We study the vortex-accelerated secondary baroclinic vorticity deposition (VAVD) at late-intermediate times, and dynamics of sinusoidal single-mode Richtmyer–Meshkov interfaces in two dimensions. Euler simulations using a piecewise parabolic method are conducted for three post-shock Atwood numbers (A*), 0.2, 0.635, and 0.9, with Mach number (M) of 1.3. We initialize the sinusoidal interface with a slightly “diffuse” or small-but-finite thickness interfacial transition layer to facilitate comparison with experiment and avoid ill-posed phenomena associated with evolutions of an inviscid vortex sheet. The thickness of the interface is chosen so that there are no secondary structures along the interface prior to the multivalue timetM, which is defined as the time when the extracted medial axis of an interfacial layer first becomes multivalued. For an interval of 11tM beyond tM, the simulations reveal nearly monotonic strong growth of both positive and negative baroclinic circulation in a vortex bilayer pattern inside the complex roll-up region. The circulations grow and secondary baroclinic circulation dominates at intermediate times, especially for higher A*. This vorticity deposition is due to misalignment of density gradient across the interface and vortex-centripetal acceleration (secondary baroclinic), and enhanced by the intensification of interfacial density gradient arising from the vortex-induced strain. Our simulation results for A*=0.635 agree with the recent air–sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) experiment of Jacobs and Krivets [Proceedings of the 23rd International Symposium on Shock Waves, Fort Worth, Texas, (2001)], including several large-scale features of the evolving mushroom structure: The usual interface spike-bubble amplitude growth rate ȧ and the dimensions of the spike roll-up cavity. VAVD plays an important role in the intermediate time dynamics of the interfaces. Our amplitude growth rate ȧdisagrees with the O(t−1) result of Sadot et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 1654 (1998)]. Instead, it approaches a constant which increases with A*(⩽0.9). An adjusting periodic single point vortex model which uses the calculated net circulation magnitude and its location, gives excellent results for the amplitude growth rates to late-intermediate times at low Atwood numbers (A*=0.2,0.635). The evolution of enstrophy, vorticity skewness, and flatness are quantified for the entire run duration, and one-dimensional averaged kinetic-energy spectra are presented at several times.

1.
R. D.
Richtmyer
, “
Taylor instability in shock acceleration of compressible fluids
,”
Commun. Pure Appl. Math.
13
,
297
(
1960
).
2.
E. E.
Meshkov
, “
Interface of two gases accelerated by a shock wave
,”
Fluid Dyn.
4
,
101
(
1969
).
3.
D.
Arnett
, “
The role of mixing in astrophysics
,”
Astrophys. J., Suppl. Ser.
127
,
213
(
2000
).
4.
J.
Lindl
, “
Development of the indirect-drive approach to inertial confinement fusion and the target physics basis for ignition and gain
,”
Phys. Plasmas
2
,
3933
(
1995
).
5.
J.
Yang
,
T.
Kubota
, and
E. E.
Zukoski
, “
Applications of shock induced-mixing to supersonic combustion
,”
AIAA J.
31
,
854
(
1993
).
6.
N. J.
Zabusky
, “
Vortex paradigm for accelerated inhomogeneous flows: Visiometrics for the Rayleigh–Taylor and Richtmyer–Meshkov environments
,”
Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech.
31
,
495
(
1999
).
7.
M.
Brouillette
, “
The Richtmyer–Meshkov instability
,”
Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech.
34
,
445
(
2002
).
8.
N. J.
Zabusky
,
A.
Kotenlikov
,
Y.
Gulak
, and
G.
Peng
, “
Amplitude growth rate of a Richtmyer–Meshkov unstable two-dimensional interface to intermediate times
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
475
,
147
(
2003
).
9.
Q.
Zhang
and
S.
Sohn
, “
Nonlinear theory of unstable fluid mixing driver by shock wave
,”
Phys. Fluids
9
,
1106
(
1997
).
10.
D.
Layzer
, “
On the instability of superposed fluids in a gravitational field
,”
Astrophys. J.
122
,
1
(
1955
).
11.
N. J. Zabusky, J. Ray, and R. Samtaney, “Vortex models for the Richtmyer Meshkov instability,” in Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Physics of Compressible Turbulent Mixing, edited by R. Youngs, J. Glimm, and B. Boyton (World Scientific, Singapore, 1996), pp. 88–97.
12.
J. W.
Jacobs
and
J. M.
Sheeley
, “
Experimental study of incompressible Richtmyer–Meshkov instability
,”
Phys. Fluids
8
,
405
(
1996
).
13.
O.
Sadot
,
L.
Erez
,
U.
Alon
,
D.
Oron
,
L. A.
Levin
,
G.
Erez
,
G.
Ben-Dor
, and
D.
Shvarts
, “
Study of nonlinear evolution of single-mode and two-bubble interaction under Richtmyer–Meshkov instability
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
80
,
1654
(
1998
).
14.
J. W. Jacobs and V. V. Krivets, “PLIF flow visualization of the nonlinear development and transition to turbulence of Richtmyer–Meshkov instability,” in Proceedings of the 23rd International Symposium on Shock Waves, Fort Worth, Texas, edited by F. K. Lu (CD-ROM, 2002).
15.
M.
Soteriou
and
A. F.
Ghoniem
, “
Effects of the free-stream density ratio on free and forced spatially developing shear layers
,”
Phys. Fluids
7
,
2036
(
1995
).
16.
C.
Staquet
, “
Two-dimensional secondary instability in a strongly stratified shear layer
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
296
,
73
(
1995
).
17.
J.
Reinaud
,
L.
Joly
, and
P.
Chassaing
, “
The baroclinic instability of the two-dimensional shear layer
,”
Phys. Fluids
12
,
2489
(
2000
).
18.
T. Y.
Hou
,
J. S.
Lowengrub
, and
M. J.
Shelley
, “
The long-time motion of vortex sheets with surface tension
,”
Phys. Fluids
9
,
1933
(
1997
).
19.
G.
Baker
,
D. R.
Caflisch
, and
M.
Siegel
, “
Singularity formation during the Rayleigh–Taylor instability
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
252
,
51
(
1993
).
20.
R.
Samtaney
and
D. I.
Pullin
, “
On initial-value and self-similar solutions of the compressible Euler equations
,”
Phys. Fluids
8
,
2650
(
1996
).
21.
R. L.
Holmes
,
G.
Dimonte
,
B.
Fryxell
,
M. L.
Gittings
,
J. W.
Grove
,
M.
Schneider
,
D. H.
Sharp
,
A. L.
Velikovich
,
R. P.
Weaver
, and
Q.
Zhang
, “
Richtmyer–Meshkov instability growth: Experiment, simulation and theory
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
389
,
55
(
1999
).
22.
D. I.
Pullin
, “
Contour dynamics method
,”
Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech.
24
,
89
(
1992
).
23.
D. G. Dritschel, simulations with contour-advective semi-Lagrangian (CASL) code in a periodic domain with a small-amplitude, sinusoidal, thin vortex layer show roll-ups prior to the multivalue time when the vortex layer first becomes multivalued (private communication, 2001).
24.
B. D.
Jones
and
J. W.
Jacobs
, “
A membraneless experiment for the study of Richtmyer–Meshkov instability of a shock-accelerated gas interface
,”
Phys. Fluids
9
,
3078
(
1997
).
25.
R. Samtaney and N. J. Zabusky, “Visualization, feature extraction and quantification of numerical visualizations of high gradient compressible flows,” in Flow Visualization: Techniques and Example, edited by A. J. Smits and T. T. Lim (Imperial College Press, London, 2000), Chap. 12.
26.
D. G.
Dritschel
and
M. H. P.
Ambaum
, “
A contour-advective semi-Lagrangian numerical algorithm for simulating fine-scale conservative dynamical fields
,”
Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc.
123
,
1097
(
1997
).
27.
P.
Colella
and
P. R.
Woodward
, “
The piecewise parabolic method (PPM) for gas-dynamical simulations
,”
J. Comput. Phys.
54
,
174
(
1984
).
28.
S. Zhang, “Richtmyer–Meshkov initiated, vortex accelerated inhomogeneous turbulence: High performance computing and visiometrics,” Ph.D. thesis, Rutgers University, New Jersey, 2003.
29.
R.
Samtaney
and
N. J.
Zabusky
, “
Circulation deposition on shock-accelerated planar and curved density-stratified interfaces: Models and scalings laws
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
269
,
45
(
1994
).
30.
A. D.
Kotelnikov
,
J.
Ray
, and
N. J.
Zabusky
, “
Vortex morphologies on reaccelerated interfaces: Visualization, quantification and modeling of one- and two-mode compressible and incompressible environments
,”
Phys. Fluids
12
,
3245
(
2000
).
31.
D. Meiron and M. Meloon, “Richtmyer–Meshkov instability in compressible stratified fluids,” in Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on the Physics of Compressible Turbulent Mixing, edited by G. Jourdan and L. Hovas (Institut Universitaire Thermiques Industriels, Marseille, France, 1997), pp. 337–342.
32.
D. G.
Dritschel
,
P. H.
Haynes
,
M. N.
Juckes
, and
T. G.
Sheperd
, “
The stability of a two-dimensional vorticity filament under uniform strain
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
230
,
647
(
1991
).
33.
J. K.
Prasad
,
A.
Rasheed
,
S.
Kumar
, and
B.
Sturtevant
, “
The late-time development of the Richtmyer–Meshkov instability
,”
Phys. Fluids
12
,
2108
(
2000
).
34.
R.
Krasny
and
M.
Nitsche
, “
The onset of chaos in vortex sheet flow
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
454
,
47
(
2002
).
35.
D. L.
Youngs
, “
Three-dimensional numerical simulations of turbulent mixing by Rayleigh–Taylor instability
,”
Phys. Fluids A
3
,
1312
(
1991
).
36.
S. B. Pope, Turbulent Flows (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge England, 2000), Sec. 6.7.4.
37.
M.
Lesieur
,
C.
Staquet
,
P.
Le Roy
, and
P.
Comte
, “
The mixing layer and its coherence examined from the point of view of two-dimensional turbulence
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
192
,
511
(
1988
).
38.
R. H.
Kraichnan
, “
Inertial ranges in two-dimensional turbulence
,”
Phys. Fluids
10
,
1417
(
1967
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.