In this work, an OpenFOAM-integrated numerical solver is developed using the Immersed Boundary Method (IBM) to model incompressible multiphase and turbulent flow over a solid obstacle. The solver combines the pressure implicit split operator algorithm with the kω shear stress transport (kω SST) model for the velocity–pressure coupling in Navier–Stokes equations and resolving turbulent flow near the obstacle surface. To improve the performance of the solver, an adaptive mesh refinement scheme is developed for efficient mesh using the IBM. The problem of penetration of multiphase flow through the immersed boundary is considered and resolved with a method of modifying the forcing term at solid cells. The solver has been validated via benchmark problems and applied in the simulation of complicated fluid flow problems.

1.
J.
Slotnick
,
A.
Khodadoust
,
J.
Alonso
, and
D.
Darmofal
, “
CFD vision 2030 study: A path to revolutionary computational aerosciences
,” Report No. NASA/CR-2014-218178,
March 2014
.
2.
S.
Hassan
, Teesside University Beng (Hons), Mechanical Engineering Aerodynamics Investigation of Rear Vehicle (Backlight angle),
April 2014
.
3.
D. L.
Quan
, “
A mesh-based technique for solving CFD problems with embedded geometries : Anisotropic adaptive ‘nearly’ body-fitted mesh approach
,” in Ph.D. thesis,
Catholic University of Louvain
,
2014
; available at http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/154134.
4.
C. S.
Peskin
, “
Flow patterns around heart valves: A numerical method
,”
J. Comput. Phys.
10
(
2
),
252
271
(
1972
).
5.
E. A.
Fadlun
,
R.
Verzicco
,
P.
Orlandi
, and
J.
Mohd-Yusof
, “
Combined immersed-boundary finite-difference methods for three-dimensional complex flow simulations
,”
J. Comput. Phys.
161
(
1
),
35
60
(
2000
).
6.
E.
Constant
,
C.
Li
,
J.
Favier
,
M.
Meldi
,
P.
Meliga
, and
E.
Serre
, “
Implementation of a discrete immersed boundary method in OpenFOAM
,”
Comput. Fluids
arxiv.org/abs/1609.04364 (
2016
).
7.
M.
Uhlmann
, “
An immersed boundary method with direct forcing for the simulation of particulate flows
,”
J. Comput. Phys.
209
,
448
476
(
2005
).
8.
V. S.
Pham
, “
An immersed boundary method for simulation of moving object in fluid flow
,”
J. Sci. Technol.
127
,
040
044
(
2018
).
9.
Q. V.
Do
and
V. S.
Pham
, “
A new fluid-structure interaction solver in OpenFOAM
,”
J. Sci. Technol.
135
,
023
027
(
2019
).
10.
Q. V.
Do
,
V. B.
Nguyen
,
P. K.
Nguyen
, and
V. S.
Pham
, “
An immersed boundary method OpenFOAM solver for structure two-phase flow interaction
,”
J. Sci. Technol.
138
,
028
032
(
2019
).
11.
C. J.
Greenshields
, The OpenFOAM user guide,
July 2017
, p.
235
.
12.
H.
Jasak
, “
Immersed boundary surface method in foam-extend
,” in
OpenFOAM in Hydraulic Engineering Conference
,
2018
, available at https://foam-extend.fsb.hr/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/04_Jasak_Immersed_Boundary.pdf.
13.
S. J.
Plimpton
 et al, “
Direct simulation Monte Carlo on petaflop supercomputers and beyond
,”
Phys. Fluids
31
(
8
),
086101
(
2019
).
14.
H. Z.
Yuan
,
C.
Shu
,
Y.
Wang
, and
S.
Shu
, “
A simple mass-conserved level set method for simulation of multiphase flows
,”
Phys. Fluids
30
(
4
),
040908
(
2018
).
15.
F.
Moukalled
,
L.
Mangani
, and
M.
Darwish
,
The Finite Volume Method in Computational Fluid Dynamics—An Advanced Introduction with OpenFOAM and Matlab
(
Springer
,
2016
), Vol. 113.
16.
F. R.
Menter
, “
Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications
,”
AIAA J.
32
(
8
),
1598
1605
(
1994
).
17.
D. C.
Wilcox
,
Turbulent Modeling for CFD
(
DCW Ind. Inc.
,
1994
).
18.
J.
Bredberg
, “
On the wall boundary condition for turbulence models
,” in
Internal Report 00/4, Department of Thermo and Fluid Dynamics
(
Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg
,
Sweden
,
2000
).
19.
F.
Liu
, “
A thorough description of how wall functions are implemented in OpenFOAM
,” in
Proceedings of CFD with OpenSource Software
, edited by
H.
Nilsson
(
Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg
,
Sweden
2016
).
20.
A.
Baniabedalruhman
, “
Dynamic meshing around fluid-fluid interfaces with applications to droplet tracking in contraction geometries
,” in Ph.D. thesis,
Michigan Technological University
,
2015
; available at http://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/etds/1005.
21.
T.
Mukha
and
M.
Liefvendahl
,
Large-Eddy Simulation of a Turbulent Channel Flow
(
Sweden Technical
,
Uppsala
,
2015
).
22.
D. W.
Dodge
and
A. B.
Metzner
, “
Turbulent flow of non-Newtonian systems
,”
AIChE J.
5
(
2
),
189
204
(
1959
).
23.
R. D.
Moser
,
J.
Kim
, and
N. N.
Mansour
, “
Direct numerical simulation of turbulent channel flow up to Reτ = 590
,”
Phys. Fluids
11
(
4
),
943
945
(
1999
).
24.
M.
Ma
,
W. X.
Huang
, and
C. X.
Xu
, “
A dynamic wall model for large eddy simulation of turbulent flow over complex/moving boundaries based on the immersed boundary method
,”
Phys. Fluids
31
(
11
),
115101
(
2019
).
25.
D.
Goldstein
,
R.
Handler
, and
L.
Sirovich
, “
Modeling a no-slip flow boundary with an external force field
,”
J. Comput. Phys.
105
(
2
),
354
366
(
1993
).
26.
H.
Ye
and
D.
Wan
, “
Benchmark computations for flows around a stationary cylinder with high Reynolds numbers by RANS-overset grid approach
,”
Appl. Ocean Res.
65
,
315
326
(
2017
).
27.
K.
Lee
and
K.-S.
Yang
, “
Large eddy simulation of turbulent flow past a circular cylinder in the subcritical and critical regimes
,”
J. Mech. Sci. Technol.
31
(
4
),
1729
1737
(
2017
).
28.
J. J.
De Wilde
and
R. H. M.
Huijsmans
, “
Experiments for high Reynolds numbers VIV on risers
,” in
Proceedings of the Eleventh International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference
(
International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers
,
2001
), Vol. 3, pp.
400
405
.
29.
O.
Ubbink
, “
Numerical prediction of two fluid systems with sharp interfaces
,” in Ph.D. thesis,
Imperial College of Science Technology and Medicine
,
1997
.
30.
C.
Zhang
,
W.
Zhang
,
N.
Lin
,
Y.
Tang
, and
C.
Zhao
, “
A two-phase flow model coupling with volume of fluid and immersed boundary methods for free surface and moving structure problems
,”
Ocean Eng.
74
,
107
124
(
2013
).
31.
A. M.
Roma
,
C. S.
Peskin
, and
M. J.
Berger
, “
An adaptive version of the immersed boundary method
,”
J. Comput. Phys.
153
,
509
534
(
1999
).
32.
H.
Abdulmouti
, “
2D numerical simulation of surface flow velocity and internal flow structure generated by bubbles
,”
Multiphase Sci. Technol.
28
(
2
),
153
171
(
2016
).
33.
H.
Abdulmouti
, “
Numerical simulation and fundamental characteristics of surface flow generated by bubbly flows
,”
Int. J. Fluid Mech. Res.
45
(
3
),
263
282
(
2018
).
34.
H.
Abdulmouti
, “
Numerical simulation of bubble convection in two-phase stratified liquids
,”
Multiphase Sci. Technol.
31
(
2
),
133
149
(
2019
).
35.
P.
Lin
, “
A fixed-grid model for simulation of a moving body in free surface flows
,”
Comput. Fluids
36
(
3
),
549
561
(
2007
).
36.
M.
Greenhow
, “
Water-entry and-exit of a horizontal circular cylinder
,”
Appl. Ocean Res.
10
(
4
),
191
198
(
1988
).
You do not currently have access to this content.