Results at Ekman Reynolds numbers Re ranging from 1000 to 2828 expand the direct numerical simulation (DNS) contribution to the theory of wall-bounded turbulence. An established spectral method is used, with rules for domain size and grid resolution at each Reynolds number derived from the theory. The Re increase is made possible by better computers and by optimizing the grid in relation to the wall shear-stress direction. The boundary-layer thickness in wall units δ+ varies here by a factor of about 5.3, and reaches values near 5000, or 22 times the minimum at which turbulence has been sustained. An equivalent channel Reynolds number, based on the pressure gradient in wall units, would reach about Reτ=1250. The principal goal of the analysis, the impartial identification of a log law, is summarized in the local “Karman measure” d(lnz+)/dU+. The outcome differs from that for Hoyas and Jiménez [Phys. Fluids 18, 011702 (2006)] and for Hu et al [AIAA J. 44, 1541 (2006)] in channel-flow DNS at similar Reynolds numbers, for reasons unknown: Here, the law of the wall is gradually established up to a z+ around 400, with little statistical scatter. To leading order, it is consistent with the experiments of Österlund et al [Phys. Fluids 12, 1 (2000)] in boundary layers. With the traditional expression, a logarithmic law is not present, in that the Karman measure drifts from about 0.41 at z+70 to the 0.37–0.38 range for z+500, with Re=2828. However, if a virtual origin is introduced with a shift of a+=7.5 wall units, the data support a long logarithmic layer with κ=0.38 a good fit to d(ln[z++a+])/dU+. A determination of the Karman constant from the variation of the skin-friction coefficients with Reynolds numbers also yields values near 0.38. The uncertainty is about ±0.01. These values are close to the boundary-layer experiments, but well below the accepted range of [0.40,0.41] and the experimental pipe-flow results near 0.42. The virtual-origin concept is also controversial, although nonessential at transportation or atmospheric Reynolds numbers. Yet, this series may reflect some success in verifying the law of the wall and investigating the logarithmic law by DNS, redundantly and with tools more impartial than the visual fit of a straight line to a velocity profile.

At the request of the authors and editor, this article is being retracted effective 28 October 2009.

1.
G.
Coleman
,
J.
Ferziger
, and
P.
Spalart
, “
A numerical study of the turbulent Ekman layer
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
[PubMed]
0022-1120
213
,
313
(
1990
).
2.
The Re=400 case considered here is an unpublished larger-domain version of Case A90 from Ref. 1. While measurable, the differences in global statistics between the small- and large-domain simulations are within the quoted uncertainty of the earlier data.
3.
G.
Coleman
, “
Similarity statistics from a direct numerical simulation of the neutrally stratified planetary boundary layer
,”
J. Atmos. Sci.
[PubMed]
0022-4928
56
,
891
(
1999
).
4.
S.
Hoyas
and
J.
Jiménez
, “
Scaling of the velocity fluctuations in turbulent channels up to Reτ=2003
,”
Phys. Fluids
[PubMed]
1070-6631
18
,
011702
(
2006
).
5.
Z.
Hu
,
C.
Morfey
, and
N.
Sandham
, “
Wall pressure and shear stress spectra from direct simulations of channel flow
,”
AIAA J.
[PubMed]
0001-1452
44
,
1541
(
2006
).
6.
P.
Spalart
,
R.
Moser
, and
M.
Rogers
, “
Spectral methods for the Navier–Stokes equations with one infinite and two periodic directions
,”
J. Comput. Phys.
[PubMed]
0021-9991
96
,
297
(
1991
).
7.
G.
Csanady
, “
On the ‘resistance law’ of a turbulent Ekman layer
,”
J. Atmos. Sci.
[PubMed]
0022-4928
24
,
467
(
1967
).
8.
P.
Spalart
, “
Direct simulation of a turbulent boundary layer up to Rθ=1410
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
[PubMed]
0022-1120
187
,
61
(
1988
).
9.
The earlier Re=1000 run used z=0.23u/f, despite the erroneous claim in Ref. 3 that z=0.23D.
10.
A.
Blackadar
and
H.
Tennekes
, “
Asymptotic similarity in neutral barotropic planetary boundary layers
,”
J. Atmos. Sci.
[PubMed]
0022-4928
25
,
1015
(
1968
).
11.
G.
Barenblatt
, “
Scaling laws for fully developed turbulent shear flows: Part I. Basic hypothesis and analysis
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
[PubMed]
0022-1120
248
,
513
(
1993
).
12.
M.
Wosnik
,
L.
Castillo
, and
W.
George
, “
A theory for turbulent pipe and channel flows
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
[PubMed]
0022-1120
421
,
115
(
2000
).
13.
B.
McKeon
,
J.
Li
,
W.
Jiang
,
J.
Morrison
, and
A.
Smits
, “
Further observations of the mean velocity distribution in fully developed pipe flow
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
[PubMed]
0022-1120
501
,
135
(
2004
).
14.
J.
Österlund
,
A.
Johansson
,
H.
Nagib
, and
M.
Hites
, “
A note on the overlap region in turbulent boundary layers
,”
Phys. Fluids
[PubMed]
1070-6631
12
,
1
(
2000
).
15.
E.
Zanoun
,
F.
Durst
, and
H.
Nagib
, “
Response to ‘Comment on “Evaluating the law of the wall in two-dimensional fully developed turbulent channel flows”’
,”
Phys. Fluids
[PubMed]
1070-6631
16
,
3509
(
2004
).
16.
K. A.
Chauhan
,
H. M.
Nagib
, and
P.
Monkewitz
, “
On the composite logarithmic profile in zero pressure gradient turbulent boundary layers
,” AIAA Paper No. 2007-532,
2007
.
17.
P.
Spalart
, “
Theoretical and numerical study of a three-dimensional turbulent boundary layer
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
[PubMed]
0022-1120
205
,
319
(
1989
).
18.
H.
Squire
, “
Reconsideration of the theory of free turbulence
,”
Philos. Mag.
[PubMed]
0031-8086
39
,
1
(
1948
).
You do not currently have access to this content.