A thick ridge of a film arising along the periphery of a substrate, which is the so-called edge-bead, is investigated experimentally and numerically for the case where the bead becomes double-peaked shape in direction away from the periphery of the substrate. It is clarified, by the optical measurement of thickness variations, that the double-peaked bead is separated from a single bead during the drying process, and after the separation, the inner bead moves inward. This motion of the bead is modeled by a lubrication-approximated flow equation, where the Laplace pressure and the solutocapillary effect are taken into account, coupled with the convective and diffusive mass transfer. The numerically simulated motion of the bead shows a good agreement with that obtained by the experiment, and it is revealed that the mechanism how the double-peaked edge-bead is formed. At the early stage of the drying process, a single bead is formed by the Laplace pressure due to the curvature along the substrate periphery. Along this single bead, the concentration gradient is caused by both the spatial distribution of the evaporation rate and the thickness effect on the change rate of the concentration, due to the fact that the resin concentration increases at a faster rate in the thin region. Consequently, the concentration distribution has a local minimum in the middle of the single bead, which drives oppositely directed solutocapillary flows and separates the bead. After the separation, the inner bead moves inward by a kind of a feed-forward mechanism, until the viscosity of the film becomes large enough to suppress the flow.

1.
U.
Ayachit
,
The ParaView Guide: A Parallel Visualization Application
(
Kitware Inc.
,
Clifton Park, NY
,
2015
).
2.
C.
Mack
, in
Fundamental Principles of Optical Lithography: The Science of Microfabrication
, edited by
C.
Mack
(
John Wiley & Sons
,
2007
).
3.
M.
Pannek
,
T.
Dunkel
, and
D. W.
Schubert
, “
Effect of a bell-shaped cover in spin coating process on final film thickness
,”
Mater. Res. Innovations
4
,
340
343
(
2001
).
4.
A. G.
Emslie
,
F. T.
Bonner
, and
L. G.
Peck
, “
Flow of a viscous liquid on a rotating disk
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
29
,
858
862
(
1958
).
5.
D. B.
Thiessen
,
D. J.
Chione
,
C. B.
McCreary
, and
W. B.
Krantz
, “
Robust digital image analysis of pendant drop shapes
,”
J. Colloid Interface Sci.
177
,
658
665
(
1996
).
6.
A.
Oron
,
S. H.
Davis
, and
S. G.
Bankoff
, “
Long-scale evolution of thin liquid films
,”
Rev. Mod. Phys.
69
,
931
980
(
1997
).
7.
M. H.
Eres
,
D. E.
Weidner
, and
L. W.
Schwartz
, “
Three-dimensional direct numerical simulation of surface-tension-gradient effects on the leveling of an evaporating multicomponent fluid
,”
Langmuir
15
,
1859
1871
(
1999
).
8.
S. B. G.
O’brien
and
L. W.
Schwartz
, “
Theory and modeling of thin film flows
,” in
Encyclopedia of Surface and Colloid Science
(
Marcel Dekker, Inc.
,
2002
), pp.
5283
5297
.
9.
L. W.
Schwartz
and
R. V.
Roy
, “
Theoretical and numerical results for spin coating of viscous liquids
,”
Phys. Fluids
16
,
569
584
(
2004
).
10.
E.
Sultan
,
A.
Boudaoud
, and
M. B.
Amar
, “
Evaporation of a thin film: Diffusion of the vapor and Marangoni instabilities
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
543
,
183
202
(
2005
).
11.
P. H.
Gaskell
,
P. K.
Jimack
,
M.
Sellier
, and
H. M.
Thompson
, “
Flow of evaporating, gravity-driven thin liquid films over topography
,”
Phys. Fluids
18
,
013601
(
2006
).
12.
S. G.
Yiantsios
and
B. G.
Higgins
, “
Marangoni flows during driving of colloidal films
,”
Phys. Fluids
18
,
082103
(
2006
).
13.
T.
Okuzono
,
M.
Kobayashi
, and
M.
Doi
, “
Final shape of a drying thin film
,”
Phys. Rev. E
80
,
021603
(
2009
).
14.
D. E.
Weidner
,
L. W.
Schwartz
, and
M. H.
Eres
, “
Simulation of coating layer evolution and drop formation on horizontal cylinders
,”
J. Colloid Interface Sci.
187
,
243
258
(
1997
).
15.
L. E.
Sriven
and
C. V.
Sternling
, “
The Marangoni effects
,”
Nature
187
,
186
188
(
1960
).
16.
R. D.
Deegan
,
O.
Bakajin
,
T. F.
Dupont
,
G.
Huber
,
S. R.
Nagel
, and
T. A.
Witten
, “
Contact line deposits in an evaporating drop
,”
Phys. Rev. E
62
,
756
765
(
2000
).
17.
J. A.
Diez
,
L.
Kondic
, and
A.
Bertozzi
, “
Global models for moving contact lines
,”
Phys. Rev. E
63
,
011208
(
2000
).
18.
J. A.
Diez
and
L.
Kondic
, “
Computing three-dimensional thin film flows including contact lines
,”
J. Comput. Phys.
183
,
274
306
(
2002
).
19.
H. A.
Van der Vorst
, “
Bi-CGSTAB: A fast and smoothly converging variant of Bi-CG for the solution of non-symmetric linear systems
,”
SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comput.
3
,
631
644
(
1992
).
20.
Y.
Miki
and
T.
Washizawa
, “
A2ILU: Auto-accelerated ILU preconditioner for sparse linear systems
,”
SIAM J. Sci. Comput.
35
,
A1212
A1232
(
2013
).
21.
A. H.
Lefebvre
, in
Atomization and Sprays
(
Taylor & Francis
,
1988
), Chap. 4, pp.
127
136
.
22.
D. E.
Weidner
,
L. W.
Schwartz
, and
R. R.
Eley
, “
Role of surface tension gradients in correcting coating defects in corners
,”
J. Colloid Interface Sci.
179
,
66
75
(
1996
).
23.
R. V.
Roy
,
A. J.
Roberts
, and
M. E.
Simpson
, “
A lubrication model of coating flows over a curved substrate in space
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
454
,
235
261
(
2002
).
You do not currently have access to this content.