Smoluchowski’s formula for thin-double-layer electrophoresis does not apply for highly charged particles, where surface conduction modifies the electrokinetic transport in the electro-neutral bulk. To date, systematic studies of this nonzero Dukhin-number effect have been limited to weak fields. Employing our recent macroscale model [O. Schnitzer and E. Yariv, “Macroscale description of electrokinetic flows at large zeta potentials: Nonlinear surface conduction,” Phys. Rev. E 86, 021503 (2012)], valid for arbitrary Dukhin numbers, we analyze herein particle electrophoresis at small (but finite) Dukhin numbers; valid for arbitrary fields, this asymptotic limit essentially captures the practical range of parameters quantifying typical colloidal systems. Perturbing about the irrotational zero-Dukhin-number flow, we derive a linear scheme for calculating the small-Dukhin-number correction to Smoluchowski’s velocity. This scheme essentially amounts to the solution of a linear diffusion–advection problem governing the salt distribution in the electro-neutral bulk. Using eigenfunction expansions, we obtain a semi-analytic solution for this problem. It is supplemented by asymptotic approximations in the respective limits of weak fields, small ions, and strong fields; in the latter singular limit, salt polarization is confined to a diffusive boundary layer. With the salt-transport problem solved, the velocity correction is readily obtained by evaluating three quadratures, corresponding to the contributions of (i) electro- and diffuso-osmotic slip due to polarization of both the Debye layer and the bulk; (ii) a net Maxwell force on the electrical double layer; and (iii) Coulomb body forces acting on the space charge in the “electro-neutral” bulk. The velocity correction calculated based upon the semi-analytic solution exhibits a transition from the familiar retardation at weak fields to velocity enhancement at moderate fields; this transition is analytically captured by the small-ion approximation. At stronger fields, the velocity correction approaches a closed-form asymptotic approximation which follows from an analytic solution of the diffusive boundary-layer problem. In this régime, the correction varies as the 3/2-power of the applied field. Our small-Dukhin-number scheme, valid at arbitrary field strengths, naturally lends itself to a tractable analysis of nonlinear surface-conduction effects in numerous electrokinetic problems.

1.
M.
Smoluchowski
, “
Elektrische endosmose und strömungsströme
,” in
Handbuch der Elektrizität und des Magnetismus, Band II, Stationaire Ströme
, edited by
L.
Graetz
(
Barth-Verlag
,
Leipzig
,
1921
).
2.
R. J.
Hunter
,
Foundations of Colloidal Science
(
Oxford University Press
,
Oxford, UK
,
2000
).
3.
F. A.
Morrison
, “
Electrophoresis of a particle of arbitrary shape
,”
J. Colloid Interface Sci.
34
,
210
214
(
1970
).
4.
B. J.
Kirby
,
Micro- and Nanoscale Fluid Mechanics: Transport in Microfluidic Devices
(
Cambridge University Press
,
Cambridge
,
2010
).
5.
A. V.
Delgado
,
F.
Gonzalez-Caballero
,
R. J.
Hunter
,
L. K.
Koopal
, and
J.
Lyklema
, “
Measurement and interpretation of electrokinetic phenomena
,”
J. Colloid Interface Sci.
309
,
194
224
(
2007
).
6.
J.
Lyklema
,
Fundamentals of Interface and Colloid Science
(
Academic
,
New York
,
1995
), Vol.
II
.
7.
R. W.
O’Brien
and
L. R.
White
, “
Electrophoretic mobility of a spherical colloidal particle
,”
J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 2
74
,
1607
1626
(
1978
).
8.
S. S.
Dukhin
, “
Diffusion-electrical theory of electrophoresis
,” in
Twentieth International Congress on Pure and Applied Chemistry
(
Moscow
,
1965
), Vol.
A72
, p.
68
.
9.
B. V.
Derjaguin
and
S. S.
Dukhin
, “
Nonequilibrium double layer and electrokinetic phenomena
,” in
Electrokinetic Phenomena
,
Surface and Colloid Science
, edited by
E.
Matijevic
(
John Wiley
,
New York
,
1974
), Vol.
7
, pp.
273
336
.
10.
R. W.
O’Brien
and
R. J.
Hunter
, “
The electrophoretic mobility of large colloidal particles
,”
Can. J. Chem.
59
,
1878
1887
(
1981
).
11.
R. W.
O’Brien
, “
The solution of the electrokinetic equations for colloidal particles with thin double layers
,”
J. Colloid Interface Sci.
92
,
204
216
(
1983
).
12.
J. D.
Sherwood
, “
The primary electroviscous effect in a suspension of spheres
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
101
,
609
629
(
1980
).
13.
E. J.
Hinch
and
J. D.
Sherwood
, “
Primary electroviscous effect in a suspension of spheres with thin double layers
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
132
,
337
47
(
1983
).
14.
W. C.
Chew
, “
Dielectric enhancement and electrophoresis due to an electrochemical double layer: A uniform approximation
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
80
,
4541
(
1984
).
15.
E. J.
Hinch
,
J. D.
Sherwood
,
W. C.
Chew
, and
P. N.
Sen
, “
Dielectric response of a dilute suspension of spheres with thin double layers in an asymmetric electrolyte
,”
J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 2
80
,
535
551
(
1984
).
16.
Y.
Pawar
,
Y. E.
Solomentsev
, and
J. L.
Anderson
, “
Polarization effects on diffusiophoresis in electrolyte gradients
,”
J. Colloid Interface Sci.
155
,
488
498
(
1993
).
17.
A. S.
Khair
and
T. M.
Squires
, “
Fundamental aspects of concentration polarization arising from nonuniform electrokinetic transport
,”
Phys. Fluids
20
,
087102
(
2008
).
18.
A. S.
Khair
and
T. M.
Squires
, “
Surprising consequences of ion conservation in electro-osmosis over a surface charge discontinuity
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
615
,
323
334
(
2008
).
19.
E.
Yariv
, “
Electro-osmotic flow near a surface charge discontinuity
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
521
,
181
189
(
2004
).
20.
A. S.
Khair
and
T. M.
Squires
, “
The influence of hydrodynamic slip on the electrophoretic mobility of a spherical colloidal particle
,”
Phys. Fluids
21
,
042001
(
2009
).
21.
R. W.
O’Brien
and
D. N.
Ward
, “
The electrophoresis of a spheroid with a thin double layer
,”
J. Colloid Interface Sci.
121
,
402
413
(
1988
).
22.
H. J.
Keh
and
T. Y.
Huang
, “
Diffusiophoresis and electrophoresis of colloidal spheroids
,”
J. Colloid Interface Sci.
160
,
354
371
(
1993
).
23.
E.
Yariv
and
O.
Schnitzer
, “
The electrophoretic mobility of rod-like particles
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
719
, R3 (
2013
).
24.
O.
Schnitzer
and
E.
Yariv
, “
Macroscale description of electrokinetic flows at large zeta potentials: Nonlinear surface conduction
,”
Phys. Rev. E: Stat., Nonlinear, Soft Matter Phys.
86
,
021503
(
2012
).
25.
D. A.
Saville
, “
Electrokinetic effects with small particles
,”
Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech.
9
,
321
337
(
1977
).
26.
O.
Schnitzer
,
R.
Zeyde
,
I.
Yavneh
, and
E.
Yariv
, “
Nonlinear electrophoresis of a highly charged colloidal particle
,”
Phys. Fluids
25
,
052004
(
2013
).
27.
V.
Shilov
,
S.
Barany
,
C.
Grosse
, and
O.
Shramko
, “
Field-induced disturbance of the double layer electro-neutrality and non-linear electrophoresis
,”
Adv. Colloid Interface Sci.
104
,
159
173
(
2003
).
28.

The Dukhin number increases with the Debye thickness and the zeta potential, and decreases with particle size. In thin-double-layer systems, one routinely encounters zeta potentials of about 120 mV. In aqueous solutions, the thickest Debye width is about 100 nm; at this extreme, the thin-double-layer limit is still reasonably satisfied for particle size of about 5 μm. For these values, the Dukhin number is about 0.2.

29.
S. S.
Dukhin
, “
Electrophoresis at large Péclet numbers
,”
Adv. Colloid Interface Sci.
36
,
219
248
(
1991
).
30.
N. A.
Mishchuk
and
S. S.
Dukhin
, “
Electrophoresis of solid particles at large Péclet numbers
,”
Electrophoresis
23
,
2012
2022
(
2002
).
31.
N. A.
Mishchuk
and
N. O.
Barinova
, “
Theoretical and experimental study of nonlinear electrophoresis
,”
Colloid J.
73
,
88
96
(
2011
).
32.

In principle, a finite value of γ introduces through condition (16) a coupling between φ and φs. The latter is governed by Laplace’s equation within the solid particle and the continuity condition φs = φ at r = 1. This coupling disappears in the thin-double-layer limit, considered next.

33.

The case of a moderately charged particle (Du = 0) and that of highly charged particle [Du = O(1)] were actually considered separately in Ref. 24, leading to two macroscale models; combining them leads to a uniformly valid model, which may be used for arbitrary values of Du: see section VIII in Ref. 24. In the present paper, we employ the uniformly valid model.

34.

Strictly speaking, a small-Dukhin-number approximation corresponds to the domain δ ≪ Du ≪ 1. The reason for the lower bound has to do with the derivation of the macroscale SY model. When Du = O(δ), errors of the same order as the correction might originate from higher-order terms in the thin-double-layer approximation δ ≪ 1.24 

35.
N. J.
Rivette
and
J. C.
Baygents
, “
A note on the electrostatic force and torque acting on an isolated body in an electric field
,”
Chem. Eng. Sci.
51
,
5205
5211
(
1996
).
36.

A naíve substitution of (56) into (55) would only yield the second term in (57). Consistently obtaining the remaining two terms using this method requires the calculation of c1 to O(α).

37.
H.
Brenner
, “
The Stokes resistance of an arbitrary particle—IV. Arbitrary fields of flow
,”
Chem. Eng. Sci.
19
,
703
727
(
1964
).
38.
L. G.
Leal
,
Advanced Transport Phenomena: Fluid Mechanics and Convective Transport Processes
(
Cambridge University Press
,
New York
,
2007
).
39.
J.
Happel
and
H.
Brenner
,
Low Reynolds Number Hydrodynamics
(
Prentice-Hall
,
Englewood Cliffs, NJ
,
1965
).
40.

The approximation presented in Ref. 24 is slightly different, as it was derived using the high-surface-charge model, where the brackets may be replaced by ln16.

41.
O.
Schnitzer
and
E.
Yariv
, “
Dielectric-solid polarization at strong fields: Breakdown of Smoluchowski’s electrophoresis formula
,”
Phys. Fluids
24
,
082005
(
2012
).
42.
O.
Schnitzer
and
E.
Yariv
, “
Strong-field electrophoresis
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
701
,
333
351
(
2012
).
43.
E.
Yariv
, “
“Force-free” electrophoresis?
,”
Phys. Fluids
18
,
031702
(
2006
).
You do not currently have access to this content.