Direct numerical simulation data of the separating and reattaching flow around a blunt bluff body are used for the assessment of the combined role played by the numerical resolution and subgrid turbulence closure in large eddy simulation. The ability of the large-scale resolved field to capture the main flow features is first analyzed. The behavior of the intensity of the resolved fluctuations as a function of the filter lengths reveals a higher sensitivity of the resolved flow on a reduction of resolution in the streamwise direction rather than in the spanwise one. On the other hand, the analysis of the subgrid stresses shows the presence of two challenging phenomena, a reversal of flow of energy from the fluctuating to the mean field in the leading-edge shear layer and a backward energy transfer from small to large scale within the main recirculating bubble. These two phenomena challenge for subgrid closures that should be able to reproduce a flow of energy from the space of small unknown subgrid scales to drive the resolved mean and fluctuating motion. In particular, it is found that the formalism of subgrid viscosity models allows us to capture neither the negative turbulence production of the leading-edge shear layer nor the backward energy transfer within the main flow recirculation. On the other hand, the subgrid similarity models are able to capture both these two phenomena but, from a quantitative point of view, the intensity of the reproduced stresses is very weak. In conclusion, the need of subgrid closures based on a mixed modeling approach for the solution of the flow is envisaged.

1.
S.
de Miranda
,
L.
Patruno
,
F.
Ubertini
, and
G.
Vairo
, “
On the identification of flutter derivatives of bridge decks via RANS turbulence models: Benchmarking on rectangular prisms
,”
Eng. Struct.
76
,
359
370
(
2014
).
2.
M.
Ricci
,
L.
Patruno
,
I.
Kalkman
,
S.
de Miranda
, and
B.
Blocken
, “
Towards LES as a design tool: Wind loads assessment on a high-rise building
,”
J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn.
180
,
1
18
(
2018
).
3.
N. J.
Cherry
,
R.
Hillier
, and
M. E. M.
Latour
, “
Unsteady measurements in a separated and reattaching flow
.”
J. Fluid Mech.
144
,
13
46
(
1984
).
4.
M.
Kiya
and
K.
Sasaki
, “
Structure of large-scale vortices and unsteady reverse flow in the reattaching zone of a turbulent separation bubble
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
154
,
463
491
(
1985
).
5.
Y.
Nakamura
,
Y.
Ohya
, and
H.
Tsuruta
, “
Experiments on vortex shedding from flat plates with square leading and trailing edges
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
222
,
437
447
(
1991
).
6.
A.
Cimarelli
,
A.
Leonforte
, and
D.
Angeli
, “
On the structure of the self-sustaining cycle of separating and reattaching flows
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
857
,
907
936
(
2018
).
7.
L.
Bruno
,
M. V.
Salvetti
, and
F.
Ricciardelli
, “
Benchmark on the aerodynamics of a rectangular 5:1 cylinder: An overview after the first four years of activity
,”
J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn.
126
,
87
106
(
2014
).
8.
L.
Bruno
,
D.
Fransos
,
N.
Coste
, and
A.
Bosco
, “
3D flow around a rectangular cylinder: A computational study
,”
J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn.
98
,
263
276
(
2010
).
9.
L.
Bruno
,
N.
Coste
, and
D.
Fransos
, “
Simulated flow around a rectangular 5:1 cylinder: Spanwise discretization effects and emerging flow features
,”
J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn.
104
,
203
215
(
2012
).
10.
K.
Sasaki
and
M.
Kiya
, “
Three-dimensional vortex structure in a leading-edge separation bubble at moderate Reynolds numbers
,”
J. Fluids Eng.
113
,
405
410
(
1991
).
11.
M.
Kiya
and
K.
Sasaki
, “
Structure of a turbulent separation bubble
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
137
,
83
113
(
1983
).
12.
A.
Cimarelli
,
A.
Leonforte
, and
D.
Angeli
, “
Direct numerical simulation of the flow around a rectangular cylinder at a moderately high Reynolds number
,”
J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn.
174
,
39
49
(
2018
).
13.
M.
Ricci
,
L.
Patruno
,
S.
de Miranda
, and
F.
Ubertini
, “
Flow field around a 5:1 rectangular cylinder using LES: Influence of inflow turbulence conditions, spanwise domain size and their interaction
,”
Comput. Fluid
149
,
181
193
(
2017
).
14.
A. N.
Stokes
and
M. C.
Welsh
, “
Flow-resonant sound interaction in a duct containing a plate, II: Square leading edge
,”
J. Sound Vib.
104
,
55
73
(
1986
).
15.
K.
Hourigan
,
M. C.
Thompson
, and
B. T.
Tan
, “
Self-sustained oscillations in flows around long blunt plates
,”
J. Fluids Struct.
15
,
387
398
(
2001
).
16.
P.
Sagaut
,
Large-Eddy Simulation for Incompressible Flows—An Introduction
(
Springer-Verlag
,
2001
).
17.
U.
Piomelli
,
Y.
Yu
, and
R.
Adrian
, “
Subgrid-scale energy transfer and near-wall turbulence structure
,”
Phys. Fluids
8
,
215
224
(
1996
).
18.
A.
Cimarelli
and
E.
De Angelis
, “
Analysis of the Kolmogorov equation for filtered wall-turbulent flows
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
676
,
376
395
(
2011
).
19.
A.
Cimarelli
and
E.
De Angelis
, “
Anisotropic dynamics and sub-grid energy transfer in wall-turbulence
,”
Phys. Fluids
24
,
015102
(
2012
).
20.
A.
Cimarelli
and
E.
De Angelis
, “
The physics of energy transfer toward improved subgrid-scale models
,”
Phys. Fluids
26
,
055103
(
2014
).
21.
A.
Cimarelli
,
E.
De Angelis
, and
C.
Casciola
, “
Paths of energy in turbulent channel flows
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
715
,
436
451
(
2013
).
22.
A.
Cimarelli
,
E.
De Angelis
,
J.
Jiménez
, and
C.
Casciola
, “
Cascades and wall-normal fluxes in turbulent channel flows
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
796
,
417
436
(
2016
).
23.
J.
Smagorinsky
, “
General circulation experiments with the primitive equations
,”
Mon. Weather. Rev.
91
,
99
164
(
1963
).
24.
R.
Rogallo
and
P.
Moin
, “
Numerical simulation of turbulent flows
,”
Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech.
16
,
99
137
(
1984
).
25.
J.
Bardina
,
J.
Ferziger
, and
W.
Reynolds
, “
Improved turbulence models based on LES of homogeneous incompressible turbulent flows
,” Report No. TF-19,
Thermosciences Division, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University
,
1984
.
26.
A.
Cimarelli
,
A.
Leonforte
,
E.
De Angelis
,
A.
Crivellini
, and
D.
Angeli
, “
On negative turbulence production phenomena in the shear layer of separating and reattaching flows
,”
Phys. Lett. A
383
,
1019
1026
(
2019
).
27.
P.
Saathoff
and
W.
Melbourne
, “
Effects of free-stream turbulence on surface pressure fluctuations in a separation bubble
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
337
,
1
24
(
1997
).
28.
M.
Alam
and
N.
Sandham
, “
Direct numerical simulation of ‘short’ laminar separation bubbles with turbulent reattachment
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
410
,
1
28
(
2000
).
29.
I.
Abdalla
and
Z.
Yang
, “
Numerical study of the instability mechanism in transitional separating–reattaching flow
,”
Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow
25
,
593
605
(
2004
).
30.
M.
Germano
,
U.
Piomelli
,
P.
Moin
, and
W. H.
Cabot
, “
A dynamic subgrid-scale eddy viscosity model
,”
Phys. Fluids A
3
,
1760
1765
(
1991
).
31.
Y.
Zang
,
R.
Street
, and
J. R.
Koseff
, “
A dynamic mixed subgrid-scale model and its application to turbulent recirculating flows
,”
Phys. Fluids A
5
,
3186
3196
(
1993
).
32.
B.
Vreman
,
B.
Geurts
, and
H.
Kuerten
, “
On the formulation of the dynamic mixed subgrid-scale model
,”
Phys. Fluids
6
,
4057
4059
(
1994
).
33.
A.
Cimarelli
,
A.
Abbà
, and
M.
Germano
, “
General formalism for a reduced description and modelling of momentum and energy transfer in turbulence
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
866
,
865
896
(
2019
).
You do not currently have access to this content.