In active microrheology, a probe particle is driven by an external force through a complex medium and its motion studied in order to infer properties of the embedding material. It is conducted in two limiting forms: either the probe is propelled by a fixed force, as with magnetic tweezers, or it is driven at a fixed velocity, as with optical tweezers. Recent work has shown that the mean probe motion can be interpreted as an effective material viscosity, but that this viscosity depends on whether the fixed-force or fixed-velocity mode is employed. We compute the effective viscosity probed by fixed-velocity active microrheology of a dilute colloidal dispersion. A comparison is made between this new result and the effective viscosity probed in the fixed-force mode. In the absence of hydrodynamic interactions, the particle-phase contributions to the effective viscosity for the two modes differ by exactly a factor of two. A simple scaling argument has been previously advanced to rationalize this difference: in the fixed-force mode, the probe is free to diffuse, and thus the relaxation time scale is set by the relative diffusivity between probe and bath. However, in the fixed-velocity mode, thermal motion of the probe particle is “frozen out” because the probe cannot diffuse; the relaxation rate is thus halved. The ratio of the two rates is independent of how quickly the probe particle is driven through the suspension—the extent and shape of microstructural deformation is the same for the two cases. In contrast, when the suspended particles interact hydrodynamically, the distortions to the suspension microstructure in the fixed-velocity versus fixed-force modes differ. We show that, depending on the strength of the hydrodynamic interactions, the ratio of the fixed-velocity to the fixed-force microstructural contributions to the effective viscosity may be as small as 1.3, and only approaches 2.0 when hydrodynamic interactions among the particles are negligibly weak. While this ratio varies both as a function of the strength of the deformation imposed and of the strength of hydrodynamic interactions, the fixed-velocity effective viscosity agrees qualitatively with that already measured for the fixed-force mode: the colloidal dispersion thins in the limit of weak hydrodynamic interactions; and it first thins and then thickens in the limit of strong hydrodynamic interactions, as the strength of deformation increases, recovering characteristics of shear-(force-) thinning and thickening well known in colloidal dispersions. The agreement between the two, and with traditional macrorheological approaches, shows that both fixed-force and fixed-velocity provide a useful tool for the interrogation of complex fluids.

1.
T. G.
Mason
and
D. A.
Weitz
, “
Optical measurements of frequency-dependent linear viscoelastic moduli of complex fluids
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
74
,
1250
1253
(
1995
).
2.
J. C.
Crocker
and
D. G.
Grier
, “
Methods of digital video microscopy for colloidal studies
,”
J. Colloid Interface Sci.
179
,
298
310
(
1996
).
3.
F. C.
MacKintosh
and
C. F.
Schmidt
, “
Microrheology
,”
Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci.
4
,
300
307
(
1999
).
4.
A.
Einstein
, “
On the theory of the Brownian movement
,”
Ann. Phys.
324
,
371
381
(
1906
).
5.
W.
Sutherland
, “
A dynamical theory of diffusion for non-electrolytes and the molecular mass of albumin
,”
Philos. Mag.
9
,
781
785
(
1905
).
6.
J.-B.
Perrin
, “
Mouvement Brownien et réalité moléculaire (Brownian movement and the molecular reality)
,”
Ann. Chim. Phys.
18
,
5
114
(
1909
).
7.
J.-B.
Perrin
,
Les Atomes
(
Librairies Felix Alcan
,
1914
).
8.
R.
Zwanzig
and
M.
Bixon
, “
Hydrodynamic theory of the velocity correlation
,”
Phys. Rev. A
2
,
2005
2012
(
1970
).
9.
T. G.
Mason
and
D. A.
Weitz
, “
Particle tracking microrheology of complex fluids
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
79
,
3282
3286
(
1997
).
10.
T. M.
Squires
and
T. G.
Mason
, “
Fluid mechanics of microrheology
,”
Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech.
42
,
413
438
(
2010
).
11.
J. C.
Crocker
, “
Measurement of the hydrodynamic corrections to the Brownian motion of two colloidal spheres
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
106
,
2837
2840
(
1997
).
12.
J. C.
Crocker
,
M. T.
Valentine
,
E. R.
Weeks
,
T.
Gisler
,
P. D.
Kaplan
,
A. G.
Yodh
, and
D. A.
Weitz
, “
Two-point microrheology of inhomogeneous soft materials
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
85
(
4
),
888
891
(
2000
).
13.
A. J.
Levine
and
T. C.
Lubensky
, “
One- and two-particle microrheology
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
85
,
1774
1778
(
2000
).
14.
T. M.
Squires
and
J. F.
Brady
, “
A simple paradigm for active and nonlinear microrheology
,”
Phys. Fluids
17
,
073101
1
073101
21
(
2005
).
15.
R. N.
Zia
and
J. F.
Brady
, “
Single particle motion in colloids: force-induced diffusion
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
658
,
188
210
(
2010
).
16.
P.
Habdas
,
D.
Schaar
,
A. C.
Levitt
, and
E. R.
Weeks
, “
Forced motion of a probe particle near the colloidal glass transition
,”
Europhys. Lett.
67
,
477
483
(
2004
).
17.
A.
Meyer
,
A.
Marshall
,
B. G.
Bush
, and
E. M.
Furst
, “
Laser tweezer microrheology of a colloidal suspension
,”
J. Rheol.
50
,
77
92
(
2006
).
18.
A.
Ashkin
,
J. M.
Dziedzic
, and
T.
Yamane
, “
Optical trapping and manipulation of single cells using infrared laser beams
,”
Nature (London)
330
(
6150
),
769
771
(
1987
).
19.
K.
Svoboda
and
S.
Block
, “
Biological applications of optical forces
,”
Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct.
23
,
247
285
(
1994
).
20.
A. S.
Khair
and
J. F.
Brady
, “
‘Microviscoelasticity' of colloidal dispersions
,”
J. Rheol.
49
,
1449
1481
(
2005
).
21.
A. S.
Khair
and
J. F.
Brady
, “
Single particle motion in colloidal dispersions: A simple model for active and nonlinear microrheology
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
557
,
73
117
(
2006
).
22.
R. N.
Zia
and
J. F.
Brady
, “
Microviscosity, microdiffusivity, and normal stresses in colloidal dispersions
,”
J. Rheol.
56
(
5
),
1175
1208
(
2012
).
23.
J. F.
Morris
and
J. F.
Brady
, “
Self diffusion in sheared suspensions
,”
J. Fluid. Mech.
312
,
223
252
(
1996
).
24.
J.
Bergenholtz
,
J. F.
Brady
, and
M.
Vicic
, “
The non-Newtonian rheology of dilute colloidal suspensions
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
456
,
239
275
(
2002
).
25.
J. F.
Brady
and
J. F.
Morris
, “
Microstructure of strongly sheared suspensions and its impact on rheology and diffusion
,”
J. Fluid. Mech.
348
,
103
139
(
1997
).
26.
J.
Bender
and
N.
Wagner
, “
Optical measurement of the contributions of colloidal forces to the rheology of concentrated suspensions
,”
J. Colloid Interface Sci.
172
,
171
184
(
1995
).
27.
B. J.
Maranzano
and
N. J.
Wagner
, “
Flow-small angle neutron scattering measurements of colloidal dispersion microstructure evolution through the shear thickening transition
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
117
(
22
),
10291
10302
(
2002
).
28.
N. J.
Wagner
and
J. F.
Brady
, “
Shear thickening in colloidal dispersions
,”
Phys. Today
62
(
10
),
27
32
(
2009
).
29.
G. K.
Batchelor
, “
Brownian diffusion of particles with hydrodynamic interaction
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
74
,
1
29
(
1976
).
30.
D.
Jeffrey
and
Y.
Onishi
, “
Calculation of the resistance and mobility functions for two unequal rigid spheres in low-Reynolds-number flow
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
139
,
261
290
(
1984
).
31.
J. F.
Brady
, “
The rheological behavior of concentrated colloidal dispersions
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
99
,
567
581
(
1993
).
32.
J. F.
Brady
and
M.
Vicic
, “
Normal stresses in colloidal suspensions
,”
J. Rheol.
39
(
3
),
545
566
(
1995
).
33.
D. R.
Foss
and
J. F.
Brady
, “
Structure, diffusion and rheology of Brownian suspensions by Stokesian Dynamics simulation
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
407
,
167
200
(
2000
).
34.
D. R.
Foss
, “
Rheological behavior of colloidal suspensions: The effects of hydrodynamic interactions
,” Ph.D. thesis (
California Institute of Technology
,
1999
).
35.
I. C.
Carpen
and
J. F.
Brady
, “
Microrheology of colloidal dispersions by Brownian dynamics simulations
,”
J. Rheol.
49
,
1483
1502
(
2005
).
36.
S.
Kim
and
S. J.
Karrila
,
Microhydrodynamics: Principles and Selected Applications
(
Butterworth-Heinemann
,
Boston
,
1991
).
37.
M.
Abramowitz
and
I. A.
Stegun
,
Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables
(
Dover
,
New York
,
1964
).
38.
Y.
Almog
and
H.
Brenner
, “
Non-continuum anomalies in the apparent viscosity experienced by a test sphere moving through an otherwise quiescent suspension
,”
Phys. Fluids
9
,
16
22
(
1997
).
39.
R. N.
Zia
and
J. F.
Brady
, “
Stress development, relaxation, and memory in colloidal dispersions: Transient nonlinear microrheology
,”
J. Rheol.
57
(
2
),
457
492
(
2013
).
40.
L. G.
Wilson
,
A. W.
Harrison
,
A. B.
Schofield
,
J.
Arlt
, and
W. C. K.
Poon
, “
Passive and active microrheology of hard-sphere colloids
,”
J. Phys. Chem.
113
,
3806
3812
(
2009
).
You do not currently have access to this content.