In the present work the role of a pair of nearly parallel least stable modes (having opposite phases and almost identical amplitude distributions), as a key element of optimal transient growth in shear flows, is explored. The general character of this mechanism is demonstrated by four examples. The first two examples are the temporal and spatial growth of optimal disturbances in circular pipe flow. The time and distance, at which the maximum energy amplification of an initial disturbance is achieved, are well predicted analytically by considering only the pair of least stable modes. Furthermore, the dependence of the maximum energy amplification on the Reynolds number matches previous numerical results based on the analysis of many modes. In the temporal case the predicted amplification factor agrees well with these numerical results. The other two examples are concerned with a two-dimensional potential shear layer over a compliant surface, and with a two-dimensional wall-jet. In these examples, a similar growth mechanism takes place near a point where two kinds of two-dimensional modes bifurcate. In the potential shear layer, the maximum optimal growth achieved by two nearly parallel modes is solved analytically for temporal disturbances, whereas in the wall-jet case the distance, at which the maximum amplification is achieved, is well predicted for spatial disturbances. Finally, it appears that the transient growth mechanism based on the interference between two nearly parallel modes is a general case which includes the direct resonance mechanism as a limit for short times.

1.
T.
Elingsen
and
E.
Palm
, “
Stability of linear flow
,”
Phys. Fluids
18
,
487
(
1975
).
2.
M. T.
Landahl
, “
A note on an algebriac instability of inviscid parallel shear flows
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
98
,
243
(
1980
).
3.
D. J.
Benney
and
L. H.
Gustavsson
, “
A new mechanism for linear and nonlinear hydrodynamic instability
,”
Stud. Appl. Math.
64
,
185
(
1981
).
4.
L. S.
Hultgren
and
L. H.
Gustavsson
, “
Algebriac growth of disturbances in a laminar boundary layer
,”
Phys. Fluids
24
,
1000
(
1981
).
5.
L. H.
Gustavsson
, “
Energy growth of three-dimensional disturbance in plane Poiseuille flow
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
224
,
241
(
1991
).
6.
D. S. Henningson, “An eigenfunction expansion of localized disturbances,” in Advances in Turbulence 3 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1991), pp. 162–169.
7.
P. L.
O’Sullivan
and
K. S.
Breuer
, “
Transient growth in circular pipe flow. 1. Linear disturbances
,”
Phys. Fluids
6
,
3643
(
1994
).
8.
D. S.
Henningson
,
L. H.
Gustavsson
, and
K. S.
Breuer
, “
Localized disturbances in parallel shear flows
,”
Appl. Sci. Res.
53
,
51
(
1994
).
9.
K. M.
Butler
and
B. F.
Farrell
, “
Three-dimensional optimal perturbations in viscous shear flow
,”
Phys. Fluids A
4
,
1637
(
1992
).
10.
S. C.
Reddy
and
D. S.
Henningson
, “
Energy growth in viscous channel flow
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
252
,
209
(
1993
).
11.
P.
Andersson
,
M.
Berggren
, and
D. S.
Henningson
, “
Optimal disturbances and bypass transition in boundary layers
,”
Phys. Fluids
11
,
134
(
1999
).
12.
P.
Luchini
, “
Reynolds-number-independent instability of the boundary layer over a flat surface: optimal perturbations
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
404
,
289
(
2000
).
13.
P.
Corbett
and
A.
Bottaro
, “
Optimal perturbations for boundary layers subjected to streamwise pressure gradient
,”
Phys. Fluids
12
,
120
(
2000
).
14.
A.
Tumin
and
E.
Reshotko
, “
Spatial theory of optimal disturbances in boundary layers
,”
Phys. Fluids
13
,
2097
(
2001
).
15.
P. J.
Schmid
and
D. S.
Henningson
, “
Optimal energy density growth in Hagen–Poiseuille flow
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
277
,
197
(
1994
).
16.
L.
Bergström
, “
Nonlinear behaviour of transiently amplified disturbances in pipe Poiseuille flow
,”
Eur. J. Mech. B/Fluids
14
,
719
(
1995
).
17.
L.
Bergström
, “
Self-sustained amplification of disturbances in pipe Poiseuille flow
,”
Eur. J. Mech. B/Fluids
18
,
635
(
1999
).
18.
L.
Bergström
, “
Optimal growth of small disturbances in pipe Poiseuille flow
,”
Phys. Fluids A
5
,
2710
(
1993
).
19.
E.
Reshotko
and
A.
Tumin
, “
Spatial theory of optimal disturbances in a circular pipe flow
,”
Phys. Fluids
13
,
991
(
2001
).
20.
G. K.
Batchelor
and
A. E.
Gill
, “
Analysis of the stability of axisymmetric jets
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
14
,
529
(
1962
).
21.
L.
Bergström
, “
Initial algebriac growth of small angular dependent disturbances in pipe Poiseuille flow
,”
Stud. Appl. Math.
87
,
61
(
1992
).
22.
M. R.
Khorrami
,
M. R.
Malik
, and
R. L.
Ash
, “
Application of spectral collocation techniques to the stability of swirling flows
,”
J. Comput. Phys.
81
,
206
(
1989
).
23.
J. A. C. Weideman and S. C. Reddy, A matlab differentiation matrix suite, August 1998. Available at http://osu.orst.edu∼weidemaj/differ.html.
24.
T. B. Benjamin, “Fluid flow with flexible boundaries,” in Proceedings of the 11th International Congress on Applied Mathematics, Vol. 109, edited by H. Gortler (Springer, Berlin, 1964).
25.
V.
Levinski
,
D. E.
Levy
, and
J.
Cohen
, “
Effects of wall compliance on the hydrodynamic stability and transition delay of a wall-jet flow
,”
Fluid Dyn. Res.
29
,
115
(
2001
).
26.
D. M.
Bushnell
,
J. N.
Hefner
, and
R. L.
Ash
, “
Effect of compliant wall motion on turbulent boundary layers
,”
Phys. Fluids
20
,
S31
(
1977
).
27.
T. B.
Benjamin
, “
Effects of a flexible boundary on hydrodynamic stability
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
9
,
513
(
1960
).
28.
P.
Mele
,
M.
Morganti
,
M. F.
Scibilia
, and
A.
Lasek
, “
Behavior of wall jet in laminar-to-turbulent transition
,”
AIAA J.
24
,
938
(
1986
).
29.
J.
Cohen
,
M.
Amitay
, and
B.
Bayly
, “
Laminar-turbulent transition of wall-jet flows subjected to blowing and suction
,”
Phys. Fluids A
4
,
283
(
1992
).
30.
D. H.
Chun
and
W. H.
Schwarz
, “
Stability of the plane incompressible viscous wall jet subjected to small disturbances
,”
Phys. Fluids
10
,
911
(
1967
).
31.
N. I.
Akatnov
, “
Development of two-dimensional laminar incompressible jet near a rigid wall
,”
Proc. Leningrad Polytech. Inst.
5
,
24
(
1953
).
32.
M. B.
Glauert
, “
The wall-jet
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
1
,
625
(
1956
).
33.
M. R.
Malik
, “
Numerical methods for hypersonic boundary layer stability
,”
J. Comput. Phys.
86
,
376
(
1990
).
34.
A.
Tumin
and
L.
Aizatulin
, “
Instability and receptivity of laminar wall jets
,”
Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn.
9
,
33
(
1997
).
35.
G. Ben-Dov, V. Levinski, and J. Cohen, “Optimal disturbances in Hagen–Poiseuille flow with superimposed rigid rotation,” in Proceedings of the 42nd Israel Annual Conference on Aerospace Sciences, February 2002.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.