Hinged arrays have garnered increasing interest due to their potential to provide flexible and adaptable solutions for the various challenges faced in ocean development. The effectiveness of these arrays in engineering applications heavily depends on the motion characteristics of each individual module, rather than specific modules, such as the one with the strongest motion. However, the presence of hinge constraints results in coupled motion responses of all modules instead of independent ones. The objective of this study is to investigate the motion behavior of large arrays formed by multiple floaters hinged together, while existing literature mainly focused on two-body hinged systems. Based on the potential flow theory and Rankine source panel method, a numerical program was developed to calculate the hydrodynamic interactions and the coupled motion responses. First, a model test was conducted to validate the developed frequency-domain simulations. A good agreement was achieved. Then, the effects of hinge constraints, the number of modules, and two external constraints on the motion responses of the entire array were discussed. The results indicated that the heave motion of the array subjected to hinge constraints was significantly suppressed, but a strong pitch motion occurred in a larger wavelength range. For hinged arrays, the floaters located at the two ends were most likely to be excited with the strongest motions. Moreover, a shorter hinged array could be used to quantify the trends in the motion of arrays with more floaters. The calculation results also revealed that the motion responses of a hinged array were highly sensitive to the external constraints, e.g., mooring lines.

1.
H.
Behera
,
C.-O.
Ng
, and
T.
Sahoo
, “
Oblique wave scattering by a floating elastic plate over a porous bed in single and two-layer fluid systems
,”
Ocean Eng.
159
,
280
294
(
2018
).
2.
S. A.
Selvan
and
H.
Behera
, “
Wave energy dissipation by a floating circular flexible porous membrane in single and two-layer fluids
,”
Ocean Eng.
206
,
107374
(
2020
).
3.
R.
Gayathri
,
M. B.
Khan
,
H.
Behera
, and
C.-C.
Tsai
, “
Wave attenuation by a submerged circular porous membrane
,”
J. Ocean Eng. Sci.
(published online) (
2022
).
4.
M. M.
Hossain
,
C.-C.
Tsai
, and
H.
Behera
, “
Instability mechanism of shear-layered fluid in the presence of a floating elastic plate
,”
Phys. Fluids
35
,
027102
(
2023
).
5.
H.
Liang
,
S.
Zheng
,
Y.
Shao
,
K. H.
Chua
,
Y. S.
Choo
, and
D.
Greaves
, “
Water wave scattering by impermeable and perforated plates
,”
Phys. Fluids
33
,
077111
(
2021
).
6.
Z.
Liu
and
Y.
Wang
, “
Numerical studies of submerged moored box-type floating breakwaters with different shapes of cross-sections using SPH
,”
Coastal Eng.
158
,
103687
(
2020
).
7.
R.
Halder
,
M.
Damodaran
, and
B.
Khoo
, “
Deep learning-driven nonlinear reduced-order models for predicting wave-structure interaction
,”
Ocean Eng.
280
,
114511
(
2023
).
8.
K.
Shi
and
R.
Zhu
, “
Efficient spectral coupled boundary element method for fully nonlinear wave-structure interaction simulation
,”
Phys. Fluids
35
,
057121
(
2023
).
9.
H.
Kagemoto
and
D. K.
Yue
, “
Interactions among multiple three-dimensional bodies in water waves: n exact algebraic method
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
166
,
189
209
(
1986
).
10.
M.
Ohkusu
, “
Hydrodynamic forces on multiple cylinders in waves
,” in
Proceedings of the International Symposium Dynamics of Marine Vehicles and Structures in Waves
,
1974
.
11.
M. J.
Simon
, “
Multiple scattering in arrays of axisymmetric wave-energy devices. Part 1. A matrix method using a plane-wave approximation
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
120
,
1
25
(
1982
).
12.
J.-S.
Goo
and
K.
Yoshida
, “
A numerical method for huge semisubmersible responses in waves
,”
Soc. Nav. Archit. Mar. Eng., Trans.
98
,
365
387
(
1990
).
13.
B.
Borgarino
,
A.
Babarit
, and
P.
Ferrant
, “
Impact of wave interactions effects on energy absorption in large arrays of wave energy converters
,”
Ocean Eng.
41
,
79
88
(
2012
).
14.
D.
Zhang
,
Z.-M.
Yuan
,
J.
Du
, and
H.
Li
, “
Hydrodynamic modelling of large arrays of modularized floating structures with independent oscillations
,”
Appl. Ocean Res.
129
,
103371
(
2022
).
15.
Wadam
, “
Wave analysis by diffraction and Morison theory
,”
SESAM User Manual
(
Wadam
,
2019
).
16.
I.
Diamantoulaki
and
D. C.
Angelides
, “
Analysis of performance of hinged floating breakwaters
,”
Eng. Struct.
32
,
2407
2423
(
2010
).
17.
S.
Zheng
,
Y.
Zhang
, and
W.
Sheng
, “
Maximum theoretical power absorption of connected floating bodies under motion constraints
,”
Appl. Ocean Res.
58
,
95
103
(
2016
).
18.
E.
Loukogeorgaki
,
E. N.
Lentsiou
,
M.
Aksel
, and
O.
Yagci
, “
Experimental investigation of the hydroelastic and the structural response of a moored pontoon-type modular floating breakwater with flexible connectors
,”
Coastal Eng.
121
,
240
254
(
2017
).
19.
H.
Zhao
,
D.
Xu
,
H.
Zhang
,
S.
Xia
,
Q.
Shi
,
R.
Ding
, and
Y.
Wu
, “
An optimization method for stiffness configuration of flexible connectors for multi-modular floating systems
,”
Ocean Eng.
181
,
134
144
(
2019
).
20.
S.
Xia
,
D.
Xu
,
H.
Zhang
,
Q.
Shi
,
G.
Wen
, and
Y.
Wu
, “
Motion mitigation of hinged floating structures by adaptive control
,”
Ocean Eng.
216
,
107700
(
2020
).
21.
C.
Ma
,
C.-W.
Bi
,
Z.
Xu
, and
Y.-P.
Zhao
, “
Dynamic behaviors of a hinged multi-body floating aquaculture platform under regular waves
,”
Ocean Eng.
243
,
110278
(
2022
).
22.
J. N.
Newman
, “
Wave effects on deformable bodies
,”
Appl. Ocean Res.
16
,
47
59
(
1994
).
23.
L.
Sun
,
R. E.
Taylor
, and
Y. S.
Choo
, “
Responses of interconnected floating bodies
,”
IES J. Part A
4
,
143
156
(
2011
).
24.
S.-M.
Zheng
,
Y.-H.
Zhang
,
Y.-L.
Zhang
, and
W.-A.
Sheng
, “
Numerical study on the dynamics of a two-raft wave energy conversion device
,”
J. Fluids Struct.
58
,
271
290
(
2015
).
25.
N.
Ren
,
C.
Zhang
,
A. R.
Magee
,
Ø.
Hellan
,
J.
Dai
, and
K. K.
Ang
, “
Hydrodynamic analysis of a modular multi-purpose floating structure system with different outermost connector types
,”
Ocean Eng.
176
,
158
168
(
2019
).
26.
C.
Jiang
,
O.
El Moctar
, and
T. E.
Schellin
, “
Hydrodynamic sensitivity of moored and articulated multibody offshore structures in waves
,”
J. Mar. Sci. Eng.
9
,
1028
(
2021
).
27.
Y.
Liu
,
N.
Ren
, and
J.
Ou
, “
Hydrodynamic analysis of a hybrid modular floating structure system under different wave directions
,”
Appl. Ocean Res.
126
,
103264
(
2022
).
28.
I. B. S.
Bispo
,
S. C.
Mohapatra
, and
C. G.
Soares
, “
Numerical analysis of a moored very large floating structure composed by a set of hinged plates
,”
Ocean Eng.
253
,
110785
(
2022
).
29.
D.-Q.
Zhang
,
J.-F.
Du
,
Z.-M.
Yuan
,
M.
Zhang
, and
F.-S.
Zhu
, “
Hydrodynamic modelling of modularized floating photovoltaics arrays
,” in
Proceedings of the 42nd International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering
,
Melbourne, Australia
,
2023
.
30.
M.
Flikkema
,
M.
Breuls
,
R.
Jak
,
R.
de Ruijter
,
I.
Drummen
,
A.
Jordaens
,
F.
Adam
,
K.
Czapiewska
,
F.-Y.
Lin
,
D.
Schott
et al, “
Floating island development and deployment roadmap
,”
Technical Report No. 774253
(MARINE,
2021
).
31.
Z.-M.
Yuan
,
A.
Incecik
,
S.
Dai
,
D.
Alexander
,
C.-Y.
Ji
, and
X.
Zhang
, “
Hydrodynamic interactions between two ships travelling or stationary in shallow waters
,”
Ocean Eng.
108
,
620
635
(
2015
).
32.
Z.-M.
Yuan
,
C.-Y.
Ji
,
A.
Incecik
,
W.
Zhao
, and
A.
Day
, “
Theoretical and numerical estimation of ship-to-ship hydrodynamic interaction effects
,”
Ocean Eng.
121
,
239
253
(
2016
).
33.
L. J.
Yiew
,
L.
Bennetts
,
M.
Meylan
,
G.
Thomas
, and
B.
French
, “
Wave-induced collisions of thin floating disks
,”
Phys. Fluids
29
,
127102
(
2017
).
34.
ITTC
, “
Recommended procedures and guidelines: Analysis procedure for regular wave tests
,”
Technical Report 7.5-02–07-03.2
(
ITTC
,
2002
).
You do not currently have access to this content.