Direct numerical simulations (DNS) of a turbulent channel flow at low Reynolds number (Reτ=100,200,400, where Reτ is the Reynolds number based on the wall-shear velocity and channel half-width) are carried out to examine the effectiveness of using the Lorentz force to reduce skin friction. The Lorentz force is created by embedding electrodes and permanent magnets in the flat surface over which the flow passes. Both open-loop and closed-loop control schemes are examined. For open-loop control, both temporally and spatially oscillating Lorentz forces in the near-wall region are tested. It is found that skin-friction drag can be reduced by approximately 40% if a temporally oscillating spanwise Lorentz force is applied to a Reτ=100 channel flow. However, the power to generate the required Lorentz force is an order of magnitude larger than the power saved due to the reduced drag. Simulations were carried out at higher Reynolds numbers (Reτ=200,400) to determine whether efficiency, defined as the ratio of the power saved to the power used, improves with increasing Reynolds number. We found that the efficiency decreases with increasing Reynolds number. An idealized wall–normal Lorentz force is effected by detecting the near-wall turbulent events responsible for high-skin friction. It is found that the drag can be significantly reduced with a greater efficiency than that produced by the spanwise open-loop control approach. This result suggests that, when employed with a closed-loop control scheme, the Lorentz force might result in a net decrease of power required to propel objects through viscous conducting fluids.

1.
A. B. Tsinober, “MHD drag reduction,” in Viscous Drag Reduction in Boundary Layers, Vol. 123 of Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics, edited by D. M. Bushnell and J. N. Hefner (American Institute of Aeronautical and Astronautics, Washington D.C., 1989), pp. 327–349.
2.
A. K.
Gailitis
and
O. A.
Lielausis
, “
On the possibility of drag reduction of a flat plate in an electrolyte
,”
Appl. Magnetohydrodyn. Trudy Inst. Fisiky AN Latvia SSR
12
,
143
(
1961
).
3.
A. B.
Tsinober
and
A. G.
Shtern
, “
Possibility of increasing the flow stability in a boundary layer by means of crossed electric and magnetic fields
,”
Magnetohydrodynamics
3
,
152
(
1967
).
4.
C.
Henoch
and
J.
Stace
, “
Experimental investigation of a salt water turbulent boundary layer modified by an applied streamwise magnethydrodynamic body force
,”
Phys. Fluids
7
,
1371
(
1995
).
5.
C. H.
Crawford
and
G. E.
Karniadakis
, “
Reynolds stress analysis of EMHD-controlled wall turbulence. Part I
,”
Phys. Fluids
9
,
788
(
1997
).
6.
C. C. Lin, The Theory of Hydrodynamic Stability (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1966).
7.
D. M. Nosenchuck and G. L. Brown, “Discrete spatial control of wall shear stress in a turbulent boundary layer,” in Near-Wall Turbulent Flows, edited by R. M. C. So, C. G. Speziale, and B. E. Launder (Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., New York, 1993), pp. 689–698.
8.
D. M. Nosenchuck, “Spatial and temporal characteristics of boundary layers controlled with the Lorentz force,” in 12th Australasian Fluid Mechanics Conference (University of Sydney Press, Sydney, Australia, 1995), pp. 93–96.
9.
P. R. Bandyopadhyay and J. M. Castano, “Micro-tiles for electromagnetic turbulence control in saltwater—preliminary investigations,” in Proceedings of the Forum on Control of Transitional and Turbulent Flows, Fluids Engineering Division Conference, ASME, 7–11 July 1996, edited by D. E. Parkh and R. K. Agarwal (ASME, San Diego, 1996), Vol. FED-Vol. 237, pp. 53–60.
10.
P. L. O’Sullivan and S. Biringen, “Direct simulations of low Reynolds number turbulent channel flow with emhd control,” 28th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference, 4th AIAA Shear Flow Control Conference, 29 June–2 July 1997, pp. 1–13.
11.
This amount of skin-friction drag reduction appears too small to be statistically significant but the authors contend that the trend is important and correct.
12.
R. Akhavan, W. J. Jung, and N. Mangiavacchi, “Turbulence control in wall-bounded flows by spanwise oscillations,” in Applied Scientific Research, Vol. 51 of Advances in Turbulence IV, edited by F. T. M Nieuwstadt (Kluwer, New York, 1993), pp. 299–303.
13.
F.
Laadhari
,
L.
Skandaji
, and
R.
Morel
, “
Turbulence reduction in a boundary layer by a local spanwise oscillating surface
,”
Phys. Fluids
6
,
3218
(
1994
).
14.
P.
Bradshaw
and
N. S.
Pontikos
, “
Measurements in the turbulent boundary layer on an ‘infinite’ swept wing
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
159
,
105
(
1985
).
15.
G. N.
Coleman
,
J.
Kim
, and
A.
Le
, “
A numerical study of three-dimensional wall-bounded flows
,”
Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow
19
,
333
(
1996
).
16.
O. Sendstad and P. Moin, “The near-wall mechanics of three-dimensional turbulent boundary layers,” Report No. TF-57, Thermosciences Division, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 1992.
17.
H.
Choi
,
P.
Moin
, and
J.
Kim
, “
Active turbulence control for drag reduction in wall-bounded flows
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
262
,
75
(
1994
).
18.
H.
Choi
,
P.
Moin
, and
J.
Kim
, “
Direct numerical simulation of turbulent flow over riblets
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
255
,
503
(
1993
).
19.
J.
Kim
,
P.
Moin
, and
R.
Moser
, “
Turbulence statistics in a fully developed channel flow at low Reynolds number
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
177
,
133
(
1987
).
20.
A. T. Le, G. N. Coleman, and J. Kim, “Near-wall turbulence structures in three-dimensional boundary layers,” in Proceedings of the 1st International Symposium on Turbulence and Shear Flow Phenomena, September 1999, Santa Barbara, CA, 1999.
21.
The mean shear created near the wall is subject to a shear instability if the shear is maintained long enough to allow the instability to grow, such as the T+=500 case. When T+=100, however, the shear changes sign quickly enough to prevent such an instability.
22.
ANSYS, ANSYSReference Manual, Swanson Analysis Systems, Inc., Houston, PA, December 1992, Version 5.0.
23.
C.
Lee
,
J.
Kim
,
D.
Babcock
, and
R.
Goodman
, “
Application of neural networks to turbulence control for drag reduction
,”
Phys. Fluids
9
,
1740
(
1997
).
24.
C.
Lee
,
J.
Kim
, and
H.
Choi
, “
Suboptimal control of turbulent channel flow for drag reduction
J. Fluid Mech.
358
,
245
(
1998
).
25.
P.
Koumoutsakos
, “
Vorticity flux control for a turbulent channel flow
,”
Phys. Fluids
11
,
248
(
1999
).
26.
T. Bewley and P. Moin, “Optimal control of turbulent channel flows,” Active Control of Vibration and Noise, ASME, 1994 (ASME, Chicago, 1994), Vol. DE-Vol. 75, pp. 221–227.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.