While kinetic helicity is not Galilean invariant locally, it is known [Moffatt, J. Fluid Mech. 35, 117 (1969)] that its spatial integral quantifies the degree of knottedness of vorticity field lines. Being a topological property of the flow, mean kinetic helicity is Galilean invariant. Here, we provide a direct mathematical proof that kinetic helicity is Galilean invariant when spatially integrated over regions enclosed by vorticity surfaces, i.e., surfaces of zero vorticity flux. We also discuss so-called relative kinetic helicity, which is Galilean invariant when integrated over any region in the flow.
REFERENCES
1.
J. J.
Moreau
, “
Constants of a îvortex batch in perfect barotropic fluid
,” Wkly. Minutes Meet. Acad. Sci.
252
, 2810
–2812
(1961
).2.
W. M.
Elsasser
, “
Hydromagnetic dynamo theory
,” Rev. Mod. Phys.
28
, 135
(1956
).3.
L.
Woltjer
, “
A theorem on force-free magnetic fields
,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
44
, 489
–491
(1958
).4.
H. K.
Moffatt
, “
The degree of knottedness of tangled vortex lines
,” J. Fluid Mech.
35
, 117
–129
(1969
).5.
V. I.
Arnold
, “
Proc. summer school in diff. equations (dilizhan, erevan); English transl.: (1986) Sel. Math. Sov
.” (1973
) p. 327
.6.
V. I.
Arnold
and
B. A.
Khesin
, “
Topological methods in hydrodynamics
,” Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech.
24
, 145
–166
(1992
).7.
A.
Pouquet
,
D.
Rosenberg
,
J. E.
Stawarz
, and
R.
Marino
, “
Helicity dynamics, inverse, and bidirectional cascades in fluid and magnetohydrodynamic turbulence: A brief review
,” Earth Space Sci.
6
, 351
–369
(2019
).8.
S.
Angriman
,
P. J.
Cobelli
,
M.
Bourgoin
,
S. G.
Huisman
,
R.
Volk
, and
P. D.
Mininni
, “
Broken mirror symmetry of tracer's trajectories in turbulence
,” Phys. Rev. Lett.
127
, 254502
(2021
).9.
C. G.
Speziale
, “
On helicity fluctuations in turbulence
,” Q. Appl. Math.
45
, 123
–129
(1987
).10.
H. K.
Moffatt
and
A.
Tsinober
, “
Helicity in laminar and turbulent flow
,” Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech.
24
, 281
–312
(1992
).11.
12.
L.
Biferale
,
S.
Musacchio
, and
F.
Toschi
, “
Inverse energy cascade in three-dimensional isotropic turbulence
,” Phys. Rev. Lett.
108
, 164501
(2012
).13.
P.
Baj
,
F. A.
Portela
, and
D.
Carter
, “
On the simultaneous cascades of energy, helicity, and enstrophy in incompressible homogeneous turbulence
,” J. Fluid Mech.
952
, A20
(2022
).14.
U.
Frisch
,
Z. S.
She
, and
P.
Sulem
, “
Large-scale flow driven by the anisotropic kinetic alpha effect
,” Physica D
28
, 382
–392
(1987
).15.
K.
Inagaki
,
N.
Yokoi
, and
F.
Hamba
, “
Mechanism of mean flow generation in rotating turbulence through inhomogeneous helicity
,” Phys. Rev. Fluids
2
, 114605
(2017
).16.
T.
Teitelbaum
and
P. D.
Mininni
, “
The decay of turbulence in rotating flows
,” Phys. Fluids
23
, 065105
(2011
).17.
C.
Rorai
,
D.
Rosenberg
,
A.
Pouquet
, and
P. D.
Mininni
, “
Helicity dynamics in stratified turbulence in the absence of forcing
,” Phys. Rev. E
87
, 063007
(2013
).18.
M.
Buzzicotti
,
H.
Aluie
,
L.
Biferale
, and
M.
Linkmann
, “
Energy transfer in turbulence under rotation
,” Phys. Rev. Fluids
3
, 034802
(2018
).19.
M. A.
Berger
and
G. B.
Field
, “
The topological properties of magnetic helicity
,” J. Fluid Mech.
147
, 133
–148
(1984
).20.
J. M.
Finn
and
T. M.
Antonsen
, “
Magnetic helicity: What is it and what is it good for?
,” Comments Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion
9
, 111
–126
(1985
).21.
H.
Aluie
, “
Coarse-grained incompressible magnetohydrodynamics: Analyzing the turbulent cascades
,” New J. Phys.
19
, 025008
(2017
).22.
L. C.
Evans
, Partial Differential Equations
(
American Mathematical Society
, 2022
), Vol.
19
.23.
An implicit assumption is that the flow is sufficiently smooth, which is in any case required for conservation laws to hold.21,24
24.
G. L.
Eyink
, “
Dissipative anomalies in singular Euler flows
,” Physica D
237
, 1956
–1968
(2008
).© 2023 Author(s). Published under an exclusive license by AIP Publishing.
2023
Author(s)
You do not currently have access to this content.