We derived a constitutive equation for the Rouse model (the most frequently utilized bead-spring model) with its spring constant κ, bead friction coefficient ζ, and the (squared) Brownian force intensity B being allowed to change under flow. Specifically, we modified the Langevin equation of the original Rouse model by introducing time (t)-dependent κ, ζ, and B (of arbitrary t dependence), which corresponded to the decoupling and preaveraging approximations often made in bead-spring models. From this modified Langevin equation, we calculated time evolution of second-moment averages of the Rouse eigenmode amplitudes and further converted this evolution into a constitutive equation. It turned out that the equation has a functional form, σ ( t ) = t d t { κ ( t ) / κ ( t ) } M ( t , t ) C 1 ( t , t ) , where σ ( t ) and C 1 ( t , t ) are the stress and Finger strain tensors, and M ( t , t ) is the memory function depending on κ ( t ) , ζ ( t ) , and B ( t ) defined under flow. This equation, serving as a basis for analysis of nonlinear rheological behavior of unentangled melts, reproduces previous theoretical results under specific conditions, the Lodge–Wu constitutive equation for the case of t-independent κ, ζ, and B [A. S. Lodge and Y. Wu, “Constitutive equations for polymer solutions derived from the bead/spring model of Rouse and Zimm,” Rheol. Acta 10, 539 (1971)], the finite extensible nonlinear elastic (FENE)-Peterlin mean-Rouse formulation for the case of t-dependent changes of the only κ reported by Wedgewood and co-workers [L. E. Wedgewood et al., “A finitely extensible bead-spring chain model for dilute polymer solutions,” J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 40, 119 (1991)], and analytical expression of steady state properties for arbitrary κ ( t ) , ζ ( t ) , and B(t) reported by ourselves [H. Watanabe et al., “Revisiting nonlinear flow behavior of Rouse chain: Roles of FENE, friction reduction, and Brownian force intensity variation,” Macromolecules 54, 3700 (2021)]. It is to be added that a constitutive equation reported by Narimissa and Wagner [E. Narimissa and M. H. Wagner, “Modeling nonlinear rheology of unentangled polymer melts based on a single integral constitutive equation,” J. Rheol. 64, 129 (2020)] has a significantly different functional form and cannot be derived from the Rouse model with any simple modification of the Rouse–Langevin equation.

1.
R. G.
Larson
,
The Structure and Rheology of Complex Fluids
(
Oxford University Press
,
1999
).
2.
R. A.
Stratton
, “
Non-Newtonian flow in polymer systems with no entanglement coupling
,”
Macromolecules
5
,
304
(
1972
).
3.
P. G.
Santangelo
and
C. M.
Roland
, “
Interrupted shear flow of unentangled polystyrene melts
,”
J. Rheol.
45
,
583
(
2001
).
4.
Y.
Matsumiya
,
H.
Watanabe
,
Y.
Masubuchi
,
Q.
Huang
, and
O.
Hassager
, “
Nonlinear elongational rheology of unentangled polystyrene and poly (p-tert-butylstyrene) melts
,”
Macromolecules
51
,
9710
(
2018
).
5.
P. E.
Rouse
, “
A theory of the linear viscoelastic properties of dilute solutions of coiling polymers
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
21
,
1272
(
1953
).
6.
A. S.
Lodge
and
Y.
Wu
, “
Constitutive equations for polymer solutions derived from the bead/spring model of Rouse and Zimm
,”
Rheol. Acta
10
,
539
(
1971
).
7.
L. E.
Wedgewood
,
D. N.
Ostrov
, and
R. B.
Bird
, “
A finitely extensible bead-spring chain model for dilute polymer solutions
,”
J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech.
40
,
119
(
1991
).
8.
A.
Peterlin
, “
Hydrodynamics of macromolecules in a velocity field with longitudinal gradient
,”
J. Polym. Sci., Part B: Polym. Lett.
4
,
287
(
1966
).
9.
B. H. A. A.
van den Brule
, “
Brownian dynamics simulation of finitely extensible bead-spring chains
,”
J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech.
47
,
357
(
1993
).
10.
G.
Ianniruberto
,
G.
Marrucci
, and
Y.
Masubuchi
, “
Melts of linear polymers in fast flows
,”
Macromolecules
53
,
5023
(
2020
).
11.
Y.
Matsumiya
and
H.
Watanabe
, “
Non-universal features in uniaxially extensional rheology of linear polymer melts and concentrated solutions: A review
,”
Prog. Polym. Sci.
112
,
101325
(
2021
).
12.
G.
Ianniruberto
,
A.
Brasiello
, and
G.
Marrucci
, in
Proceedings of the 7th Annual European Rheology Conference
(European Society of Rheology,
Moscow
,
2011
), p.
61
.
13.
T.
Yaoita
,
T.
Isaki
,
Y.
Masubuchi
,
H.
Watanabe
,
G.
Ianniruberto
, and
G.
Marrucci
, “
Primitive chain network simulation of elongational flows of entangled linear chains: Stretch/orientation-induced reduction of monomeric friction
,”
Macromolecules
45
,
2773
(
2012
).
14.
G.
Ianniruberto
,
A.
Brasiello
, and
G.
Marrucci
, “
Modeling unentangled polystyrene melts in fast elongational flows
,”
Macromolecules
52
,
4610
(
2019
).
15.
G.
Ianniruberto
and
G.
Marrucci
, “
Origin of shear thinning in unentangled polystyrene melts
,”
Macromolecules
53
,
1338
(
2020
).
16.
H.
Watanabe
,
Y.
Matsumiya
, and
T.
Sato
, “
Nonlinear rheology of FENE dumbbell with friction-reduction: Analysis of Brownian force intensity through comparison of extensional and shear viscosities
,”
J. Soc. Rheol. Jpn.
48
,
259
(
2020
).
17.
H.
Watanabe
,
Y.
Matsumiya
, and
T.
Sato
, “
Revisiting nonlinear flow behavior of Rouse chain: Roles of FENE, friction-reduction, and Brownian force intensity variation
,”
Macromolecules
54
,
3700
(
2021
).
18.
E.
Narimissa
and
M. H.
Wagner
, “
Modeling nonlinear rheology of unentangled polymer melts based on a single integral constitutive equation
,”
J. Rheol.
64
,
129
(
2020
).
19.
L.
Poh
,
E.
Narimissa
, and
M. H.
Wagner
, “
Universality of steady shear flow of Rouse melts
,”
Rheol. Acta
59
,
755
(
2020
).
20.
M.
Doi
and
S. F.
Edwards
,
The Theory of Polymer Dynamics
(
Oxford University Press
,
1986
).
21.
R. B.
Bird
,
C. F.
Curtiss
,
R. C.
Armstrong
, and
O.
Hassager
,
Dynamics of Polymeric Liquids
, 2nd ed. (
Wiley
,
1987
), Vol.
1
.
22.
R. B.
Bird
and
W. J.
Drugan
, “
Universality of steady shear flow of Rouse melts
,”
Phys. Fluids
29
,
053103
(
2017
).
23.
A. E.
Likhtman
,
Viscoelasticity and Molecular Rheology in Polymer Science: A Comprehensive Reference
(
Elsevier
,
Amsterdam
,
2012
).
24.
All rheological and structural quantities [such as u ( n , t ) u ( n , t ) ] are averaged over the distribution function of { u } , ψ ( { u } , t ) . The important and essential point is the lack of explicit knowledge of the functional form of ψ ( { u } , t ) . Nevertheless, ψ ( { u } , t ) surely exists, and the average is taken over this existing ψ ( { u } , t ) . Our use of the first and second-moment averages of Brownian force F B , characterized by Eqs. (6) and (7), allows us to calculate the averages of our interest without knowledge of the functional form of ψ ( { u } , t ) . This functional form would be different from that of the standard Rouse model, but detailed knowledge of this difference is not necessary for our calculation.
25.
R. B.
Bird
,
R. C.
Armstrong
, and
O.
Hassager
,
Dynamics of Polymeric Liquids
, 2nd ed. (
Wiley
,
1987
), Vol.
2
.
26.
D. S.
Pearson
,
A. D.
Kiss
,
L. J.
Fetters
, and
M.
Doi
, “
Flow-induced birefringence of concentrated polyisoprene solutions
,”
J. Rheol.
33
,
517
(
1989
).
27.
T.
Uneyama
,
K.
Horio
, and
H.
Watanabe
, “
Anisotropic mobility model for polymers under shear and its linear response functions
,”
Phys. Rev. E
83
,
061802
(
2011
).
28.
Y.
Kwon
and
A. I.
Leonov
, “
Stability constraints in the formulation of viscoelastic constitutive equations
,”
J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech.
58
,
25
(
1995
).

Supplementary Material

You do not currently have access to this content.