This study aims to investigate the impact of microbursts, which are a common meteorological phenomenon, on aircraft performance. A multiphase computational fluid dynamics model has been developed to simulate the microburst-generated downdraft environment over an airfoil. The simulations were conducted at a 12° angle of attack for takeoff conditions with a Reynolds number of 2 × 10 5⁠. The lift and drag coefficients were compared to experimental results and exhibited a strong correlation. Additionally, this study examined the volume of fluid and the coefficient of pressure distribution. It also examined the boundary-layer velocity profiles at five different chord positions, the location of rivulet formation on the upper surface of the airfoil, and water film height. The results revealed a maximum variation of 72.18% and 16.53% in lift and drag coefficients, respectively, between the numerical and experimental results. These findings provide valuable insight into the effects of microbursts on aircraft performance and have implications for the aviation industry.

Topics
Energy tower, Weather hazard, Atmospheric science, Aviation, Aircraft, Failure analysis, Computational fluid dynamics, Turbulence theory and modelling, Aerodynamics, Fluid drag
1.
J.
McCarthy
, “
Low-altitude wind shear: A 15-year retrospective
,” in
Workshop on Wind Shear and Wind Shear Alert Systems
(
American Meteorological Society
,
Boston
,
1996
), pp.
1
–
13
.
Google Scholar
 
2.
A.
O' Connor
 and
D.
Kearney
, “
Evaluating the effect of turbulence on aircraft during landing and take-off phases
,”
IJAAA.
5
(
4
),
10
(
2018
).
https://doi.org/10.15394/ijaaa.2018.1284
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
3.
Civil Aviation Authority
,
Missed Approaches in Response to Onboard Windshear Alerts
(
International Civil Aviation Organization
,
2013
).
4.
Flight Safety Foundation
,
Flight Safety Foundation Alar Tool Kit, Briefing Note 5.4 Wind Shear
(
Flight Safety Foundation
,
2009
).
5.
International Civil Aviation Organization
,
Manual on Low-Level Wind Shear
,
1st ed.
(
International Civil Aviation Organization
,
2005
).
6.
J.
Albright
,
Wind Shear: Has It Been Tamed?
(
Business & Commercial Aviation
,
2015
).
Google Scholar
 
7.
G.
Zhenxing
,
G.
Hongbin
, and
L.
Hui
, “
Real-time simulation of large aircraft flying through microburst wind field
,”
Chin. J. Aeronaut.
22
(
2009
),
459
–
466
(
2009
).
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1000-9361(08)60126-0
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
8.
M.
Cavcar
, “
Bréguet range equation?
,”
J. Aircr.
43
(
5
),
1542
–
1544
(
2006
).
https://doi.org/10.2514/1.17696
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
9.
W. K.
Binienda
, “
Special issue on mechanics of advanced materials and structures
,”
J. Aerosp. Eng.
24
(
2
),
146
(
2011
).
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0000087
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
10.
N. T.
Nguyen
 and
M. R.
Jovanovic
, “
Microburst effects on small unmanned aerial vehicles: Simulation and experimental results
,”
J. Aircr.
54
(
1
),
137
–
146
(
2017
).
Google Scholar
 
11.
Y.
Li
,
X.
Liu
,
Z.
Sun
, and
H.
Li
, “
CFD analysis of low Reynolds number airfoils in microburst environments
,”
J. Aerosp. Eng.
34
(
1
),
040207
(
2021
).
Google Scholar
 
12.
S.
Vora
,
S.
Sangle
, and
O. N.
Ramesh
, “
Aerodynamic response of quadrotor micro air vehicle in microburst conditions
,”
J. Aircr.
57
(
5
),
1665
–
1673
(
2020
).
Google Scholar
 
13.
C.
Papachristos
 and
P. J.
Papakanellos
, “
A brief overview of a simple and efficient windshear doppler-radar detector for aircraft early warning
,”
Int. J. Comput. Eng. Res.
13
(
1
),
1
–
8
(
2023
).
Google Scholar
 
14.
V.
Somashekar
 and
A.
Immanuel Selwynraj
, “
Numerical study of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) in dry microburst environment using large eddy simulation (LES) model
,”
AEAT.
94
(
7
),
1170
–
1179
(
2022
).
https://doi.org/10.1108/AEAT-10-2021-0308
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
15.
A. T.
Johnson
,
M.
Shumko
,
B.
Griffith
,
D. M.
Klumpar
,
J.
Sample
,
L.
Springer
,
N.
Leh
,
H. E.
Spence
,
S.
Smith
,
A.
Crew
, and
M.
Handley
, “
The FIREBIRD-II CubeSat mission: Focused investigations of relativistic electron burst intensity, range, and dynamics
,”
Rev. Sci. Instrum.
91
(
3
),
034503
(
2020
).
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5137905
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
PubMed
 
16.
E.
Mohajeri
,
S. H.
Pourtakdoust
, and
F.
Pazooki
, “
Model-based microburst identification using a hybridized extended Kalman filter with genetic algorithm
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. G J. Aerosp. Eng.
237
(
5
),
1212
–
1236
(
2023
).
https://doi.org/10.1177/09544100221119864
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
17.
X.
Fang
,
J.
Jiang
, and
W. H.
Chen
, “
Model predictive control with wind preview for aircraft forced landing
,”
IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst.
59
,
3995
(
2023
).
https://doi.org/10.1109/TAES.2023.3235321
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
18.
T. N.
Trask
, “
The impact of unmanned aircraft system observations on convection initiation along a boundary in numerical weather prediction
,”
Doctoral Dissertation
(
The University of North Dakota
,
2023
).
Google Scholar
 
19.
V.
Somashekar
 and
A.
Immanuel Selwynraj
, “
Experimental study of microburst effects on airfoil for Micro/Unmanned Aerial Vehicle applications
,”
Proc. AIP
2316
(
1
),
020002
(
2021
).
Google Scholar
 
20.
V.
Somashekar
 and
A.
Immanuel Selwynraj
, “
Comparative study on the prediction of aerodynamic characteristics of mini-unmanned aerial vehicle with turbulence models
,”
Int. J. Aviat. Aeronaut. Aerosp.
8
(
1
),
7
(
2021
).
Google Scholar
 
21.
V.
Somashekar
 and
A.
Immanuel Selwynraj
, “
Design of airfoil for low Reynolds number flights using python automation code
,” in
IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering
(
IOP Publishing
,
2021
), Vol.
1123
, p.
012010
.
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
© 2023 Author(s). Published under an exclusive license by AIP Publishing.
2023
Author(s)
You do not currently have access to this content.