The measurement of particle volume fraction in flow fields is of great significance in scientific research and engineering applications. As one of the particle detection techniques, the light extinction method is widely used in measuring nano-particles volume fraction in flow fields due to its simplicity and non-contact nature. In particular, in complex reactive flow fields like combustion reactions, the volume fraction of soot particulate and other particles can be accurately measured and reconstructed via the light extinction method that based on the Beer–Lambert law. This is crucial for exploring combustion phenomena, understanding their internal mechanisms, and reducing pollutant emissions. However, due to the enormous computational burden, current algebra reconstruction techniques struggle to achieve high-precision three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction of particles. Therefore, this paper originally proposes a 3D reconstruction algorithm based on the Beer–Lambert law physical information neural networks (LB-PINNs). By incorporating physical information as constraints into the particle reconstruction process, it is possible to achieve high-precision 3D reconstruction of particles in complex flow field environments with low computational cost. Meanwhile, to address the trade-off issues of reconstruction accuracy and smooth noise resistance in previous reconstruction algorithms, i.e., Tikhonov regularization, this paper employs dynamically adjusted regularization parameters in the LB-PINN algorithm. This approach ensures smooth noise-resistant processing while maintaining reconstruction accuracy, significantly reducing computation time and resource consumption. According to the experimental results, LB-PINNs demonstrate superior performance compared to previous reconstruction algorithms when reconstructing the soot volume fraction in complex reacting flow fields, i.e., combustion flame scenarios.

1.
H. I.
Schiff
,
G. I.
Mackay
, and
J.
Bechara
, “
The use of tunable diode laser absorption spectroscopy for atmospheric measurements
,”
Res. Chem. Intermed.
20
,
525
556
(
1994
).
2.
Y.
Wang
and
R. K.
Wang
, “
Measurement of particle concentration in flow by statistical analyses of optical coherence tomography signals
,”
Opt. Lett.
36
,
2143
2145
(
2011
).
3.
V. L.
Kasyutich
and
P. A.
Martin
, “
Towards a two-dimensional concentration and temperature laser absorption tomography sensor system
,”
Appl. Phys. B
102
,
149
162
(
2011
).
4.
M.
Jiang
et al, “
Measuring particle size and concentration of non-spherical particles by combined light extinction and scattering method
,”
Measurement
184
,
109911
(
2021
).
5.
A.
Katsevich
, “
An improved exact filtered backprojection algorithm for spiral computed tomography
,”
Adv. Appl. Math.
32
,
681
697
(
2004
).
6.
E. W.
Hansen
and
P.-L.
Law
, “
Recursive methods for computing the Abel transform and its inverse
,”
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A
2
,
510
520
(
1985
).
7.
S.
Manzhos
and
H.-P.
Loock
, “
Photofragment image analysis using the Onion-Peeling Algorithm
,”
Comput. Phys. Commun.
154
,
76
87
(
2003
).
8.
K. J.
Daun
et al, “
Deconvolution of axisymmetric flame properties using Tikhonov regularization
,”
Appl. Opt.
45
(
19
),
4638
4646
(
2006
).
9.
R.
Gordon
,
R.
Bender
, and
G. T.
Herman
, “
Algebraic Reconstruction Techniques (ART) for three-dimensional electron microscopy and X-ray photography
,”
J. Theor. Biol.
29
(
3
),
471
481
(
1970
).
10.
A. H.
Andersen
and
A. C.
Kak
, “
Simultaneous algebraic reconstruction technique (SART): A superior implementation of the art algorithm
,”
Ultrason. Imaging
6
(
1
),
81
94
(
1984
).
11.
L. A.
Shepp
and
Y.
Vardi
, “
Maximum likelihood reconstruction for emission tomography
,”
IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging
1
(
2
),
113
122
(
1982
).
12.
T.
Yu
and
W.
Cai
, “
Benchmark evaluation of inversion algorithms for tomographic absorption spectroscopy
,”
Appl. Opt.
56
(
8
),
2183
2194
(
2017
).
13.
C.
Shui
et al, “
Benchmark evaluation of tomographic algorithms for simultaneous reconstruction of temperature and volume fraction fields of soot and metal-oxide nanoparticles in non-uniform flames
,”
Sci. China Technol. Sci.
64
,
237
250
(
2021
).
14.
T.
Yu
et al, “
Rapid tomographic reconstruction based on machine learning for time-resolved combustion diagnostics
,”
Rev. Sci. Instrum.
89
(
4
),
043101
(
2018
).
15.
J.
Huang
,
H.
Liu
, and
W.
Cai
, “
Tomographic reconstruction for 3D flame imaging using convolutional neural networks
,” in
Proceedings of the 12th Asia-Pacific Conference on Combustion (ASPACC)
,
2019
.
16.
B.
Ogunjumelo
,
M. M.
Hossain
,
G.
Lu
, and
A.
Khan
, “
Tomographic imaging and deep learning based reconstruction of burner flames
,” in
IEEE International Conference on Imaging Systems and Techniques (IST)
,
Copenhagen, Denmark
,
2023
.
17.
G.
Kissas
,
Y.
Yang
,
E.
Hwuang
,
W. R.
Witschey
,
J. A.
Detre
, and
P.
Perdikaris
, “
Machine learning in cardiovascular flows modeling: Predicting arterial blood pressure from non-invasive 4D flow MRI data using physics-informed neural networks
,”
Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng.
358
,
112623
(
2020
).
18.
L.
Sun
,
H.
Gao
,
S.
Pan
, and
J.-X.
Wang
, “
Surrogate modeling for fluid flows based on physics-constrained deep learning without simulation data
,”
Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng.
361
,
112732
(
2020
).
19.
M.
Jafargholi
et al, “
Laminar syngas–air premixed flames in a closed rectangular domain: DNS of flame propagation and flame/wall interactions
,”
Combust. Flame
188
,
453
468
(
2018
).
20.
K. C.
Smyth
and
C. R.
Shaddix
, “
The elusive history of m∼ = 1.57 – 0.56i for the refractive index of soot
,”
Combust. Flame
107
(
3
),
314
320
(
1996
).
21.
Q.
Wang
,
Z.
Li
,
Z.
Sun
et al, “
Simultaneous soot multi-parameter fields predictions in laminar sooting flames from neural network-based flame luminosity measurement I: Methodology
,”
Opt. Lett.
46
,
3869
3872
(
2021
).
22.
Q.
Wang
et al, “
Experimental characterization of the different nitrogen dilution effects on soot formation in ethylene diffusion flames
,”
Proc. Combust. Inst.
36
,
3227
3235
(
2017
).
23.
S.
Discetti
and
Y.
Liu
, “
Machine learning for flow field measurements: A perspective
,”
Meas. Sci. Technol.
34
,
021001
(
2023
).
24.
Q.
Wang
,
Z.
Yan
,
C.
Li
et al, “
The effect of ammonia on soot formation in ethylene diffusion flames
,”
Sci. China Technol. Sci.
66
,
3422
3438
(
2023
).
25.
R.
Byers
and
S.
Matcher
, “
Attenuation of stripe artifacts in optical coherence tomography images through wavelet-FFT filtering
,”
Biomed. Opt. Express
10
,
4179
4189
(
2019
).
You do not currently have access to this content.