It is well known that an alternating magnetic field (either single phase or multiphase) applied to a conductor, whether solid or fluid, will induce electric currents in the conductor, and hence a Lorentz force distribution. This Lorentz force is in general rotational, and if the conductor is fluid, it is set in motion. Thus the magnetic field acts as a nonintrusive stirring device and it can, in principle, be engineered to provide any desired pattern of stirring. Stirring may also be effected through the interaction of a steady current distribution driven through a fluid and the associated magnetic field. When the field frequency is high, the Lorentz force is confined to a thin electromagnetic boundary layer, and the net effect of the magnetic field is to induce either a tangential velocity or a tangential stress just inside the boundary layer. The distribution of velocity or stress is related to the structure of the applied field. Symmetric configurations may lead to patterns of stirring in which the streamlines lie on toroidal surfaces; more generally, however, the streamline pattern is chaotic. Examples of both types are presented, and applications are discussed. A somewhat related problem arises if electrically conducting particles are suspended in a nonconducting fluid, the whole being subjected to the same type of alternating magnetic field. Currents are now induced in the particles, and each particle experiences a force and a couple. When several particles are in suspension, the movement of each is influenced by the presence of the others, and a problem somewhat analogous to the problem of interacting point vortices arises. For a suspension of conducting particles, inhomogeneity of the field leads to inhomogeneity of the concentration of particles, and a bulk flow is, in general, induced. The general principles underlying this behavior are briefly summarized.

1.
Metallurgical Applications of Magnetohydrodynamics, edited by H. K. Moffatt and M. R. E. Proctor (The Metals Society, London, 1984).
2.
Liquid Metal Magnetohydrodynamics, edited by J. Lielpeteris and R. Moreau, (Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1989).
3.
MHD-Flows and Turbulence II, edited by H. Branover and A. Yakhot (Israel U.P., Jerusalem, 1980).
4.
V. Bojarevičs, Ya. Freibergs, E. I. Shilova, and E. V. Shcherbinin, Electrically Induced Vortical Flows (Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1989).
5.
E. F.
Northrup
,
Phys. Rev.
XXIV
,
474
(
1907
).
6.
W.
Braunbeck
,
Z. Phys.
73
,
312
(
1932
).
7.
In the turbulent regime, the torque may depend on fluid density and viscosity as well as on its conductivity.
8.
Rem exceeds values of order unity only on the very large scales arising in geophysical and astrophysical contexts, or in the large cooling circuits of fast breeder nuclear reactors.
9.
L. L.
Tir
,
Magn. Gidrodin.
20
,
100
(
1976
).
10.
H. K. Moffatt, in Ref. 1, p. 180.
11.
H. K.
Moffatt
,
J. Fluid Mech.
22
,
521
(
1965
),
H. K.
Moffatt
,
58
,
823
(
1973
).,
J. Fluid Mech.
12.
A. T.
Richardson
,
J. Fluid Mech.
63
,
593
(
1974
).
13.
H. K. Moffatt, in Ref. 3, p. 45.
14.
See, for example,
A. B.
Kapusta
,
Magn. Gidrodin.
5
,
117
(
1969
).
15.
See, for example, S. Asai, in Ref. 2, p. 391.
16.
D. J.
Hayes
,
M. R.
Brown
, and
M. R.
Hobdell
,
J. Br. Nucl. Energy Soc.
10
,
93
(
1971
).
17.
A. Alemany, J. Barbet, Y. Fautrelle, and R. Moreau, Brevet (Patent) d’invention 77.17296 Agence Nationale de Valorization de la Recherche.
18.
The situation is very similar to that studied by
K.
Bajer
and
H. K.
Moffatt
[
J. Fluid Mech.
212
,
337
(
1990
)] in which quadraticfoicing was used on the surface of the sphere. The case of cubic forcing has been studied by H. Stone [to appear in J. Fluid Mech. (1991)] in the context of Stokes flow inside a viscous drop subjected to an arbitrary linear deformation field, and the chaotic character of the flow is eyident in that context also.
19.
J. C. R. Hunt and M. R. Maxey, in Ref. 3, p. 249.
20.
J. A.
Shercliff
,
Proc. R. Soc., London Ser. A
375
,
455
(
1981
).
21.
J. Etay and M. Gamler, in Ref. 1, p. 190.
22.
W. A.
Peifer
,
J. Metals
17
,
487
(
1965
).
23.
J.
Mestel
,
J. Fluid Mech.
117
,
27
(
1982
).
24.
A. D.
Sneyd
and
H. K.
Moffatt
,
J. Fluid Mech.
117
,
45
(
1982
) and references therein.
25.
A. D. Sneyd, in Ref. 1, p. 205.
26.
D. C. Lillicrap, in Ref. 2, p. 363.
27.
V.
Bojarevičs
and
E. V.
Shcherbinin
,
J. Fluid Mech.
126
,
413
(
1983
).
28.
S. D. Lympany, J. W. Evans, and R. Moreau, in Ref. 1, p. 15.
29.
R. Moreau, S. Pigny, and S. A. Maslowe, in Ref. 2, p. 197.
30.
H. K.
Moffatt
,
J. Fluid Mech.
218
,
509
(
1990
).
31.
H.
Aref
,
Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech.
15
,
345
(
1983
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.