The homogeneous mixture model (HMM) is widely in use for simulation of cavitating flows. The mass transfer is typically ruled by simplified models whose efficiency is strictly dependent on the empirical choice of vaporization/condensation constants. In the present paper, we formulate a physically based mass-transfer model relying on the solution of the complete Rayleigh–Plesset (RP) equation. The latter can model the elasticity of the bubbles and non-linear interaction with the external pressure field. The model is tested in different configurations, also considering comparisons with the Schnerr–Sauer model (SSm) and the linearized version of the RP equation. The preliminary simplified tests show that the SS model responds statically to pressure variations and thus in not able to reproduce the actual dynamics of cavitation, under certain circumstances. On the other hand, the linearized RP model (RPl), although dynamically responsive to pressure variations, produces unrealistic small-amplitude bubble fluctuations, whereas the complete RP model (RPc) gives more realistic results. Tests on the performance of the SSm and RP models were carried out considering the turbulent flow in a convergent–divergent Venturi channel, already tested in numerical and experimental reference research. Here, we use the incompressible HMM. The study highlights various crucial aspects of the RPc model, emphasizing its own ability in replicating the shedding cycle as a three-dimensional, and non-stationary phenomenon. On the other hand, the SSm model results as a valid approximation for initial growth stages but fails to capture complex dynamics during the collapse phase. The results are consistent with recent literature findings, and refinements in grid resolution enhance accuracy in capturing the non-stationary sheet-to-cloud vapor dynamics. Neglecting compressibility may account for disparities between numerical and experimental outcomes, especially concerning shock waves generation and propagation. The RPc model emerges as a good candidate in reproducing bubble cloud dynamics and, in the next future, can be implemented in compressible HMM.
Skip Nav Destination
,
Article navigation
April 2024
Research Article|
April 23 2024
Rayleigh–Plesset-based Eulerian mixture model for cavitating flows
M. Cianferra
;
M. Cianferra
a)
(Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Validation, Writing – original draft)
Department of Engineering and Architecture, University of Trieste
, Trieste, Italy
a)Author to whom correspondence should be addressed: [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
V. Armenio
V. Armenio
(Conceptualization, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing)
Department of Engineering and Architecture, University of Trieste
, Trieste, Italy
Search for other works by this author on:
M. Cianferra
a)
V. Armenio
Department of Engineering and Architecture, University of Trieste
, Trieste, Italy
a)Author to whom correspondence should be addressed: [email protected]
Physics of Fluids 36, 043327 (2024)
Article history
Received:
December 22 2023
Accepted:
March 28 2024
Citation
M. Cianferra, V. Armenio; Rayleigh–Plesset-based Eulerian mixture model for cavitating flows. Physics of Fluids 1 April 2024; 36 (4): 043327. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0193567
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
Phase behavior of Cacio e Pepe sauce
G. Bartolucci, D. M. Busiello, et al.
How to cook pasta? Physicists view on suggestions for energy saving methods
Phillip Toultchinski, Thomas A. Vilgis
Pour-over coffee: Mixing by a water jet impinging on a granular bed with avalanche dynamics
Ernest Park, Margot Young, et al.
Related Content
Multiscale modeling of different cavitating flow patterns around NACA66 hydrofoil
Physics of Fluids (October 2022)
Investigation of cavitation shedding mechanisms including reentrant jet and shock wave by Eulerian–Lagrangian multiscale simulation
Physics of Fluids (March 2024)
Euler–Lagrange study of cavitating turbulent flow around a hydrofoil
Physics of Fluids (November 2021)
On the connection between Lagrangian and Eulerian metrics for recurrent particulate flows
Physics of Fluids (November 2020)
Numerical investigation of how gap size influences tip leakage vortex cavitation inception using a Eulerian – Lagrangian method
Physics of Fluids (January 2023)