A simple procedure to approximate the noncommutation terms that arise whenever it is necessary to use a variable scale filtering of the motion equations and to compensate directly the flow solutions from the commutation error is here presented. Such a situation usually concerns large eddy simulation of nonhomogeneous turbulent flows. The noncommutation of the average and differentiation operations leads to nonhomogeneous terms in the motion equations, that act as source terms of intensity which depend on the gradient of the filter scale δ and which, if neglected, induce a systematic error throughout the solution. Here the different noncommutation terms of the motion equation are determined as functions of the δ gradient and of the δ derivatives of the filtered variables. It is shown here that approximated noncommutation terms of the fourth order of accuracy, with respect to the filtering scale, can be obtained using series expansions in the filter width of approximations based on finite differences and introducing successive levels of filtering, which makes it suitable to use in conjunction with dynamic or mixed subgrid models. The procedure operates in a way which is independent of the type of filter in use and without increasing the differential order of the equations, which, on the contrary, would require additional boundary conditions. It is not necessary to introduce a mapping function of the nonuniform grid in the physical domain into a uniform grid in an infinite domain. A priori tests on the turbulent channel flow (Reτ 180 and 590) highlight the approximation capability of the present procedure. A numerical example is given, which draws attention to the nonlocal effects on the solution due to the lack of noncommutation terms in the motion equation and to the efficiency of the present procedure in reducing the commutation error on the solution.

1.
S.
Ghosal
and
P.
Moin
, “
The basic equations for large eddy simulation of turbulent flows in complex geometries
,”
J. Comput. Phys.
118
,
24
(
1995
).
2.
H.
Van der Ven
, “
A family of large eddy simulation (LES) filters with nonuniform filter widths
,”
Phys. Fluids
7
,
1171
(
1995
).
3.
C.
Fureby
and
G.
Tabor
, “
Mathematical and physical constraints on large-eddy simulations
,”
Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn.
9
,
85
(
1997
).
4.
O. V.
Vasilyev
,
T. S.
Lund
, and
P.
Moin
, “
A general class of commutative filters for LES in complex geometries
,”
J. Comput. Phys.
146
,
82
(
1998
).
5.
S.
Ghosal
, “
Mathematical and physical constraints on large-eddy simulation of turbulence
,”
AIAA J.
34
,
425
(
1999
).
6.
P. Sagaut, Large Eddy Simulation for Incompressible Flows (Springer, Berlin, 2001).
7.
M.
Germano
,
U.
Piomelli
,
P.
Moin
, and
W. H.
Cabot
, “
A dynamic subgrid-scale eddy viscosity model
,”
Phys. Fluids A
3
,
1760
(
1991
).
8.
M.
Germano
, “
Turbulence, the filtering approach
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
236
,
325
(
1992
).
9.
J. Bardina, J. H. Ferziger, and W. C. Reynolds, “Improved subgrid models for large eddy simulation,” AIAA Pap. 80-1357 (1980).
10.
J.
Smagorinsky
, “
General circulation experiments with the primitive equations
,”
Mon. Weather Rev.
91
,
99
(
1963
).
11.
G.
Alfonsi
,
G.
Passoni
,
L.
Pancaldo
, and
D.
Zampaglione
, “
A spectral-finite difference solution of the Navier–Stokes equations in three dimensions
,”
Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids
28
,
129
(
1998
).
12.
G.
Passoni
,
G.
Alfonsi
,
G.
Tula
, and
U.
Cardu
, “
A wavenumber parallel computational code for the numerical integration of the Navier–Stokes equations
,”
Parallel Comput.
25
,
593
(
1999
).
13.
R. D.
Moser
,
J.
Kim
, and
N. N.
Mansour
, “
Direct numerical simulation of turbulent channel flow up to Reτ=590,
Phys. Fluids
11
,
943
(
1999
).
14.
P.
Moin
and
J.
Kim
, “
Numerical investigation of turbulent channel flow
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
118
,
341
(
1982
).
15.
J. W.
Deardorff
, “
A numerical study of three-dimensional turbulent channel flow at large Reynolds numbers
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
41
,
435
(
1970
).
16.
U.
Schumann
, “
Subgrid scale model for finite difference simulations of turbulent flows in plane channels and anuli
,”
J. Comput. Phys.
18
,
376
(
1975
).
17.
G. Grötzbach, in Encyclopedia of Fluid Mechanics, edited by N. P. Cheresimov (Gulf, West Orange, NJ, 1987), Vol. 6.
18.
U.
Piomelli
,
J.
Ferziger
, and
P.
Moin
, “
New approximate boundary conditions for large eddy simulations of wall-bounded flows
,”
Phys. Fluids A
1
,
1061
(
1989
).
19.
K.
Horiuti
, “
Higher order terms in the anisotropic representation of Reynolds stresses
,”
Phys. Fluids A
2
,
1708
(
1990
).
20.
D. Carati and W. Cabot, “Anisotropic eddy viscosity models,” Proceedings of the Summer Program—Center for Turbulence Research, Stanford, 1996, pp. 249–256.
21.
M.
Iovieno
and
D.
Tordella
, “
The angular momentum equation for a finite element of fluid: A new representation and application to turbulent flows
,”
Phys. Fluids
14
,
2673
(
2002
).
22.
S.
Ghosal
, “
An analysis of numerical errors in large-eddy simulations of turbulence
,”
J. Comput. Phys.
125
,
187
(
1996
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.