The flow inside a fluid damper where a piston reciprocates sinusoidally inside an outer casing containing high-viscosity silicone oil is simulated using a finite volume method, at various excitation frequencies. The oil is modeled by the Carreau-Yasuda (CY) and Phan-Thien and Tanner (PTT) constitutive equations. Both models account for shear-thinning, but only the PTT model accounts for elasticity. The CY and other generalised Newtonian models have been previously used in theoretical studies of fluid dampers, but the present study is the first to perform full two-dimensional (axisymmetric) simulations employing a viscoelastic constitutive equation. It is found that the CY and PTT predictions are similar when the excitation frequency is low, but at medium and higher frequencies, the CY model fails to describe important phenomena that are predicted by the PTT model and observed in experimental studies found in the literature, such as the hysteresis of the force-displacement and force-velocity loops. Elastic effects are quantified by applying a decomposition of the damper force into elastic and viscous components, inspired from large amplitude oscillatory shear theory. The CY model also overestimates the damper force relative to the PTT model because it underpredicts the flow development length inside the piston-cylinder gap. It is thus concluded that (a) fluid elasticity must be accounted for and (b) theoretical approaches that rely on the assumption of one-dimensional flow in the piston-cylinder gap are of limited accuracy, even if they account for fluid viscoelasticity. The consequences of using lower-viscosity silicone oil are also briefly examined.

1.
M. C.
Constantinou
and
M. D.
Symans
, “
Experimental study of seismic response of buildings with supplemental fluid dampers
,”
The Struct. Des. Tall Build.
2
,
93
132
(
1993
).
2.
D.
Konstantinidis
,
N.
Makris
, and
J. M.
Kelly
, “
In-situ condition assessment of seismic fluid dampers: Experimental studies and challenges
,”
Meccanica
50
(
2
),
323
340
(
2015
).
3.
G.
Yao
,
F.
Yap
,
G.
Chen
,
W.
Li
, and
S.
Yeo
, “
MR damper and its application for semi-active control of vehicle suspension system
,”
Mechatronics
12
,
963
973
(
2002
).
4.
Q.-H.
Nguyen
and
S.-B.
Choi
, “
Optimal design of MR shock absorber and application to vehicle suspension
,”
Smart Mater. Struct.
18
,
035012
(
2009
).
5.
A.
Rittweger
,
J.
Albus
,
E.
Hornung
,
H.
Öry
, and
P.
Mourey
, “
Passive damping devices for aerospace structures
,”
Acta Astronaut.
50
,
597
608
(
2002
).
6.
A.
Seleemah
and
M. C.
Constantinou
, “
Investigation of seismic response of buildings with linear and nonlinear fluid viscous dampers
,” Technical Report NCEER-97-0004,
National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research
,
1997
.
7.
N.
Makris
and
M. C.
Constantinou
, “
Fractional-derivative Maxwell model for viscous dampers
,”
J. Struct. Eng.
117
,
2708
2724
(
1991
).
8.
D. H.
Wang
and
W. H.
Liao
, “
Magnetorheological fluid dampers: A review of parametric modelling
,”
Smart Mater. Struct.
20
,
023001
(
2011
).
9.
L.-Y.
Lu
,
G.-L.
Lin
, and
M.-H.
Shih
, “
An experimental study on a generalized Maxwell model for nonlinear viscoelastic dampers used in seismic isolation
,”
Eng. Struct.
34
,
111
123
(
2012
).
10.
C. C.
Currie
and
B. F.
Smith
, “
Flow characteristics of organopolysiloxane fluids and greases
,”
Ind. Eng. Chem.
42
,
2457
2462
(
1950
).
11.
P.
Longin
,
C.
Verdier
, and
M.
Piau
, “
Dynamic shear rheology of high molecular weight polydimethylsiloxanes: Comparison of rheometry and ultrasound
,”
J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech.
76
,
213
232
(
1998
).
12.
Z.
Kokuti
,
K.
van Gruijthuijsen
,
M.
Jenei
,
G.
Toth-Molnar
,
A.
Czirjak
,
J.
Kokavecz
,
P.
Ailer
,
L.
Palkovics
,
A.
Volker
, and
G.
Szabo
, “
High-frequency rheology of a high viscosity silicone oil using diffusing wave spectroscopy
,”
Appl. Rheol.
24
(
6
),
63984
(
2014
).
13.
C. J.
Black
and
N.
Makris
, “
Viscous heating of fluid dampers under small and large amplitude motions: Experimental studies and parametric modeling
,”
J. Eng. Mech.
133
,
566
577
(
2007
).
14.
C.-Y.
Hou
, “
Fluid dynamics and behavior of nonlinear viscous fluid dampers
,”
J. Struct. Eng.
134
(
1
),
56
63
(
2008
).
15.
H.-B.
Yun
,
F.
Tasbighoo
,
S.
Masri
,
J.
Caffrey
,
R.
Wolfe
,
N.
Makris
, and
C.
Black
, “
Comparison of modeling approaches for full-scale nonlinear viscous dampers
,”
J. Vib. Control
14
,
51
76
(
2008
).
16.
S.
Jiao
,
J.
Tian
,
H.
Zheng
, and
H.
Hua
, “
Modeling of a hydraulic damper with shear thinning fluid for damping mechanism analysis
,”
J. Vib. Control
23
,
3365
3376
(
2017
).
17.
K.
Yasuda
,
R.
Armstrong
, and
R.
Cohen
, “
Shear flow properties of concentrated solutions of linear and star branched polystyrenes
,”
Rheol. Acta
20
(
2
),
163
178
(
1981
).
18.
J.
Sun
,
S.
Jiao
,
X.
Huang
, and
H.
Hua
, “
Investigation into the impact and buffering characteristics of a non-Newtonian fluid damper: Experiment and simulation
,”
Shock Vib.
2014
, 170464.
19.
N.
Makris
,
S. A.
Burton
,
D.
Hill
, and
M.
Jordan
, “
Analysis and design of ER damper for seismic protection of structures
,”
J. Eng. Mech.
122
(
10
),
1003
1011
(
1996
).
20.
X.
Wang
and
F.
Gordaninejad
, “
Flow analysis and modeling of field-controllable, electro-and magneto-rheological fluid dampers
,”
J. Appl. Mech.
74
(
1
),
13
22
(
2007
).
21.
R.
Fattal
and
R.
Kupferman
, “
Time-dependent simulation of viscoelastic flows at high Weissenberg number using the log-conformation representation
,”
J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech.
126
,
23
37
(
2005
).
22.
A.
Syrakos
,
Y.
Dimakopoulos
,
G. C.
Georgiou
, and
J.
Tsamopoulos
, “
Viscoplastic flow in an extrusion damper
,”
J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech.
232
,
102
124
(
2016
).
23.
N.
Phan-Thien
and
R. I.
Tanner
, “
A new constitutive equation derived from network theory
,”
J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech.
2
,
353
365
(
1977
).
24.
R. A.
Snyder
,
G. M.
Kamath
, and
N. M.
Wereley
, “
Characterization and analysis of magnetorheological damper behavior under sinusoidal loading
,”
AIAA J.
39
,
1240
1253
(
2001
).
25.
Z.
Parlak
and
T.
Engin
, “
Time-dependent CFD and quasi-static analysis of magnetorheological fluid dampers with experimental validation
,”
Int. J. Mech. Sci.
64
(
1
),
22
31
(
2012
).
26.
G. W.
Rodgers
,
J. G.
Chase
,
J. B.
Mander
,
N. C.
Leach
, and
C. S.
Denmead
, “
Experimental development, tradeoff analysis and design implementation of high force-to-volume damping technology
,”
Bull. New Zealand Soc. Earthquake Eng.
40
(
2
),
35
48
(
2007
).
27.
N. M.
Wereley
and
L.
Pang
, “
Nondimensional analysis of semi-active electrorheological and magnetorheological dampers using approximate parallel plate models
,”
Smart Mater. Struct.
7
(
5
),
732
(
1998
).
28.
Q.-H.
Nguyen
and
S.-B.
Choi
, “
Dynamic modeling of an electrorheological damper considering the unsteady behavior of electrorheological fluid flow
,”
Smart Mater. Struct.
18
(
5
),
055016
(
2009
).
29.
N.
Makris
, “
Viscous heating of fluid dampers. I: Small-amplitude motions
,”
J. Eng. Mech.
124
,
1210
1216
(
1998
).
30.
N.
Makris
,
Y.
Roussos
,
A. S.
Whittaker
, and
J. M.
Kelly
, “
Viscous heating of fluid dampers. II: Large-amplitude motions
,”
J. Eng. Mech.
124
(
11
),
1217
1223
(
1998
).
31.
A. J.
Barlow
,
G.
Harrison
, and
J.
Lamb
, “
Viscoelastic relaxation of polydimethylsiloxane liquids
,”
Proc. R. Soc. A
282
,
228
251
(
1964
).
32.
F. A.
Morrison
,
Understanding Rheology
(
Oxford University Press
,
2001
).
33.
N.
Phan-Thien
, “
A nonlinear network viscoelastic model
,”
J. Rheol.
22
,
259
283
(
1978
).
34.
K.
Foteinopoulou
,
V. G.
Mavrantzas
, and
J.
Tsamopoulos
, “
Numerical simulation of bubble growth in Newtonian and viscoelastic filaments undergoing stretching
,”
J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech.
122
,
177
200
(
2004
).
35.
Y.
Dimakopoulos
and
J.
Tsamopoulos
, “
On the transient coating of a straight tube with a viscoelastic material
,”
J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech.
159
,
95
114
(
2009
).
36.
J.
Papaioannou
,
A.
Giannousakis
,
Y.
Dimakopoulos
, and
J.
Tsamopoulos
, “
Bubble deformation and growth inside viscoelastic filaments undergoing very large extensions
,”
Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.
53
,
7548
7569
(
2014
).
37.
D.
Pettas
,
G.
Karapetsas
,
Y.
Dimakopoulos
, and
J.
Tsamopoulos
, “
On the origin of extrusion instabilities: Linear stability analysis of the viscoelastic die swell
,”
J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech.
224
,
61
77
(
2015
).
38.
D.
Fraggedakis
,
M.
Pavlidis
,
Y.
Dimakopoulos
, and
J.
Tsamopoulos
, “
On the velocity discontinuity at a critical volume of a bubble rising in a viscoelastic fluid
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
789
,
310
346
(
2016
).
39.
J.
Azaiez
,
R.
Guénette
, and
A.
Aït-Kadi
, “
Numerical simulation of viscoelastic flows through a planar contraction
,”
J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech.
62
,
253
277
(
1996
).
40.
R.
Poole
, “
The Deborah and Weissenberg numbers
,”
British Soc. Rheol. Rheol. Bull.
53
,
32
39
(
2012
).
41.
G. K.
Batchelor
,
An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics
(
Cambridge University Press
,
2000
), pp.
224
227
.
42.
Q.
He
and
X.-P.
Wang
, “
Numerical study of the effect of Navier slip on the driven cavity flow
,”
ZAMM-J. Appl. Math. Mech.
89
(
10
),
857
868
(
2009
).
43.
J.
Koplik
and
J. R.
Banavar
, “
Corner flow in the sliding plate problem
,”
Phys. Fluids
7
(
12
),
3118
3125
(
1995
).
44.
T.
Qian
and
X.-P.
Wang
, “
Driven cavity flow: From molecular dynamics to continuum hydrodynamics
,”
Multiscale Model. Simul.
3
(
4
),
749
763
(
2005
).
45.
S. G.
Hatzikiriakos
, “
Slip mechanisms in complex fluid flows
,”
Soft Matter
11
(
40
),
7851
7856
(
2015
).
46.
S. G.
Hatzikiriakos
, “
Wall slip of molten polymers
,”
Prog. Polym. Sci.
37
(
4
),
624
643
(
2012
).
47.
L. A.
Archer
, “
Wall slip: Measurement and modeling issues
,” in
Polymer Processing Instabilities: Control and Understanding
, edited by
S. G.
Hatzikiriakos
and
K. B.
Migler
(
Marcel Dekker
,
2005
), Chap. 4, pp.
73
120
.
48.
G.
Karapetsas
and
J.
Tsamopoulos
, “
Transient squeeze flow of viscoplastic materials
,”
J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech.
133
,
35
56
(
2006
).
49.
A.
Syrakos
and
A.
Goulas
, “
Estimate of the truncation error of finite volume discretization of the Navier-Stokes equations on colocated grids
,”
Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids
50
(
1
),
103
130
(
2006
).
50.
A.
Syrakos
and
A.
Goulas
, “
Finite volume adaptive solutions using SIMPLE as smoother
,”
Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids
52
,
1215
1245
(
2006
).
51.
M.
Pavlidis
,
Y.
Dimakopoulos
, and
J.
Tsamopoulos
, “
Steady viscoelastic film flow over 2D topography: I. The effect of viscoelastic properties under creeping flow
,”
J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech.
165
,
576
591
(
2010
).
52.
Y.
Dimakopoulos
and
J.
Tsamopoulos
, “
A quasi-elliptic transformation for moving boundary problems with large anisotropic deformations
,”
J. Comput. Phys.
192
,
494
522
(
2003
).
53.
N.
Chatzidai
,
A.
Giannousakis
,
Y.
Dimakopoulos
, and
J.
Tsamopoulos
, “
On the elliptic mesh generation in domains containing multiple inclusions and undergoing large deformations
,”
J. Comput. Phys.
228
,
1980
2011
(
2009
).
54.
A.
Syrakos
,
S.
Varchanis
,
Y.
Dimakopoulos
,
A.
Goulas
, and
J.
Tsamopoulos
, “
A critical analysis of some popular methods for the discretisation of the gradient operator in finite volume methods
,”
Phys. Fluids
29
,
127103
(
2017
).
55.
C. M.
Rhie
and
W. L.
Chow
, “
Numerical study of the turbulent flow past an airfoil with trailing edge separation
,”
AIAA J.
21
,
1525
1532
(
1983
).
56.
P.
Oliveira
,
F.
Pinho
, and
G.
Pinto
, “
Numerical simulation of non-linear elastic flows with a general collocated finite-volume method
,”
J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech.
79
,
1
43
(
1998
).
57.
H. M.
Matos
,
M. A.
Alves
, and
P. J.
Oliveira
, “
New formulation for stress calculation: Application to viscoelastic flow in a T-junction
,”
Numer. Heat Transfer, Part B
56
,
351
371
(
2009
).
58.
A.
Afonso
,
M.
Oliveira
,
P.
Oliveira
,
M.
Alves
, and
F.
Pinho
, “
The finite-volume method in computational rheology
,” in
Finite-Volume Methods: Powerful Means of Engineering Design
(
In-Tech Open Publishers
,
2012
), Chap. 7, pp.
141
170
.
59.
R.
Fattal
and
R.
Kupferman
, “
Constitutive laws for the matrix-logarithm of the conformation tensor
,”
J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech.
123
,
281
285
(
2004
).
60.
A.
Afonso
,
P.
Oliveira
,
F.
Pinho
, and
M.
Alves
, “
The log-conformation tensor approach in the finite-volume method framework
,”
J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech.
157
,
55
65
(
2009
).
61.
M. A.
Alves
,
P. J.
Oliveira
, and
F. T.
Pinho
, “
A convergent and universally bounded interpolation scheme for the treatment of advection
,”
Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids
41
(
1
),
47
75
(
2003
).
62.
A.
Sidi
, “
Review of two vector extrapolation methods of polynomial type with applications to large-scale problems
,”
J. Comput. Sci.
3
,
92
101
(
2012
).
63.
P.
Saramito
, “
On a modified non-singular log-conformation formulation for Johnson–Segalman viscoelastic fluids
,”
J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech.
211
,
16
30
(
2014
).
64.
R.
Sousa
,
R.
Poole
,
A.
Afonso
,
F.
Pinho
,
P.
Oliveira
,
A.
Morozov
, and
M.
Alves
, “
Lid-driven cavity flow of viscoelastic liquids
,”
J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech.
234
,
129
138
(
2016
).
65.
S.
Dalal
,
G.
Tomar
, and
P.
Dutta
, “
Numerical study of driven flows of shear thinning viscoelastic fluids in rectangular cavities
,”
J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech.
229
,
59
78
(
2016
).
66.
P. J.
Oliveira
, “
Method for time-dependent simulations of viscoelastic flows: Vortex shedding behind cylinder
,”
J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech.
101
,
113
137
(
2001
).
67.
K.
Hyun
,
M.
Wilhelm
,
C. O.
Klein
,
K. S.
Cho
,
J. G.
Nam
,
K. H.
Ahn
,
S. J.
Lee
,
R. H.
Ewoldt
, and
G. H.
McKinley
, “
A review of nonlinear oscillatory shear tests: Analysis and application of large amplitude oscillatory shear (LAOS)
,”
Prog. Polym. Sci.
36
,
1697
1753
(
2011
).
68.
M. A.
Alves
and
R. J.
Poole
, “
Divergent flow in contractions
,”
J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech.
144
,
140
148
(
2007
).
69.
P.
Sousa
,
P.
Coelho
,
M.
Oliveira
, and
M.
Alves
, “
Three-dimensional flow of Newtonian and Boger fluids in square–square contractions
,”
J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech.
160
,
122
139
(
2009
).
70.
P.
Sousa
,
P.
Coelho
,
M.
Oliveira
, and
M.
Alves
, “
Effect of the contraction ratio upon viscoelastic fluid flow in three-dimensional square–square contractions
,”
Chem. Eng. Sci.
66
,
998
1009
(
2011
).
71.
A. M.
Afonso
,
P. J.
Oliveira
,
F. T.
Pinho
, and
M. A.
Alves
, “
Dynamics of high-Deborah-number entry flows: A numerical study
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
677
,
272
304
(
2011
).
72.
R.
Comminal
,
J. H.
Hattel
,
M. A.
Alves
, and
J.
Spangenberg
, “
Vortex behavior of the Oldroyd-B fluid in the 4-1 planar contraction simulated with the streamfunction–log-conformation formulation
,”
J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech.
237
,
1
15
(
2016
).
73.
M. R.
Hashemi
,
M. T.
Manzari
, and
R.
Fatehi
, “
Non-linear stress response of non-gap-spanning magnetic chains suspended in a Newtonian fluid under oscillatory shear test: A direct numerical simulation
,”
Phys. Fluids
29
,
107106
(
2017
).
74.
K. S.
Cho
,
K.
Hyun
,
K. H.
Ahn
, and
S. J.
Lee
, “
A geometrical interpretation of large amplitude oscillatory shear response
,”
J. Rheol.
49
,
747
758
(
2005
).
75.
P.
Saramito
and
J.
Piau
, “
Flow characteristics of viscoelastic fluids in an abrupt contraction by using numerical modeling
,”
J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech.
52
,
263
288
(
1994
).
76.
M. A.
Alves
,
P. J.
Oliveira
, and
F. T.
Pinho
, “
Benchmark solutions for the flow of Oldroyd-B and PTT fluids in planar contractions
,”
J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech.
110
,
45
75
(
2003
).
77.
M. S.
Oliveira
,
P. J.
Oliveira
,
F. T.
Pinho
, and
M. A.
Alves
, “
Effect of contraction ratio upon viscoelastic flow in contractions: The axisymmetric case
,”
J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech.
147
,
92
108
(
2007
).
78.
A. E.
Likhtman
and
T. C. B.
McLeish
, “
Quantitative theory for linear dynamics of linear entangled polymers
,”
Macromolecules
35
,
6332
6343
(
2002
).
79.
R. P.
Wool
, “
Polymer entanglements
,”
Macromolecules
26
,
1564
1569
(
1993
).
80.
R. M.
Corless
,
G. H.
Gonnet
,
D. E.
Hare
,
D. J.
Jeffrey
, and
D. E.
Knuth
, “
On the Lambert W function
,”
Adv. Comput. Math.
5
,
329
359
(
1996
).
81.
R. H.
Ewoldt
and
G. H.
McKinley
, “
On secondary loops in LAOS via self-intersection of Lissajous–Bowditch curves
,”
Rheol. Acta
49
,
213
219
(
2010
).
82.

The temperature rise of the fluid due to viscous dissipation can be important and deserves a separate study. It is investigated theoretically in Refs. 29 and 30 and experimentally in Ref. 13. In Ref. 13, experiments performed with a damper of much larger size than the present model showed that if the amplitude of oscillation is significantly greater than the piston diameter then the oil temperature in the neighbourhood of the piston can rise by 50 or more degrees Celsius during 6 oscillation cycles (the temperature rise is smaller farther away from the piston), which leads to a 10% drop in the maximum damper force during the same period. A force drop is expected because such a temperature rise would reduce the oil viscosity to half its room temperature value.10,31 However, other experiments (again in Ref. 13) with a smaller damper showed a negligible effect of the temperature rise on the force magnitude, so this issue requires further investigation.

83.

The full Carreau-Yasuda model includes a fifth parameter, the viscosity limit η as γ̇. The experimental data for silicone oil10,12 such as those plotted in Fig. 2 do not reveal such a non-zero limit; therefore, we set η = 0, in which case the Carreau-Yasuda model reduces to Eq. (8).

84.

The “microscopic” fluid element is still much larger than the molecular dimensions so that the fluid can be regarded as a continuum.

85.

The instantaneous energy balance for the damper fluid includes the rate of work of the force Ff l, the rate of viscous dissipation of energy into heat, and the rate of change of energy stored in the fluid in the form of elastic energy. However, considering a full period of oscillation, if the flow has reached the periodic state, the stored elastic energy at time t is exactly equal to that at time t + T. Therefore, the work of Ff l during a complete cycle is equal to the amount of energy dissipated to heat by viscous action during the same period.

86.

Note, however, that the lPTT-10 geometry differs slightly from that of the lPTT-100 and lPTT-500 simulations, and comparing Rec, De, and Wi values between different geometries is not a completely valid way of assessing the relative importance of the effects that these numbers quantify (see our previous publication, Ref. 22).

87.

For the f = 2 Hz simulation, we reduced the time step to Δt = T/32 000 to ensure that it is quite smaller than the relaxation time; this results in λt ≈ 45.

88.

The Lambert W function is double-valued on the interval (−1/e, 0), but here 2ab2 > 0 and there is only one branch to follow.

You do not currently have access to this content.