A long-standing question in the Reynolds-averaged modeling of turbulent flow is how to predict accurately flows with temporal or spatial unsteadiness. In this paper, we present a “return to equilibrium” approach to modeling the unsteady Reynolds stress anisotropy bij in terms of differential transport equations, the solutions to which are constrained by algebraic closures for bij in flows at equilibrium and by the corresponding rapid-distortion-theory solutions for flows far from equilibrium. When coupled with scale equations for the turbulent kinetic energy and the dissipation rate, these anisotropy evolution equations comprise a complete closure scheme for which no additional model coefficients are required. Evaluations of this closure scheme, in which two different existing equilibrium algebraic models for bij were employed, were carried out for homogeneous turbulence in flows with a step imposition of shear, with continuously oscillatory shear at different frequencies and with a prescribed time-dependent plane-strain rate. Good agreement was achieved between model predictions and experimental/simulation target data in all test cases, with either Girimaji's bij model or a structure-based bij model used as the equilibrium algebraic closure.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
March 2024
Research Article|
March 07 2024
“Return to equilibrium” anisotropy model for non-equilibrium Reynolds stress closures
G. J. Brereton
G. J. Brereton
a)
(Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Writing – original draft)
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Michigan State University
, East Lansing, Michigan 48824-1226, USA a)Author to whom correspondence should be addressed: [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
a)Author to whom correspondence should be addressed: [email protected]
Physics of Fluids 36, 035121 (2024)
Article history
Received:
December 20 2023
Accepted:
February 11 2024
Citation
G. J. Brereton; “Return to equilibrium” anisotropy model for non-equilibrium Reynolds stress closures. Physics of Fluids 1 March 2024; 36 (3): 035121. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0192839
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
114
Views
Citing articles via
Chinese Academy of Science Journal Ranking System (2015–2023)
Cruz Y. Li (李雨桐), 李雨桐, et al.
On Oreology, the fracture and flow of “milk's favorite cookie®”
Crystal E. Owens, Max R. Fan (范瑞), et al.
Physics-informed neural networks for solving Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes equations
Hamidreza Eivazi, Mojtaba Tahani, et al.
Related Content
Further assessments of a “return to equilibrium” anisotropy model for non-equilibrium Reynolds stress closures
Physics of Fluids (January 2025)
A mapping closure for turbulent scalar mixing using a time‐evolving reference field
Physics of Fluids A: Fluid Dynamics (December 1992)
Scale-resolving simulations of turbulent flows with coherent structures: Toward cut-off dependent data-driven closure modeling
Physics of Fluids (June 2024)
Conditional mixing statistics in a self-similar scalar mixing layer
Physics of Fluids (September 2005)
Reynolds stress closure for nonequilibrium effects in turbulent flows
Physics of Fluids (November 2008)