In this paper, a data driven approach is presented for the prediction of incompressible laminar steady flow field over airfoils based on the combination of deep Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) and deep Multilayer Perceptron (MLP). The flow field over an airfoil depends on the airfoil geometry, Reynolds number, and angle of attack. In conventional approaches, Navier-Stokes (NS) equations are solved on a computational mesh with corresponding boundary conditions to obtain the flow solutions, which is a time consuming task. In the present approach, the flow field over an airfoil is approximated as a function of airfoil geometry, Reynolds number, and angle of attack using deep neural networks without solving the NS equations. The present approach consists of two steps. First, CNN is employed to extract the geometrical parameters from airfoil shapes. Then, the extracted geometrical parameters along with Reynolds number and angle of attack are fed as input to the MLP network to obtain an approximate model to predict the flow field. The required database for the network training is generated using the OpenFOAM solver by solving NS equations. Once the training is done, the flow field around an airfoil can be obtained in seconds. From the prediction results, it is evident that the approach is efficient and accurate.

1.
Abadi
,
M.
 et al., “
TensorFlow: Large-scale machine learning on heterogeneous systems
,” Software available from https://www.tensorflow.org/,
2015
.
2.
Chollet
,
F.
, Keras,
2015
, https://keras.io.
3.
Duraisamy
,
K.
,
Iaccarino
,
G.
, and
Xiao
,
H.
, “
Turbulence modeling in the age of data
,”
Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech.
51
,
357
377
(
2019
).
4.
Guo
,
X.
,
Li
,
W.
, and
Iorio
,
F.
, “
Convolutional neural networks for steady flow approximation
,” in
Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD’16)
(
ACM
,
New York, NY, USA
,
2016
), pp.
481
490
.
5.
Jameson
,
A.
, “
Aerodynamic design via control theory
,”
J. Sci. Comput.
3
(
3
),
233
260
(
1988
).
6.
Jasak
,
H.
,
Jemcov
,
A.
, and
Tukovic
,
Z.
, “
OpenFOAM: A C++ library for complex physics simulations
,” in
International Workshop on Coupled Methods in Numerical Dynamics
(
IUC Dubrovnik Croatia
,
2007
), Vol. 1000, pp.
1
20
.
7.
Jin
,
X.
,
Cheng
,
P.
,
Chen
,
W.-L.
, and
Li
,
H.
, “
Prediction model of velocity field around circular cylinder over various Reynolds numbers by fusion convolutional neural networks based on pressure on the cylinder
,”
Phys. Fluids
30
,
047105
(
2018
).
8.
Kingma
,
D. P.
and
Ba
,
J.
, “
ADAM: A method for stochastic optimization
,” CoRR, Vol. abs/1412.6,
2014
.
9.
LeCun
,
Y.
,
Bengio
,
Y.
, and
Hinton
,
G.
, “
Deep learning
,”
Nature
521
,
436
(
2015
).
10.
LeCun
,
Y.
,
Boser
,
B.
,
Denker
,
J. S.
,
Henderson
,
D.
,
Howard
,
R. E.
,
Hubbard
,
W.
, and
Jackel
,
L. D.
, “
Backpropagation applied to hand written zip code recognition
,”
Neural Comput.
1
(
4
),
541
551
(
1989
).
11.
Ling
,
J.
and
Templeton
,
J.
, “
Evaluation of machine learning algorithms for prediction of regions of high Reynolds averaged Navier Stokes uncertainty
,”
Phys. Fluids
27
(
8
),
085103
(
2015
).
12.
Ma
,
M.
,
Lu
,
J.
, and
Tryggvason
,
G.
, “
Using statistical learning to close two-fluid multiphase flow equations for a simple bubbly system
,”
Phys. Fluids
27
(
9
),
092101
(
2015
).
13.
Maulik
,
R.
,
San
,
O.
,
Rasheed
,
A.
, and
Vedula
,
P.
, “
Data-driven deconvolution for large eddy simulations of Kraichnan turbulence
,”
Phys. Fluids
30
(
12
),
125109
(
2018
).
14.
Nielsen
,
M. A.
,
Neural Network and Deep Learning
(
Determination Press
,
2015
).
15.
Rosenblatt
,
F.
, “
The Perceptron, a perceiving and recognizing automaton project para
,” Report Vol. 85, Nos. 460–461,
Cornell Aeronautical Laboratory
,
1957
.
16.
Ruder
,
S.
, “
An overview of gradient descent optimization algorithms
,” [cs.LG],
2017
.
17.
Rumelhart
,
D. E.
,
Hinton
,
G. E.
, and
Williams
,
R. J.
,
Neurocomputing: Foundations of Research
, Learning Representations by Back-propagating Errors (
MIT Press
,
Cambridge, MA, USA
,
1988
), pp.
696
699
.
18.
Samareh
,
J. A.
, “
A survey of shape parameterization techniques
,”
paper presented at the CEAS/AIAA/ICASE/NASA LaRC International Forum on Aeroelasticity and Structural Dynamics
,
Williamsburg, VA
,
22–25 June 1999
, pp.
333
343
.
19.
Selig
,
M. S.
,
UIUC Airfoil Data Site
(
Department of Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
,
1996
).
20.
Singh
,
A. P.
and
Duraisamy
,
K.
, “
Using field inversion to quantify functional errors in turbulence closures
,”
Phys. Fluids
28
(
4
),
045110
(
2016
).
21.
Skinner
,
S. N.
and
Zare-Behtash
,
H.
, “
State-of-the-art in aerodynamic shape optimisation methods
,”
Appl. Soft Comput.
62
,
933
962
(
2018
).
22.
Song
,
W.
and
Keane
,
A.
, “
A study of shape parameterisation methods for airfoil optimisation
,” AIAA Paper 2004-4482,
2004
.
23.
Wang
,
Z.
,
Luo
,
K.
,
Li
,
D.
,
Tan
,
J.
, and
Fan
,
J.
, “
Investigations of data-driven closure for subgrid-scale stress in large-eddy simulation
,”
Phys. Fluids
30
(
12
),
125101
(
2018
).
24.
Weller
,
H. G.
,
Tabor
,
G.
,
Jasak
,
H.
, and
Fureby
,
C.
, “
A tensorial approach to computational continuum mechanics using object-oriented techniques
,”
Comput. Phys.
12
(
6
),
620
(
1998
).
25.
Wu
,
J.-L.
,
Xiao
,
H.
, and
Paterson
,
E.
, “
Physics-informed machine learning approach for augmenting turbulence models: A comprehensive framework
,”
Phys. Rev. Fluids
3
,
074602
(
2018
).
26.
Zhu
,
L.
,
Zhang
,
W.
,
Kou
,
J.
, and
Liu
,
Y.
, “
Machine learning methods for turbulence modeling in subsonic flows around airfoils
,”
Phys. Fluids
31
(
1
),
015105
(
2019
).
You do not currently have access to this content.