We report the results of an experimental investigation of the flow induced by the collapse of a column of granular material (glass beads of diameter d) over a horizontal surface. Two different setups are used, namely, a rectangular channel and a semicircular tube, allowing us to compare two-dimensional and axisymmetric flows, with particular focus on the internal flow structure. In both geometries the flow dynamics and the deposit morphologies are observed to depend primarily on the initial aspect ratio of the granular column a=HiLi, where Hi is the height of the initial granular column and Li its length along the flow direction. Two distinct regimes are observed depending on a: an avalanche of the column flanks producing truncated deposits for small a and a column free fall leading to conical deposits for large a. In both geometries the characteristic time scale is the free fall of the granular column τc=Hig. The flow initiated by Coulomb-like failure never involves the whole granular heap but remains localized in a surface layer whose size and shape depend on a and vary in both space and time. Except in the vicinity of the pile foot where the flow is pluglike, velocity profiles measured at the side wall are identical to those commonly observed in steady granular surface flows: the velocity varies linearly with depth in the flowing layer and decreases exponentially with depth in the static layer. Moreover, the shear rate is constant, γ̇=0.3gd, independent of the initial aspect ratio, the flow geometry, position along the heap, or time. Despite the rather complex flow dynamics, the scaled deposit height HfLi and runout distance ΔLLi both exhibit simple power laws whose exponents depend on a and on the flow geometry. We show that the physical origin of these power laws can be understood on the basis of a dynamic balance between acceleration, pressure gradient, and friction forces at the foot of the granular pile. Two asymptotic behaviors can be distinguished: the flow is dominated by friction forces at small a and by pressure forces at large a. The effect of the flow geometry is determined primarily by mass conservation and becomes important only for large a.

1.
S. B.
Savage
and
K.
Hutter
, “
The motion of a finite mass of granular material down a rough incline
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
199
,
177
(
1989
).
2.
O.
Pouliquen
, “
Scaling laws in granular flows down rough inclined planes
,”
Phys. Fluids
11
,
542
(
1999
).
3.
R. M.
Iverson
and
J. W.
Vallance
, “
New views on granular mass flows
,”
Geology
29
,
115
(
2001
).
4.
G. D. R.
Midi
, “
On dense granular flows
,”
Eur. Phys. J. E
14
,
341
(
2004
).
5.
K.
Hutter
,
T.
Koch
,
C.
Pluss
, and
S. B.
Savage
, “
The dynamic of avalanches of granular materials from initiation to runout. Part. II experiments
,”
Acta Mech.
109
,
127
(
1995
).
6.
O.
Pouliquen
and
Y.
Forterre
, “
Friction law for dense granular flows: application to the motion of a mass down a rough inclined plane
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
453
,
131
(
2002
).
7.
A.
Mangeney
,
Ph.
Heinrich
,
R.
Roche
,
G.
Boudon
, and
J. L.
Cheminée
, “
Modeling of debris avalanche and generated water waves: Application to real and potential events in Montserrat
,”
Phys. Chem. Earth
25
,
741
(
2000
).
8.
E. B.
Pitman
,
C. C.
Nichita
,
A.
Patra
,
A.
Bauer
,
M.
Sheridan
, and
M.
Bursik
, “
Computing granular avalanches and landslides
,”
Phys. Fluids
15
,
3638
(
2003
).
9.
G.
Lube
,
H.
Huppert
,
S.
Sparks
, and
M.
Hallworth
, “
Axisymmetric collapse of granular columns
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
508
,
175
(
2004
).
10.
E.
Lajeunesse
,
A.
Mangeney-Castelnau
, and
J. P.
Vilotte
, “
Spreading of a granular mass on a horizontal plane
,”
Phys. Fluids
16
,
2371
(
2004
).
11.
N. J.
Balmforth
and
R. R.
Kerswell
, “
Granular collapse in two dimensions
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
538
,
399
(
2005
).
12.
R. P.
Denlinger
and
R.
Iverson
, “
Granular avalanches across irregular three-dimensional terrain: 1. Theory and computation
,”
J. Geophys. Res.
109
,
F01014
(
2004
).
13.
R. R.
Kerswell
, “
Dam break with Coulomb friction: A model for granular slumping?
Phys. Fluids
17
,
057101
(
2005
).
14.
A.
Mangeney-Castelnau
,
F.
Bouchut
,
J. P.
Vilotte
,
E.
Lajeunesse
,
A.
Aubertin
, and
M.
Pirulli
, “
On the use of Saint-Venant equations for simulating the spreading of a granular mass
,”
J. Geophys. Res.
110
,
B09103
(
2005
).
15.
S.
Siavoshi
and
A.
Kudrolli
, “
Failure of a granular step
,”
Phys. Rev. E
71
,
051302
(
2005
).
16.
R.
Zenit
, “
Computer simulations of the collapse of granular columns
,”
Phys. Fluids
17
,
031703
(
2005
).
17.
L.
Staron
and
J.
Hinch
, “
Study of the collapse of granular columns using DEM numerical simulation
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
(in press).
18.
S.
Courrech du Pont
,
R.
Fischer
,
P.
Gondret
,
B.
Perrin
, and
M.
Rabaud
, “
Instantaneous velocity profiles during granular avalanches
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
94
,
048003
(
2005
).
19.
P.
Jop
,
Y.
Forterre
, and
O.
Pouliquen
, “
Crucial role of side walls for granular surface flows: Consequence for the granular rheology
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
(in press).
20.
S.
Douady
,
B.
Andreotti
, and
A.
Daerr
, “
On granular surface flow equations
,”
Eur. Phys. J. B
11
,
131
(
1999
).
21.
D. V.
Khakhar
,
A. V.
Orpe
,
P.
Andresen
, and
J. M.
Ottino
, “
Surface flow of granular materials: Model and experiments in heap formation
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
441
,
255
(
2001
).
You do not currently have access to this content.