The supersonic jet interaction flow field generated by a sonic circular jet with a pressure ratio of 532 exhausting into a turbulent MACH 4.0 cross flow over a flat plate was investigated using numerical simulations. The simulations made use of the three-dimensional Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) equations coupled with Wilcox’s 1998 k-ω turbulence model. The numerical solution was validated with experimental data that include the pressure distribution on the flat plate, with an empirical formula for the height of the barrel shock, and with the Schlieren pictures showing the location and shape of the main shock formations. The simulations correctly captured the location and shape of the main flow features and compared favorably with the experimental pressure distribution on the flat plate. The validated numerical simulation was used to investigate in detail the flow physics. The flow field was found to be dominated by the shock formations and their coupling with the strong vortical structures. Three primary shock formations were observed: a barrel shock, a bow shock, and a separation-induced shock wave. While the general structure of the barrel shock was found to be similar to that of the underexpanded jet exhausting into a quiescent medium, two unique features distinguished the flow field: the concave indentation in the leeside of the recompression (barrel) shock and the folding of the windward side of the barrel shock due to an inner reflection line. The presence of the steep pressure gradients associated with the shocks creates strong vortical motions in the fluid. Six primary vortices were identified: (i) the well-known horseshoe vortex, (ii) an upper trailing vortex, (iii) two trailing vortices formed in the separation region and, aft of the bow shock wave, (iv) two more trailing vortices that eventually merge together into one single rotational motion. The low-pressure region aft of the injector was found to be generated by the combined effect of the concave indentation in the leeside of the barrel shock and the lower trailing vortices. The trailing vortices were found to be the main mechanism responsible for the mixing of the injectant with the freestream fluid.

1.
AGARD, “
Computational and experimental assessment of jets in crossflow
,”
AGARD Conference Proceedings
No. 534, Winchester, United Kingdom, April
1993
.
2.
R. B.
Cubbison
,
B. H.
Anderson
, and
J. J.
Ward
, “
Surface pressure distributions with a sonic jet normal to adjacent flat surfaces at Mach 2.92 to 6.4
,”
NASA
Technical Note No. TN D-580,
1961
.
3.
J.
Brandeis
and
J.
Gill
, “
Experimental investigation of super- and hypersonic jet interaction on missile configurations
,”
J. Spacecr. Rockets
35
,
296
(
1998
).
4.
F. W.
Spaid
,
E. E.
Zukoski
, and
R.
Rosen
, “
A study of secondary injection of gases into a supersonic flow
,” NACA Technical Report No. 32-834, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, August
1966
.
5.
V.
Viti
,
J. A.
Schetz
, and
R.
Neel
, “
Numerical studies of the jet interaction flowfield with a main jet and an array of smaller jets
,”
International Congress of Aeronautical Sciences
, Toronto, Canada, September
2002
, ICAS Paper 2002-4.7.1.
6.
V.
Viti
, “
Numerical studies of the jet interaction flowfield with a main jet and an array of smaller jets
,” Ph.D. dissertation, Virginia Tech, September
2002
.
7.
R.
Chamberlain
,
D.
McClure
, and
A.
Dang
, “
CFD analysis of lateral jet interaction phenomena for the THAAD interceptor
,”
38th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting
, 10–13 January
2000
, AIAA Paper No. 00-0963.
8.
V.
Viti
,
S.
Wallis
,
J. A.
Schetz
, and
R.
Neel
, “
Jet interaction with a main jet and an array of smaller jets
,”
AIAA J.
42
,
1358
(
2004
).
9.
B. A.
Haven
and
M.
Kurosaka
, “
Kidney and anti-kidney vortices in crossflow jets
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
352
,
27
(
1997
).
10.
R. C.
Orth
,
J. A.
Schetz
, and
F. S.
Billig
, “
The interaction and penetration of gaseous jets in supersonic flow
,”
NASA
Contractor Report No. CR-1386, July
1969
.
11.
W.
Letko
, “
Loads induced on a flat plate at a Mach number of 4.5 with a sonic or supersonic jet exhausting normal to the surface
,”
NASA
Technical Note No. D-1935,
1963
.
12.
P. F.
Hawkins
,
H.
Lehman
, and
J. A.
Schetz
, “
Structure of highly under-expanded transverse jets in a supersonic stream
,”
AIAA J.
5
,
882
(
1967
).
13.
F. S.
Billig
and
J. A.
Schetz
, “
Penetration of a fluid jet into a supersonic stream
,”
J. Spacecr. Rockets
3
,
1658
(
1966
).
14.
J. A.
Schetz
,
Injection and Mixing in Turbulent Flow
,
Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics
, Vol.
68
(
AIAA
,
Reston, VA
,
1980
).
15.
F. W.
Spaid
and
E. E.
Zukoski
, “
Secondary injection of gases into a supersonic flow
,”
AIAA J.
2
,
1689
(
1964
).
16.
A. I.
Glagolev
,
A. I.
Zubkov
, and
Y. A.
Panov
, “
Supersonic flow past a gas jet obstacle emerging from a plate
,”
Fluid Mech.-Sov. Res.
2
,
97
(
1979
).
17.
A. I.
Glagolev
,
A. I.
Zubkov
, and
Y. A.
Panov
, “
Interaction between a supersonic flow and gas issuing from a hole in a plate
,”
Fluid Mech.-Sov. Res.
3
,
99
(
1979
).
18.
D. M.
Voitenko
,
A. I.
Zubkov
, and
Y. A.
Panov
, “
Existence of supersonic zones in three-dimensional separation flows
,”
Fluid Mech.-Sov. Res.
2
,
20
(
1979
).
19.
Y. H.
Byun
,
K. J.
Bae
,
S.
Wallis
,
V.
Viti
,
J. A.
Schetz
, and
R.
Bowersox
, “
Jet interaction in supersonic flow with a downstream surface ramp
,”
J. Spacecr. Rockets
42
,
38
(
2005
).
20.
J. A.
Schetz
,
S.
Cox-Stouffer
, and
R.
Fuller
, “
Integrated CFD and experimental studies of complex injectors in supersonic flows
,” AIAA Paper No. 98-2780, June
1998
.
21.
L.
Maddalena
,
T. L.
Campioli
,
J. A.
Schetz
, “
Experimental and computational investigation of an aeroramp injector in a Mach four cross flow
,”
13th International Space Planes and Hypersonics Systems and Technologies
, Capua, Italy, 16–20 May
2005
, AIAA Paper No. 2005-3235.
22.
D. C.
Wilcox
, “
Comparison of two-equation turbulence models for boundary layers with pressure gradient
,”
AIAA J.
31
,
1414
(
1993
).
23.
D. C.
Wilcox
,
Turbulence Modeling for CFD
, 2nd ed. (
DCW Industries
,
La Canada, CA
,
1998
).
24.
C. -J.
Tam
and
M. R.
Gruber
, “
Numerical study of jet injection into a supersonic crossflow
,”
35th AIAA Joint Propulsion Conference
, Los Angeles, CA, 20–24 June
1999
, AIAA Paper No. 99-2254.
25.
J. L.
Payne
,
C. J.
Roy
, and
S. J.
Beresh
, “
A comparison of turbulence models for a supersonic jet in transonic cross flow
,”
39th AIAA Aerospace Science Meeting and Exhibit
, January
2001
, AIAA Paper No. 2001-1048.
26.
V.
Viti
,
J. A.
Schetz
, and
R.
Neel
, “
Comparison of first and second order turbulence models for a jet/3D ramp combination in supersonic flow
,”
43rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit
, January
2005
, AIAA Paper No. 2005-0499.
27.
F. R.
Menter
, “
Zonal two equation k-ω turbulence models for aerodynamic flows
,” AIAA Paper No. 93-2906, July
1993
.
28.
R. P.
Roger
and
S. C.
Chan
, “
Parameters affecting penetration of a single jet into a supersonic crossflow: A CFD study—II
,” AIAA Paper No. 98-0425, January
1998
.
29.
A.
Nedungadi
and
M. J.
Lewis
, “
A numerical study of fuel mixing enhancement using oblique shock/vortex interactions
,” AIAA Paper No. 96-2920, February
1997
.
30.
A.
Nedungadi
and
M. J.
Lewis
, “
Computational study of three-dimensional shock-vortex interaction
,”
J. Aircr.
34
,
2545
(
1996
).
31.
T.
Hsieh
, “
Analysis of the scaling effects for missile configuration with lateral thruster
,” AIAA Paper No. 99-0810, January
1999
.
32.
J.
McDaniel
,
C.
Glass
,
D.
Staack
, and
C.
Miller
, “
Experimental and computational comparison of an under-expanded jet flowfield
,” AIAA Paper No. 2002-0305, January
2002
.
33.
AeroSoft, Inc., GASP 3.2 User Manual,
1997
.
34.
AeroSoft, Inc., GASP 4.0 User Manual,
2001
.
35.
J. C.
Tannehill
,
D. A.
Anderson
, and
R. H.
Pletcher
,
Computational Fluid Mechanics and Heat Transfer
, 2nd ed. (
Taylor & Francis
,
London
,
1997
).
36.
K. M.
Peery
and
S. T.
Imlay
, “
Blunt-body flow simulations
,” AIAA Paper No. 88-2904,
1988
.
37.
Pointwise, Inc., GRIDGEN version 13.3 User Manual,
1999
.
38.
M.
Vinokur
, “
On one-dimensional Stretching functions for finite difference calculations
,”
J. Comput. Phys.
50
,
215
(
1983
).
39.
J. E.
Bardina
,
P. G.
Huang
, and
T. J.
Coakley
, “
Turbulence modeling validation, testing and development
,”
NASA
Technical Memorandum No. TM 110446, April
1997
.
40.
P. J.
Roache
,
Verification and Validation in Computational Science and Engineering
(
Hermosa
,
Albuquerque, NM
,
1998
).
41.
C. J.
Roy
, “
Grid convergence error analysis for mixed-order numerical schemes
,” AIAA Paper No. 2001-2006, June
2001
.
42.
T. R.
Fric
and
A.
Roshko
, “
Vortical structure in the wake of a transverse jet
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
279
,
1
(
1994
).
43.
M. R.
Gruber
,
A. S.
Nejad
,
T. H.
Chen
, and
J. C.
Dutton
, “
Transverse injection from circular and elliptical nozzles into a supersonic crossflow
,”
J. Propul. Power
16
,
449
(
2000
).
44.
S.
Murugappan
,
E.
Gutmark
, and
C.
Carter
, “
Control of penetration and mixing of an excited supersonic jet into a supersonic cross stream
,”
Phys. Fluids
17
,
106101
(
2005
).
45.
M. A.
Woodmansee
and
J. C.
Dutton
, “
Experimental measurements of pressure, temperature, and density in an under-expanded sonic jet flowfield
,” AIAA Paper No. 99-3600, June
1999
.
46.
M. A.
Woodmansee
,
V.
Iyer
,
J. C.
Dutton
, and
R. P.
Lucht
, “
Nonintrusive pressure and temperature measurements in an underexpanded sonic jet flowfield
,”
AIAA J.
42
,
1170
(
2004
).
47.
J.
Olejniczak
,
M. J.
Wright
, and
G. V.
Candler
, “
Numerical study of inviscid shock interactions on double-wedge geometries
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
352
,
1
(
1997
).
48.
S.
Wallis
, “
Innovative transverse jet interaction arrangements in supersonic crossflow
,” M.S. thesis,
Virginia Tech
, December
2001
.
49.
C. F.
Chenault
and
P. S.
Beran
, “
κ-ε and Reynolds stress turbulence model comparisons for two-dimensional injection flows
,”
AIAA J.
36
,
1401
(
1998
).
50.
C. F.
Chenault
,
P. S.
Beran
, and
R. D.
Bowersox
, “
Numerical investigation of supersonic injection using a Reynolds-stress turbulence model
,”
AIAA J.
37
,
1257
(
1999
).
51.
A.
Palekar
,
C. R.
Truman
, and
P.
Vorobie
, “
Prediction of transverse injection of a sonic jet in supersonic cross flow
,” AIAA Paper No. 2005-5366, June
2005
.
52.
L.
Cortelezzi
and
A. R.
Karagozian
, “
On the formation of the counter-rotating vortex pair in transverse jets
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
446
,
1347
(
2001
).
You do not currently have access to this content.