In this study, the nonlinear effect of contactless bubble–bubble interactions in inertial micropumps is characterized via reduced parameter one-dimensional and three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics (3D CFD) modeling. A one-dimensional pump model is developed to account for contactless bubble-bubble interactions, and the accuracy of the developed one-dimensional model is assessed via the commercial volume of fluid CFD software, FLOW-3D. The FLOW-3D CFD model is validated against experimental bubble dynamics images as well as experimental pump data. Precollapse and postcollapse bubble and flow dynamics for two resistors in a channel have been successfully explained by the modified one-dimensional model. The net pumping effect design space is characterized as a function of resistor placement and firing time delay. The one-dimensional model accurately predicts cumulative flow for simultaneous resistor firing with inner-channel resistor placements (0.2L < x < 0.8L where L is the channel length) as well as delayed resistor firing with inner-channel resistor placements when the time delay is greater than the time required for the vapor bubble to fill the channel cross section. In general, one-dimensional model accuracy suffers at near-reservoir resistor placements and short time delays which we propose is a result of 3D bubble-reservoir interactions and transverse bubble growth interactions, respectively, that are not captured by the one-dimensional model. We find that the one-dimensional model accuracy improves for smaller channel heights. We envision the developed one-dimensional model as a first-order rapid design tool for inertial pump-based microfluidic systems operating in the contactless bubble–bubble interaction nonlinear regime.

1.
S.
Hassan
and
X.
Zhang
, “
Design and fabrication of capillary-driven flow device for point-of-care diagnostics
,”
Biosensors
10
,
39
(
2020
).
2.
Q.
Shizhi
and
H.
Bau
, “
Magneto-hydrodynamics based microfluidics
,”
Mech. Res. Commun.
36
,
10
(
2009
).
3.
N.
Mishchuk
,
T.
Heldal
,
T.
Volden
,
J.
Auerswald
, and
H.
Knapp
, “
Micropump based on electroosmosis of the second kind
,”
Electrophoresis
30
,
3499
(
2009
).
4.
J.
Snyder
,
J.
Getpreecharsawas
,
D.
Fang
,
T.
Gaborski
,
C.
Striemer
,
P.
Fauchet
,
D.
Borkholder
, and
J.
McGrath
, “
High-performance, low-voltage electroosmotic pumps with molecularly thin silicon nanomembranes
,”
Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
110
,
18425
18430
(
2013
).
5.
K.
Vinayakumar
,
G.
Nadiger
,
V.
Shetty
,
S.
Dinesh
,
M.
Nayak
, and
K.
Rajanna
, “
Packaged peristaltic micropump for controlled drug delivery application
,”
Rev. Sci. Instrum.
88
,
015102
(
2017
).
6.
D.
Duffy
,
H.
Gillis
,
J.
Lin
,
N.
Sheppard
, and
G.
Kellogg
, “
Microfabricated centrifugal microfluidic systems: Characterization and multiple enzymatic assays
,”
Anal. Chem.
71
,
4669
(
1999
).
7.
V.
Gnyawali
,
M.
Saremi
,
M.
Kolios
, and
S.
Tsai
, “
Stable microfluidic flow focusing using hydrostatics
,”
Biomicrofluidics
11
,
034104
(
2017
).
8.
J.
Lake
,
K.
Heyde
, and
W.
Ruder
, “
Low-cost feedback-controlled syringe pressure pumps for microfluidics applications
,”
PLoS One
12
,
e0175089
(
2017
).
9.
M. I.
Mohammed
,
S.
Haswell
, and
I.
Gibson
, “
Lab-on-a-chip or chip-in-a-lab: Challenges of commercialization lost in translation
,”
Procedia Technology
20
,
54
–59 (
2015
), proceedings of The 1st International Design Technology Conference, DESTECH2015, Geelong.
10.
E.
Torniainen
,
A.
Govyadinov
,
D.
Markel
, and
P.
Kornilovitch
, “
Bubble-driven inertial micropump
,”
Phys. Fluids
24
,
122003
(
2012
).
11.
H.
Hoefemann
,
S.
Wadle
,
N.
Bakhtina
,
V.
Kondrashov
,
N.
Wangler
, and
R.
Zengerle
, “
Sorting and lysis of single cells by bubblejet technology
,”
Sens. Actuators, B
168
,
442
445
(
2012
).
12.
B.
Hayes
,
A.
Hayes
,
M.
Rolleston
,
A.
Ferreira
, and
J.
Kirsher
, “
Pulsatory mixing of laminar flow using bubble-driven micro-pumps
,” in
Proceedings of the ASME 2018 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition
(
2018
), Vol.
7
.
13.
E.
Ory
,
H.
Yuan
,
A.
Prosperetti
,
S.
Popinet
, and
S.
Zaleski
, “
Growth and collapse of a vapor bubble in a narrow tube
,”
Phys. Fluids
12
,
1268
(
2000
).
14.
Z.
Yin
and
A.
Prosperetti
, “‘
Blinking bubble’ micropump with microfabricated heaters
,”
J. Micromech. Microeng.
15
,
1683
(
2005
).
15.
M.
Einat
and
M.
Grajower
, “
Microboiling measurements of thermal-inkjet heaters
,”
J. Microelectromech. Syst.
19
,
391
(
2010
).
16.
A.
Govyadinov
,
P.
Kornilovitch
,
D.
Markel
, and
E.
Torniainen
, “
Single-pulse dynamics and flow rates of inertial micropumps
,”
Microfluid. Nanofluid.
20
,
73
(
2016
).
17.
E.
Sourtiji
and
Y.
Peles
, “
A micro-synthetic jet in a microchannel using bubble growth and collapse
,”
Appl. Therm. Eng.
160
,
114084
(
2019
).
18.
B.
Hayes
,
A.
Govyadinov
, and
P.
Kornilovitch
, “
Microfluidic switchboards with integrated inertial pumps
,”
Microfluid. Nanofluid.
22
,
15
(
2018
).
19.
P.
Kornilovitch
,
A.
Govyadinov
,
D.
Markel
, and
E.
Torniainen
, “
One-dimensional model of inertial pumping
,”
Phys. Rev. E
87
,
023012
(
2013
).
20.
H.
Yuan
and
A.
Prosperetti
, “
The pumping effect of growing and collapsing bubbles in a tube
,”
J. Micromech. Microeng.
9
,
402
413
(
1999
).
21.
J.
Zou
,
B.
Li
, and
C.
Ji
, “
Interactions between two oscillating bubbles in a rigid tube
,”
Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci.
61
,
105
(
2015
).
22.
C.
Hirt
and
B.
Nichols
, “
Volume of fluid (vof) method for the dynamics of free boundaries
,”
J. Comput. Phys.
39
,
201
225
(
1981
).
23.
C.
Borgnakke
and
R. E.
Sonntag
,
Fundamentals of Thermodynamics
, 8th ed. (
Wiley
,
1999
).
24.
O. E.
Ruiz
, “
CFD model of the thermal inkjet droplet ejection process
,”
in
Proceeding of Heat Transfer Summer Conference
(
2007
), Vol.
3
.
25.
T.
Theofanous
,
L.
Biasi
,
H.
Isbin
, and
H.
Fauske
, “
A theoretical study on bubble growth in constant and time-dependent pressure fields
,”
Chem. Eng. Sci.
24
,
885
897
(
1969
).
26.
S.
Timoshenko
and
J.
Goodier
,
Theory of Elasticity
, 3rd ed. (
McGaw-Hill, Inc
.,
1970
).
You do not currently have access to this content.