Direct numerical simulations of fluid flow through a concentric annulus with a rotating inner wall were performed at ReDh=8900. To elucidate the modifications of the near-wall turbulent structure induced by rotation of the inner wall, we compared data obtained at rotation rates of N=0.0 and 0.429 for a system with a radius ratio (R*) of 0.5. Conditional quadrant/octant analysis and probability density functions of the velocity fluctuations revealed distinctive features of the three-dimensional turbulent boundary layer (3DTBL) in the concentric annulus with a rotating inner wall. Coherent structures near the inner wall were identified by a λ2-based eduction scheme to give the detailed information on the activated near-wall turbulent structures. The ensemble-averaging of the educed coherent vortices showed that enhanced ejections near the vortices were primarily responsible for the augmented turbulent structures. The alteration of the turbulent structures was attributed to the centrifugal force arising from rotation of the inner wall. The assumption of Littell and Eaton on the cause of the altered turbulent structures in 3DTBLs was invalid in the present study. Taken together, the present results showed that the 3DTBL in a rotating concentric annulus has features different from those observed in other types of 3DTBL due to the transverse curvature.

1.
S. Y.
Chung
and
H. J.
Sung
, “
Large-eddy simulation of turbulent flow in a concentric annulus with rotation of an inner cylinder
,”
Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow
26
,
191
(
2005
).
2.
P.
Bradshaw
and
N. S.
Pontikos
, “
Measurements in the turbulent boundary layer on an ‘infinite’ swept wing
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
159
,
105
(
1985
).
3.
S. C.
Anderson
and
J. K.
Eaton
, “
Reynolds stress development in a pressure driven three-dimensional turbulent boundary layer
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
202
,
263
(
1989
).
4.
P.
Moin
,
T. H.
Shih
,
D.
Driver
, and
N. N.
Mansour
, “
Direct numerical simulation of a three-dimensional turbulent boundary layer
,”
Phys. Fluids A
2
,
1846
(
1990
).
5.
O.
Sendstad
and
P.
Moin
, “
The near wall mechanics of three-dimensional turbulent boundary layers
,” Report TF-57, Thermosciences Division, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University,
1992
.
6.
W. R.
Schwarz
and
P.
Bradshaw
, “
Turbulence structural changes for a three-dimensional turbulent boundary layer in a 30° degree bend
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
272
,
183
(
1994
).
7.
G. N.
Coleman
,
J.
Kim
, and
A. T.
Le
, “
A numerical study of three-dimensional wall-bounded flows
,”
Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow
17
,
333
(
1996
).
8.
G. N.
Coleman
,
J.
Kim
, and
P. R.
Spalart
, “
A numerical study of strained three-dimensional wall-bounded turbulence
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
416
,
75
(
2000
).
9.
A. T.
Le
,
G. N.
Coleman
, and
J.
Kim
, “
Near-wall turbulence structures in three-dimensional boundary layers
,”
Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow
21
,
480
(
2000
).
10.
R. P.
Lohmann
, “
The response of a developed turbulent boundary layer to local transverse surface motion
,”
J. Fluids Eng.
98
,
354
(
1976
).
11.
H. S.
Littell
and
J. K.
Eaton
, “
Turbulence characteristics of the boundary-layer on a rotating-disk
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
266
,
175
(
1994
).
12.
C.
Chiang
and
J. K.
Eaton
, “
An experimental study of the effects of three-dimensionality on the near wall turbulence structures using flow visualization
,”
Exp. Fluids
20
,
266
(
1996
).
13.
H. S.
Kang
,
H.
Choi
, and
J. Y.
Yoo
, “
On the modification of the near-wall coherent structure in a three-dimensional turbulent boundary layer on a free rotating disk
,”
Phys. Fluids
10
,
2315
(
1998
).
14.
C.
Kannepalli
and
U.
Piomelli
, “
Large-eddy simulation of a three-dimensional shear-driven turbulent boundary layer
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
423
,
175
(
2000
).
15.
X.
Wu
and
K. D.
Squires
, “
Prediction and investigation of the turbulent flow over a rotating disk
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
418
,
231
(
2000
).
16.
M.
Lygren
and
H. I.
Andersson
, “
Turbulent flow between a rotating and a stationary disk
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
426
,
297
(
2001
).
17.
K.
Kim
,
S.-J.
Baek
, and
H. J.
Sung
, “
An implicit velocity decoupling procedure for the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations
,”
Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids
38
,
125
(
2002
).
18.
S. Y.
Chung
,
G. H.
Rhee
, and
H. J.
Sung
, “
Direct numerical simulation of turbulent concentric annular pipe flow. Part 1: Flow field
,”
Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow
23
,
426
(
2002
).
19.
J. M.
Nouri
and
J. H.
Whitelaw
, “
Flow of Newtonian and non-Newtonian fluids in a concentric annulus with rotation of the inner cylinder
,”
J. Fluids Eng.
116
,
821
(
1994
).
20.
J. P.
Johnston
and
K. A.
Flack
, “
Review—Advances in three-dimensional wall-bounded flows
,”
J. Fluids Eng.
118
,
219
(
1996
).
21.
P.
Orlandi
and
M.
Fatica
, “
Direct simulations of turbulent flow in a pipe rotating about its axis
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
343
,
43
(
1997
).
22.
W. W.
Willmarth
and
S. S.
Lu
, “
Structure of the Reynolds stress near the wall
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
55
,
65
(
1972
).
23.
R. S.
Brodkey
,
J. M.
Wallace
, and
H.
Eckelmann
, “
Some properties of truncated turbulence signals in bounded shear flows
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
63
,
209
(
1974
).
24.
J.
Jeong
,
F.
Hussain
,
W.
Schoppa
, and
J.
Kim
, “
Coherent structures near the wall in a turbulent channel flow
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
332
,
185
(
1997
).
25.
R. F.
Blackwelder
and
R. E.
Kaplan
, “
On the wall structure of the turbulent boundary layer
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
76
,
89
(
1976
).
26.
J.
Jeong
and
F.
Hussain
, “
On the identification of a vortex
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
285
,
69
(
1995
).
27.
J.
Kim
, “
On the structure of pressure fluctuations in simulated turbulent channel flow
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
205
,
421
(
1989
).
You do not currently have access to this content.