Experiments examining the interaction of shock waves with an interface separating two gases of different densities are reported. Flow visualization by the schlieren method and x-ray densitometry reveals that important secondary effects are introduced by the experimental apparatus, especially at the walls of the shock tube from shock wave/boundary layer interaction below, above, and at the interface itself. These effects can impair the observation of the primary phenomenon under study and can lead to the overall deformation of the interface. In particular, the thickness of the viscous boundary layer at the interface is computed using a familiar shock tube turbulent boundary layer model and the occurrence of bifurcation of reflected waves below and above the interface is successfully predicted based on classical bifurcation arguments. The formation of wall vortical structures at the interface is explained in terms of baroclinic vorticity deposition resulting from the interaction of reflected waves with the interface distorted by the boundary layer. This mechanism of wall vortex formation can also explain observed test gas contamination in reflected shock tunnels when shock wave bifurcation is absent. In general, it is found that most of the side effects of the experimental investigation of the Richtmyer–Meshkov instability can be alleviated by performing experiments in large test sections near atmospheric initial pressure.

1.
R. D.
Richtmyer
, “
Taylor instability in shock acceleration of compressible fluids
,”
Commun. Pure Appl. Math.
8
,
297
(
1960
).
2.
E. E.
Meshkov
, “
Instability of the interface of two gases accelerated by a shock wave
,”
Sov. Fluid Dynamics
4
,
101
(
1969
).
3.
M.
Brouillette
and
B.
Sturtevant
, “
Growth induced by multiple shock waves normally incident on plane gaseous interfaces
,”
Physica D
37
,
248
(
1989
).
4.
M.
Brouillette
and
B.
Sturtevant
, “
Experiments on the Richtmyer–Meshkov instability: Small-scale perturbations on a plane interface
,”
Phys. Fluids A
5
,
916
(
1993
).
5.
M.
Brouillette
and
B.
Sturtevant
, “
Experiments on the Richtmyer–Meshkov instability: Single-scale perturbations on a continuous interface
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
263
,
271
(
1994
).
6.
M. Brouillette, Ph.D. thesis, California Institute of Technology, 1989.
7.
R. Bonazza, Ph.D. thesis, California Institute of Technology, 1992.
8.
H. Mirels, NACA TN-3401 (1955).
9.
H.
Mirels
, “
Shock tube test time limitation due to turbulent-wall boundary layer
,”
AIAA J.
2
,
84
(
1964
).
10.
H.
Mirels
, “
Turbulent boundary layer behind constant velocity shock including wall blowing effects
,”
AIAA J.
22
,
1042
(
1983
).
11.
H.
Mark
, “
The interaction of a reflected shock wave with the boundary layer in a shock tube
,”
J. Aeronaut. Sci.
24
,
304
(
1957
).
12.
S. Byron and N. Rott, “On the interaction of the reflected shock wave with the laminar boundary layer on the shock tube walls,” in Proceedings of the 1961 Heat Transfer and Fluid Mechanics Institute (Stanford University Press, Standford, California, 1961), p. 38.
13.
R. V. Hess, “Interaction of moving shocks and hot layers,” NACA TN-4002 (1957).
14.
L.
Davies
and
J. L.
Wilson
, “
Influence of reflected shock and boundary-layer interaction on shock-tube flows
,”
Phys. Fluids
12
,
37
(
1969
).
15.
R. J.
Stalker
and
K. C. A.
Crane
, “
Driver gas contamination in a high-enthalpy reflected shock tunnel
,”
AIAA J.
16
,
277
(
1978
).
16.
W. J. Glowacki, A. L. Kuhl, H. M. Glaz, and R. E. Ferguson, “Shock wave interaction with high sound speed layer,” in Shock Waves and Shock Tubes, edited by D. Bershader and R. Hanson (Stanford University Press, Stanford, 1986), p. 188.
17.
P. A. Thompson, Compressible-Fluid Dynamics (McGraw–Hill, New York, 1972).
18.
L.
Houas
,
A.
Farhat
, and
R.
Brun
, “
Shock induced Rayleigh–Taylor instability in the presence of a boundary layer
,”
Phys. Fluids
31
,
807
(
1988
).
19.
G. Rodriguez, I. Galametz, H. Croso, and J.-F. Haas, “Richtmyer–Meshkov instability in a vertical shock tube,” in Shock Waves@Marseille IV, Proceedings of the 19th International Symposium on Shock Waves, edited by R. Brun and L. Dumitrescu (Springer, New York, 1995), p. 275.
20.
M.
Vetter
and
B.
Sturtevant
, “
Experiments on the Richtmyer–Meshkov instability of an air/SF6 interface
,”
Shock Waves
4
,
247
(
1995
).
21.
R.
Bonazza
and
B.
Sturtevant
, “
X-ray measurements of growth rates at a gas interface accelerated by shock waves
,”
Phys. Fluids
8
,
2496
(
1996
).
22.
J. W.
Jacobs
, “
Shock-induced mixing of a light-gas cylinder
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
234
,
629
(
1992
).
23.
J. M.
Budzinski
,
R. F.
Benjamin
, and
J. W.
Jacobs
, “
Influence of initial conditions on the flow patterns of a shock-accelerated thin fluid layer
,”
Phys. Fluids
6
,
3510
(
1994
).
24.
A. I. Abamukov, V. Yu. Fadeev, S. I. Kholkin, E. E. Meshkov, V. V. Nikiforov, P. N. Nizovtzev N. N. Sadilov, S. K. Sobolev, V. A. Tilkunov, V. O. Tochilin, A. I. Tolshmyakov, and N. V. Zhidov, “Studies of film effects on the turbulent mixing zone evolution in shock tube experiments,” in Proceedings of the Fifth International Workshop on Compressible Turbulent Mixing, edited by R. Young, J. Glimm, and B. Boston (World Scientific, Singapore, 1996), p. 118.
25.
M. V. Bliznetsov, Y. V. Vlasov, V. I. Dudin, E. E. Meshkov, A. A. Nikulin, V. A. Til’kunov, A. I. Tolshmyakov, and S. A. Kholkin, “How the film may control the gas-gas turbulent mixing development in shock tube experiments,” in Proceedings of the Sixth International Workshop on Compressible Turbulent Mixing, edited by G. Jourdan and L. Houas (Imprimerie Caractère, Marseille, 1997), p. 90.
26.
S. G.
Zaitsev
,
E. V.
Lazareva
,
V. V.
Chernukha
, and
V. M.
Belyaev
, “
Intensification of mixing at the interface between media of different densities upon the passage of a shock wave through it
,”
Sov. Phys. Dokl.
30
,
579
(
1985
).
27.
L.
Rosenhead
, “
The formation of vortices from a surface of discontinuity
,”
Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A
134
,
170
(
1931
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.