Fluid–structure interactions of a synthetic badminton shuttlecock at various flight speeds are investigated computationally. The cork of the shuttlecock is held fixed and its skirt is free to deform. The cross-sectional area of the skirt decreases with an increase in flight speed leading to a significant reduction in the drag compared to that for an undeformed shuttlecock. Four regimes of deformation, with an increase in speed, are identified. The deformation is steady and axisymmetric in regime 1. Beyond a certain speed, which is referred to as “buckling speed,” the deformation is in regime 2. The skirt assumes a non-axisymmetric shape with a significant increase in its rate of deformation with speed. It undergoes vibration in regime 3. The amplitude of vibration increases with increased speed. In regime 4, the vibrations are modulated atop a lower frequency wave that travels circumferentially along the skirt. Compared to a rigid shuttlecock at the same flow speed, the streamwise vortex structures inside the skirt are weaker in a deformed shuttlecock. The decrease in the drag coefficient with an increase in speed is due to a decrease in the cross-sectional area of the skirt as well as a reduction in the entrainment of the flow through the gaps in the skirt area. The computational results are in good agreement with the available experimental measurements. The effect of the elastic modulus of the material and various structural reinforcements is studied.

1.
See t.ly/QApl for
B.
Clement
, “
Badminton second to soccer in participation worldwide
” (
2004
).
2.
See https://olympic.ca/2014/09/11/shuttlecock-and-balls-the-fastest-moving-objects-in-sport/ for
M.
Nadolny
, “
Shuttlecock and balls: The fastest moving objects in sport
” (
2014
).
3.
K.
Shah
,
R.
Shakya
, and
S.
Mittal
, “
Aerodynamic forces on projectiles used in various sports
,”
Phys. Fluids
31
,
015106
(
2019
).
4.
A. J.
Cooke
, “
Shuttlecock aerodynamics
,”
Sports Eng.
2
,
85
96
(
1999
).
5.
F.
Alam
,
C.
Nutakom
, and
H.
Chowdhury
, “
Effect of porosity of badminton shuttlecock on aerodynamic drag
,”
Procedia Eng.
112
,
430
435
(
2015
), ‘The Impact of Technology on Sport VI’ 7th Asia-Pacific Congress on Sports Technology, APCST2015.
6.
S.
Kitta
,
H.
Hasegawa
,
M.
Murakami
, and
S.
Obayashi
, “
Aerodynamic properties of a shuttlecock with spin at high Reynolds number
,”
Procedia Eng.
13
,
271
277
(
2011
).
7.
C. M.
Chan
and
J. S.
Rossmann
, “
Badminton shuttlecock aerodynamics: Synthesizing experiment and theory
,”
Sports Eng.
15
,
61
71
(
2012
).
8.
A.
Verma
,
A.
Desai
, and
S.
Mittal
, “
Aerodynamics of badminton shuttlecocks
,”
J. Fluids Struct.
41
,
89
98
(
2013
), Special Issue on Bluff Body Flows (Blubof2011).
9.
A.
Cooke
, “
Computer simulation of shuttlecock trajectories
,”
Sports Eng.
5
,
93
105
(
2002
).
10.
J.
Hart
,
J.
Potts
, and
D.
James
, “
Comparison of turbulence modelling approaches in simulation of a feather shuttle: A porous conical bluff body
,”
Sports Eng.
21
,
465
(
2018
).
11.
C.
Lin
,
C.
Chua
, and
J.
Yeo
, “
Aerodynamics of badminton shuttlecock: Characterization of flow around a conical skirt with gaps, behind a hemispherical dome
,”
J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn.
127
,
29
39
(
2014
).
12.
T.-M. T.
Woo
and
F.
Alam
, “
Comparative aerodynamics of synthetic badminton shuttlecocks
,”
Sports Eng.
21
,
21
29
(
2018
).
13.
B. E.
Launder
and
D. B.
Spalding
, “
The numerical computation of turbulent flows
,” in
Numerical Prediction of Flow, Heat Transfer, Turbulence and Combustion
(
Elsevier
,
1983
), pp.
96
116
.
14.
J.
Han
,
Y.
Shui
,
L.
Nie
, and
G.
Chen
, “
Unsteady flow control mechanisms of a bio-inspired flexible flap with the fluid–structure interaction
,”
Phys. Fluids
35
,
057124
(
2023
).
15.
H.
Moradi
,
A.
Rahbar Ranji
,
H.
Haddadpour
, and
H.
Moghadas
, “
A hybrid model for simulation of fluid–structure interaction in water entry problems
,”
Phys. Fluids
33
,
017102
(
2021
).
16.
Y.
Zheng
,
Y.
Dai
,
C.
Yang
,
Y.
Li
, and
Y.
Hu
, “
Effect of wingtip bending morphing on gust-induced aerodynamics based on fluid-structure interaction method
,”
Phys. Fluids
35
,
115124
(
2023
).
17.
S.
Horcas
,
T.
Barlas
,
F.
Zahle
, and
N.
Sørensen
, “
Vortex induced vibrations of wind turbine blades: Influence of the tip geometry
,”
Phys. Fluids
32
,
065104
(
2020
).
18.
Y.-N.
Zhang
,
X.
Qiu
,
F.-P.
Chen
,
K.-H.
Liu
,
X.-R.
Dong
, and
C.
Liu
, “
A selected review of vortex identification methods with applications
,”
J. Hydrodyn.
30
,
767
779
(
2018
).
19.
J. C. R.
Hunt
,
A. A.
Wray
, and
P.
Moin
, “
Eddies, streams, and convergence zones in turbulent flows
,” in
Proceedings of the Summer Program
(
Center for Turbulence Research
,
1988
), pp.
193
208
.
20.
J.
Jeong
and
F.
Hussain
, “
On the identification of a vortex
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
285
,
69
94
(
1995
).
21.
C.
Liu
,
Y.
Wang
,
Y.
Yang
, and
Z.
Duan
, “
New omega vortex identification method
,”
Sci. China Phys., Mech. Astron.
59
,
684711
(
2016
).
22.
B.
Epps
, “
Review of vortex identification methods
,” AIAA 2017-0989,
2017
.
23.
S.
Mittal
,
J. S. S.
Pandi
, and
M.
Hore
, “
Cellular vortex shedding from a cylinder at low Reynolds number
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
915
,
A74
(
2021
).
24.
J. S.
Samuthira Pandi
and
S.
Mittal
, “
Wake transitions and laminar separation bubble in the flow past an Eppler 61 airfoil
,”
Phys. Fluids
31
,
114102
(
2019
).
25.
J. S. S.
Pandi
and
S.
Mittal
, “
Streamwise vortices, cellular shedding and force coefficients on finite wing at low Reynolds number
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
958
,
A10
(
2023
).
You do not currently have access to this content.