallel plates: Some experimental observations
,”
J. Sound Vib.
4
(
1
),
62
72
(
1966
).
34.
R.
Parker
and
D.
Llewelyn
, “
Flow induced vibration of cantilever mounted flat plates in an enclosed passage: An experimental investigation
,”
J. Sound Vib.
25
(
3
),
451
463
(
1972
).
35.
R.
Parker
and
S. A. T.
Stoneman
, “
The excitation and consequences of acoustic resonances in enclosed fluid flow around solid bodies
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part C: J. Mech. Eng. Sci.
203
(
1
),
9
19
(
1989
).
You do not currently have access to this content.