Theoretical and direct numerical simulation models of transient algebraic growth in boundary layers have advanced significantly without an adequate, parallel experimental effort. Experiments that feature disturbances excited by high levels of freestream turbulence or distributed surface roughness show behavior consistent with optimal-disturbance theories but cannot address the theories’ key predictions concerning the growth and decay of disturbances at specific spanwise wavenumbers. The present experiment seeks to provide such data for a flat plate boundary layer using a spanwise roughness array to excite controlled stationary disturbances. The results show that although general trends and qualitative behaviors are correctly captured by optimal-disturbance theories, significant quantitative differences exist between the theories’ predictions and the current experimental measurements. Discrepancies include the location of the wall-normal disturbance profiles’ maxima and the streamwise location of the maximum energy growth. While these discrepancies do not argue against the validity of transient-growth theory in general, they do indicate that correct modeling of receptivity to realistic disturbances is critical and that realistic stationary disturbances can exhibit strongly nonoptimal behavior.

1.
E.
Reshotko
, “
Transient growth: A factor in bypass transition
,”
Phys. Fluids
13
,
1067
(
2001
).
2.
T.
Ellingsen
and
E.
Palm
, “
Stability of linear flow
,”
Phys. Fluids
18
,
487
(
1975
).
3.
M. T.
Landahl
, “
A note on an algebraic instability of inviscid parallel shear flows
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
98
,
243
(
1980
).
4.
L. S.
Hultgren
and
L. H.
Gustavsson
, “
Algebraic growth of disturbances in a laminar boundary layer
,”
Phys. Fluids
24
,
1000
(
1981
).
5.
L.
Boberg
and
U.
Brosa
, “
Onset of turbulence in a pipe
,”
Z. Naturforsch., A: Phys. Sci.
43
,
697
(
1988
).
6.
L. H.
Gustavsson
, “
Energy growth of three-dimensional disturbances in plane Poiseuille flow
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
224
,
241
(
1991
).
7.
K.
Butler
and
B.
Farrell
, “
Three-dimensional optimal perturbations in viscous shear flow
,”
Phys. Fluids A
4
,
1637
(
1992
).
8.
L.
Trefethen
,
A.
Trefethen
,
S.
Reddy
, and
T.
Driscoll
, “
Hydrodynamic stability without eigenvalues
,”
Science
261
,
578
(
1993
).
9.
P. J.
Schmid
,
D. S.
Henningson
,
M. R.
Khorami
, and
M. R.
Malik
, “
A sensitivity study of hydrodynamic stability operators
,”
Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn.
4
,
227
(
1993
).
10.
D. Henningson, “Bypass transition and linear growth mechanisms,” in Advances in Turbulence V, edited by R. Benzi (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1995).
11.
A. Boiko, G. R. Grek, A. V. Dovgal, and V. V. Kozlov, The Origin of Turbulence in Near-wall Flows (Springer, Berlin, 1994).
12.
B. F.
Farrell
, “
Optimal excitation of perturbations in viscous shear flow
,”
Phys. Fluids
31
,
2093
(
1988
).
13.
P.
Andersson
,
M.
Berggren
, and
D. S.
Henningson
, “
Optimal disturbances and bypass transition in boundary layers
,”
Phys. Fluids
11
,
134
(
1999
).
14.
P.
Luchini
, “
Reynolds-number-independent instability of the boundary layer over a flat surface: Optimal perturbations
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
404
,
289
(
2000
).
15.
A.
Tumin
and
E.
Reshotko
, “
Spatial theory of optimal disturbances in boundary layers
,”
Phys. Fluids
13
,
2097
(
2001
).
16.
P.
Andersson
,
L.
Brant
,
B.
Allessandro
, and
D.
Henningson
, “
On the breakdown of boundary layer streaks
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
428
,
29
(
2001
).
17.
P. S.
Klebanoff
, “
Effect of free-stream turbulence on the laminar boundary layer
,”
Bull. Am. Phys. Soc.
10
,
1323
(
1971
).
18.
J. M. Kendall, “Experimental study of disturbances produced in a pre-transitional laminar boundary layer by weak freestream turbulence,” AIAA Paper 85–1695 (1985).
19.
K. J. A.
Westin
,
A. V.
Boiko
,
B. G. B.
Klingmann
,
V. V.
Kozlov
, and
P. H.
Alfredsson
, “
Experiments in a boundary layer subjected to free stream turbulence. Part 1. Boundary layer structure and receptivity
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
281
,
193
(
1994
).
20.
M.
Matsubara
and
P. H.
Alfredsson
, “
Disturbance growth in boundary layers subjected to free-stream turbulence
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
430
,
149
(
2001
).
21.
J. Kendall, “Laminar boundary layer velocity distortion by surface roughness: Effect upon stability,” AIAA Paper 81–0195 (1981).
22.
E. Reshotko and L. Leventhal, “Preliminary experimental study of disturbances in a laminar boundary layer due to distributed roughness,” AIAA Paper 81–1224 (1981).
23.
K. S.
Breuer
and
J. H.
Haritonidis
, “
The evolution of a localized disturbance in a laminar boundary layer. Part 1. Weak disturbances
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
220
,
569
(
1990
).
24.
E. B. White and E. Reshotko, “Roughness-induced transient growth in a flat-plate boundary layer,” AIAA Paper 2002–0138 (2002).
25.
E. Reshotko, W. S. Saric, and H. M. Nagib, “Flow quality issues for large wind tunnels,” AIAA Paper 97–0225 (1997).
26.
W. S. Saric, “Low-speed boundary layer transition experiments,” in Transition: Experiments, Theory and Computation, edited by T. C. Corke, G. Erlebacher, and M. Hussaini (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1996).
27.
M.
Gaster
,
C. E.
Grosch
, and
T. L.
Jackson
, “
The velocity field created by a shallow bump in a boundary layer
,”
Phys. Fluids
6
,
3079
(
1994
).
28.
R. D.
Joslin
and
C. E.
Grosch
, “
Growth characteristics downstream of a shallow bump: Computation and experiment
,”
Phys. Fluids
7
,
3042
(
1995
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.