Junction flows may suffer from secondary flows such as horseshoe vortices and corner separations that can dramatically impair the performances of aircrafts. The present article brings into focus the unsteady aspects of the flow at the intersection of a wing and a flat plate. The simplified junction flow test case is designed according to a literature review to favor the onset of a corner separation. The salient statistical and fluctuating properties of the flow are scrutinized using large eddy simulation and wind tunnel tests, which are carried out at a Reynolds number based on the wing chord c and the free stream velocity U of Rec=2.8×105. As the incoming boundary layer at Reθ=2100 (θ being the boundary layer momentum thickness one-half chord upstream the junction) experiences the adverse pressure gradient created by the wing, a three dimensional separation occurs at the nose of the junction leading to the formation of a horseshoe vortex. The low frequency, large scale bimodal behavior of the horseshoe vortex at the nose of the junction is characterized by multiple frequencies within f.δ/U=[0.050.1] (where δ is the boundary layer thickness one-half chord upstream the wing). Downstream of the bimodal region, the meandering of the core of the horseshoe vortex legs in the crossflow planes is scrutinized. It is found that the horseshoe vortex oscillates around a mean location over an area covering almost 10% of the wing chord in the tranverse plane at the trailing edge at normalized frequencies around f.δ/U=0.20.3. This so-called meandering is found to be part of a global dynamics of the horseshoe vortex initiated by the bimodal behavior. Within the corner, no separation is observed and it is shown that a high level of anisotropy (according to Lumley’s formalism) is reached at the intersection of the wing and the flat plate, which makes the investigated test case challenging for numerical methods. The conditions of apparition of a corner separation are eventually discussed and we assume that the vicinity of the horseshoe vortex suction side leg might prevent the corner separation. It is also anticipated that higher Reynolds number junction flows are more likely to suffer from such separations.

1.
M.
Aly
,
C.
Trupp
, and
D.
Gerrard
, “
Measurements and prediction of a fully developed turbulent flow in an equilateral triangular duct
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
85
,
57
(
1978
).
2.
P.
Bradshaw
, “
Turbulent secondary flows
,”
Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech.
19
,
53
(
1987
).
3.
F.
Gessner
, “
The origin of secondary flow in turbulent flow along a corner
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
58
,
1
(
1973
).
4.
A.
Nakayama
and
H.
Rahaij
, “
Measurements of turbulent flow behind a flat plate mounted normal to the wall
,”
AIAA J.
22
,
1817
(
1984
).
5.
V.
Kornilov
and
A.
Kharitonov
, “
Investigation of the structure of turbulent flows in streamwise asymmetric corner configurations
,”
Exp. Fluids
2
,
205
(
1984
).
6.
L.
Kubendran
,
H.
McMahon
, and
J.
Hubbartt
, “
Turbulent flow around a wing/fuselage type juncture
,”
AIAA J.
24
,
1447
(
1986
).
7.
H.
McMahon
,
P.
Merati
, and
K.
Yoo
, “
Mean velocities and Reynolds stresses in the juncture flow and in the shear layer downstream of an appendage
,” Georgia Institute of Technology Technical Report No. GITAER87-4, Atlanta,
1987
.
8.
R.
Mehta
, “
Effect of wing nose shape on the flow in a wing body junction
,”
Aeronaut. J.
88
,
456
(
1984
).
9.
I.
Shabaka
and
P.
Bradshaw
, “
Turbulent flow measurements in an idealized wing/body junction
,”
AIAA J.
19
,
131
(
1981
).
10.
A.
Abdulla
,
R.
Bhargava
, and
R.
Raj
, “
An experimental study of local wall shear stress, surface static pressure, and flow visualization upstream, alongside, and downstream of a blade endwall corner
,”
J. Turbomach.
113
,
626
(
1991
).
11.
A.
Abdulla
and
R.
Raj
, “
Three dimensional flow structure in the wake of a wing body juncture
,”
AIAA
Paper No. 94-2289,
1994
.
12.
A.
Ahmed
and
M.
Khan
, “
Effect of sweep on wing body juncture flows
,”
AIAA
Paper No. 95-0868,
1995
.
13.
A.
Arnott
and
L.
Bernstein
, “
The aerodynamic interaction at the junction between a forward swept wing and a plate
,”
Aeronaut. J.
February
,
67
(
2000
).
14.
T.
Barber
, “
An investigation of strut-wall intersection losses
,”
J. Aircr.
15
,
676
(
1978
).
15.
L.
Bernstein
and
S.
Hamid
, “
On the effect of a swept wing plate junction flow on the lift and drag
,”
Aeronaut. J.
August/September
,
293
(
1995
).
16.
B.
Chang
and
F.
Gessner
, “
Experimental investigation of flow about a strut-endwall configuration
,”
AIAA J.
29
,
2105
(
1991
).
17.
W.
Devenport
,
N.
Agarwal
,
M.
Dewitz
, and
R.
Simpson
, “
Effects of a leading edge fillet on the flow near and past an appendage body junction
,”
AIAA J.
30
,
2177
(
1992
).
18.
W.
Devenport
and
R.
Simpson
, “
Time dependent and time averaged turbulence structure near the nose of a wing/body junction
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
210
,
23
(
1990
).
19.
S.
Dickinson
, “
An experimental investigation of appendage-flat plate junction flow, Vol. 1: Description
,”
David Taylor Naval Ships Research and Development Center
Technical Report No. DTNSRDC-86/051,
1986
.
20.
J.
Fleming
,
R.
Simpson
,
J.
Cowling
, and
W.
Devenport
, “
An experimental study of a turbulent wing-body junction and wake flow
,”
Exp. Fluids
14
,
366
(
1993
).
21.
M.
Goody
, “
An experimental investigation of pressure fluctuations in three dimensional turbulent boundary layers
,” Ph.D. thesis,
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
,
1999
.
22.
M.
Hasan
,
M.
Casarella
, and
E.
Rood
, “
An experimental study of the flow and wall pressure field around a wing-body junction
,”
Trans. ASME, J. Vib., Acoust., Stress, Reliab. Des.
108
,
308
(
1986
).
23.
J.
Jupp
, “
Interference aspects of the A310 high speed wing configuration
,” Subsonic/Transonic Configuration Aerodynamics AGARD CP 285 Paper No. 11,
1980
.
24.
M.
Khan
, “
Experimental investigation of the influence of wing sweep on juncture flow
,” Ph.D. thesis,
Texas A&M University, Aerospace Engineering Department
,
1994
.
25.
J.
Menna
and
F.
Pierce
, “
The mean flow structure around and within a turbulent junction vortex—Part I: The upstream and surrounding three-dimensionnal boundary layer
,”
ASME J. Fluids Eng.
110
,
406
(
1988
).
26.
S.
Ölçmen
and
R.
Simpson
, “
An experimental study of a three-dimensional pressure driven turbulent boundary layer
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
290
,
225
(
1995
).
27.
D.
Philips
,
J.
Cimbala
, and
A. L.
Treaster
, “
Suppression of the wing-body junction vortex by body surface suction
,”
J. Aircr.
29
,
118
(
1992
).
28.
E.
Rood
and
D.
Anthony
, “
Tail profile effects on unsteady large scale flow structure in the wing and plate junction
,”
ASME Fluids Engineering Division
,
1985
.
29.
J.
Ross
,
J.
Vogel
, and
V.
Corsiglia
, “
Full-scale wind tunnel study of wing fuselage interaction and comparison with paneling method
,”
AIAA
Paper No. 81-1666,
1981
.
30.
R.
Rifki
,
J.
Khan
,
A.
Ahmed
, and
Z.
Bangash
, “
Effect of the aspect ratio on the flow field on surface mounted obstacles
,”
AIAA
Paper No. 2005-4848,
2005
.
31.
R.
Simpson
, “
Junction flows
,”
Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech.
33
,
415
(
2001
).
32.
J.
Vassberg
,
A.
Sclafani
, and
M.
DeHaan
, “
A wing-body fairing design for the DLR-F6 model: A DPW-III case study
,”
AIAA
Paper No. 2005-4730,
2005
.
33.
D.
Wood
and
R.
Westphal
, “
Measurements of the flow around a lifting wing/body junction
,”
AIAA J.
30
,
6
(
1992
).
34.
E.
Tinoco
, “
DLR F6-FX2B summary
,”
Third CFD Drag Prediction Workshop
,
2006
.
35.
C. J.
Baker
, “
The laminar horseshoe vortex
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
95
,
347
(
1979
).
36.
M.
Khan
,
A.
Ahmed
, and
R.
Trosper
, “
Dynamics of the juncture vortex
,”
AIAA J.
33
,
1273
(
1995
).
37.
J.
Wang
,
W.
Bi
, and
Q.
Wei
, “
Effects of an upstream inclined rod on the circular cylinder-flat plate junction flow
,”
Exp. Fluids
46
,
1093
(
2009
).
38.
C.
Lin
,
W. -J.
Lai
, and
K. -A.
Chang
, “
Simultaneous particle image velocimetry and laser Doppler velocimetry measurements of periodical oscillatory horseshoe vortex system near square cylinder-base plate juncture
,”
J. Eng. Mech.
129
,
1173
(
2003
).
39.
C.
Lin
,
P.
Chiu
, and
S.
Shieh
, “
Characteristics of horseshoe vortex system near a vertical plate-base plate juncture
,”
Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci.
27
,
25
(
2002
).
40.
C.
Seal
,
C.
Smith
, and
D.
Rockwell
, “
Dynamics of the vorticity distribution in endwall junctions
,”
AIAA J.
35
,
1041
(
1997
).
41.
J.
Fleming
,
R.
Simpson
, and
W.
Devenport
, “
An experimental study of a turbulent wing-body junction and wake flow
,” Aerospace and Ocean Engineering Departement, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Technical Report No. VPI-AOE-179,
1991
.
42.
S.
Kim
,
D.
Walker
, and
R.
Simpson
, “
Observation and measurements of flow structures in the stagnation region of a wing body junction
,”
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Technical Report No. VPI-E-91-20,
1991
.
43.
W.
Devenport
,
N.
Agarwal
,
M.
Dewitz
,
R.
Simpson
, and
K.
Poddar
, “
Effects of a fillet on the flow past a wing-body junction
,”
AIAA J.
28
,
2017
(
1990
).
44.
D.
Apsley
and
M.
Leschziner
, “
Investigation of advanced turbulence models for the flow in a generic wing/body junction
,”
Flow, Turbul. Combust.
67
,
25
(
2001
).
45.
J.
Bain
and
C.
Fletcher
, “
Predictions of generic wing body junction flow behaviour
,”
J. Wind. Eng. Ind. Aerodyn.
50
,
19
(
1993
).
46.
J.
Bonnin
,
T.
Buchal
, and
W.
Rodi
, “
ERCOFTAC workshop on data bases and testing of calculation methods for turbulent flows
,” ERCOFTAC Bulletin No. 28,
1996
.
47.
W.
Briley
and
H.
McDonald
, “
Computation of turbulent horseshoe vortex past swept and unswept wing body junctions
,” Scientific Research Associates, Inc. Technical Report No. SRA R 82-920001 F,
1982
.
48.
H.
Chen
, “
Assessment of a Reynolds stress closure model for appendage/hull junction flows
,”
ASME J. Fluids Eng.
117
,
557
(
1995
).
49.
J.
Gorski
,
T.
Govindan
, and
B.
Lakshminarayana
, “
Computation of three-dimensional turbulent shear flows in corners
,”
AIAA J.
23
,
685
(
1985
).
50.
M.
Hemsch
and
J.
Morrison
, “
Statistical analysis of CFD solutions from 2nd drag prediction workshop
,”
AIAA
Paper No. 2004-0556,
2004
.
51.
D.
Jones
and
D.
Clarke
, “
Simulation of a wing body junction experiment using the fluent code
,” Australian Government Defence Department Technical Report No. DTSO-TR-1731,
2005
.
52.
R.
Paciorri
,
A.
Bonfiglioni
,
A.
Di Mascio
, and
B.
Favini
, “
RANS simulation of a junction flow
,”
Int. J. Comput. Fluid Dyn.
19
,
179
(
2005
).
53.
S.
Parneix
,
P.
Durbin
, and
M.
Behnia
, “
Computation of 3D turbulent boundary layers using the V2langf model
,”
Flow, Turbul. Combust.
60
,
19
(
1998
).
54.
F.
Smith
and
J.
Gajjar
, “
Flow past wing body junctions
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
144
,
191
(
1984
).
55.
J.
Paik
,
C.
Escauriaza
, and
F.
Sotiropoulos
, “
On the bimodal dynamics of the turbulent horseshoe vortex system in a wing body type junction
,”
Phys. Fluids
19
,
045107
(
2007
).
56.
S.
Fu
,
Z.
Xiao
,
H.
Chen
,
Y.
Zhang
, and
J.
Huang
, “
Simulation of wing-body junction flows with hybrid RANS/LES methods
,”
Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow
28
,
1379
(
2007
).
57.
N.
Alin
and
C.
Fureby
, “
Large eddy simulation of junction vortex flows
,”
AIAA
Paper No. 2008-668,
2008
.
58.
J.
Wong
and
E.
Png
, “
Numerical investigation of the wing body junction vortex using various large eddy simulation models
,”
AIAA
Paper No. 2009-4159,
2009
.
59.
R.
Langtry
,
M.
Kuntz
, and
F.
Menter
, “
Drag prediction of engine-airframe interference effects with CFX-5
,”
J. Aircr.
42
,
1523
(
2005
).
60.
F.
Gand
,
V.
Brunet
, and
S.
Deck
, “
A combined experimental, RANS and LES investigation of a wing body junction flow
,”
AIAA
Paper No. 2010-4753,
2010
.
61.
V.
Brion
, “
Stabilité des paires de tourbillons contra-rotatifs: Application au tourbillon de jeu dans les turbomachines
,” Ph.D. thesis,
Ecole Polytechnique, Spécialité Mécanique
,
2009
.
62.
I.
Mary
and
P.
Sagaut
, “
Large eddy simulation of flow around an airfoil near stall
,”
AIAA J.
40
,
1139
(
2002
).
63.
M.
Pamiès
,
P. -E.
Weiss
,
E.
Garnier
,
S.
Deck
, and
P.
Sagaut
, “
Generation of synthetic turbulent inflow data for large eddy simulation of spatially evolving wall-bounded flows
,”
Phys. Fluids
21
,
045103
(
2009
).
64.
F.
Simon
,
S.
Deck
,
P.
Guillen
,
P.
Sagaut
, and
A.
Merlen
, “
Numerical simulation of the compressible mixing layer past an axisymmetric trailing edge
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
591
,
215
(
2007
).
65.
S.
Deck
and
P.
Thorigny
, “
Unsteadiness of an axisymmetric separating-reattaching flow: Numerical investigation
,”
Phys. Fluids
19
,
065103
(
2007
).
66.
P.
Weiss
,
S.
Deck
,
J.
Robinet
, and
P.
Sagaut
, “
On the dynamics of axisymmetric turbulent separating/reattaching flows
,”
Phys. Fluids
21
,
075103
(
2009
).
67.
M.
Pamiès
,
E.
Garnier
,
A.
Merlen
, and
P.
Sagaut
, “
Response of a spatially developing turbulent boundary layer to active control strategies in the framework of opposition control
,”
Phys. Fluids
19
,
108102
(
2007
).
68.
J.
Dandois
,
E.
Garnier
, and
P.
Sagaut
, “
Numerical simulation of active separation control by a synthetic jet
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
574
,
25
(
2007
).
69.
M.
Péchier
,
P.
Guillen
, and
R.
Caysac
, “
Magnus effect over finned projectiles
,”
J. Spacecr. Rockets
38
,
542
(
2001
).
70.
E.
Lenormand
,
P.
Sagaut
,
L.
Ta Phuoc
, and
P.
Comte
, “
Subgrid-scale models for large-eddy simulations of compressible wall bounded flows
,”
AIAA J.
38
,
1340
(
2000
).
71.
N.
Jarrin
,
S.
Benhamadouche
,
D.
Laurence
, and
R.
Prosser
, “
A synthetic-eddy-method for generating inflow conditions for large-eddy simulations
,”
Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow
27
,
585
(
2006
).
72.
P.
Sagaut
,
S.
Deck
, and
M.
Terracol
,
Multiscale and Multiresolution Approaches in Turbulence
(
Imperial College Press
,
London
,
2006
).
73.
P.
Sagaut
and
S.
Deck
, “
Large eddy simulation for aerodynamics: status and perspectives
,”
Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. A
367
,
2849
(
2009
).
74.
D.
De Graaff
and
J.
Eaton
, “
Reynolds number scaling of the flat plate turbulent boundary layer
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
422
,
319
(
2000
).
75.
M.
Drela
and
M.
Giles
, “
Viscous-inviscid analysis of transonic and low Reynolds number airfoils
,”
AIAA J.
25
,
1347
(
1987
).
76.
J.
Burg
,
Maximum Entropy Spectral Analysis
(
IEEE
,
New York
,
1978
).
77.
P.
Welch
, “
The use of fast Fourier transform for the estimation of power spectra: A method based on time averaging over short modified periodograms
,”
IEEE Trans. Audio Electroacoust.
15
,
70
(
1967
).
78.
J.
Lumley
and
G.
Newman
, “
The return to isotropy of homogeneous turbulence
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
82
,
161
(
1977
).
79.
S.
Deck
,
P.
Weiss
,
M.
Pamiès
, and
E.
Garnier
, “
On the use of stimulated detached eddy simulation (SDES) on spatially developing boundary layers
,” edited by S.-H. Peng and W. Haase,
Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics and Multidisciplinary Design
(
Springer
, Berlin/Heidelberg,
2008
, Vol. 97, pp. 67–76.
You do not currently have access to this content.