Undergraduate students of fluid mechanics bring a range of preconceptions to the classroom. The sometimes counterintuitive nature of fluid mechanics means that many of these preconceptions are, in fact, misconceptions. Such misconceptions can be hard to address and can persist even among nominally high-performing students. A pedagogical approach (i.e., predict, test, and reflect) is presented. The approach provides an effective structure for addressing and correcting misconceptions through the use of low-cost hands-on activities that students can quickly and easily undertake during regular class time. The activities all have the same structure of describing the activity, having students make a prediction based on their intuition/prior experience, testing that prediction using simple, low-cost activities, reflecting on the success or failure of the prior prediction, and analysis of the activity to illustrate the correct conception of the flow. Course evaluations indicate that students have found this approach very helpful in improving their conceptual understanding in an introductory engineering fluid mechanics class.

1.
S.
Freeman
,
S. L.
Eddy
,
M.
McDonough
,
M. K.
Smith
,
N.
Okoroafor
,
H.
Jordt
, and
M. P.
Wenderoth
, “
Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics
,”
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
111
(
23
),
8410
8415
(
2014
).
2.
L.
Deslauriers
,
E.
Schelew
, and
C.
Wieman
, “
Improved learning in a large-enrollment physics class
,”
Science
332
(
6031
),
862
864
(
2011
).
3.
A. C.
Rowat
,
N. N.
Sinha
,
P. M.
So ¨rensen
,
O.
Campàs
,
P.
Castells
,
D.
Rosenberg
,
M. P.
Brenner
, and
D. A.
Weitz
, “
The kitchen as a physics classroom
,”
Phys. Educ.
49
(
5
),
512
(
2014
).
4.
M. T. H.
Chi
and
R. D.
Roscoe
,
The Processes and Challenges of Conceptual Change Reconsidering Conceptual Change: Issues in Theory and Practice
, edited by
M.
Limón
and
L.
Mason
(
Kluwer Academic Publishers
,
2002
), pp.
3
27
5.
D.
Montfort
,
S.
Brown
, and
K.
Findley
, “
Using interviews to identify student misconceptions in dynamics
,” in
37th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference
,
2007
.
6.
S.
Sengupta
,
S. J.
Ergas
,
J. A.
Cunningham
,
R.
Goel
,
A.
Feldman
, and
Y.
Chen
, “
Concept inventory for fundamentals of environmental engineering courses: Concept inventory development and testing
,”
Environ. Eng. Sci.
34
,
895
907
(
2017
).
7.
R. L.
Miller
,
R. A.
Streveler
,
M. A.
Nelson
,
M. R.
Geist
, and
B. M.
Olds
, “
Concept inventories meet cognitive psychology: Using beta testing as a mechanism for identifying engineering student misconceptions
,” in
Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition,
2005
.
8.
See
American Institute of Chemical Engineers
, https://newjimi.cce.oregonstate.edu/concept_warehouse/ for “
AIChE Concept Warehouse
;” accessed 17 December 2021.
9.
J.
Martin
,
J.
Mitchell
, and
T.
Newell
, “
Development of a concept inventory for fluid mechanics
,” in 33rd Annual Frontiers in Education,
2003
.
10.
D.
Hestenes
,
M.
Wells
, and
G.
Swackhamer
, “
Force concept inventory
,”
Phys. Teach.
30
(
3
),
141
151
(
1992
).
11.
A.
Jacobi
,
J.
Martin
,
J.
Mitchell
, and
T.
Newell
, “
A concept inventory for heat transfer
,” in
33rd Annual Frontiers in Education
,
2003
.
12.
J. W.
Mitchell
and
J. K.
Martin
,
Use of Thermodynamics, Fluid Mechanics and Heat Transfer Concept Inventories to Assess Student Learning in Core Courses
(
University of Wisconsin
,
Madison, WI
,
2009
).
13.
M. K.
Watson
,
A. R.
Mills
,
K. C.
Bower
,
K.
Brannan
,
M. H.
Woo
, and
R. W.
Welch
, “
Refinement of a concept inventory to assess conceptual understanding in civil engineering fluid mechanics
,” in
ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
,
2015
.
14.
M. T. H.
Chi
,
J. D.
Slotta
, and
N.
Leeuw
, “
From things to processes: A theory of conceptual change for learning science concepts
,”
Learn. Instrum.
4
(
1
),
27
43
(
1994
).
15.
R.
Hake
, “
Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses
,”
Am. J. Phys.
66
,
64
(
1998
).
16.
A. J.
Welsh
, “
Exploring undergraduates' perceptions of the use of active learning techniques in science lectures
,”
J. Coll. Sci. Teach.
42
,
80
87
(
2012
); available at https://mydigitalpublication.com/publication/?i=129308.
17.
A.
Mironer
, “
A couple of fluid mechanics brainteasers
,” paper presented at
Annual Conference
,
Charlotte, NC
,
1999
.
18.
See
N. B.
Kaye
, https://teachingfluids.wordpress.com/ for “
Teaching fluids
;” accessed 4 February 2022.
19.
See
Wikipedia
, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Table_tennis#Ball for “
Table tennis
;” accessed 4 February 2022.
20.
L.
Deslauriers
,
L. S.
McCarty
,
K.
Miller
,
K.
Callaghan
, and
G.
Kestin
, “
Measuring actual learning versus feeling of learning in response to being actively engaged in the classroom
,”
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
116
(
39
),
19251
19257
(
2019
).
21.
N. A.
Bradbury
, “
Attention span during lectures: 8 seconds, 10 minutes, or more?
,”
Adv. Physiol. Educ.
40
,
509
513
(
2016
).
22.
A.
Hilton
and
R. M.
Neupauer
,
H2Oh!: Classroom Demonstrations for Water Concepts
(
ASCE
,
Reston, VA
,
2012
).
23.
R.
Granger
,
Experiments in Fluid Mechanics
(
Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.
,
1988
).
24.
L. A.
Garrison
and
T. J.
Garrison
, “
A demo every day: Bringing fluid mechanics to life
,” paper presented at
ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
,
Seattle, WA
,
2015
.
25.
G. M.
Homsey
,
Multimedia Fluid Mechanics
(
Cambridge University Press
,
2019
).
You do not currently have access to this content.