In general rigid bead-rod theory, we deduce the rheological properties of a suspension of macromolecules from the orientation distribution that arises during flow. The most important feature governing this orientation is macromolecular architecture, and right behind this, enters hydrodynamic interaction. Until now, general rigid bead-rod theory has neglected hydrodynamic interactions, namely, the interferences of Stokes flow velocity profiles between nearby beads. The lopsidedness of the architecture affects orientability, and so do these heretofore unexplored interferences within the macromolecule. We here employ a new method for exploring how such hydrodynamic interactions affect the complex viscosity. This method has, with great effort, been used to examine hydrodynamic interactions in complex architectures, namely, multi-bead rods and backbone-branched polymers. However, it has yet to be applied to canonical forms. In this paper, we focus on the simplest of rigid architectures: (i) rigid dumbbell, (ii) tridumbbell, (iii) rigid rings, and (iv) planar stars. We call these forms canonical. We arrive at beautiful algebraic expressions for the complex viscosity for each canonical form. We find that for the dimensionless complex viscosity, for all canonical forms, hydrodynamic interactions just depend on the ratio of the bead diameter to the nearest bead separation, d/2LA. Furthermore, we find that for the dimensionless complex viscosity, for canonical forms (i) and (iii), hydrodynamic interactions shift the real part upward and minus the imaginary part downward. For canonical forms (ii), both parts are unaffected. For canonical forms (iv), the story depends interestingly on the number of beads. We advance the mathematics of fluids by establishing, for intramolecular hydrodynamic interactions, the foundational equations which future work must recover.

1.
R. B.
Bird
,
C. F.
Curtiss
,
R. C.
Armstrong
, and
O.
Hassager
,
Dynamics of Polymeric Liquids
, 2nd ed. (
John Wiley & Sons, Inc
.,
New York
,
1987
), Vol.
2
. Errata: On p. 409 of the first printing, the n+m! in the denominator should be nm!; In Table 16.4–1, under L entry “length of rod” should be “bead center to center length of a rigid dumbbell”; In the Figure 14.1–2 caption, “Multibead rods of length L” should be “Multibead rods of length L+d.”
2.
R. B.
Bird
,
O.
Hassager
,
R. C.
Armstrong
, and
C. F.
Curtiss
,
Dynamics of Polymeric Liquids
, 1st ed. (
John Wiley and Sons, Inc
.,
New York
,
1977
), Vol.
2
.
3.
O.
Hassager
, “
Kinetic theory and theology of bead-rod models for macromolecular solutions. II. Linear unsteady flow properties
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
60
(
10
),
4001
4008
(
1974
). Erratum: In Eq. (2) of “1/2” should be “1/2” and “” should be “.”
4.
J. D.
Ferry
,
Viscoelastic Properties of Polymers
, 3rd ed. (
John Wiley & Sons
,
New York
,
1980
).
5.
M. C.
Pak
,
K.-I.
Kim
,
M. A.
Kanso
, and
A. J.
Giacomin
, “
General rigid bead-rod theory with hydrodynamic interaction for polymer viscoelasticity
,”
Phys. Fluids
34
(
2
),
023106
023117
(
2022
).
6.
M. A.
Kanso
,
M. C.
Pak
,
K.-I.
Kim
,
S. J.
Coombs
, and
A. J.
Giacomin
, “
Hydrodynamic interaction and complex viscosity of multi-bead rods
,”
Phys. Fluids
34
(
4
),
043102
043113
(
2022
).
7.
A. J.
Giacomin
and
M. A.
Kanso
, “
General rigid bead-rod macromolecular theory
,” in
Recent Advances in Rheology: Theory, Biorheology, Suspension and Interfacial Rheology
, edited by
D.
De Kee
and
A.
Ramachandran
(
AIP Publishing
,
Melville, NY
,
2022
), Chap. 2,
pp. 1
32
.
8.
S. J.
Coombs
,
M. A.
Kanso
,
K. E.
Haddad
, and
A. J.
Giacomin
, “
Complex viscosity of star-branched macromolecules from analytical general rigid bead-rod theory
,”
Phys. Fluids
33
(
9
), Part 1,
093111
093124
(
2021
).
9.
K.
El Haddad
,
C.
Aumnate
,
C.
Saengow
,
M. A.
Kanso
,
S. J.
Coombs
, and
A. J.
Giacomin
, “
Complex viscosity of graphene suspensions
,”
Phys. Fluids
33
(
9
), Part 1,
093109
(
2021
).
10.
Ad Hoc Committee on Official Nomenclature and Symbols
, “
Official symbols and nomenclature of The Society of Rheology
,”
J. Rheol.
57
(
4
),
1047
1055
(
2013
).
11.
M. A.
Kanso
,
A. J.
Giacomin
,
C.
Saengow
, and
J. H.
Piette
, “
Macromolecular architecture and complex viscosity
,”
Phys. Fluids
31
,
087107
(
2019
). Errata: Eq. (21) should be “a2ν2+23(6b9)aν+19(36b2123b+81)=0”; In Table XIV, n0ns should be η0ηs. In Table XV, ψ1,0 should be Ψ1,0, and nKT should be nkT. In Table IV, Macromolecule 21 entry should be 12L,32L,0; L,0,0; 0,0,0; 12L,32L,0 and Macromolecule 17 entry should be multiplied by L. In Eq. (44), η should be 2η.
12.
R. B.
Bird
and
A. J.
Giacomin
, “
Who conceived the complex viscosity?
,”
Rheol. Acta
51
(
6
),
481
486
(
2012
).
13.
A. J.
Giacomin
and
R. B.
Bird
, “
Erratum: Official nomenclature of The Society of Rheology: -η
,”
J. Rheol.
55
(
4
),
921
923
(
2011
).
14.
R. B.
Bird
,
R. C.
Armstrong
, and
O.
Hassager
,
Dynamics of Polymeric Liquids
, 1st ed. (
Wiley
,
New York
,
1977
), Vol.
1
.
15.
S. J.
Coombs
, “
Macromolecular branching from general rigid bead-rod theory
,” Master's thesis (Queen's University, Kingston, Canada,
2021
).
You do not currently have access to this content.