A large number of experiments and numerical simulations have proved that friction factors in laminar channel flows are roughness-dependent provided that the ratios between roughness and channel height (i.e., the relative roughness) exceed some threshold values. However, it is not yet clear what are the causes that lead to this anomalous behaviour. In order to shed light into this issue, this study presents results from two-dimensional Lattice-Boltzmann simulations of laminar flows in channels with rough walls. The Reynolds number, the geometry of the roughness elements and the relative roughness were varied extensively in order to provide a comprehensive set of data. The analysis and interpretation of the data were carried out within the framework of the Spatially Averaged Navier-Stokes equations, which are ideal to investigate momentum transfer mechanisms in flows over rough walls. The results show that for most of the investigated roughness geometries, the pressure gradient driving the flow is balanced by form-drag, viscous drag, and viscous shear stress whereas form-induced stresses remain largely negligible. Furthermore, it was observed that the higher the ratio between the drag acting upon the roughness elements and the total drag, the more friction factors deviate from classical theory. On the basis of these observations, we propose a formula, which predicts the shear stress partitioning and we discuss its relevance within the context of biomedical applications.

1.
J.
Nikuradse
, “
Laws of flows in rough pipes
,” National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics Technical Memorandum 1292, Washington,
1950
.
2.
G.
Gamrat
,
M.
Favre-Marinet
,
S.
Leperson
,
R.
Bavier
, and
F.
Ayela
, “
An experimental study and modelling of roughness effects on laminar flow in microchannels
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
594
,
399
423
(
2008
).
3.
D.
Gloss
and
H.
Herwig
, “
Wall roughness effects in laminar flows: An often ignored though significant issue
,”
Exp. Fluids
49
(
2
),
461
470
(
2010
).
4.
S. G.
Kandlikar
,
D.
Schmitt
,
A. L.
Carrano
, and
J. B.
Taylor
, “
Characterization of surface roughness effects on pressure drop in single-phase flow in minichannels
,”
Phys. Fluids
17
(
10
),
100606
(
2005
).
5.
M.
Mala
and
D.
Li
, “
Flow characteristics of water in microtubes
,”
Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow
20
(
2
),
142
148
(
1999
).
6.
D.
Pfund
,
D.
Rector
, and
A.
Shekarriz
, “
Pressure drop measurements in a microchannel
,”
AIChE J.
46
(
8
),
1496
1507
(
2000
).
7.
H.
Herwig
,
D.
Gloss
, and
T.
Wenterodt
, “
Flow in channels with rough walls: old and new concepts
,”
Heat Transfer Eng.
31
(
8
),
658
665
(
2010
).
8.
Y.
Wang
and
P.
Dimitrakopoulos
, “
Nature of the hemodynamic forces exerted on vascular endothelial cells or leukocytes adhering to the surface of blood vessels
,”
Phys. Fluids
18
(
8
),
087107
(
2006
).
9.
A. M.
Lee
,
M. A.
Berny-Lang
,
S.
Liao
,
E.
Kanso
,
P.
Kuhn
,
O. J. T.
McCarty
, and
P. K.
Newton
, “
A low-dimensional deformation model for cancer cells in flow
,”
Phys. Fluids
24
(
8
),
081903
(
2012
).
10.
D. P.
Gaver
and
S. M.
Kute
, “
A theoretical model study of the influence of fluid stresses on a cell adhering to a microchannel wall
,”
Biophys. J.
75
(
2
),
721
733
(
1998
).
11.
K. V.
Christ
,
K. B.
Williamson
,
K. S.
Masters
, and
K. T.
Turner
, “
Measurement of single-cell adhesion strength using a microfluidic assay
,”
Biomed. Microdevices
12
(
3
),
443
455
(
2010
).
12.
T.
Das
,
T. K.
Maitia
, and
S.
Chakraborty
, “
Augmented stress-responsive characteristics of cell lines in narrow confinements
,”
Integr. Biol.
3
(
6
),
684
695
(
2011
).
13.
P.
Rupprecht
 et al., “
A tapered channel microfluidic device for comprehensive cell adhesion analysis, using measurements of detachment kinetics and shear stress-dependent motion
,”
Biomicrofluidics
6
(
1
),
014107
(
2012
).
14.
J.
Koo
and
C.
Kleinstreuer
, “
Liquid flow in microchannels: Experimental observations and computational analyses of microfluidics effects
,”
J. Micromech. Microeng.
13
(
5
),
568
569
(
2003
).
15.
Z. Y.
Guo
and
Z. X.
Li
, “
Size effect on single-phase channel flow and heat transfer at microscale
,”
Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow
24
(
3
),
284
298
(
2003
).
16.
J. A.
Ochoa-Tapia
and
S.
Whitaker
, “
Momentum-transfer at the boundary between a porous-medium and a homogeneous fluid: 1. Theoretical development
,”
Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer
38
(
14
),
2635
2646
(
1995
).
17.
D.
Pokrajac
and
C.
Manes
, “
Interface between turbulent flows above and within rough porous walls
,”
Acta Geophys.
56
(
3
),
824
844
(
2008
).
18.
C.
Camporeale
,
E.
Mantelli
, and
C.
Manes
, “
Interplay among unstable modes in films over permeable walls
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
719
,
527
550
(
2013
).
19.
S.
Whitaker
, “
Flow in porous media I: A theoretical derivation of Darcy's law
,”
Transp. Porous Media
1
(
1
),
3
25
(
1986
).
20.
S.
Whitaker
, “
The Forchheimer equation: A theoretical development
,”
Transp. Porous Media
25
(
1
),
27
61
(
1996
).
21.
N. R.
Wilson
and
R. H.
Shaw
, “
A higher order closure model for canopy flow
,”
J. Appl. Meteorol.
16
,
1197
1205
(
1977
).
22.
C.
Manes
,
D.
Pokrajac
,
O.
Coceal
, and
I.
McEwan
, “
On the significance of form-induced stress in rough wall turbulent boundary layers
,”
Acta Geophys.
56
(
3
),
845
861
(
2008
).
23.
V.
Nikora
,
I.
McEwan
,
S.
McLean
,
S.
Coleman
,
D.
Pokrajac
, and
R.
Walters
, “
Double-averaging concept for rough-bed open-channel and overland flows: Theoretical background
,”
J. Hydraul. Eng.
133
(
8
),
873
883
(
2007
).
24.
S.
Succi
,
The Lattice Boltzmann Equation for Fluid Dynamics and Beyond
(
Oxford University Press
,
2001
) .
25.
Y. H.
Qian
,
D.
D'Humieres
, and
P.
Lallemand
, “
Lattice BGK models for Navier-Stokes equation
,”
Europhys. Lett.
17
,
479
484
(
1992
).
26.
S.
Hou
,
Q.
Zou
,
S.
Chen
,
G.
Doolen
, and
A.
Cogley
, “
Simulation of cavity flow by lattice Boltzmann method
,”
J. Comput. Phys.
118
(
2
),
329
347
(
1995
).
27.
J.
Sterling
and
S.
Chen
, “
Stability analysis of lattice Boltzmann methods
,”
J. Comput. Phys.
123
(
1
),
196
206
(
1996
).
28.
G.
Croce
and
P.
D'Agaro
, “
Numerical simulation of roughness effect on microchannel heat transfer and pressure drop in laminar flow
,”
J. Phys. D
38
(
10
),
1518
1530
(
2005
).
You do not currently have access to this content.