In this paper, the response of a semi-submersible offshore wind turbine, combined with an absorbing wave energy converter (WEC), is analyzed within the FAST to AQWA coupling framework after single mooring line (ML) failure, under rated and extreme (1 in 10 years wind and wave) conditions. Comparisons are made among the six-degree of motions of the platform, power output, and tensions of the unbroken MLs. With upwind mooring line, the hybrid system suffers the most: surge up to 3.3 times the rotor diameter (D) due to the large hub forces and turbine power reduction by 80%, owing to the pitch response of the platform in both rated and extreme conditions; more likelihood of fatigue in unbroken ML under extreme conditions. Regardless of the failure line condition, the mean tension of the unbroken MLs reduces at the expense of larger motions, compared to a non-faulty line condition. The shutdown measures can reduce significantly the tensions in the MLs at rated conditions, owing to turbine larger influence on the platform than WEC, higher motion response and damping processes. The effect of the WEC on the platform is mainly reflected in heave and roll, providing more stability than in a stand-alone floating turbine case. During extreme conditions, the turbine shuts down, and thus, the response is more attributed to the drift of the platform rather than turbine or WEC operation. On a wider level, research is also needed to determine the response in simultaneously ML failures and misaligned operating flows.

1.
K.
Tanaka
,
I.
Sato
,
T.
Utsunomiya
, and
H.
Kakuya
, “
Validation of dynamic response of a 2-MW hybrid-spar floating wind turbine during typhoon using full-scale field data
,”
Ocean Eng.
218
,
108262
(
2020
).
2.
B. C.
Boren
, “
Distributed embedded energy converters for ocean wave energy harvesting: enabling a domain of transformative technologies
” (
National Renewable Energy Lab.(NREL)
,
2021
).
3.
Y. Q.
Zhang
,
W. Q.
Wei
,
J. H.
Zheng
,
B.
Peng
,
Y. R.
Qian
,
C. Y.
Li
,
Y.
Zheng
,
E.
Fernandez-Rodriguez
, and
A.
Yu
, “
Quantifying the surge-induced response of a floating tidal stream turbine under wave-current flows
,”
Energy
283
,
129072
(
2023
).
4.
Y. R.
Wang
,
Y. Q.
Zhang
,
Z.
Zhang
,
C.
Feng
, and
E.
Fernandez-Rodriguez
, “
Analysis of wake and power fluctuation of a tidal current turbine under variable wave periods
,”
Energy
304
,
132059
(
2024
).
5.
J. J.
Hu
,
B. Z.
Zhou
,
C.
Vogel
,
P.
Liu
,
R.
Willden
,
K.
Sun
,
J.
Zang
,
J.
Geng
,
P.
Jin
,
L.
Cui
,
B.
Jiang
, and
M.
Collu
, “
Optimal design and performance analysis of a hybrid system combing a floating wind platform and wave energy converters
,”
Appl Energ
269
,
114998
(
2020
).
6.
G.
Ayuso-Virgili
,
K.
Christakos
,
D.
Lande-Sudall
, and
N.
Lümmen
, “
Measure-correlate-predict methods to improve the assessment of wind and wave energy availability at a semi-exposed coastal area
,”
Energy
309
,
132904
(
2024
).
7.
J.
Xu
,
J. X.
Li
,
S. Q.
Pan
,
Y.
Yao
,
L.
Chen
, and
Z. Y.
Wu
, “
Assessment of wind and wave energy in China seas under climate change based on CMIP6 climate model
,”
Energy
310
,
133207
(
2024
).
8.
Y. N.
Li
,
S. Q.
Yan
,
H. D.
Shi
,
Q. W.
Ma
,
D. M.
Li
, and
F. F.
Cao
, “
Hydrodynamic analysis of a novel multi-buoy wind-wave energy system
,”
Renewable Energy
219
,
119477
(
2023
).
9.
Y.
Wen
,
B.
Kamranzad
, and
P. Z.
Lin
, “
Joint exploitation potential of offshore wind and wave energy along the south and southeast coasts of China
,”
Energy
249
,
123710
(
2022
).
10.
Y.
Si
,
Z.
Chen
,
W.
Zeng
,
J.
Sun
,
D.
Zhang
,
X.
Ma
, and
P.
Qian
, “
The influence of power-take-off control on the dynamic response and power output of combined semi-submersible floating wind turbine and point-absorber wave energy converters
,”
Ocean Eng.
227
,
108835
(
2021
).
11.
H. R.
Ghafari
,
H.
Ghassemi
, and
G. H.
He
, “
Numerical study of the Wavestar wave energy converter with multi-point-absorber around DeepCwind semisubmersible floating platform
,”
Ocean Eng.
232
,
109177
(
2021
).
12.
Z. S.
Cheng
,
T. R.
Wen
,
M. C.
Ong
, and
K.
Wang
, “
Power performance and dynamic responses of a combined floating vertical axis wind turbine and wave energy converter concept
,”
Energy
171
,
190
(
2019
).
13.
C.
Barrera
,
T.
Battistella
,
R.
Guanche
, and
I. J.
Losada
, “
Mooring system fatigue analysis of a floating offshore wind turbine
,”
Ocean Eng.
195
,
106670
(
2020
).
14.
W. Z.
Jia
,
M. N.
Yue
,
W. P.
Miao
,
Y.
Yang
, and
C.
Li
, “
Dynamic analysis of a 5 MW Barge-type FOWT with two-mooring failure of wind-wave misalignment scenarios
,”
Ocean Eng.
285
,
115456
(
2023
).
15.
H. Y.
Wu
,
Y. S.
Zhao
,
Y. P.
He
,
Y. L.
Shao
,
W. G.
Mao
,
Z. L.
Han
,
C.
Huang
,
X. L.
Gu
, and
Z. Y.
Jiang
, “
Transient response of a TLP-type floating offshore wind turbine under tendon failure conditions
,”
Ocean Eng.
220
,
108486
(
2021
).
16.
Y.
Yang
,
M.
Bashir
,
C.
Li
, and
J.
Wang
, “
Investigation on mooring breakage effects of a 5 MW barge-type floating offshore wind turbine using F2A
,”
Ocean Eng.
233
,
108887
(
2021
).
17.
P. A.
Berthelsen
, “Qualification of innovative floating substructures for 10MW wind turbines and water depths greater than 50m” (
2015
).
18.
E. J.
Ransley
,
D. M.
Greaves
,
A.
Raby
,
D.
Simmonds
,
M. M.
Jakobsen
, and
M.
Kramer
, “
RANS-VOF modelling of the Wavestar point absorber
,”
Renewable Energy
109
,
49
(
2017
).
19.
W. E.
Cummins
, “
The impulse response function and ship motions
” (
Department of the Navy, David W. Taylor Model Basin, Hydromechanics Laboratory, Research and Development Report
,
2010
).
20.
B.
Zhou
,
J.
Hu
,
K.
Sun
,
Y.
Liu
, and
M.
Collu
, “
Motion response and energy conversion performance of a heaving point absorber wave energy converter
,”
Front. Energy Res.
8
,
553295
(
2020
).
21.
C.
Han
,
T.
You-gang
,
T.
Haicheng
, and
Q.
Yao
, “
Design and frequency domain analysis of semi-submersible floating foundation for offshore wind turbine
,”
Ocean Eng
31
,
61
(
2013
).
22.
S. H.
Jeon
,
Y. U.
Cho
,
M. W.
Seo
,
J. R.
Cho
, and
W. B.
Jeong
, “
Dynamic response of floating substructure of spar-type offshore wind turbine with catenary mooring cables
,”
Ocean Eng.
72
,
356
(
2013
).
23.
C.
Windt
,
J.
Davidson
,
E. J.
Ransley
,
D.
Greaves
,
M.
Jakobsen
,
M.
Kramer
, and
J. V.
Ringwood
, “
Validation of a CFD-based numerical wave tank model for the power production assessment of the wavestar ocean wave energy converter
,”
Renewable Energy
146
,
2499
(
2020
).
24.
Y.
Yang
,
M.
Bashir
,
C.
Michailides
,
C.
Li
, and
J.
Wang
, “
Development and application of an aero-hydro-servo-elastic coupling framework for analysis of floating offshore wind turbines
,”
Renewable Energy
161
,
606
(
2020
).
You do not currently have access to this content.