The purpose of the present paper is to consider the von Neumann reflection (vNR) which takes place for a small incident shock Mach number and a small wedge angle. A series of experiments has been performed with ordinary smooth straight wedges and step-like wedges that simulate the former. The reflection configuration over the step-like wedge has suggested unsteady characteristics of the vNR. Contrary to the established notion of shock reflection phenomena over straight wedges, while the triple point trajectory was approximately a straight line through the apex of the wedge, the vNR showed unsteadiness in the relation between angles of incidence and reflection ir), and thus the flow-field proved to be non-self-similar near the triple point. Based on the measured values, the incident angle for the reflected wave and the Mach number of the flow ahead of the reflected wave were estimated. These values show that the reflected wave is not a Mach wave, but it moves on the ir)-plane almost along a trivial solution. In particular, the flow Mach number ahead of the reflected wave approaches unity, which leads to analytical formulas for angles of incidence and reflection as functions of the incident shock Mach number only. The reflected wave degenerates to a normal Mach wave as the incident shock proceeds. In the case of the vNR, the von Neumann paradox takes place only at an early stage of reflection, and the paradox is resolved later, since the flow properties such as angles of incidence and reflection are given by the trivial solution which is a particular solution for the three-shock theory.

1.
L. F.
Henderson
and
A.
Siegenthaler
, “
Experiments on the diffraction of weak blast waves: the von Neumann paradox
,”
Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A
369
,
537
(
1980
).
2.
J. M.
Dewey
and
D. J.
McMillin
, “
Observation and analysis of the Mach reflection of weak uniform plane shock waves, Part 1. Observations
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
152
,
49
(
1985
).
3.
A.
Sakurai
,
L. F.
Henderson
,
K.
Takayama
,
Z.
Walenta
, and
P.
Colella
, “
On the von Neumann paradox of weak Mach reflection
,”
Fluid Dyn. Res.
4
,
333
(
1989
).
4.
P.
Colella
and
L. F.
Henderson
, “
The von Neumann paradox for the diffraction of weak shock waves
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
213
,
71
(
1990
).
5.
F.
Higashino
,
L. F.
Henderson
, and
F.
Shimizu
, “
Experiments on the interaction of a pair of cylindrical shock waves in air
,”
Shock Waves
1
,
275
(
1991
).
6.
A.
Sasoh
,
K.
Takayama
, and
T.
Saito
, “
A weak shock wave reflection over wedges
,”
Shock Waves
2
,
277
(
1992
).
7.
A.
Sasoh
and
K.
Takayama
, “
Characterization of disturbances propagation in weak shockwave reflections
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
277
,
331
(
1994
).
8.
F. Higashino, S. Matsuo, Y. Miura, and S. Ogawa, “Von Neumann reflection of oblique shock waves,” in Shock Waves @ Marseille IV, edited by R. Brun and L. Z. Dumitrescu (Springer, Berlin, 1995), pp. 175–180.
9.
R. J. Virgona and F. Higashino, “Mach-stem growth in von Neumann reflection,” in Proc. 20th Intl. Symp. on Shock Waves, edited by B. Sturtevant, J. E. Shepherd, and H. G. Hornung (World Scientific Publishing, Singapore, 1996), pp. 381–386.
10.
J. J.
Liu
, “
Sound wave structure downstream of pseudo-steady weak and strong Mach reflections
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
324
,
309
(
1996
).
11.
S. Canic and B. L. Keyfitz, “Oblique shock interactions and the von Neumann paradox,” in Proc. 20th Intl. Symp. on Shock Waves, edited by B. Sturtevant, J. E. Shepherd, and H. G. Hornung (World Scientific Publishing, Singapore, 1996), pp. 435–440.
12.
T.
Adachi
,
S.
Kobayashi
, and
T.
Suzuki
, “
An experimental analysis of oblique shock reflection over a two-dimensional multi-guttered wedge
,”
Fluid Dyn. Res.
9
,
119
(
1992
).
13.
T.
Suzuki
,
T.
Adachi
, and
S.
Kobayashi
, “
Nonstationary shock reflection over nonstraight surfaces: an approach with a method of multiple steps
,”
Shock Waves
7
,
55
(
1997
).
14.
G.
Ben-Dor
,
G.
Mazor
,
K.
Takayama
, and
O.
Igra
, “
Influence of surface roughness from regular to Mach reflection in pseudo-steady flows
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
176
,
333
(
1987
).
15.
A.
Sakurai
, “
On the problem of weak Mach reflection
,”
J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.
19
,
1440
(
1964
).
16.
B. W.
Skews
, “
The flow in the vicinity of a three-shock intersection
,”
CASI Trans.
4
,
99
(
1971
).
17.
S. Kobayashi, T. Adachi, and T. Suzuki, “Regular reflection of a shock wave over a porous layer: theory and experiment,” in Shock Waves @ Marseille IV, edited by R. Brun and L. Z. Dumitrescu (Springer, Berlin, 1995), pp. 175–180.
18.
Ames Research Staff, “Equations, tables and charts for compressible flow,” NACA Rep. 1135 (1953).
19.
J. M. Dewey and A. A. van Netten, “Non-self-similarity of the initial stages of Mach reflection,” in Proc. 20th Intl. Symp. on Shock Waves, edited by B. Sturtevant, J. E. Shepherd, and H. G. Hornung (World Scientific Publishing, Singapore, 1996), pp. 399–404.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.