A finite-mixing-length theory is presented for turbulent mixing. This theory contains Fickian diffusion as the limiting case for lm/L→0, where lm is the mixing length and L is the scale of the distribution under consideration. The new model is of similar generality to that of Taylor (1921), “Diffusion by continuous movements.” However, while Taylor’s model, being strictly Lagrangian, is difficult to apply to inhomogeneous scenarios, the new model is Eulerian and easily applicable to bottom boundary layers and other inhomogeneous flows. When applied to steady suspended sediment concentrations c(z), the theory predicts the observed trend of apparent Fickian diffusivities εFick=−wsc/(dc/dz) being larger for particles with larger settling velocity ws, in a given flow. The corresponding nature of the ratios between apparent Fickian sediment diffusivities and eddy viscosities, β=εFick/vt, for different particles in the same flow, is also revealed. That is, β is an increasing function of the particle settling velocity and may be greater or smaller than unity depending on the relative magnitude of the vertical scales for concentrations Lc and for horizontal velocity Lu. Applied to the case of wave motion over ripples, even the observed trend of fine sand indicating decreasing εFick(z) while coarse sand shows increasing εFick(z) can be modelled with realistic turbulence parameters. Different Fickian diffusivities displayed by different species like density, heat, and salinity in a given turbulent flow may also be qualitatively explainable in terms of finite-mixing-length effects.

1.
G. I.
Taylor
, “
Diffusion by continuous movements
,”
London Math. Soc.
20
,
196
(
1921
).
2.
P. Nielsen, Coastal Bottom Boundary Layers and Sediment Transport (World Scientific, Singapore, 1992).
3.
A. G.
Anderson
, “
Distribution of suspended sediment in a natural stream
,”
Trans., Am. Geophys. Union
23
,
678
(
1942
).
4.
W. H.
Graf
and
M.
Cellino
, “
Suspension flows in open channels; experimental study
,”
J. Hydraul. Res.
40
,
435
(
2002
).
5.
N. L.
Coleman
, “
Flume studies of the sediment transfer coefficient
,”
Water Resour. Res.
6
,
801
(
1970
).
6.
P.
Nielsen
, “
Entrainment and distribution of different sand sizes under water waves
,”
J. Sediment. Petrol.
53
,
423
(
1983
).
7.
W. F. McFetridge and P. Nielsen, “Sediment suspension by non-breaking waves,” Report No. Tech. Rep. COEL-85/005 (1985).
8.
P. Nielsen, “Combined convection and diffusion; a new framework for suspended sediment modelling,” Proc. Coastal Sediments ’91, 1991 (ASCE), pp. 418–431.
9.
P. F.
Tooby
,
G. L.
Wick
, and
J. D.
Isacs
, “
The motion of a small sphere in a rotating velocity field: A possible mechanism for suspending particles in turbulence
,”
J. Geophys. Res.
82
,
2096
(
1977
).
10.
P.
Nielsen
, “
On the motion of suspended sand particles
,”
J. Geophys. Res., [Oceans]
89
,
616
(
1984
).
11.
P. D.
Friedman
and
J.
Katz
, “
Mean rise rate of droplets in isotropic turbulence
,”
Phys. Fluids
14
,
3059
(
2002
).
12.
P.
Nielsen
, “
Turbulence effects on the settling of suspended particles
,”
J. Sediment. Petrol.
63
,
835
(
1993
).
13.
M.
Muste
and
V. C.
Patel
, “
Velocity profiles for particles and liquid in open-channel flow with suspended sediment
,”
J. Hydraul. Eng.
123
,
742
(
1997
).
14.
S. B. Pope, Turbulent Flows (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000).
15.
C. G.
du Toit
and
J. F. A.
Sleath
, “
Velocity measurements close to rippled beds in oscillatory flow
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
112
,
71
(
1981
).
16.
J. D.
Nash
and
J. N.
Moum
, “
Microstructure estimates of turbulent salinity flux and the dissipation spectrum of salinity
,”
J. Phys. Oceanogr.
32
,
2312
(
2002
).
17.
N. L.
Coleman
, “
Effects of suspended sediment on the open-channel velocity distribution
,”
Water Resour. Res.
22
,
1377
(
1986
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.