Laser Doppler velocimetry (LDV) measurement and large eddy simulation (LES) were used to study confined isothermal turbulent swirling flows in a model dump combustor. The aim was to gain deeper understanding of the flow and turbulence structures in dump combustors and to examine the capability of LES for prediction of turbulent swirling flows. A refractive index matching technique is used in the LDV measurement to improve the near-wall data. A high-order finite difference scheme on Cartesian grids with a scale-similarity subfilter scale model is used in the LES. Turbulent inflow boundary conditions with different energy spectra, different outflow boundary conditions, and grid resolutions are tested in the LES. Three test cases with different swirl numbers and Reynolds numbers are studied in the measurements and the simulations. The Reynolds numbers range from 10 000 to 20 000, and the swirl number is varied from 0 to 0.43. With appropriate inflow, outflow boundary conditions, and fine grid resolution, the LES results are in fairly good agreement with the LDV data. The experimental and numerical results show that turbulence in the dump combustor is highly anisotropic behind the sudden expansion and in the internal recirculation zone near the axis of the combustor. Turbulence decays rapidly along the streamwise direction downstream, and the structure of turbulence depends highly on the level of inlet swirl. At low swirl numbers, turbulence is primarily generated in the shear layer behind the sudden expansion; at high swirl numbers the near axis flow becomes very unstable and vortex breakdown occurs. The shear layer near the axis of the combustor caused by vortex breakdown generates most of the turbulent kinetic energy. Large-scale motions (coherent structures) are found in the near axis vortex breakdown region. A helical flow in the guiding pipe breaks down near the sudden expansion to form a large bubble-like recirculation zone whose center moves slowly around the axis. Downstream of the bubble the core of the rotational large scale azimuthal flow motion is off the combustor axis and rotates around the axis at a frequency about 18–25 Hz (Strouhal number about 0.17–0.4). As the swirl number increases the coherent structure becomes more evident, and the internal recirculation zone moves upstream. LES successfully simulated the vortex breakdown, the internal recirculation zones and the anisotropic turbulence structures for all the swirl numbers considered.

1.
R. C.
Chanaud
, “
Observations of oscillatory motion in certain swirling flows
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
21
,
111
(
1965
).
2.
P.
Billant
,
J. M.
Chomaz
, and
P.
Huerre
, “
Experimental study of vortex breakdown in swirling jets
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
376
,
183
(
1998
).
3.
M. M.
Ribeiro
and
J. H.
Whitelaw
, “
Co-axial jets with and without swirl
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
96
,
769
(
1980
).
4.
R. D.
Mehta
,
D. H.
Wood
, and
P. D.
Clausen
,“
Some effects of swirl on turbulent mixing layer development
,”
Phys. Fluids A
3
,
2716
(
1991
).
5.
J.
Panda
and
D. K.
McLaughlin
, “
Experiments on the instabilities of a swirling jet
,”
Phys. Fluids
6
,
263
(
1994
).
6.
R. F.
Huang
and
F. C.
Tsai
, “
Flow field characteristics of swirling double concentric jets
,”
Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci.
25
,
151
(
2001
).
7.
F. H.
Champagne
and
S.
Kromat
, “
Experiments on the formation of a recirculation zone in swirling coaxial jets
,”
Exp. Fluids
29
,
494
(
2000
).
8.
O.
Kitoh
, “
Experimental study of turbulent swirling flow in a straight pipe
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
225
,
445
(
1991
).
9.
A. S.
Nejad
,
S. P.
Vanka
, and
S. C.
Favaloro
, “
Application of laser velocimetry for characterization of confined swirling flow
,”
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
111
,
36
(
1989
).
10.
R.
Weber
,
B. M.
Visser
, and
F.
Boysan
, “
Assessment of turbulence modeling for engineering prediction of swirling vortices in the near burner zone
,”
Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow
11
,
225
(
1990
).
11.
S. A.
Ahmed
, “
Velocity measurements and turbulence statistics of a confined isothermal swirling flow
,”
Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci.
17
,
256
(
1998
).
12.
O.
Lucca-Negro
and
T. O.
Doherty
, “
Vortex breakdown: a review
,”
Prog. Energy Combust. Sci.
27
,
431
(
2001
).
13.
J. J.
Cassidy
and
H. T.
Falvey
, “
Observations of unsteady flow arising after vortex breakdown
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
41
,
727
(
1970
).
14.
A. K.
Gupta
,
D. G.
Lilley
, and
N.
Syred
, Swirl Flows, Energy and Engineering Science Series (Abacus, London,
1984
).
15.
F. G.
Gouldin
,
R. N.
Haithore
, and
B. T.
Vu
, “
Periodic oscillations observed in swirling flows with and without combustion
,”
Proc. Combust. Inst.
20
,
269
(
1984
).
16.
C. M.
Coats
, “
Coherent structures in combustion
,”
Prog. Energy Combust. Sci.
22
,
427
(
1996
).
17.
C. O.
Paschereit
,
E.
Gutmark
, and
W.
Weisenstein
, “
Coherent structures in swirling flows and their role in acoustic combustion control
,”
Phys. Fluids
11
,
2667
(
1999
).
18.
S.
Wang
and
Z.
Rusak
, “
On the stability of an axisymmetric rotating flow in a pipe
,”
Phys. Fluids
8
,
1007
(
1996
).
19.
J. M.
Lopez
, “
On the bifurcation structure of axisymmetric vortex breakdown in a constricted pipe
,”
Phys. Fluids
6
,
3683
(
1994
).
20.
E.
Serre
and
P.
Bontoux
, “
Vortex breakdown in a three-dimensional swirling flow
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
459
,
347
(
2002
).
21.
J. K.
Harvey
, “
Some observations of the vortex breakdown phenomenon
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
14
,
585
(
1962
).
22.
I.
Kubo
and
F. G.
Gouldin
, “
Numerical calculations of turbulent swirling flow
,”
J. Fluids Eng.
97
,
310
(
1975
).
23.
M. A. R.
Sharif
and
Y. K. E.
Wong
, “
Evaluation of the performance of three turbulence closure models in the prediction of confined swirling flows
,”
Comput. Fluids
24
,
81
(
1995
).
24.
S.
Jakirlic
,
J.
Volkert
,
H.
Pascal
,
K.
Hanjalic
, and
C.
Tropea
, “
DNS, experimental and modeling study of axially compressed in-cylinder swirling flow
,”
Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow
21
,
627
(
2000
).
25.
J. L.
Xia
,
G.
Yadigaroglu
,
Y. S.
Liu
,
J.
Schmidli
, and
B. L.
Smith
, “
Numerical and experimental study of swirling in a model combustor
,”
Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer
41
,
1485
(
1998
).
26.
U.
Piomelli
, “
Large-eddy simulation: achievements and challenges
,”
Prog. Aerosp. Sci.
35
,
335
(
1999
).
27.
C. D.
Pierce
and
P.
Moin
, “
Large eddy simulation of a confined coaxial jet with swirl and heat release
,” AIAA 98-2892, 29th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference, 15–18 June
1998
.
28.
W. W.
Kim
,
S.
Menon
, and
H. C.
Mongia
, “
Large-eddy simulation of a gas turbine combustor flow
,”
Combust. Sci. Technol.
143
,
25
(
1999
).
29.
F. F.
Grinstein
,
T. R.
Young
,
E. J.
Gutmark
,
G.
Li
,
G.
Hsiao
, and
H. C.
Mongia
, “
Flow dynamics in a swirl combustor
,”
J. Turbul.
3
,
1
(
2002
).
30.
D.
Carati
,
G. S.
Winckelmans
, and
H.
Jeanmart
, “
On the modeling of subgrid-scale and filtered-scale stress tensors in large eddy simulation
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
441
,
119
(
2001
).
31.
J.
Gullbrand
and
F. K.
Chow
, “
The effect of numerical errors and turbulence models in LES of channel flow, with and without explicit filtering
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
495
,
323
(
2003
).
32.
F. K.
Chow
and
P.
Moin
, “
A further study of numerical errors in large eddy simulations
,”
J. Comput. Phys.
184
,
366
(
2003
).
33.
M.
Olsson
and
L.
Fuchs
, “
Large eddy simulation of a forced semi-confined circular impinging jet
,”
Phys. Fluids
10
,
476
(
1998
).
34.
S.
Liu
,
C.
Meneveau
, and
J.
Katz
, “
On the properties of similarity subgrid scale models as deduced from measurements in a turbulent jet
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
275
,
83
(
1994
).
35.
J.
Gullbrand
,
X. S.
Bai
, and
L.
Fuchs
, “
High-order Cartesian grid method for calculation of incompressible turbulent flows
,”
Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids
36
,
687
(
2001
).
36.
K.
Akselvoll
and
P.
Moin
, “
Large-eddy simulation of turbulent confined coannular jets
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
315
,
387
(
1996
).
37.
H.
Pitsch
and
L. D. de
Lageneste
, “
Large-eddy simulation of premixed turbulent combustion using a level-set approach
,”
Proc. Combust. Inst.
29
,
2001
(
2002
).
38.
C. D.
Pierce
and
P.
Moin
, “
Method for generating equilibrium swirling inflow conditions
,”
AIAA J.
36
,
1325
(
1998
).
39.
C. D.
Pierce
, “
Progress-variable approach for large eddy simulation of turbulent combustion
,” Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University, Stanford, CA,
2001
.
40.
X. S.
Bai
and
L.
Fuchs
, “
Modeling of turbulent reacting flows past a bluff body: Assessment of accuracy and efficiency
,”
Comput. Fluids
23
,
507
(
1994
).
41.
S.
Ghosal
and
P.
Moin
, “
The basic equations for the large eddy simulation of turbulent flows in complex geometry
,”
J. Comput. Phys.
118
,
24
(
1995
).
42.
L. G.
Margolin
,
P. K.
Smolarkiewicz
, and
A. A.
Wyszogrodzki
, “
Implicit turbulent modeling for high Reynolds number flows
,”
ASME Trans. J. Fluids Eng.
124
,
862
(
2002
).
43.
C.
Fureby
and
F. F.
Grinstein
, “
Large eddy simulation of high Reynolds number free and wall-bounded flows
,”
J. Comput. Phys.
181
,
68
(
2002
).
44.
G. S.
Winckelmans
,
H.
Jeanmart
, and
D.
Carati
, “
On the comparison of turbulent intensities from large-eddy simulation with those from experiment or direct numerical simulation
,”
Phys. Fluids
14
,
1809
(
2002
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.